Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
Pauline Leven (2014)
The Many-Headed Muse: Tradition and Innovation in Late Classical Greek Lyric Poetry
W. Johnson (2010)
Readers and Reading Culture in the High Roman Empire: A Study of Elite Communities
B. Graziosi (2002)
Inventing Homer: The Early Reception of Epic
R. Hunter (2004)
The Cambridge Companion to Homer: Homer and Greek literature
Pauline Leven (2013)
Reading the Octopus: Authorship, Intertexts, and A Hellenistic Anecdote (Machon Fr. 9 Gow)American Journal of Philology, 134
André Barbera, M. West (1994)
Ancient Greek MusicNotes, 50
Alexander Beecroft (2010)
Authorship and Cultural Identity in Early Greece and China: Patterns of Literary Circulation
Jan Kindstrand (1973)
Homer in der zweiten Sophistik : Studien zu der Homerlektüre und dem Homerbild bei Dion von Prusa, Maximos von Tyros und Ailios Aristeides
E. Csapo (2004)
The Politics of the New Music
M. Lefkowitz (1981)
The lives of the Greek poets
J. Hordern (2004)
Cyclopea: Philoxenus, Theocritus, Callimachus, Bion1The Classical Quarterly, 54
Froma Zeitlin (2001)
Being Greek under Rome: Visions and revisions of Homer
Andrew Barker (1984)
Greek musical writings. 1 : the musician and his art
(2010)
Homer between History and Fiction in Imperial Greek Literature
J. Hordern (1999)
The Cyclops of PhiloxenusThe Classical Quarterly, 49
A. D’Angour (2011)
The Greeks and the New: Contents
B. Graziosi, Richard Fletcher, Johanna Hanink (2016)
Close encounters with the ancient poets
AbstractTaking issue with the Gorgias and its dismissal of fifth-century Athenian rhetoricians and statesmen, in his Reply to Plato in Defence of the Four (Or. 3) the imperial sophist Aelius Aristides finds himself dealing with Plato’s condemnation of New Music, which in the Gorgias had gone hand in hand with the censure of rhetoric. In a brilliant display of new musical ‘revisionism’ so far ignored by scholars, Aristides presents in a positive light the notorious new dithyrambist Philoxenus of Cythera, so that Plato’s influential criticism of New Music, and especially of its political implications, backfires. This paper provides a close analysis of Aristides’ new musical discussion, concentrating both on the sophist’s engagement with Platonic musical critique and on his use of anecdotal traditions about Philoxenus circulating under the Empire. The ultimate goal is to contribute to the history of New Music and its ancient, not always predictable, reception.
Greek and Roman Musical Studies – Brill
Published: Mar 21, 2019
Read and print from thousands of top scholarly journals.
Already have an account? Log in
Bookmark this article. You can see your Bookmarks on your DeepDyve Library.
To save an article, log in first, or sign up for a DeepDyve account if you don’t already have one.
Copy and paste the desired citation format or use the link below to download a file formatted for EndNote
Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
All DeepDyve websites use cookies to improve your online experience. They were placed on your computer when you launched this website. You can change your cookie settings through your browser.