Get 20M+ Full-Text Papers For Less Than $1.50/day. Start a 14-Day Trial for You or Your Team.

Learn More →

Equilibrium points and basins of convergence in the triangular restricted four-body problem with a radiating body

Equilibrium points and basins of convergence in the triangular restricted four-body problem with... The dynamics of the four-body problem have attracted increasing attention in recent years. In this paper, we extend the basic equilateral four-body problem by introducing the e ect of radiation pressure, Poynting-Robertson drag, and solar wind drag. In our setup, three primaries lay at the vertices of an equilateral triangle and move in circular orbits around their common center of mass. Here, one of the primaries is a radiating body and the fourth body (whose mass is negligible) does not a ect the motion of the primaries. We show that the existence and the number of equilibrium points of the problem depend on the mass parameters and radiation factor. Consequently, the allowed regions of motion, the regions of the basins of convergence for the equilibrium points, and the basin entropy will also depend on these parameters. The present dynamical model is analyzed for three combinations of mass for the primaries: equal masses, two equal masses, di erent masses. As the main results, we nd that in all cases the libration points are unstable if the radiation factor is larger than 0.01 and hence able to destroy the stability of the libration points in the restricted four-body problem composed by Sun, Jupiter, Trojan asteroid and a test (dust) particle. Also, we conclude that the number of xed points decreases with the increase of the radiation factor. Keywords: Four-body problem, Radiation forces, Equilibrium points, Basins of convergence, Basin entropy. 1. Introduction galactic dynamics, mainly motivated by the fact that there are many astrophysical systems that can be roughly ap- The n-body problem is one of the oldest and most re- proximated to that model, for example, the Sun-Jupiter- searched problems in astrophysics, it deals with the motion Saturn-satellite system, the Sun-Jupiter-Trojan-spacecraft of bodies that are subject to their mutual gravitational system, the Sun-Jupiter-Earth-satellite system, the Saturn- attractions (or to other forces as well). The study of the Tethys-Telesto-spacecraft system [4], or even any of the n-body problem is essential to the understanding of the four-star systems of our galaxy [5]. Aiming to get a bet- motions of celestial bodies and is of particular interest in ter understanding of the problem, several modi cations to spacecraft navigation [1]. Since there is no general ana- the e ective potential in the classical restricted four-body lytical solution to the n-body problem for n  3, several problem have been proposed, see e.g. [6{9], where it was simpli cations have been introduced with the most promi- found that the introduction of the additional terms signi - nent being the restricted three and four body problems [2]. cantly modi es the existence, position, and stability of the In both cases, the mass of one of the bodies (test parti- equilibrium points, and therefore the overall dynamics of cle) is negligible in comparison to the others (primaries) the system. such that it does not a ect their motion. In the restricted Since it is a well-known fact that in the n-body with three-body problem the primaries move in a circular or el- n  3 it is not possible to nd explicit formulae for the liptic trajectory (solutions of a two-body problem), while position of the equilibrium points, numerical methods be- in the restricted four-body problem the primaries move come the natural and the most ecient way of nding the in a straight-line equilibrium con guration or in an equi- locations of the xed points in many di erent dynamical lateral triangle con guration (solutions to the three-body systems. One of the most popular methods to nd roots of problem) [3]. multivariate functions is the Newton-Raphson algorithm, The restricted four-body problem has many applica- this method allows us to get a global picture of the set of tions in celestial mechanics, dynamical astronomy, and initial conditions that lead to a particular xed point. The nal picture produced after evolving (via the root- nding algorithm) the whole set of initial conditions in a certain Corresponding author region of the con guration space is called the basin of Email address: fldubeibem@unal.edu.co (F. L. Dubeibe ) Preprint submitted to Elsevier December 21, 2018 arXiv:1812.08641v1 [nlin.CD] 20 Dec 2018 convergence (see e.g. [10, 11]). and regardless of the mass distribution of the primaries, During the past few years, the Newton-Raphson basins they always will lie at the vertices of an equilateral trian- of convergence have been extensively investigated in many gle. If the primary m is a radiating body, the equations di erent versions of the restricted four-body problem. As of motion for the test particle m in an inertial frame of characteristic examples of these works, may be mentioned reference R = (X; Y ), can be written as [18]: the one by Baltagiannis & Papadakis [12], who determined " Gmm SAQ R the position and stability of the equilibrium points in the i pr 1 m R = R + equilateral triangle con guration of the four-body problem R c R i=1 !# using di erent combinations of primaries, and the study _ _ R  R R R 1 1 1 1 carried out by Zotos [13], who extended the study of the (1 + sw) ; (1) c R R c basins of convergence for cases not considered by Bataglia- 1 1 nis. Moreover, Suraj et. al. [14] studied the existence where S denotes the solar energy ux density, A the geo- and locations of libration points along with the Newton- metric cross-section of the test particle, Q the radiation pr Raphson basins of convergence for the same model, but pressure coecient, c the speed of light, and sw the ratio using triaxial rigid bodies as primaries, and later stud- of solar wind to Poynting-Robertson drag. ied the e ect of small perturbations in the inertial forces In Eq. (1), the rst term on the right-hand side rep- on the Newton-Raphson basins of convergence [15]. Fur- resents the in uence of the gravitational forces due to the ther, the linear equilibrium con guration of the restricted three massive bodies, while the second term includes the four-body problem was considered by Zotos in order to e ect of radiation pressure and drag forces. The ratio of determine how the mass parameter and angular velocity force due to radiation pressure compared to gravity, allow in uence the geometry of the Newton-Raphson basins of us to introduce a dimensionless radiation factor (see e.g. convergence [16], while the photo-gravitational restricted [8]) four-body problem with variable mass was studied in [17]. F SAQ R r pr In the current paper, we aim to extend the work of = = ; (2) F c GMm g 1 Baltagiannis [12] and Zotos [13] by performing a full anal- ysis of the location, stability, and basins of convergence For simplicity, in all that follows we shall use canonical of the equilibrium points, associated to the inclusion of a units, such that the sum of the masses, as well as the radiating body in the equilateral triangle con guration of distance between the primaries, the angular velocity, and the four-body problem. The inclusion of the radiation and the gravitational constant, are set to 1. Additionally, as drag forces in the restricted four-body problem, allow us we consider the non-relativistic limit of the model, the to model in a more realistic way the dynamics of a test speed of light will be chosen to the value c = 1 10 [19, particle in presence of an astrophysical system with, e.g., 20], unless otherwise is speci ed. Taking into account the an active star. Unlike the gravitational force, radiation previous de nitions, the equations of motion in a synodic and drag forces are generally non-conservative, causing a frame of reference r = (x; y) read as loss of orbital energy such that the particles will spiral to- m (x x ) m (x x ) 1 1 2 2 ward the source. This new e ect can signi cantly modify x  2 y _ = x (1 ) 3 3 r r the dynamics of the model and deserves a complete study 1 2 in the context of the restricted four-body problem. m (x x ) 3 3 (1 + sw) F ; (3) The present paper has the following structure: the equations of motion for a test particle are derived in sec- m (y y ) m (y y ) 1 1 2 2 tion 2. In section 3, we analyze the position, linear stabil- y  + 2 x _ = y (1 ) 3 3 r r 1 2 ity, zero velocity surfaces and basins of convergence of the m (y y ) 3 3 equilibrium points, as a function of the radiation param- (1 + sw) F ; (4) eter. Here, we study three combinations of mass for the primary bodies: equal masses, two equal masses, di erent where masses. In Section 4 the complexity (unpredictability) of m (x x ) 1 1 the basins is analyzed through the basin entropy, showing F = N + x _ (y y ) ; x 1 2 2 c r r its dependence with the radiation parameter. Finally, the 1 1 main conclusions of this work are drawn in section 5. m (y y ) 1 1 F = N + y _ + (x x ) ; y 1 2 2 c r r 1 1 2. Equations of motion with N = (x x ) x _ + (y y ) y _ ; Consider the equilateral restricted four-body problem 1 1 (henceforth ERFBP). Let m ; m , and m be the masses 1 2 3 and of the primaries and let m be the mass of the test particle, 1=2 2 2 which satis es m  m with i = 1; 2; 3. The primaries i r = (x x ) + (y y ) ; i = 1; 2; 3: i i i revolve in the same plane with uniform angular velocity, 2 The coordinates of the primaries can be fully deter- Due to the existence of dissipative terms, the Jacobi mined by placing the center of mass of the ERFBP at the constant is no longer conserved and varies with time ac- origin of the synodic frame of reference, with m lying on cording to the following relation the x-axis, and taking each side of the equilateral triangle C = 2(1 + sw) (F x _ + F y _ ) : (9) x y equal to unity (see Eq. (13) in Ref. [21]), i.e., In absence of dissipative forces ( = 0), Eqs. (7) and y = 0; (8) reduce to the classical ERFBP (see e.g. [12, 13, 21]), m x + m x + m x = 0; 1 1 2 2 3 3 and hence the Jacobi constant (9) is conserved m y + m y + m y = 0; 1 1 2 2 3 3 2 2 2 2 (x x ) + (y y ) = 1; C = 2 U x _ + y _ : (10) 2 1 2 1 2 2 (x x ) + (y y ) = 1; 3 2 3 2 2 2 (x x ) + (y y ) = 1: 3. Libration points and zero velocity surfaces 1 3 1 3 This set of equations lead to the following solutions for the In what follows, we will determine how the radiation coordinates of the primaries factor a ects the position, stability, and basins of conver- gence of the libration points, when using one of the three x = K =K ; 1 1 2 possible combinations of mass for the primaries, m = m (m m ) + m (2 m + m ) 3 2 3 1 2 3 m = m ; m 6= m = m ; and m 6= m 6= m . To do 2 3 1 2 3 1 2 3 x = ; 2 K K 1 2 so, let us derive some general expressions in terms of the m (m m ) + m (m + 2 m ) 2 3 2 1 2 3 masses of the primary bodies. x = ; 2 K K First, the location of the libration points can be deter- 1 2 y = 0 ; mined by solving the system of equations x _ = y _ = x  = y  = 0, which leads to the following algebraic system of 3 m y = ; equations 2 K m (x x ) m (y y ) 3 m 1 1 1 1 x (1 ) + (1 + sw) y = ; (5) 3 2 r cr 2 K 1 1 1 m (x x ) with i i = 0 ; (11) i=2 2 2 K =  m + m m + m ; K = m + m + m : 1 2 3 2 1 2 3 2 3 m (y y ) m (x x ) 1 1 1 1 y (1 ) (1 + sw) 3 2 r cr 1 1 Therefore, there are four possible cases for the location of the three massive bodies. Here, we will consider the fourth X m (y y ) i i = 0 ; (12) case (see Table 1). i=2 Case x x x y y y 1 2 3 1 2 3 whose solution shall depend on the parameters and sw, 1 + + 0 + as well as the values of mass, where the last ones will 2 + + 0 + modify also the position of the primaries (x ; y ) according i i 3 + 0 + to (5). In spite of the fact that the Jacobi constant is not a 4 + 0 + conserved quantity when radiation terms are included ( 6= Table 1: Location of the primary bodies according to the four possi- 0), an analytic expression for the zero velocity surfaces ble cases. (ZVS) can be derived as follows. From Eq. (9), we get 2 2 It can be easily noted that by de ning the e ective C (t) = 2U (x _ + y _ ) potential 2(1 + sw) [a + a + a ] ; (13) 1 2 3 1 m m m c 1 2 3 2 2 U = x + y + (1 ) + + ; (6) 2 r r r 1 2 3 with the equations of motion (3) and (4) can be written in the [(x x ) x _ + (y y ) y _ ] 1 1 a = dt; (14) compact form 2 2 x _ + y _ @U a = dt (15) x  2 y _ = (1 + sw) F ; (7) 2 x 2 @x @U y y y  + 2 x _ = (1 + sw) F : (8) 1 a = arctan ; (16) @y x x 3 and setting x _ = y _ = 0, time dependent terms vanish and consequently Eq. (13) reduces to m y y 1 1 C = 2U 2(1 + sw) arctan : (17) c x x Therefore, Eq. (17) de nes the zero velocity surfaces of the problem, or in other words, it determines the forbidden regions of motion for a test particle. Note that for = 0, the expression for ZVS coincides with the usual expression for the classical ERFBP. Finally, concerning the stability of the xed points, it is a well-known fact that detailed information about the motion of a system can be obtained by linearizing the equa- tions of motion about a xed point, (x ; y ). For this, we rst introduce the following changes of variable: x _ ! , and y _ ! , such that the equations of motion (7-8) can be written as the rst-order system x _ =  (18) y _ =  (19) @U (x; y) = + 2 (1 + sw)F (x; y; ; ) (20) @x Figure 1: (Color online). Parametric evolution of the libration points @U (x; y) for 2 [0; 1]. Blue dots indicate the location of the libration points _ = 2 (1 + sw)F (x; y; ; ) (21) for = 0, while red dots represent the coordinates of the primaries. @y Then, the system (18-21) can be linearized by means of the coecient matrix The equilibrium points are stable if all the roots of the 0 1 0 0 1 0 characteristic polynomial evaluated at (x ; y ; 0; 0) are pure B C 0 0 0 1 imaginary roots or complex roots with negative real parts; B C A = (22) @ A A A A A otherwise, they are unstable. 11 12 13 14 A A A A 21 22 23 24 3.1. Case 1: m = m = m 1 2 3 with Let us start considering the case in which the three @ U (x; y) @F (x; y; ; ) A = (1 + sw) ; primary bodies have the same value of mass, i.e, m = 11 1 @x @x m = m = 1=3. According to Eqs. (5), the coordinates 2 3 @ U (x; y) @F (x; y; ; ) of the primaries (x ; y ); (x ; y ); and (x ; y ), are given A = (1 + sw) ; 1 1 2 2 3 3 @x@y @y respectively by @F (x; y; ; ) A = (1 + sw) ; 1 1 1 1 1 p ; 0 ; p ; ; and p ; : 2 2 3 2 3 2 3 @F (x; y; ; ) A = 2 (1 + sw) ; In Fig. 1, we have plotted the location and evolution of the equilibrium points for increasing from 0 to 1. Blue @ U (x; y) @F (x; y; ; ) A = (1 + sw) ; dots are the solutions for = 0, while red dots denote @x@y @x the coordinates of the three massive bodies . It can be @ U (x; y) @F (x; y; ; ) A = (1 + sw) ; seen that as increases, L and L reach both the same 1 10 @y @y point along the x-axis and completely disappear for @F (x; y; ; ) 0:687. Also, it is observed that the libration points L , A = 2 (1 + sw) ; 2 L , L , and L , move gradually toward the position of 5 6 9 @F (x; y; ; ) y the radiating body until they disappear for  0:999. A = (1 + sw) ; @ On the other hand, L , L , L , and L , exhibit a small 3 4 7 8 displacement from their initial positions (see Table 2 for a and therefore, the characteristic polynomial will be given detailed description). by the quartic equation On the subject of the stability of the xed points, it is (A + A ) 13 24 found that in accordance with Ref. [12], for = 0, all the +  (A A A A A A ) 13 24 14 23 22 11 + (A A + A A A A A A ) 11 24 13 22 12 23 14 21 Along the paper, we shall use the customary value for the ratio + A A A A = 0: (23) of solar wind to Poynting-Robertson drag, sw = 0:35. 11 22 12 21 4 Figure 2: (Color online). Zero velocity surfaces for increasing values of the radiation factor , using m = m = m = 1=3. Blue dots indicate 1 2 3 the location of the libration points, while red dots denote the coordinates of the primaries. The color code is indicated in the lower-right panel. equilibrium points are unstable. In the interval 2 (0; 1], change with the radiation factor . the stability of the xed points remains unaltered, since Moreover, in Fig. 2, we show the parametric evolu- the form of the roots for all the equilibria does not change, tion of the ZVS with , for di erent values of the Jacobi i.e., for L , L , L and L , the characteristic equation (23) constant. Here, it can be noted that the regions of al- 1 3 5 6 gives place to complex eigenvalues of the form  = lowed motion are substantially modi ed for larger values 1;2;3;4 a ib, while for the libration points L , L , L , L , L of . For example, when C = 2:92 (blue contour) and for 2 4 7 8 9 and L , all roots takes the form  =  ib and  = = 0:125, the forbidden region is made up of three small 10 1;2 3;4 a. So, we may conclude that if the primary bodies are islands located just around the libration points L , L , 3 5 equal mass, the stability of the libration points does not and L . Then, the test particle will be free to move almost 5 Figure 3: (Color online). Basins of convergence using m = m = m = 1=3, for increasing values of the radiation factor . Cyan dots 1 2 3 indicate the location of the libration points, while red dots denote the coordinates of the primaries. The color code is speci ed in the text. Interval N. Equilibria Equilibria ever, as increases, these small islands get bigger, rstly, forming a small connection near m until completely sur- 2 [0:000; 0:687] 10 L 1 1;2;3;4;5;6;7;8;9;10 round it. For ! 1, the forbidden region in left-hand-side 2 [0:688; 0:999] 8 L 2;3;4;5;6;7;8;9 joins the one surrounding m , until the allowed regions of = 1:000 4 L 3;4;7;8 motion around m and m , become almost isolated. This 2 3 Table 2: Existence of equilibrium points with the variation of the e ect can be explained if we consider that,  1, implies radiation factor , for m = m = m . 