Get 20M+ Full-Text Papers For Less Than $1.50/day. Start a 14-Day Trial for You or Your Team.

Learn More →

The Impact of Different Teaching Approaches and Languages on Student Learning of Introductory Programming Concepts

The Impact of Different Teaching Approaches and Languages on Student Learning of Introductory... The Impact of Different Teaching Approaches and Languages on Student Learning of Introductory Programming Concepts WANDA M. KUNKLE, Penn State Harrisburg ROBERT B. ALLEN, Yonsei University Learning to program, especially in the object-oriented paradigm, is a difficult undertaking for many students. As a result, computing educators have tried a variety of instructional methods to assist beginning programmers. These include developing approaches geared specifically toward novices and experimenting with different introductory programming languages. However, determining the effectiveness of these interventions poses a problem. The research presented here developed an instrument to assess student learning of fundamental and object-oriented programming concepts, then used that instrument to investigate the impact of different teaching approaches and languages on university students' ability to learn those concepts. Extensive data analysis showed that the instrument performed well overall. Reliability of the assessment tool was statistically satisfactory and content validity was supported by intrinsic characteristics, question response analysis, and expert review. Preliminary support for construct validity was provided through exploratory factor analysis. Three components that at least partly represented the construct "understanding of fundamental programming concepts" were identified: methods and functions, mathematical and logical expressions, and control structures. Analysis revealed significant differences in student performance based http://www.deepdyve.com/assets/images/DeepDyve-Logo-lg.png ACM Transactions on Computing Education (TOCE) Association for Computing Machinery

The Impact of Different Teaching Approaches and Languages on Student Learning of Introductory Programming Concepts

Loading next page...
 
/lp/association-for-computing-machinery/the-impact-of-different-teaching-approaches-and-languages-on-student-s42I3FGq4O

References (171)

Publisher
Association for Computing Machinery
Copyright
Copyright © 2016 by ACM Inc.
ISSN
1946-6226
DOI
10.1145/2785807
Publisher site
See Article on Publisher Site

Abstract

The Impact of Different Teaching Approaches and Languages on Student Learning of Introductory Programming Concepts WANDA M. KUNKLE, Penn State Harrisburg ROBERT B. ALLEN, Yonsei University Learning to program, especially in the object-oriented paradigm, is a difficult undertaking for many students. As a result, computing educators have tried a variety of instructional methods to assist beginning programmers. These include developing approaches geared specifically toward novices and experimenting with different introductory programming languages. However, determining the effectiveness of these interventions poses a problem. The research presented here developed an instrument to assess student learning of fundamental and object-oriented programming concepts, then used that instrument to investigate the impact of different teaching approaches and languages on university students' ability to learn those concepts. Extensive data analysis showed that the instrument performed well overall. Reliability of the assessment tool was statistically satisfactory and content validity was supported by intrinsic characteristics, question response analysis, and expert review. Preliminary support for construct validity was provided through exploratory factor analysis. Three components that at least partly represented the construct "understanding of fundamental programming concepts" were identified: methods and functions, mathematical and logical expressions, and control structures. Analysis revealed significant differences in student performance based

Journal

ACM Transactions on Computing Education (TOCE)Association for Computing Machinery

Published: Jan 18, 2016

There are no references for this article.