Get 20M+ Full-Text Papers For Less Than $1.50/day. Start a 14-Day Trial for You or Your Team.

Learn More →

Traffic accident increase attributed to Daylight Saving Time doubled after Energy Policy Act

Traffic accident increase attributed to Daylight Saving Time doubled after Energy Policy Act Current Biology (2020) 30(7) R298-R300, doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cub.2020.03.007 Licences CC-BY-NC-ND Trac accident increase attributed to Daylight Saving Time doubled after Energy Policy Act Jos e Mar a Mart n-Olalla Universidad de Sevilla. Facultad de F sica. Departamento de F sica de la Materia Condensada. ES41012 Sevilla. Spain (Dated: February 6, 2020) On January 30, 2020 Current Biology released the report \A Chronobiological Evaluation of the Acute E ects of Daylight Saving Time on Trac Accident Risk" (doi: 10.1016/j.cub.2019.12.045 by Fritz et al. where it was argued that fatal trac accident risk increases by 6 % in the US due to Daylight Saving Time spring transition. This manuscript is a 1000 word correspondence showing that the bulk of this reported risk comes from the transition dates mandated by the Energy Policy Act in 2007. Keywords: circadian, time zones, latitude, summer time, seasons, circadian misalignment, meridian, enter- tainment (light), transportation, road accidents, trac accident This is the accepted manuscript of a correspondence published by Current Biology Volume 30, Issue 7, Pages R298-R300. ISSN 0960-9822, ESSN 1879-0445. For the authored, published version please visit doi https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cub.2020.03.007 The impact of Daylight Saving Time (DST) transitions ing else changes. As the Sun gets higher in the sky in on the human circadian system and on everyday life is spring/summer more people nd natural to advance their currently subject to close analysis. Fritz et al. [1] stud- activity aiming to mitigate their exposure to the highest ied recently large scale United States (US) registry data insolation: at 40 N insolation eciency climbs up to a (1996 to 2017) on fatal motor vehicle accidents (MVA) tropical 95 % (see right axis in Figure 1). Likewise, as the and reported the incidence rate ratio. The authors report solar altitude decreases in autumn/winter people delay results for data before 2006, for data after 2007, and for their activity aiming to mitigate their exposure to morn- the whole observation period. They also report morn- ing darkness. This circanual cycle is observed in tropical, ing, afternoon and whole-day results. The discussion and pre-industrial societies[2]. It is also observed in extrat- conclusions are extracted mainly from the whole-day g- ropical, industrial societies synchronized by clocks[3, 4] ures and those from the entire 1996 to 2017 period. Yet and which have adopted year-round time schedules where the breakdown illustrates a most interesting fact: the DST transition dates regulate the mechanism. Chronobi- amendments in the Uniform Time Act made by the En- ologists largely criticizes[1, 5] the practice, yet they even- ergy Policy Act doubled the increase of fatal morning tually acknowledge that people are prone to this natural MVA attributed to the spring transition. behaviour[6]. Figure 1 shows a simplistic scenario at 40 N |the lati- In Figure 1 the spring transition brings the human tude of New York City and Madrid| in which the yearly activity at the H-hour from the black line to the blue evolution of the solar altitude z at the latest sunrise time line. In fall, the shift is reversed. Vertical colored strip |here after the H-hour| is plotted (black line). Solar bands display transition dates. The Energy Policy Act altitude is appropriate for understanding a key parame- advanced in 2007 the spring transition by three weeks. ter related to the rate of trac accidents: illumination In 2020 z will change from z  12 to z  1 at 40 N st dst conditions (see Figure 1B in Ref. [1]). The H-hour is in the US. It