1 2 3 that the force due to radiation pressure is comparable to the force of gravity, being able to push the test particle away from m . without any restriction around the primary bodies. How- 6 m Interval Equilibria We nish this subsection by discussing the so-called basins of convergence and their evolution with the radi- 2 [0:000; 0:928] L 1;2;5;6;7;8;9;10 ation factor . As pointed out in section 1, by basin of 0:05 2 [0:929; 0:999] L 2;5;6;7;8;9 convergence, we refer to the set of points that after suc- = 1:000 L 7;8 cessive iterations converge to a speci c xed point. The 2 [0:000; 0:912] L 1;2;5;6;7;8;9;10 numerical procedure for obtaining such basins is the mul- 0:10 2 [0:913; 0:999] L 2;5;6;7;8;9 tivariate Newton-Raphson method, which can be de ned = 1:000 L 7;8 by the map 2 [0:000; 0:350] L 2;3;5;6;7;8;9;10 x = x J f (x ); (24) n+1 n n 2 [0:351; 0:360] L 1;2;3;4;5;6;7;8;9;10 0:15 2 [0:361; 0:889] L 1;2;5;6;7;8;9;10 where x = (x; y), f (x ) represents the system of equa- 2 [0:890; 0:999] L 2;5;6;7;8;9 tions (11-12), and J is the inverse Jacobian matrix. The = 1:000 L 7;8 initial guesses are de ned within the region enclosed by 2 [0:000; 0:293] L 2;3;5;6;7;8;9;10 x 2 [8; 5; 8; 5] and y 2 [8; 5; 8; 5], the step size is equal 2 12 2 [0:294; 0:608] L 1;2;3;4;5;6;7;8;9;10 to 10 , and tolerance of the order 10 . Each initial 0:20 2 [0:609; 0:859] L 1;2;5;6;7;8;9;10 condition leading to a given xed point is plotted using 2 [0:860; 0:999] L 2;5;6;7;8;9 the following color code: L ! dark green, L ! dark 1 2 = 1:000 L 7;8 grey, L ! black, L ! orange, L ! purple, L ! red 3 4 5 6 2 [0:000; 0:160] L 2;3;5;6;7;8;9;10 wine, L ! light blue, L ! blue, L ! green and L ! 7 8 9 10 2 [0:161; 0:816] L 1;2;3;4;5;6;7;8;9;10 yellow; while the libration points are denoted by cyan dots. 0:25 2 [0:817; 0:999] L 2;3;4;5;6;7;8;9 In Fig. 3, we plot the basins of convergence of the = 1:000 L 3;4;7;8 equilibrium points, for nine di erent values of the radiation 2 [0:000; 0:751] L 1;2;3;4;5;6;7;8;9;10 factor . Here, it can be easily observed that some of the 0:30 2 [0:752; 0:999] L 2;3;4;5;6;7;8;9 equilibrium points disappear as increases, or in other = 1:000 L 3;4;7;8 words, the number of colors for = 1 is reduced compared 2 [0:000; 0:644] L 1;2;3;4;5;6;7;8;9;10 to the case = 0. It should be noted that as soon as > 0 0:35 2 [0:645; 0:999] L 2;3;4;5;6;7;8;9 the 2=3 symmetry is broken and replaced by a re ection = 1:000 L 3;4;7;8 symmetry with respect to the x-axis. Additionally, the 2 [0:000; 0:430] L 1;2;3;4;5;6;7;8;9;10 complexity of the basins increases for higher values of the 0:40 2 [0:431; 0:999] L 2;3;4;5;6;7;8;9 radiation parameter, despite the fact that the number of = 1:000 L libration points is much smaller than in the case = 0. 3;4;7;8 2 [0:000; 0:999] L The last statement can be clearly envisioned in the last 1;2;3;4;5;6;7;8 0:45 = 1:000 L panel of Fig. 3, where the right-hand side region becomes 3;4;7;8 very noisy, suggesting an increasing unpredictability of the Table 3: Existence of equilibrium points with the variation of the basins. radiation factor , for di erent values of m = m . 2 3 3.2. Case 2: m 6= m = m 1 2 3 radiation factor , for di erent values of m = m = m. 2 3 As a second case, we have assumed that m = m = m. 2 3 This gure can be analyzed as follows: (i) in the case Accordingly, the mass parameter of the radiating body m  m, it can be noted that the collinear points L and 1 3 will be given by m = 1 2m, and the coordinates of the L do not exist. For larger values of , the equilibria L 4 1 primaries (x ; y ); (x ; y ); and (x ; y ), read as 1 1 2 2 3 3 and L approximate each other until they join near the ! ! p p x-axis, while the points L , L , L , and L move toward p 2 5 6 9 3 1 3 1 3m; 0 ; (2m 1); ; and (2m 1); : the radiating body until they disappear for = 1. (ii) 2 2 2 2 As expected, when m  m the results are exactly like the ones described in the previous subsection. (iii) For The last result implies that not only the position of the m  m  0:5, the non-collinear points L and L do not 1 9 10 primaries depends on the parameter m, but the existence exist. As increases, L , L , L , and L exhibit very small 3 4 7 8 and location of libration points will also depend on this displacements with respect to their initial positions, while parameter and on , according to Eqs. (11, 12). In Table the libration points L , L , L , and L move abruptly 1 2 5 6 3, we present how the total number of equilibrium points toward the radiating body, until they disappear for = 1. varies on di erent intervals of the radiation factor and for Concerning the stability of the xed points, we start di erent values of m. It can be observed that for larger considering the case = 0. Here, we found that if m 2 values of the total number of xed points is reduced, (0; 0:0027] the libration points L , L , and L are stable, 3 5 6 where the nal number of surviving points increases for for m 2 [0:0027; 0:0188], only L , and L remain stable, 5 6 large values of m. but for m > 0:0188 all the equilibria are unstable. All In Figure 4, we present a graphic representation of the those results agree with the ones given in Ref. [12]. Once evolution of equilibrium points with the variation of the 7 Figure 4: (Color online). Existence and evolution of the equilibrium points with the variation of the radiation factor , for di erent cases of m = m . Cyan dots denote the initial position of the equilibria, while purple dots show their nal position. The location of the primaries is 2 3 indicated in red color. we start varying in steps of  = 1 10 , we get: (i) all the equilibria are unstable. (iv) For = 0:004 and for = 0:001 and m 2 (0; 0:0024] the libration points L , m 2 (0; 0:0093] L and L are stable, but for m > 0:0093 3 5 6 L and L are stable; for m 2 [0:0025; 0:0185] only L and all the xed points are unstable. (v) Finally, for > 0:004, 5 6 5 L are stable, while for m > 0:0185 all the equilibria are all xed points are unstable regardless the value of m. unstable. (ii) For = 0:002 and m 2 (0; 0:0011] the xed From the previous results, we can infer that the sta- points L , L and L are stable; for m 2 [0:0012; 0:0174] bility of the libration points remains unaltered, only for 3 5 6 only L and L are stable, but for m > 0:0174 all the values of radiation factor of the order 10 , however, for 5 6 xed points are unstable. (iii) For = 0:003 and m 2 larger values of , all the equilibria become unstable. At (0; 0:0147] only L and L are stable, while for m > 0:0147 this point, it should be noted that the radiation factor of 5 6 8 Figure 5: (Color online). Zero velocity surfaces for di erent values of the radiation factor , when m = 0:5 and m = m = 0:25. Blue dots 1 2 3 indicate the location of the libration points, while red dots denote the position of the primaries. The color code is indicated in the lower-right panel. the solar system is of the order 10 , which implies that, points L and L become isolated points. Such islands 5 6 in a realistic system, such factor should be able to destroy start growing in size until the ZVS surrounds completely the stability of the xed points. m , in particular, for = 0:875 the motion of the test On the other hand, in Figure 5, we present the ZVS by particle is limited to a small region around m , or to a using di erent values of the Jacobi constant. The tendency larger zone that allows collisions with m and m , but 2 3 in this gure is very similar to the one observed in Fig. 2. imposes a barrier in the vicinity of m . This behavior is For example, in the case C = 2:64 and for small values of , consistent with the idea that, for ! 1, the drag forces say < 0:25, the test particle is free to move in the whole are strong enough to push away the test particle from m . con guration space, however, as increases the libration In Figure 6 we use the same color code of Fig. 3. Here, 9 Figure 6: (Color online). Basins of attraction for m = 0:5, m = m = 0:25, for increasing values of the radiation factor . Cyan dots 1 2 3 indicate the location of the libration points, while red dots denote the coordinates of the primaries. The color code is the same used gure 3. it can be noted that in the case m = 0:5, m = m = 0:25, dominates, while for 2 [0:5; 0:75] the area of the set of 1 2 3 the basins of attraction exhibit a very complex pattern points converging to the xed point L is bigger than the symmetric in shape, but asymmetric in color. Due to the one for L and L . Special attention deserves the case 9 10 fact that the number of xed points grows for intermedi- = 0:625, where the basins seem stretched, here there are ate values of ( 2 [0:25; 0:75]) and decreases for larger three prevailing colors, the ones corresponding to L ; L 1 9 values of the radiation factor ( > 0:875), the highly frac- and L , i.e., the xed points that are closer to the origin tal structures are always present. Related to the extent of of coordinates. Such a structure allows us to prognosticate the basins of convergence, it is seen that for 2 [0; 0:375] a reduction of the fractality of the basin. the area corresponding to libration point L and L pre- Finally, for > 0:875, the area corresponding to the 9 10 10 Interval N. Equilibria Equilibria 2 [0:0000; 0:0029] 8 L 1;2;3;4;5;6;7;8 2 [0:0030; 0:9887] 6 L 1;2;3;5;7;8 2 [0:9888; 0:9940] 4 L 1;2;5;8; 2 [0:9941; 1:0000] 2 L 2;5 Table 4: Existence of equilibrium points with the variation of the radiation factor , for the Sun-Jupiter-Trojan Asteroid system. basin for L increases, while for = 1 it seems to be domi- nated by L , however, in the inset of the lower right panel, it is observed that the black region is, in fact, a very noisy region composed of initial conditions tending to all the libration points. From the previous description, we may infer that in the case of two equal masses, the determina- tions of the nal state via the root nding algorithm of Newton-Raphson is highly sensitive, mainly, for lower and higher values of . 