Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
(2013)
ACM Transactions on Storage
D. Hitz, James Lau, M. Malcolm (1994)
File System Design for an NFS File Server Appliance
Minwen Ji, Alistair Veitch, J. Wilkes (2003)
Seneca: remote mirroring done write
Jeanna Matthews, D. Roselli, Adam Costello, Randolph Wang, T. Anderson (1997)
Improving the performance of log-structured file systems with adaptive methodsProceedings of the sixteenth ACM symposium on Operating systems principles
K. Keeton, Cipriano Santos, D. Beyer, J. Chase, J. Wilkes (2004)
Designing for Disasters
M. Rosenblum (1991)
The design and implementation of a log-structured file system, 303
EMC Celerra Replicator
Yanlong Wang, Zhanhuai Li, Wei Lin (2007)
RWAR: A Resilient Window-consistent Asynchronous Replication ProtocolThe Second International Conference on Availability, Reliability and Security (ARES'07)
Hengming Zou, F. Jahanian (1998)
Real-time primary-backup (RTPB) replication with temporal consistency guaranteesProceedings. 18th International Conference on Distributed Computing Systems (Cat. No.98CB36183)
(2013)
EMC Symmetrix Remote Data Facility
Ross Shaull, L. Shrira, Hao Xu (2008)
Skippy: a new snapshot indexing method for time travel in the storage manager
(2012)
Received April
James Kistler (1995)
Disconnected Operation in a Distributed File System, 1002
Fay Chang, Minwen Ji, Shun-Tak Leung, John MacCormick, Sharon Perl, Li Zhang (2002)
Myriad: Cost-Effective Disaster Tolerance
S. Krishnamurthy, W. Sanders, M. Cukier (2003)
An Adaptive Quality of Service Aware Middleware for Replicated ServicesIEEE Trans. Parallel Distributed Syst., 14
S. Ghemawat, H. Gobioff, Shun-Tak Leung (2003)
The Google file systemOperating Systems Review
Yair Sovran, Russell Power, M. Aguilera, Jinyang Li (2011)
Transactional storage for geo-replicated systemsProceedings of the Twenty-Third ACM Symposium on Operating Systems Principles
S. Savage, J. Wilkes (1996)
AFRAID - A Frequently Redundant Array of Independent Disks
B. Liskov, S. Ghemawat, R. Gruber, Paul Johnson, L. Shrira, Michael Williams (1991)
Replication in the harp file system
Lior Aronovich, Ron Asher, E. Bachmat, Haim Bitner, Michael Hirsch, S. Klein (2009)
The design of a similarity based deduplication system
Brian Cooper, R. Ramakrishnan, U. Srivastava, Adam Silberstein, P. Bohannon, H. Jacobsen, Nick Puz, Daniel Weaver, Ramana Yerneni (2008)
PNUTS: Yahoo!'s hosted data serving platformProc. VLDB Endow., 1
R. Patterson, S. Manley, Mike Federwisch, D. Hitz, S. Kleiman, Shane Owara (2002)
SnapMirror: File-System-Based Asynchronous Mirroring for Disaster Recovery
Benjamin Zhu, Kai Li, Hugo Patterson (2008)
Avoiding the Disk Bottleneck in the Data Domain Deduplication File System
Hakim Weatherspoon, L. Ganesh, Tudor Marian, M. Balakrishnan, K. Birman (2009)
Smoke and Mirrors: Reflecting Files at a Geographically Remote Location Without Loss of Performance
IOMeter
Mark Lillibridge, K. Eshghi, Deepavali Bhagwat, V. Deolalikar, Greg Trezis, Peter Camble (2009)
Sparse Indexing: Large Scale, Inline Deduplication Using Sampling and Locality
John Strunk, Garth Goodson, Michael Scheinholtz, Craig Soules, G. Ganger (2000)
Self-securing storage: protecting data in compromised systemsFoundations of Intrusion Tolerant Systems, 2003 [Organically Assured and Survivable Information Systems]
Ryuichi Oka, Aizu Wakamatsu (2018)
Dynamic Programming
A. Tridgell, P. Mackerras (1996)
The rsync algorithm
Rui Yan, J. Shu, D. Wen (2004)
An Implementation of Semi-synchronous Remote Mirroring System for SANs
A. Azagury, M. Factor, William Micka (2003)
Advanced functions for storage subsystems: Supporting continuous availabilityIBM Syst. J., 42
Dynamic Synchronous/Asynchronous Replication ASSAF NATANZON, EMC and Ben-Gurion University EITAN BACHMAT, Ben-Gurion University Online, remote, data replication is critical for today's enterprise IT organization. Availability of data is key to the success of the organization. A few hours of downtime can cost from thousands to millions of dollars With increasing frequency, companies are instituting disaster recovery plans to ensure appropriate data availability in the event of a catastrophic failure or disaster that destroys a site (e.g. flood, fire, or earthquake). Synchronous and asynchronous replication technologies have been available for a long period of time. Synchronous replication has the advantage of no data loss, but due to latency, synchronous replication is limited by distance and bandwidth. Asynchronous replication on the other hand has no distance limitation, but leads to some data loss which is proportional to the data lag. We present a novel method, implemented within EMC Recover-Point, which allows the system to dynamically move between these replication options without any disruption to the I/O path. As latency grows, the system will move from synchronous replication to semi-synchronous replication and then to snapshot shipping. It returns to synchronous replication as more bandwidth is available and latency allows. Categories and
ACM Transactions on Storage (TOS) – Association for Computing Machinery
Published: Aug 1, 2013
Read and print from thousands of top scholarly journals.
Already have an account? Log in
Bookmark this article. You can see your Bookmarks on your DeepDyve Library.
To save an article, log in first, or sign up for a DeepDyve account if you don’t already have one.
Copy and paste the desired citation format or use the link below to download a file formatted for EndNote
Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
All DeepDyve websites use cookies to improve your online experience. They were placed on your computer when you launched this website. You can change your cookie settings through your browser.