Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
E. Bonabeau (1999)
Editor's Introduction: StigmergyArtificial Life, 5
A. Cavagna (1998)
Irrelevance of memory in the minority gamePhysical Review E, 59
D. Challet, A. Chessa, M. Marsili, Yi-Cheng Zhang (2000)
From Minority Games to real marketsQuantitative Finance, 1
R. Araújo, L. Lamb (2004)
Towards understanding the role of learning models in the dynamics of the minority game16th IEEE International Conference on Tools with Artificial Intelligence
R. Michalski, John Anderson (1982)
Machine learning - an artificial intelligence approach
Yan Chen, Robert Gazzale (2004)
When Does Learning in Games Generate Convergence to Nash Equilibria? The Role of Supermodularity in an Experimental Setting ⁄The American Economic Review, 94
B. Edmonds, S. Moss (1997)
Modelling Bounded Rationality Using Evolutionary Techniques
Trond Grenager, Rob Powers, Y. Shoham (2002)
Dispersion games: general definitions and some specific learning results
(2007)
Received November
M. Cara, O. Pla, F. Guinea (1998)
Competition, efficiency and collective behavior in the “El Farol” bar modelThe European Physical Journal B - Condensed Matter and Complex Systems, 10
J. Carbonell (1990)
Machine learning: paradigms and methods
Tingting Wang, Jiming Liu (2005)
The minority game strategy in team competition: how and when?IEEE/WIC/ACM International Conference on Intelligent Agent Technology
S. Moelbert, P. Rios (2001)
The local minority gamePhysica A-statistical Mechanics and Its Applications, 303
C. Yeung, Yi-Cheng Zhang (2008)
Minority Games
A. Bazzan, Rafael Bordini, G. Andrioti, R. Vicari, J. Wahle (2000)
Wayward agents in a commuting scenario (personalities in the minority game)Proceedings Fourth International Conference on MultiAgent Systems
F. Chow, H.F Chau (2001)
Multiple Choice Minority GamePhysica A-statistical Mechanics and Its Applications, 319
D. Fogel (1995)
Evolutionary Computation: Towards a New Philosophy of Machine Intelligence
D. Kahneman (2003)
Maps of Bounded Rationality: Psychology for Behavioral EconomicsThe American Economic Review, 93
M. Vidal, E. Durfee (1997)
Agents Learning about Agents: A Framework and Analysis
(1999)
Competition, efficiency and collective behavior
G. Theraulaz, E. Bonabeau (1999)
A Brief History of StigmergyArtificial Life, 5
Thomas Bäck (2006)
Evolutionary Computation: Toward a New Philosophy of Machine Intelligence (IEEE Press Series on Computational Intelligence)
Junling Hu, Michael Wellman (2001)
Learning about other agents in a dynamic multiagent systemCognitive Systems Research, 2
Yi Li, Adrian Vandeemen, R. Savit (2000)
The minority game with variable payoffsPhysica A-statistical Mechanics and Its Applications, 284
Y. Shoham, Rob Powers, Trond Grenager (2004)
On the Agenda(s) of Research on Multi-Agent Learning
R. Araújo, L. Lamb (2007)
An Information-Theoretic Analysis of Memory Bounds in a Distributed Resource Allocation Mechanism
Rob Powers, Y. Shoham (2005)
Learning against opponents with bounded memory
E. Gelenbe, Zhiguang Xu, Esin Seref (1999)
Cognitive packet networksProceedings 11th International Conference on Tools with Artificial Intelligence
D. Challet, Yi-Cheng Zhang (1998)
On the minority game: Analytical and numerical studiesPhysica A-statistical Mechanics and Its Applications, 256
(1999)
Adaptive competition, market efficiency, phase
Y. Kodratoff, R. Michalski (1990)
Machine learning: an artificial intelligence approach volume III
(1998)
Modeling Bounded Rationality. Zeuthen Lecture Book Series
Tingting Wang, Jiming Liu (2005)
Evaluating the Minority Game strategy in agent role assignments
ACM Transactions on Autonomous and Adaptive Systems
M. Sysi-Aho, A. Chakraborti, K. Kaski (2002)
Intelligent minority game with genetic crossover strategiesThe European Physical Journal B - Condensed Matter and Complex Systems, 34
J. Crandall, M. Goodrich (2005)
Learning to compete, compromise, and cooperate in repeated general-sum gamesProceedings of the 22nd international conference on Machine learning