3.3. Case 3: m 6= m 6= m 1 2 3 As a last scenario, we consider the equilateral trian- Figure 7: (Color online). Parametric evolution of the libration points gle con guration Sun-Jupiter-Trojan Asteroid, in addition for 2 [0; 1]. Cyan dots indicate the location of the libration points with the P-R and solar wind drag forces. In the nor- for = 0, while red dots represent the coordinates of the primaries. In the upper right corner, we show a zoom of the parametric evolution malized units, the masses of the primaries are given by around m . m = m = 0:999046321943, m = m = 0:000953678050 1 S 2 J and m = m = 6:99996 10 , where m corresponds 3 A 3 to the mass of 624 Hektor, an actual asteroid of the Trojan while for > 0:0104, all the xed points become unsta- group . ble. Here, it can be noted that  10 corresponds to According with Eqs. (5), the coordinates of the pri- the largest value of the radiation factor (of the three con- mary bodies are now sidered cases) in which we still having stable xed points. So, taking into account that  10 in the Solar system, (x ; y )  (0:000953678; 0:000000); 1 1 we may conclude that in the restricted four-body problem, (x ; y )  (0:999046; 6:35659 10 ); 2 2 Sun-Jupiter-Trojan Asteroid-Spacecraft (test particle), all (x ; y )  (0:499046;0:866025): 3 3 the libration points must be unstable. In Fig. 8 we present the parametric evolution of the In agreement with the seminal paper by Baltagiannis ZVS with , for di erent values of the Jacobi constant. [22], in absence of radiation pressure and drag forces ( = In absence of the P-R and drag forces, the forbidden re- 0), the Sun-Jupiter-Trojan Asteroid system admits eight gions of the Sun-Jupiter-Trojan Asteroid system are made non-collinear equilibrium points, three of them (L , L , 6 7 of horseshoe-shaped contours, very similar to the ones ob- and L ) linearly stable. The adjective non-collinear is due served in the Sun-Jupiter system in the circular restricted to the fact that L , L , and L , do not lie exactly on 1 2 3 three-body problem (see e.g. [23]). The circular horseshoe the x-axis. As increases, the equilibria L and L , reach 4 6 is open on m , such that this opening will be greater at both the same point and completely disappear for 0:0029 < lower values of C . Keeping a xed value of C , as in- < 0:0030. The same applies for L and L for 0:9887 < 3 7 creases, the mentioned horseshoe closes on it selves form- < 0:9888, and for L and L for 0:9940 < < 0:9941 1 8 ing a donut-shaped contour in which the allowed motion (we refer the reader to Table 4 for details). On the other region becomes smaller and smaller around the radiating hand, L and L hardly move, approaching each one to its 2 5 body. For larger values of ( ! 1), the circular region nearest primary (See Fig. 7). around m disappears, and the forbidden region of motion On the stability subject, for 2 (0; 0:0029] the equi- becomes a circle containing the Lagrangian points L and 2;5 libria L , L , and L are linearly stable, however, as 6 7 8 the three masses. Here, we would like to highlight that the grows the stability of the xed points also changes, i.e., location of m almost coincides with the position of L , for 3 5 for 2 [0:0030; 0:0104], only L and L remain stable, 7 8 this reason, the red dot of m is not seen in Fig. 8. On the other hand, in Fig. 9, we plot the basins of convergence of the equilibrium points for the Sun-Jupiter- Unlike the previous cases, all calculations of this subsection were Trojan Asteroid system. The color code used in this case performed in quadruple precision and the speed of light was set as in Baltagiannis [22] is the same as in gure 3. For = 0, the frame exhibits 11 Figure 8: (Color online). Zero velocity surfaces for increasing values of the radiation factor , in the Sun-Jupiter-Trojan Asteroid-Spacecraft system. Blue dots indicate the location of the libration points, while red dots denote the position of the primaries. The color code is indicated in the lower-right panel. the eight colors of the corresponding libration points, al- imposed with m ), no initial condition of our mesh con- beit the most noticeable basins are the ones correspond- verges to this point and therefore, the purple basin neither ing to L ; L ; L ; L ; L , and L . In general, it is observed appears. 1 3 5 6 7 8 that along the negative xaxis the basin associated to L In accordance with cases 3.1 and 3.2, the complexity predominates, while along the positive xaxis the one as- of the basins increases for larger values of , this is so be- sociated to L does. In the remaining frames, the number cause, for ! 1, L (whose initial position starts along- 3 3 of equilibria decreases to 6 (L , L , L , L , L , and L ), side the x-axis) moves downward, while L moves upward, 1 2 3 5 7 8 1 then 4 (L , L , L , and L ) and nally 2 (L and L ). L moves in counterclockwise and L moves toward the ra- 1 2 5 8 2 5 7 8 However, due to the location of the equilibria L (super- diating body m . Such displacements shall break the sym- 5 1 12 Figure 9: (Color online). Basins of attraction in the Sun-Jupiter-Trojan Asteroid-Spacecraft system, for increasing values of the radiation factor . Cyan dots indicate the location of the libration points, while red dots denote the coordinates of the primaries. The color code is the same used in gure 3. metry of the basins of convergence and hence increasing not allow for convergence of any initial condition of our the intricacy of them (see e.g. the lower-mid panel in Fig. mesh after 10 iterations. 9). Lastly, when ! 1 we observe a practically white con- guration space, this color is assigned to non-converging 4. Basin entropy initial conditions, however, the inset of this panel shows a region composed by scattered dark gray dots. This results So far, the analysis of the basins of convergence has can be understood by considering that for = 1 there been purely qualitative, in order to make quantitative our exist only 2 xed points, one of them corresponds to L 5 study, in this section, we shall use a quantity recently in- which, due to its superposition with the primary m , do 3 troduced in [24] which allow us to measure the uncertainty 13 (complexity) of a given basin. The new dynamical quan- tity is termed basin entropy and provides a useful method to explore the di erences observed in our system when the radiation and mass parameters are varied. For the sake of completeness, we will brie y describe the idea behind the calculation of the basins' entropy. As- suming that the phase space contains N di erent nal states (or colors in our case), we divide the space of states into a grid of N square cells, such that each one of these cells contains at least one of the N states. De ning p A i;j as the probability to detect a state j in the ith cell and by applying the Gibbs entropy de nition to that set, the entropy for the ith cell can be expressed as S = p log : (25) i i;j i;j j=1 Therefore, the basin entropy for the total number of cells N in the basin is calculated as an average, i.e., N N N X XX 1 1 1 S = S = p log : (26) b i i;j N N p i;j Figure 10: (Color online). Basin entropy S as a function of the i=1 i=1 j=1 radiation parameter in the three considered cases: (Case 1) m = m = m , (Case 2) m 6= m = m , and (Case 3) m 6= m 6= m . 2 3 1 2 3 1 2 3 Strictly speaking, the average of this quantity must depend on the number of considered cells, such that for a larger value of N the result for the basin entropy S should points is one-fourth of the initial points, i.e., the number be more precise. However, a bigger N can be reached only of nal states N is considerably diminished, and hence, with a smaller size of the square cells, which also have a the value of Eq. (26) is also signi cantly modi ed. minimum size to contain at least one of the N states. To solve this issue, we follow the procedure outlined in [25], in which the square cells are randomly picked in the space 5. Discussion and conclusions of states through a Monte Carlo procedure, allowing us In the present paper, we numerically investigated the to increase the number of cells N as necessary. In our location, stability, and basins of convergence of the equi- particular problem, we nd that the nal value for the librium points, in the equilateral triangle con guration of basin entropy keeps constant for a number of cells larger 5 the four-body problem with a radiating body. Speci cally, than 3  10 , hence, in the three cases, we used N = 5 we showed how the radiation parameter in uences the dy- 3:5 10 cells. namics of the system, in three di erent combinations of In Fig. 10, we present the parametric evolution of the mass for the primaries: equal