Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
T. Duffy, D. Cunningham, D. Jonassen (1996)
Constructivism: Implications for the Design and Delivery of Instruction
M. Scardamalia, C. Bereiter (1991)
Higher Levels of Agency for Children in Knowledge Building: A Challenge for the Design of New Knowledge MediaThe Journal of the Learning Sciences, 1
Sally Magnan, J. Creswell (1997)
Research Design: Qualitative and Quantitative ApproachesThe Modern Language Journal, 81
B. McCombs (1991)
Unraveling Motivation: New Perspectives From Research and PracticeJournal of Experimental Education, 60
(1991)
Assessing constructions and constructing assessments: A dialogue
J. Brown, A. Collins, P. Duguid (1989)
Situated Cognition and the Culture of LearningEducational Researcher, 18
A. Bandura (1985)
Social Foundations of Thought and Action: A Social Cognitive Theory
D. Goleman (1995)
Emotional Intelligence: Why It Can Matter More Than IQ
J. Kemp (1991)
A perspective on the changing role of the educational technologistEducational Technology archive, 31
J. Bransford, Ann Brown, R. Cocking (1999)
How people learn: Brain, mind, experience, and school.
E. Deci, R. Ryan (1990)
A motivational approach to self: integration in personality.Nebraska Symposium on Motivation. Nebraska Symposium on Motivation, 38
S. Rayner, R. Riding (1997)
Towards a Categorisation of Cognitive Styles and Learning StylesEducational Psychology, 17
Commentary 21 Intentionality as much more complex than Martinez allows. Expanding Beyond a Cognitivist Framework: A Commentary on Martinez s Intentional Learning in an Intentional World Jamie Kirkley Center for Research on Learning and Technology Thomas Duffy School of Education Indiana University Bloomington, IN 47405 jkirkley@indiana.edu duffy@indiana.edu One of the looming challenges educators face today is understanding how student diversity and uniqueness impacts the complex process of learning. Affective and conative factors are increasingly examined as we seek to understand how to teach and support the whole learner. The goal is to build theory that informs practice so that we may, as Martinez argues, move beyond fuzzy, one-size- tsall [instructional] solutions to instruction that is designed to match individual learning needs. Factors such as motivation (McCombs, 1991, Deci and Ryan, 1991), self-ef cacy (Bandura, 1986), learning styles (Rayner and Riding, 1997), and emotional intelligence (Goleman, 1996) have become increasingly common terms in educational research as we seek to de ne affective and conative variables that impact the learning process as well as design of instruction. However, as with much of educational research, there are a vast number of complex, interrelated variables to consider and no one
ACM Journal of Computer Documentation (JCD) – Association for Computing Machinery
Published: Feb 1, 2000
Read and print from thousands of top scholarly journals.
Already have an account? Log in
Bookmark this article. You can see your Bookmarks on your DeepDyve Library.
To save an article, log in first, or sign up for a DeepDyve account if you don’t already have one.
Copy and paste the desired citation format or use the link below to download a file formatted for EndNote
Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
All DeepDyve websites use cookies to improve your online experience. They were placed on your computer when you launched this website. You can change your cookie settings through your browser.