changed from z  19 to z  7 before st dst a function of latitude only if expressed as a mean solar 2006. In Europe at 40 N, it will change from z  17 st time or as a distance to solar noon. It impacts human to z  5 this year. dst social life since an activity starting at or after the H-hour Either of the last two cases keeps the Sun high enough would certainly occur in the photoperiod irrespective of over the horizon so that illumination conditions at the H- calendar date. People at 40 N latitude would see the hour are unaltered. Therefore an increase of trac acci- Sun crossing the horizon in January 5th at the H-hour dents due to changing illumination conditions is expected and would see the Sun as high as z = 30 above the to be slight. However, the changing in illumination con- horizon in June at the same hour of the day, if noth- ditions is dramatic for the current US regulations: a nice deal of trac volume is shifted close to dawn after the transition. Several cons and pros must be further considered: rst, olalla@us.es; a fraction of population commutes before H-hour in the Typeset by REVT X arXiv:2004.04156v1 [physics.pop-ph] 9 Apr 2020 2 Zenith ST to DST DST to ST 90° 100% Latitude=40°N H-hour=07:22 72° 95% 54° 81% 36° 59% 18° 18° ☀ 31% ☀ ☀ 8° ☀ ☀ 18° 18° 14° 14° ☀ 2° 1° 9° ☀☀ ☀ H-hour (ST) 0° 4° -2° H-hour (DST) -18° JAN FEB MAR APR MAY JUN JUL AUG SEP OCT NOV DEC FIG. 1. The seasonal variation of solar altitude at 40 N. The solar altitude z at the hour of the latest sunrise of the year |black, H-hour (Standard Time, ST)| and at the preceding hour {blueish, H-hour (Daylight Saving Time, DST)| as a function of calendar date for 40 N latitude where the H-hour is 07:22 mean solar time, the sunrise time on January the 5th. Coloured vertical strip bands display di erent arrangements of transition dates; each one expands for one week. The yellowish line displays solar altitude at solar noon. Sunrise is set at z = 0:85 due to solar nite apparent size and atmospheric refraction. winter dawn, they are more prone to see the Sun below dence interval at 1.06, markedly greater than 1.00 (see the horizon after DST begins in the middle of March; Figure 2 of Ref. [1]). Indeed the morning increase after second, z still worsens as latitude decreases (see Supple- 2007 is the one and only result close to RSD. It is there- mentary material); third, and although gure 1 is show- fore a marked impact. Following Figure 1, a plausible ing solar properties and thus it is insensitive to longitude, cause of this spike is the change in transition dates due human social activity is dictated by standard clock time to the Energy Policy Act, which brought a dramatic and which makes z worsen westward of a time meridian, predictable change in illumination conditions close to the dst an e ect discussed by the authors. On the other side, rush hour. Notice that DST onset has regularly occurred human activity at the H-hour in the US slightly reduced in the Northern hemisphere from the end of March to the compared to that in Europe at this time[7] which would end of April, only after the sun is high enough in the sky. allow a slightly larger extension of DST regulations in Illumination issues could also arise at the fall transi- the US. tion. Currently z decreases to  0 in Europe and to dst Fritz et al. [1]'s results remarkably agree with this 2 in the US |meaning that the latest sunrise (clock) framework. Figure 2 of the Ref.