masses, two equal masses, basin entropy as a function of the radiation parameter , and three di erent masses. for the considered cases. Our results indicate that, in case Following the tendency in this eld, we used a multi- 1, the basin entropy increases almost monotonically with variate Newton-Raphson method in order to calculate the the radiation parameter . A very similar behavior is ob- corresponding basins of convergence. Such basins give a served for case 3 in the interval 2 [0:025; 0:975], yet global view of the set of initial conditions that, after an for 2 [0; 0:025] and 2 [0:975; 1], the basin entropy iterative process, show a tendency to a certain xed point. decreases abruptly. Interestingly, the opposite tendency is In each of the considered cases, we examine the in uence observed for case 2, where the basin entropy decreases with of the radiation parameter on the Newton-Raphson basins the radiation parameter in the interval 2 [0; 0:825], of convergence. Aiming to quantify the uncertainty (com- but increases in the interval 2 [0:825; 1] from S  0:1 plexity) of the basins, we calculated the basin entropy, up to a value of S  1:14. In general, our ndings monitoring its variation with the radiation parameter. suggest that in cases 1 and 2, the unpredictability asso- The main conclusions of this work can be summarized ciated to the NR basins of convergence for the triangu- as follows: lar restricted four-body problem with an extreme radiat- ing body ( = 1) is larger in comparison with the non- 1. In the three considered cases, the total number of radiating case. Nevertheless, in the case of Sun-Jupiter- libration points decreases as ! 1. Trojan Asteroid-Spacecraft system (case 3), the exact op- 2. The stability analysis suggests that, in the case of posite situation occurs. These results can be explained if equal masses and for 2 [0; 1], the equilibrium points we consider that in case 3, the nal number of libration 14 of the system are always linearly unstable. In the [9] M. C. Asique, U. Prasad, M.R. Hassan, et al., On the R4BP when third primary is an oblate spheroid. Astrophys. Space Sci., rest of the cases, the libration points are unstable if 357(1) (2015) 82. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10509-015-2235-5. > 0:01. [10] E. E. Zotos, Basins of convergence of equilibrium 3. Taking into account the radiation factor for the solar points in the generalized Hill problem. International Jour- nal of Bifurcation and Chaos, 27(12) (2017) 1730043. system, we conclude that the radiation pressure and https://doi.org/10.1142/S0218127417300439. drag forces should be able to destroy the stability of [11] E. E. Zotos, A. Riano-Doncel, ~ F. L. Dubeibe, Basins of conver- the xed points in the restricted four-body problem gence of equilibrium points in the generalized H enon-Heiles sys- composed by Sun, Jupiter, Trojan asteroid and a test tem. International Journal of Non-Linear Mechanics, 99 (2018) 218-228. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijnonlinmec.2017.12.004. (dust) particle. [12] A. N. Baltagiannis, K. E. Papadakis, Equilibrium points 4. Only in case 3 (Sun-Jupiter-Trojan Asteroid - Space- and their stability in the restricted four-body problem. Interna- craft system), we detected the existence of a consid- tional Journal of Bifurcation and Chaos, 21(8) (2011) 2179-2193. https://doi.org/10.1142/S0218127411029707. erable amount of non-converging initial conditions [13] E. E. Zotos, Revealing the basins of convergence in the planar after 50000 iterations. This is due to the fact that equilateral restricted four-body problem. Astrophys. Space Sci., there exists only one e ective xed point that can be 362 (2017) 2. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10509-016-2973-z. reached after the iterative process. [14] M. S. Suraj, M. C. Asique, U. Prasad, et al., Fractal basins of attraction in the restricted four-body problem when the primaries 5. The lowest value of the basin entropy was found in are triaxial rigid bodies. Astrophys. Space Sci., 362(11) (2017) the case of two equal masses near = 0:825, while on 211. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10509-017-3188-7 the other hand the highest value of S was measured b [15] M. S. Suraj, R. Aggarwal, M. Arora, On the restricted four-body problem with the e ect of small perturbations in the Coriolis and in the same case for = 1. centrifugal forces. Astrophysics and Space Science, 362(9) (2017) 6. It is found that in the cases of two or three equal 159. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10509-017-3123-y. masses, the unpredictability associated with the basin [16] E. E. Zotos, Equilibrium points and basins of conver- gence in the linear restricted four-body problem with an- of convergence is larger for the extreme radiating gular velocity. Chaos, Solitons & Fractals, 101 (2017) 8-19. case in comparison with the non-radiating one. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chaos.2017.05.003. [17] A. Mittal, R. Agarwal, M. S. Suraj, M. Arora, On the photo-gravitational restricted four-body problem with vari- Acknowledgments able mass. Astrophysics and Space Science, 363 (2018) 1-23. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10509-018-3321-2. FLD acknowledge nancial support from Universidad de los Llanos, [18] J. A. Burns, P. L. Lamy, S. Soter, Radiation forces on Grant No. CDP 2478. FLD and GAG gratefully acknowledge the small particles in the solar system. Icarus, 40(1) (1979) 1-48. nancial support provided by COLCIENCIAS (Colombia), Grants https://doi.org/10.1016/0019-1035(79)90050-2. Nos. 8840 and 8863. [19] F. L. Dubeibe, F. D. Lora-Clavijo, G. A. Gonz alez, On the conservation of the Jacobi integral in the post-Newtonian circular restricted three-body problem. Astrophysics and Space Science, References 362(5) (2017) 97. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10509-017-3076-1 [20] E. E. Zotos, F. L. Dubeibe, Orbital dynamics in the post- References Newtonian planar circular restricted Sun-Jupiter system. Inter- national Journal of Modern Physics D, 27(4) (2018) 1850036. [1] B. G. Marchand, K. C. Howell, R. S. Wilson, Improved cor- https://doi.org/10.1142/S0218271818500360. rections process for constrained trajectory design in the n-body [21] F. R. Moulton, On a class of particular solutions of the prob- problem. Journal of Spacecraft and Rockets, 44 (2007) 884-897. lem of four bodies. Trans. Amer. Math. Soc., 1(1) (1900) 17-29. https://doi.org/10.2514/1.27205. https://doi.org/10.1090/S0002-9947-1900-1500520-3. [2] K. Meyer, G. Hall, D. On, Introduction to Hamiltonian dynam- [22] A. N. Baltagiannis, K. E. Papadakis, Periodic solu- ical systems and the N -body problem (Vol. 90). Springer Science tions in the Sun-Jupiter-Trojan Asteroid-Spacecraft sys- & Business Media, 2008. tem. Planetary and Space Science, 75 (2013) 148-157. [3] M. Michalodimitrakis, The circular restricted four-body prob- https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pss.2012.11.006. lem. Astrophysics and Space Science, 75(2) (1981) 289-305. [23] J. C. Liou, H. A. Zook, A. A. Jackson, Radiation pres- https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00648643. sure, Poynting-Robertson drag, and solar wind drag in the [4] M. Alvarez-Ram rez, E. Barrab es, Transport orbits in restricted three-body problem. Icarus, 116(1) (1995) 186-201. an equilateral restricted four-body problem. Celestial Me- https://doi.org/10.1006/icar.1995.1120. chanics and Dynamical Astronomy, 121(2) (2015) 191-210. [24] A. Daza, A. Wagemakers, B. Georgeot, D. Gu ery-Odelin, https://doi.org/10.1007/s10569-014-9594-z. M. A. Sanju an, Basin entropy: a new tool to analyze uncer- [5] A. E. Roy, Orbital motion. CRC Press, 2004. tainty in dynamical systems. Scienti c reports, 6 (2016) 31416. [6] T. J. Kalvouridis, M. Arribas, A. Elipe, Parametric evolution https://doi.org/10.1038/srep31416. of periodic orbits in the restricted four-body problem with radia- [25] A. Daza, B. Georgeot, D. Gu ery-Odelin, A. Wagemakers, M. tion pressure. Planetary and Space Science, 55(4) (2007) 475-493. A. Sanju an, Chaotic dynamics and fractal structures in experi- https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pss.2006.07.005. ments with cold atoms. Physical Review A, 95(1) (2017) 013629. [7] J. P. Papadouris, K. E. Papadakis, Equilibrium points https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevA.95.013629. in the photogravitational restricted four-body problem. Astrophysics and Space Science, 344(1) (2013) 21-38. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10509-012-1319-8. [8] R. Kumari, B. S. Kushvah, Equilibrium points and zero veloc- ity surfaces in the restricted four-body problem with solar wind drag. Astrophysics and Space Science, 344(2) (2013) 347-359. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10509-012-1340-y. http://www.deepdyve.com/assets/images/DeepDyve-Logo-lg.png Nonlinear Sciences arXiv (Cornell University)

Equilibrium points and basins of convergence in the triangular restricted four-body problem with a radiating body

Download PDF
15 pages

Loading next page...
