Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
(New York: Columbia University Press, 2017). 488 pp. $35.00 (cloth).In the years following the end of World War ii, there were two international trials of leaders of the defeated Axis nations. The International Military Tribunal at Nuremberg is by far the better known, while the International Military Tribunal for the Far East at Tokyo has languished as a distant second. There are good reasons for this. The Nuremberg prosecution was the cooperative endeavor of the United States, Britain, France and the Soviet Union and its leader was the determined and ambitious Robert H. Jackson, a skilled writer and orator on leave from the u.s. Supreme Court. Its Charter that Jackson and prosecutors from the three other nations drafted, not without friction, defined the new international crimes of aggressive war and crimes against humanity, in addition to customary war crimes. Jackson and his colleagues presented evidence to a panel of eight judges, two from each nation, in a trial that spanned ten months, from the indictments in October 1945 to adjournment in September 1946. The judges delivered the verdicts and sentences one month later. Nineteen of the 22 defendants were convicted, with twelve receiving the death sentence.The Tokyo trial was
Journal of American-East Asian Relations – Brill
Published: Mar 15, 2018
Read and print from thousands of top scholarly journals.
Already have an account? Log in
Bookmark this article. You can see your Bookmarks on your DeepDyve Library.
To save an article, log in first, or sign up for a DeepDyve account if you don’t already have one.
Copy and paste the desired citation format or use the link below to download a file formatted for EndNote
Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
All DeepDyve websites use cookies to improve your online experience. They were placed on your computer when you launched this website. You can change your cookie settings through your browser.