[1] attributes to DST time of the year actually happens on the rst Saturday spring transitions before 2006 and after 2007 a 5 % in- of November| compared to z  5 on the last Sun- dst crease in afternoon fatal MVAs and a 6 % increase in day of September, a transition date in continental Europe morning fatal MVAs before 2006. The relevance of these discontinued in 1996. Very likely an advance of the fall results ( 5 %) should be evaluated by comparing the out- transition date by some three weeks could result in a de- come to the relative standard deviation (RSD) of weekly crease of morning MVAs, mimicking the results obtained averaged fatal MVAs which is  15 % (see Figure 1A of by Fritz et al. Ref. [1]). The attributed increase is just one third of Summarizing, the analysis shows that the acute impact RSD. Also the lower endpoint of the con dence interval of DST transitions on incidence rate ratio for weekly av- for each of these observations barely reaches 1.00{1.01. erage fatal MVAs is close to 5 %, one third of the RSD of Understandably, the authors agree that this impact is observations, a slight impact. However, the results show slight. These observations can be plausibly linked to cir- that the Energy Policy Act more than doubled morning cadian misalignment and sleep deprivation since illumi- incidence rate ratio up to 13 % due to a marked change nation conditions were unaltered here. in the illumination conditions. Based on the rst obser- In sharp contrast, the morning increase attributed to vation, the authors call for discontinuing DST policies, DST after 2007 more than doubles the preceding results: despite its impact being slight. Instead the outstanding 13 % versus 5 % to 6 % with the lower endpoint of the con- analysis provided by Fritz et al. calls for discontinuing Solar altitude, z Twilight Daylight US (1942) EUR (1940) US (after 2007) EUR US (1987-2006) US (1976-1987) EUR (before 1996) EUR (after 1996)/US (before 2006) US (after 2007) Insolation efficiency, 100×sin(z) 3 the provisions of the Energy Policy Act relative to tran- sition dates. [1] Josef Fritz, Trang VoPham, Kenneth P. Wright, and C eline Vetter, \A Chronobiological Evaluation of the Acute E ects of Daylight Saving Time on Trac Accident Risk," Current Biology 30, 1 (2020). [2] Gandhi Yetish, Hillard Kaplan, Michael Gurven, Brian Wood, Herman Pontzer, Paul R Manger, Charles Wil- son, Ronald McGregor, and Jerome M Siegel, \Natural sleep and its seasonal variations in three pre-industrial so- cieties." Current Biology 25, 2862{2868 (2015). [3] Daniel Monsivais, Kunal Bhattacharya, Asim Ghosh, Robin I. M. Dunbar, and Kimmo Kaski, \Seasonal and geographical impact on human resting periods," Scienti c Reports 7, 10717 (2017). [4] Jos e Mar a Mart n-Olalla, \The long term impact of Day- light Saving Time regulations in daily life at several circles of latitude," Scienti c Reports 9, 18466 (2019). [5] Till Roenneberg, Anna Wirz-Justice, Debra J. Skene, Sonia Ancoli-Israel, Kenneth P. Wright, Derk-Jan Dijk, Phyllis Zee, Michael R. Gorman, Eva C. Winnebeck, and Elizabeth B. Klerman, \Why Should We Abolish Daylight Saving Time?" Journal of Biological Rhythms 34, 227{230 (2019). [6] Till Roenneberg, Eva C. Winnebeck, and Elizabeth B. Klerman, \Daylight Saving Time and Arti cial Time Zones { A Battle Between Biological and Social Times," Frontiers in Physiology 10, 944 (2019). [7] Jos e Mar a Mart n-Olalla, \Latitudinal trends in human primary activities: characterizing the winter day as a syn- chronizer," Scienti c Reports 8, 5350 (2018). ACKNOWLEDGMENTS Prof. Dr. Juan C. del Alamo from University of Washington and Prof. Dr. Manuel Garc a-Villalba from Universidad Carlos III alerted JMM-O of the commented paper. JMM-O thanks Prof. Dr. Jorge Mira from Universidade de Santiago de Compostela for a critical reading of this letter. An earlier version of Figure 1 was presented in a meeting held on 2018 at the Consello da Cultura Galega in Santiago de Compostela (Spain). The gure was produced by gnuplot. It plots a le produced by a script in octave which uses xplanet to compute the solar declination in the year 2020 and a script by Darin C. Koblick |available at https://www.mathworks.com/matlabcentral/ leexchange/32793- equation-of-time| to compute the equation of time in 2020 from which sunrise times and solar altitudes were produced. This project was started on February 1st, 2020. It was not funded. http://www.deepdyve.com/assets/images/DeepDyve-Logo-lg.png Physics arXiv (Cornell University)