 
/lp/arxiv-cornell-university/equilibrium-points-and-basins-of-convergence-in-the-triangular-GvubH6w7nH
ISSN
0218-1274
eISSN
ARCH-3338
DOI
10.1142/S0218127420300037
Publisher site
See Article on Publisher Site

Abstract

The dynamics of the four-body problem have attracted increasing attention in recent years. In this paper, we extend the basic equilateral four-body problem by introducing the e ect of radiation pressure, Poynting-Robertson drag, and solar wind drag. In our setup, three primaries lay at the vertices of an equilateral triangle and move in circular orbits around their common center of mass. Here, one of the primaries is a radiating body and the fourth body (whose mass is negligible) does not a ect the motion of the primaries. We show that the existence and the number of equilibrium points of the problem depend on the mass parameters and radiation factor. Consequently, the allowed regions of motion, the regions of the basins of convergence for the equilibrium points, and the basin entropy will also depend on these parameters. The present dynamical model is analyzed for three combinations of mass for the primaries: equal masses, two equal masses, di erent masses. As the main results, we nd that in all cases the libration points are unstable if the radiation factor is larger than 0.01 and hence able to destroy the stability of the libration points in the restricted four-body problem composed by Sun, Jupiter, Trojan asteroid and a test (dust) particle. Also, we conclude that the number of xed points decreases with the increase of the radiation factor. Keywords: Four-body problem, Radiation forces, Equilibrium points, Basins of convergence, Basin entropy. 1. Introduction galactic dynamics, mainly motivated by the fact that there are many astrophysical systems that can be roughly ap- The n-body problem is one of the oldest and most re- proximated to that model, for example, the Sun-Jupiter- searched problems in astrophysics, it deals with the motion Saturn-satellite system, the Sun-Jupiter-Trojan-spacecraft of bodies that are subject to their mutual gravitational system, the Sun-Jupiter-Earth-satellite system, the Saturn- attractions (or to other forces as well). The study of the Tethys-Telesto-spacecraft system [4], or even any of the n-body problem is essential to the understanding of the four-star systems of our galaxy [5]. Aiming to get a bet- motions of celestial bodies and is of particular interest in ter understanding of the problem, several modi cations to spacecraft navigation [1]. Since there is no general ana- the e ective potential in the classical restricted four-body lytical solution to the n-body problem for n  3, several problem have been proposed, see e.g. [6{9], where it was simpli cations have been introduced with the most promi- found that the introduction of the additional terms signi - nent being the restricted three and four body problems [2]. cantly modi es the existence, position, and stability of the In both cases, the mass of one of the bodies (test parti- equilibrium points, and therefore the overall dynamics of cle) is negligible in comparison to the others (primaries) the system. such that it does not a ect their motion. In the restricted Since it is a well-known fact that in the n-body with three-body problem the primaries move in a circular or el- n  3 it is not possible to nd explicit formulae for the liptic trajectory (solutions of a two-body problem), while position of the equilibrium points, numerical methods be- in the restricted four-body problem the primaries move come the natural and the most ecient way of nding the in a straight-line equilibrium con guration or in an equi- locations of the xed points in many di erent dynamical lateral triangle con guration (solutions to the three-body systems. One of the most popular methods to nd roots of problem) [3]. multivariate functions is the Newton-Raphson algorithm, The restricted four-body problem has many applica- this method allows us to get a global picture of the set of tions in celestial mechanics, dynamical astronomy, and initial conditions that lead to a particular xed point. The nal picture produced after evolving (via the root- nding algorithm) the whole set of initial conditions in a certain Corresponding author region of the con guration space is called the basin of Email address: fldubeibem@unal.edu.co (F. L. Dubeibe ) Preprint submitted to Elsevier December 21, 2018 arXiv:1812.08641v1 [nlin.CD] 20 Dec 2018 convergence (see e.g. [10, 11]). and regardless of the mass distribution of the primaries, During the past few years, the Newton-Raphson basins they always will lie at the vertices of an equilateral trian- of convergence have been extensively investigated in many gle. If the primary m is a radiating body, the equations di erent versions of the restricted four-body problem. As of motion for the test particle m in an inertial frame of characteristic examples of these works, may be mentioned reference R = (X; Y ), can be written as [18]: the one by Baltagiannis & Papadakis [12], who determined " Gmm SAQ R the position and stability of the equilibrium points in the i pr 1 m R = R + equilateral triangle con guration of the four-body problem R c R i=1 !# using di erent combinations of primaries, and the study _ _ R  R R R 1 1 1 1 carried out by Zotos [13], who extended the study of the (1 + sw) ; (1) c R R c basins of convergence for cases not considered by Bataglia- 1 1 nis. Moreover, Suraj et. al. [14] studied the existence where S denotes the solar energy ux density, A the geo- and locations of libration points along with the Newton- metric cross-section of the test particle, Q the radiation pr Raphson basins of convergence for the same model, but pressure coecient, c the speed of light, and sw the ratio using triaxial rigid bodies as primaries, and later stud- of solar wind to Poynting-Robertson drag. ied the e ect of small perturbations in the inertial forces In Eq. (1), the rst term on the right-hand side rep- on the Newton-Raphson basins of convergence [15]. Fur- resents the in uence of the gravitational forces due to the ther, the linear equilibrium con guration of the restricted three massive bodies, while the second term includes the four-body problem was considered by Zotos in order to e ect of radiation pressure and drag forces. The ratio of determine how the mass parameter and angular velocity force due to radiation pressure compared to gravity, allow in uence the geometry of the Newton-Raphson basins of us to introduce a dimensionless radiation factor (see e.g. convergence [16], while the photo-gravitational restricted [8]) four-body problem with variable mass was studied in [17]. F SAQ R r pr In the current paper, we aim to extend the work of = = ; (2) F c GMm g 1 Baltagiannis [12] and Zotos [13] by performing a full anal- ysis of the location, stability, and basins of convergence For simplicity, in all that follows we shall use canonical of the equilibrium points, associated to the inclusion of a units, such that the sum of the masses, as well as the radiating body in the equilateral triangle con guration of distance between the primaries, the angular velocity, and the four-body problem. The inclusion of the radiation and the gravitational constant, are set to 1. Additionally, as drag forces in the restricted four-body problem, allow us we consider the non-relativistic limit of the model, the to model in a more realistic way the dynamics of a test speed of light will be chosen to the value c = 1 10 [19, particle in presence of an astrophysical system with, e.g., 20], unless otherwise is speci ed. Taking into account the an active star. Unlike the gravitational force, radiation previous de nitions, the equations of motion in a synodic and drag forces are generally non-conservative, causing a frame of reference r = (x; y) read as loss of orbital energy such that the particles will spiral to- m (x x ) m (x x ) 1 1 2 2 ward the source. This new e ect can signi cantly modify x  2 y _ = x (1 ) 3 3 r r the dynamics of the model and deserves a complete study 1 2 in the context of the restricted four-body problem. m (x x ) 3 3 (1 + sw) F ; (3) The present paper has the following structure: the equations of motion for a test particle are derived in sec- m (y y ) m (y y ) 1 1 2 2 tion 2. In section 3, we analyze the position, linear stabil- y  + 2 x _ = y (1 ) 3 3 r r 1 2 ity, zero velocity surfaces and basins of convergence of the m (y y ) 3 3 equilibrium points, as a function of the radiation param- (1 + sw) F ; (4) eter. Here, we study three combinations