M. Andrecut, M. Ali (2001)
Q learning in the minority game.Physical review. E, Statistical, nonlinear, and soft matter physics, 64 6 Pt 2
Yi Li, R. Riolo, Robert Systems, U. Department, U. Michigan (1999)
Evolution in minority games. (II). Games with variable strategy spacesPhysica A-statistical Mechanics and Its Applications, 276
D. Challet, Yi-Cheng Zhang (1997)
Emergence of cooperation and organization in an evolutionary gamePhysica A-statistical Mechanics and Its Applications, 246
B. Webb (2002)
Swarm Intelligence: From Natural to Artificial SystemsConnection Science, 14
W. Arthur (1994)
Inductive Reasoning and Bounded RationalityThe American Economic Review, 84
Publication date: May 2009. On the Use of Memory and Resources in Minority Games @BULLET
R. Savit, R. Manuca, R. Riolo (1999)
Adaptive Competition, Market Efficiency, and Phase TransitionsPhysical Review Letters, 82
H. Simon (1955)
A Behavioral Model of Rational ChoiceQuarterly Journal of Economics, 69
(2009)
Article 11, Publication date
E. Bonabeau, M. Dorigo, G. Theraulaz (1999)
Swarm intelligence: from natural to artificial systems
D. MacKay (2004)
Information Theory, Inference, and Learning AlgorithmsIEEE Transactions on Information Theory, 50
R. Savit, R. Manuca, Rick Systems, U. Michigan, P. Department (1997)
Adaptive Competition, Market Efficiency, Phase Transitions and Spin-GlassesarXiv: Adaptation and Self-Organizing Systems
J. Farmer (1999)
Physicists attempt to scale the ivory towers of financeComput. Sci. Eng., 1
R. Manuca, Yi Li, R. Riolo, Robert Systems, U. Michigan, Physics Dept., College William, Mary (1998)
The structure of adaptive competition in minority gamesPhysica A-statistical Mechanics and Its Applications, 282
(2000)
Modeling bounded rationality by genetic algorithms
E. Moro (2004)
The Minority Game: an introductory guidearXiv: Disordered Systems and Neural Networks
The use of resources in multiagent learning systems is a relevant research problem, with a number of applications in resource allocation, communication and synchronization. Multiagent distributed resource allocation requires that agents act on limited, localized information with minimum communication overhead in order to optimize the distribution of available resources. When requirements and constraints are dynamic, learning agents may be needed to allow for adaptation. One way of accomplishing learning is to observe past outcomes, using such information to improve future decisions. When limits in agents' memory or observation capabilities are assumed, one must decide on how large should the observation window be. We investigate how this decision influences both agents' and system's performance in the context of a special class of distributed resource allocation problems, namely dispersion games. We show by using several numerical experiments over a specific dispersion game (the Minority Game) that in such scenario an agent's performance is non-monotonically correlated with her memory size when all other agents are kept unchanged. We then provide an information-theoretic explanation for the observed behaviors, showing that a downward causation effect takes place.
ACM Transactions on Autonomous and Adaptive Systems (TAAS) – Association for Computing Machinery
Published: May 1, 2009
Read and print from thousands of top scholarly journals.
Already have an account? Log in
Bookmark this article. You can see your Bookmarks on your DeepDyve Library.
To save an article, log in first, or sign up for a DeepDyve account if you don’t already have one.
Copy and paste the desired citation format or use the link below to download a file formatted for EndNote
Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
All DeepDyve websites use cookies to improve your online experience. They were placed on your computer when you launched this website. You can change your cookie settings through your browser.