Traffic accident increase attributed to Daylight Saving Time doubled after Energy Policy Act

Martín-Olalla, José María
Physics , Volume 2020 (2004) – Apr 9, 2020
Download PDF
3 pages

Loading next page...
 
/lp/arxiv-cornell-university/traffic-accident-increase-attributed-to-daylight-saving-time-doubled-a4nFo7AscC

References

References for this paper are not available at this time. We will be adding them shortly, thank you for your patience.

ISSN
0960-9822
eISSN
ARCH-3341
DOI
10.1016/j.cub.2020.03.007
Publisher site
See Article on Publisher Site

Abstract

Current Biology (2020) 30(7) R298-R300, doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cub.2020.03.007 Licences CC-BY-NC-ND Trac accident increase attributed to Daylight Saving Time doubled after Energy Policy Act Jos e Mar a Mart n-Olalla Universidad de Sevilla. Facultad de F sica. Departamento de F sica de la Materia Condensada. ES41012 Sevilla. Spain (Dated: February 6, 2020) On January 30, 2020 Current Biology released the report \A Chronobiological Evaluation of the Acute E ects of Daylight Saving Time on Trac Accident Risk" (doi: 10.1016/j.cub.2019.12.045 by Fritz et al. where it was argued that fatal trac accident risk increases by 6 % in the US due to Daylight Saving Time spring transition. This manuscript is a 1000 word correspondence showing that the bulk of this reported risk comes from the transition dates mandated by the Energy Policy Act in 2007. Keywords: circadian, time zones, latitude, summer time, seasons, circadian misalignment, meridian, enter- tainment (light), transportation, road accidents, trac accident This is the accepted manuscript of a correspondence published by Current Biology Volume 30, Issue 7, Pages R298-R300. ISSN 0960-9822, ESSN 1879-0445. For the authored, published version please visit doi https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cub.2020.03.007 The impact of Daylight Saving Time (DST) transitions ing else changes. As the Sun gets higher in the sky in on the human circadian system and on everyday life is spring/summer more people nd natural to advance their currently subject to close analysis. Fritz et al. [1] stud- activity aiming to mitigate their exposure to the highest ied recently large scale United States (US) registry data insolation: at 40 N insolation eciency climbs up to a (1996 to 2017) on fatal motor vehicle accidents (MVA) tropical 95 % (see right axis in Figure 1). Likewise, as the and reported the incidence rate ratio. The authors report solar altitude decreases in autumn/winter people delay results for data before 2006, for data after 2007, and for their activity aiming to mitigate their exposure to morn- the whole observation period. They also report morn- ing darkness. This circanual cycle is observed in tropical, ing, afternoon and whole-day results. The discussion and pre-industrial societies[2]. It is also observed in extrat- conclusions are extracted mainly from the whole-day g- ropical, industrial societies synchronized by clocks[3, 4] ures and those from the entire 1996 to 2017 period. Yet and which have adopted year-round time schedules where the breakdown illustrates a most interesting fact: the DST transition dates regulate the mechanism. Chronobi- amendments in the Uniform Time Act made by the En- ologists largely criticizes[1, 5] the practice, yet they even- ergy Policy Act doubled the increase of fatal morning tually acknowledge that people are prone to this natural MVA attributed to the spring transition. behaviour[6]. Figure 1 shows a simplistic scenario at 40 N |the lati- In Figure 1 the spring transition brings the human tude of New York City and Madrid| in which the yearly activity at the H-hour from the black line to the blue evolution of the solar altitude z at the latest sunrise time line. In fall, the shift is reversed. Vertical colored strip |here after the H-hour| is plotted (black line). Solar bands display transition dates. The Energy Policy Act altitude is appropriate for understanding a key parame- advanced in 2007 the spring transition by three weeks. ter related to the rate of trac accidents: illumination In 2020 z will change from z  12 to z  1 at 40 N st dst conditions (see Figure 1B in Ref. [1]). The H-hour is in the US. It changed from z  19 to z  7 before st dst a