of mass for the primary bodies: equal masses, two equal masses, di erent where masses. In Section 4 the complexity (unpredictability) of m (x x ) 1 1 the basins is analyzed through the basin entropy, showing F = N + x _ (y y ) ; x 1 2 2 c r r its dependence with the radiation parameter. Finally, the 1 1 main conclusions of this work are drawn in section 5. m (y y ) 1 1 F = N + y _ + (x x ) ; y 1 2 2 c r r 1 1 2. Equations of motion with N = (x x ) x _ + (y y ) y _ ; Consider the equilateral restricted four-body problem 1 1 (henceforth ERFBP). Let m ; m , and m be the masses 1 2 3 and of the primaries and let m be the mass of the test particle, 1=2 2 2 which satis es m  m with i = 1; 2; 3. The primaries i r = (x x ) + (y y ) ; i = 1; 2; 3: i i i revolve in the same plane with uniform angular velocity, 2 The coordinates of the primaries can be fully deter- Due to the existence of dissipative terms, the Jacobi mined by placing the center of mass of the ERFBP at the constant is no longer conserved and varies with time ac- origin of the synodic frame of reference, with m lying on cording to the following relation the x-axis, and taking each side of the equilateral triangle C = 2(1 + sw) (F x _ + F y _ ) : (9) x y equal to unity (see Eq. (13) in Ref. [21]), i.e., In absence of dissipative forces ( = 0), Eqs. (7) and y = 0; (8) reduce to the classical ERFBP (see e.g. [12, 13, 21]), m x + m x + m x = 0; 1 1 2 2 3 3 and hence the Jacobi constant (9) is conserved m y + m y + m y = 0; 1 1 2 2 3 3 2 2 2 2 (x x ) + (y y ) = 1; C = 2 U x _ + y _ : (10) 2 1 2 1 2 2 (x x ) + (y y ) = 1; 3 2 3 2 2 2 (x x ) + (y y ) = 1: 3. Libration points and zero velocity surfaces 1 3 1 3 This set of equations lead to the following solutions for the In what follows, we will determine how the radiation coordinates of the primaries factor a ects the position, stability, and basins of conver- gence of the libration points, when using one of the three x = K =K ; 1 1 2 possible combinations of mass for the primaries, m = m (m m ) + m (2 m + m ) 3 2 3 1 2 3 m = m ; m 6= m = m ; and m 6= m 6= m . To do 2 3 1 2 3 1 2 3 x = ; 2 K K 1 2 so, let us derive some general expressions in terms of the m (m m ) + m (m + 2 m ) 2 3 2 1 2 3 masses of the primary bodies. x = ; 2 K K First, the location of the libration points can be deter- 1 2 y = 0 ; mined by solving the system of equations x _ = y _ = x  = y  = 0, which leads to the following algebraic system of 3 m y = ; equations 2 K m (x x ) m (y y ) 3 m 1 1 1 1 x (1 ) + (1 + sw) y = ; (5) 3 2 r cr 2 K 1 1 1 m (x x ) with i i = 0 ; (11) i=2 2 2 K =  m + m m + m ; K = m + m + m : 1 2 3 2 1 2 3 2 3 m (y y ) m (x x ) 1 1 1 1 y (1 ) (1 + sw) 3 2 r cr 1 1 Therefore, there are four possible cases for the location of the three massive bodies. Here, we will consider the fourth X m (y y ) i i = 0 ; (12) case (see Table 1). i=2 Case x x x y y y 1 2 3 1 2 3 whose solution shall depend on the parameters and sw, 1 + + 0 + as well as the values of mass, where the last ones will 2 + + 0 + modify also the position of the primaries (x ; y ) according i i 3 + 0 + to (5). In spite of the fact that the Jacobi constant is not a 4 + 0 + conserved quantity when radiation terms are included ( 6= Table 1: Location of the primary bodies according to the four possi- 0), an analytic expression for the zero velocity surfaces ble cases. (ZVS) can be derived as follows. From Eq. (9), we get 2 2 It can be easily noted that by de ning the e ective C (t) = 2U (x _ + y _ ) potential 2(1 + sw) [a + a + a ] ; (13) 1 2 3 1 m m m c 1 2 3 2 2 U = x + y + (1 ) + + ; (6) 2 r r r 1 2 3 with the equations of motion (3) and (4) can be written in the [(x x ) x _ + (y y ) y _ ] 1 1 a = dt; (14) compact form 2 2 x _ + y _ @U a = dt (15) x  2 y _ = (1 + sw) F ; (7) 2 x 2 @x @U y y y  + 2 x _ = (1 + sw) F : (8) 1 a = arctan ; (16) @y x x 3 and setting x _ = y _ = 0, time dependent terms vanish and consequently Eq. (13) reduces to m y y 1 1 C = 2U 2(1 + sw) arctan : (17) c x x Therefore, Eq. (17) de nes the zero velocity surfaces of the problem, or in other words, it determines the forbidden regions of motion for a test particle. Note that for = 0, the expression for ZVS coincides with the usual expression for the classical ERFBP. Finally, concerning the stability of the xed points, it is a well-known fact that detailed information about the motion of a system can be obtained by linearizing the equa- tions of motion about a xed point, (x ; y ). For this, we rst introduce the following changes of variable: x _ ! , and y _ ! , such that the equations of motion (7-8) can be written as the rst-order system x _ =  (18) y _ =  (19) @U (x; y) = + 2 (1 + sw)F (x; y; ; ) (20) @x Figure 1: (Color online). Parametric evolution of the libration points @U (x; y) for 2 [0; 1]. Blue dots indicate the location of the libration points _ = 2 (1 + sw)F (x; y; ; ) (21) for = 0, while red dots represent the coordinates of the primaries. @y Then, the system (18-21) can be linearized by means of the coecient matrix The equilibrium points are stable if all the roots of the 0 1 0 0 1 0 characteristic polynomial evaluated at (x ; y ; 0; 0) are pure B C 0 0 0 1 imaginary roots or complex roots with negative real parts; B C A = (22) @ A A A A A otherwise, they are unstable. 11 12 13 14 A A A A 21 22 23 24 3.1. Case 1: m = m = m 1 2 3 with Let us start considering the case in which the three @ U (x; y) @F (x; y; ; ) A = (1 + sw) ; primary bodies have the same value of mass, i.e, m = 11 1 @x @x m = m = 1=3. According to Eqs. (5), the coordinates 2 3 @ U (x; y) @F (x; y; ; ) of the primaries (x ; y ); (x ; y ); and (x ; y ), are given A = (1 + sw) ; 1 1 2 2 3 3 @x@y @y respectively by @F (x; y; ; ) A = (1 + sw) ; 1 1 1 1 1 p ; 0 ; p ; ; and p ; : 2 2 3 2 3 2 3 @F (x; y; ; ) A = 2 (1 + sw) ; In Fig. 1, we have plotted the location and evolution of the equilibrium points for increasing from 0 to 1. Blue @ U (x; y) @F (x; y; ; ) A = (1 + sw) ; dots are the solutions for = 0, while red dots denote @x@y @x the coordinates of the three massive bodies . It can be @ U (x; y) @F (x; y; ; ) A = (1 + sw) ; seen that as increases, L and L reach both the same 1 10 @y @y point along the x-axis and completely disappear for @F (x; y; ; ) 0:687. Also, it is observed that the libration points L , A = 2 (1 + sw) ; 2 L , L , and L , move gradually toward the position of 5 6 9 @F (x; y; ; ) y the radiating body until they disappear for  0:999. A = (1 + sw) ; @ On the other hand, L , L , L , and L , exhibit a small 3 4 7 8 displacement from their initial positions (see Table 2 for a and therefore, the characteristic polynomial will be given detailed description). by the quartic equation On the subject of the stability of the xed points, it is (A + A ) 13 24 found that in accordance with Ref. [12], for = 0, all the +  (A A A A A A ) 13 24 14 23 22 11 + (A A + A A A A A A ) 11 24 13 22 12 23 14 21 Along the paper, we shall use the customary value for the ratio + A A A A = 0: (23) of solar wind to Poynting-Robertson drag, sw = 0:35. 11 22 12 21 4 Figure 2: (Color online). Zero velocity surfaces for increasing values of the radiation factor , using m = m = m = 1=3. Blue dots indicate 1 2 3 the location of the libration points, while red dots denote the coordinates of the primaries. The color code is indicated in the lower-right panel. equilibrium points are unstable. In the interval 2 (0; 1], change with the radiation factor . the stability of the xed points remains unaltered, since Moreover, in Fig. 2, we show the parametric evolu- the form of the roots for all the equilibria does not change, tion of the ZVS with , for di erent values of the Jacobi i.e., for L , L , L and L , the characteristic equation (23) constant. Here, it can be noted that the regions of al- 1 3 5 6 gives place to complex eigenvalues of the form  = lowed motion are substantially modi ed for larger values 1;2;3;4 a ib, while for the libration points L , L , L , L , L of . For example, when C = 2:92 (blue contour) and for 2 4 7 8 9 and L , all roots takes the form  =  ib and  = = 0:125, the forbidden region is made up of three small 10 1;2 3;4 a. So, we may conclude that if the primary bodies are islands located just around the libration points L , L , 3 5 equal mass, the stability of the libration points does not and L . Then, the test particle will be free to move almost 5 Figure 3: (Color online). Basins of convergence using m = m = m = 1=3, for increasing values of the radiation factor . Cyan dots 1 2 3 indicate the location of the libration points, while red dots denote the coordinates of the primaries. The color code is speci ed in the text. Interval N. Equilibria Equilibria ever, as increases, these small islands get bigger, rstly, forming a small connection near m until completely sur- 2 [0:000; 0:687] 10 L 1 1;2;3;4;5;6;7;8;9;10 round it. For ! 