function of latitude only if expressed as a mean solar 2006. In Europe at 40 N, it will change from z  17 st time or as a distance to solar noon. It impacts human to z  5 this year. dst social life since an activity starting at or after the H-hour Either of the last two cases keeps the Sun high enough would certainly occur in the photoperiod irrespective of over the horizon so that illumination conditions at the H- calendar date. People at 40 N latitude would see the hour are unaltered. Therefore an increase of trac acci- Sun crossing the horizon in January 5th at the H-hour dents due to changing illumination conditions is expected and would see the Sun as high as z = 30 above the to be slight. However, the changing in illumination con- horizon in June at the same hour of the day, if noth- ditions is dramatic for the current US regulations: a nice deal of trac volume is shifted close to dawn after the transition. Several cons and pros must be further considered: rst, olalla@us.es; a fraction of population commutes before H-hour in the Typeset by REVT X arXiv:2004.04156v1 [physics.pop-ph] 9 Apr 2020 2 Zenith ST to DST DST to ST 90° 100% Latitude=40°N H-hour=07:22 72° 95% 54° 81% 36° 59% 18° 18° ☀ 31% ☀ ☀ 8° ☀ ☀ 18° 18° 14° 14° ☀ 2° 1° 9° ☀☀ ☀ H-hour (ST) 0° 4° -2° H-hour (DST) -18° JAN FEB MAR APR MAY JUN JUL AUG SEP OCT NOV DEC FIG. 1. The seasonal variation of solar altitude at 40 N. The solar altitude z at the hour of the latest sunrise of the year |black, H-hour (Standard Time, ST)| and at the preceding hour {blueish, H-hour (Daylight Saving Time, DST)| as a function of calendar date for 40 N latitude where the H-hour is 07:22 mean solar time, the sunrise time on January the 5th. Coloured vertical strip bands display di erent arrangements of transition dates; each one expands for one week. The yellowish line displays solar altitude at solar noon. Sunrise is set at z = 0:85 due to solar nite apparent size and atmospheric refraction. winter dawn, they are more prone to see the Sun below dence interval at 1.06, markedly greater than 1.00 (see the horizon after DST begins in the middle of March; Figure 2 of Ref. [1]). Indeed the morning increase after second, z still worsens as latitude decreases (see Supple- 2007 is the one and only result close to RSD. It is there- mentary material); third, and although gure 1 is show- fore a marked impact. Following Figure 1, a plausible ing solar properties and thus it is insensitive to longitude, cause of this spike is the change in transition dates due human social activity is dictated by standard clock time to the Energy Policy Act, which brought a dramatic and which makes z worsen westward of a time meridian, predictable change in illumination conditions close to the dst an e ect discussed by the authors. On the other side, rush hour. Notice that DST onset has regularly occurred human activity at the H-hour in the US slightly reduced in the Northern hemisphere from the end of March to the compared to that in Europe at this time[7] which would end of April, only after the sun is high enough in the sky. allow a slightly larger extension of DST regulations in Illumination issues could also arise at the fall transi- the US. tion. Currently z decreases to  0 in Europe and to dst Fritz et al. [1]'s results remarkably agree with this 2 in the US |meaning that the latest sunrise (clock) framework. Figure 2 of the Ref.[1] attributes to DST time of the year actually happens on the rst Saturday spring transitions before 2006 and after 2007 a 5 % in- of November| compared to z  5 on the last Sun- dst crease in afternoon fatal MVAs and a 6 % increase in day of September, a transition date in continental Europe morning fatal MVAs before 2006. The relevance of these discontinued in 1996. Very likely an advance of the fall results ( 5 %) should be evaluated by comparing the out- transition date by some three weeks could result in a de- come to the relative standard deviation (RSD) of weekly crease of morning MVAs, mimicking the results obtained averaged fatal MVAs which is  15 % (see Figure 1A of by Fritz et al. Ref. [1]). The attributed increase is just one third of Summarizing, the analysis shows that the acute impact RSD. Also the lower endpoint of the con dence interval of DST transitions on incidence rate ratio for weekly av- for each of these observations barely reaches 1.00{1.01. erage fatal MVAs is close to 5 %, one third of the RSD of Understandably, the authors agree that this impact is observations, a slight impact. However, the results show slight. These observations can be plausibly linked to cir- that the Energy Policy Act more than doubled morning cadian misalignment and sleep deprivation since illumi- incidence rate ratio up to 13 % due to a marked change nation conditions were unaltered here. in the illumination conditions. Based on the rst obser- In sharp contrast, the morning increase attributed to vation, the authors call for discontinuing DST policies, DST after 2007 more than doubles the preceding results: despite its impact being slight. Instead the outstanding 13 % versus 5 % to 6 % with the lower endpoint of the con- analysis provided by Fritz et al. calls for discontinuing Solar altitude, z Twilight Daylight US (1942) EUR (1940) US (after 2007) EUR US (1987-2006) US (1976-1987) EUR (before 1996) EUR (after 1996)/US (before 2006) US (after 2007) Insolation efficiency, 100×sin(z) 3 the provisions of the Energy Policy Act relative to tran- sition dates. [1] Josef Fritz, Trang VoPham, Kenneth P. Wright, and C eline Vetter, \A Chronobiological Evaluation of the Acute E ects of Daylight Saving Time on Trac Accident Risk," Current Biology 30, 1 (2020). [2] Gandhi Yetish, Hillard Kaplan, Michael Gurven, Brian Wood, Herman Pontzer, Paul R Manger, Charles Wil- son, Ronald McGregor, and Jerome M Siegel, \Natural sleep and its seasonal variations in three pre-industrial so- cieties." Current Biology 25, 2862{2868 (2015). [3] Daniel Monsivais, Kunal Bhattacharya, Asim Ghosh, Robin I. M. Dunbar, and Kimmo Kaski, \Seasonal and geographical impact on human resting periods," Scienti c Reports 7, 10717 (2017). [4] Jos e Mar a Mart n-Olalla, \The long term impact of Day- light Saving Time regulations in daily life at several circles of latitude," Scienti c Reports 9, 18466 (2019). [5] Till Roenneberg, Anna Wirz-Justice, Debra J. Skene, Sonia Ancoli-Israel, Kenneth P. Wright, Derk-Jan Dijk, Phyllis Zee, Michael R. Gorman, Eva C. Winnebeck, and Elizabeth B. Klerman, \Why Should We Abolish Daylight Saving Time?" Journal of Biological Rhythms 34, 227{230 (2019). [6] Till Roenneberg, Eva C. Winnebeck, and Elizabeth B. Klerman, \Daylight Saving Time and Arti cial Time Zones { A Battle Between Biological and Social Times," Frontiers in Physiology 10, 944 (2019). [7] Jos e Mar a Mart n-Olalla, \Latitudinal trends in human primary activities: characterizing the winter day as a syn- chronizer," Scienti c Reports 8, 5350 (2018). ACKNOWLEDGMENTS Prof. Dr. Juan C. del Alamo from University of Washington and Prof. Dr. Manuel Garc a-Villalba from Universidad Carlos III alerted JMM-O of the commented paper. JMM-O thanks Prof. Dr. Jorge Mira from Universidade de Santiago de Compostela for a critical reading of this letter. An earlier version of Figure 1 was presented in a meeting held on 2018 at the Consello da Cultura Galega in Santiago de Compostela (Spain). The gure was produced by gnuplot. It plots a le produced by a script in octave which uses xplanet to compute the solar declination in the year 2020 and a script by Darin C. Koblick |available at https://www.mathworks.com/matlabcentral/ leexchange/32793- equation-of-time| to compute the equation of time in 2020 from which sunrise times and solar altitudes were produced. This project was started on February 1st, 2020. It was not funded.

Journal

Physics – arXiv (Cornell University)

Published: Apr 9, 2020

References

  • A chronobiological evaluation of the acute effects of daylight saving time on traffic accident risk
    Fritz
  • Natural sleep and its seasonal variations in three pre-industrial societies
    Yetish
  • Seasonal and geographical impact on human resting periods
    Monsivais
  • The long term impact of Daylight Saving Time regulations in daily life at several circles of latitude
    Martín-Olalla
  • Why should we abolish daylight saving time?
    Roenneberg
  • Daylight Saving time and artificial time zones – a battle between biological and social times
    Roenneberg
  • Latitudinal trends in human primary activities: characterizing the winter day as a synchronizer
    Martín-Olalla