1, the forbidden region in left-hand-side 2 [0:688; 0:999] 8 L 2;3;4;5;6;7;8;9 joins the one surrounding m , until the allowed regions of = 1:000 4 L 3;4;7;8 motion around m and m , become almost isolated. This 2 3 Table 2: Existence of equilibrium points with the variation of the e ect can be explained if we consider that,  1, implies radiation factor , for m = m = m . 1 2 3 that the force due to radiation pressure is comparable to the force of gravity, being able to push the test particle away from m . without any restriction around the primary bodies. How- 6 m Interval Equilibria We nish this subsection by discussing the so-called basins of convergence and their evolution with the radi- 2 [0:000; 0:928] L 1;2;5;6;7;8;9;10 ation factor . As pointed out in section 1, by basin of 0:05 2 [0:929; 0:999] L 2;5;6;7;8;9 convergence, we refer to the set of points that after suc- = 1:000 L 7;8 cessive iterations converge to a speci c xed point. The 2 [0:000; 0:912] L 1;2;5;6;7;8;9;10 numerical procedure for obtaining such basins is the mul- 0:10 2 [0:913; 0:999] L 2;5;6;7;8;9 tivariate Newton-Raphson method, which can be de ned = 1:000 L 7;8 by the map 2 [0:000; 0:350] L 2;3;5;6;7;8;9;10 x = x J f (x ); (24) n+1 n n 2 [0:351; 0:360] L 1;2;3;4;5;6;7;8;9;10 0:15 2 [0:361; 0:889] L 1;2;5;6;7;8;9;10 where x = (x; y), f (x ) represents the system of equa- 2 [0:890; 0:999] L 2;5;6;7;8;9 tions (11-12), and J is the inverse Jacobian matrix. The = 1:000 L 7;8 initial guesses are de ned within the region enclosed by 2 [0:000; 0:293] L 2;3;5;6;7;8;9;10 x 2 [8; 5; 8; 5] and y 2 [8; 5; 8; 5], the step size is equal 2 12 2 [0:294; 0:608] L 1;2;3;4;5;6;7;8;9;10 to 10 , and tolerance of the order 10 . Each initial 0:20 2 [0:609; 0:859] L 1;2;5;6;7;8;9;10 condition leading to a given xed point is plotted using 2 [0:860; 0:999] L 2;5;6;7;8;9 the following color code: L ! dark green, L ! dark 1 2 = 1:000 L 7;8 grey, L ! black, L ! orange, L ! purple, L ! red 3 4 5 6 2 [0:000; 0:160] L 2;3;5;6;7;8;9;10 wine, L ! light blue, L ! blue, L ! green and L ! 7 8 9 10 2 [0:161; 0:816] L 1;2;3;4;5;6;7;8;9;10 yellow; while the libration points are denoted by cyan dots. 0:25 2 [0:817; 0:999] L 2;3;4;5;6;7;8;9 In Fig. 3, we plot the basins of convergence of the = 1:000 L 3;4;7;8 equilibrium points, for nine di erent values of the radiation 2 [0:000; 0:751] L 1;2;3;4;5;6;7;8;9;10 factor . Here, it can be easily observed that some of the 0:30 2 [0:752; 0:999] L 2;3;4;5;6;7;8;9 equilibrium points disappear as increases, or in other = 1:000 L 3;4;7;8 words, the number of colors for = 1 is reduced compared 2 [0:000; 0:644] L 1;2;3;4;5;6;7;8;9;10 to the case = 0. It should be noted that as soon as > 0 0:35 2 [0:645; 0:999] L 2;3;4;5;6;7;8;9 the 2=3 symmetry is broken and replaced by a re ection = 1:000 L 3;4;7;8 symmetry with respect to the x-axis. Additionally, the 2 [0:000; 0:430] L 1;2;3;4;5;6;7;8;9;10 complexity of the basins increases for higher values of the 0:40 2 [0:431; 0:999] L 2;3;4;5;6;7;8;9 radiation parameter, despite the fact that the number of = 1:000 L libration points is much smaller than in the case = 0. 3;4;7;8 2 [0:000; 0:999] L The last statement can be clearly envisioned in the last 1;2;3;4;5;6;7;8 0:45 = 1:000 L panel of Fig. 3, where the right-hand side region becomes 3;4;7;8 very noisy, suggesting an increasing unpredictability of the Table 3: Existence of equilibrium points with the variation of the basins. radiation factor , for di erent values of m = m . 2 3 3.2. Case 2: m 6= m = m 1 2 3 radiation factor , for di erent values of m = m = m. 2 3 As a second case, we have assumed that m = m = m. 2 3 This gure can be analyzed as follows: (i) in the case Accordingly, the mass parameter of the radiating body m  m, it can be noted that the collinear points L and 1 3 will be given by m = 1 2m, and the coordinates of the L do not exist. For larger values of , the equilibria L 4 1 primaries (x ; y ); (x ; y ); and (x ; y ), read as 1 1 2 2 3 3 and L approximate each other until they join near the ! ! p p x-axis, while the points L , L , L , and L move toward p 2 5 6 9 3 1 3 1 3m; 0 ; (2m 1); ; and (2m 1); : the radiating body until they disappear for = 1. (ii) 2 2 2 2 As expected, when m  m the results are exactly like the ones described in the previous subsection. (iii) For The last result implies that not only the position of the m  m  0:5, the non-collinear points L and L do not 1 9 10 primaries depends on the parameter m, but the existence exist. As increases, L , L , L , and L exhibit very small 3 4 7 8 and location of libration points will also depend on this displacements with respect to their initial positions, while parameter and on , according to Eqs. (11, 12). In Table the libration points L , L , L , and L move abruptly 1 2 5 6 3, we present how the total number of equilibrium points toward the radiating body, until they disappear for = 1. varies on di erent intervals of the radiation factor and for Concerning the stability of the xed points, we start di erent values of m. It can be observed that for larger considering the case = 0. Here, we found that if m 2 values of the total number of xed points is reduced, (0; 0:0027] the libration points L , L , and L are stable, 3 5 6 where the nal number of surviving points increases for for m 2 [0:0027; 0:0188], only L , and L remain stable, 5 6 large values of m. but for m > 0:0188 all the equilibria are unstable. All In Figure 4, we present a graphic representation of the those results agree with the ones given in Ref. [12]. Once evolution of equilibrium points with the variation of the 7 Figure 4: (Color online). Existence and evolution of the equilibrium points with the variation of the radiation factor , for di erent cases of m = m . Cyan dots denote the initial position of the equilibria, while purple dots show their nal position. The location of the primaries is 2 3 indicated in red color. we start varying in steps of  = 1 10 , we get: (i) all the equilibria are unstable. (iv) For = 0:004 and for = 0:001 and m 2 (0; 0:0024] the libration points L , m 2 (0; 0:0093] L and L are stable, but for m > 0:0093 3 5 6 L and L are stable; for m 2 [0:0025; 0:0185] only L and all the xed points are unstable. (v) Finally, for > 0:004, 5 6 5 L are stable, while for m > 0:0185 all the equilibria are all xed points are unstable regardless the value of m. unstable. (ii) For = 0:002 and m 2 (0; 0:0011] the xed From the previous results, we can infer that the sta- points L , L and L are stable; for m 2 [0:0012; 0:0174] bility of the libration points remains unaltered, only for 3 5 6 only L and L are stable, but for m > 0:0174 all the values of radiation factor of the order 10 , however, for 5 6 xed points are unstable. (iii) For = 0:003 and m 2 larger values of , all the equilibria become unstable. At (0; 0:0147] only L and L are stable, while for m > 0:0147 this point, it should be noted that the radiation factor of 5 6 8 Figure 5: (Color online). Zero velocity surfaces for di erent values of the radiation factor , when m = 0:5 and m = m = 0:25. Blue dots 1 2 3 indicate the location of the libration points, while red dots denote the position of the primaries. The color code is indicated in the lower-right panel. the solar system is of the order 10 , which implies that, points L and L become isolated points. Such islands 5 6 in a realistic system, such factor should be able to destroy start growing in size until the ZVS surrounds completely the stability of the xed points. m , in particular, for = 0:875 the motion of the test On the other hand, in Figure 5, we present the ZVS by particle is limited to a small region around m , or to a using di erent values of the Jacobi constant. The tendency larger zone that allows collisions with m and m , but 2 3 in this gure is very similar to the one observed in Fig. 2. imposes a barrier in the vicinity of m . This behavior is For example, in the case C = 2:64 and for small values of , consistent with the idea that, for ! 1, the drag forces say < 0:25, the test particle is free to move in the whole are strong enough to push away the test particle from m . con guration space, however, as increases the libration In Figure 6 we use the same color code of Fig. 3. Here, 9 Figure 6: (Color online). Basins of attraction for m = 0:5, m = m = 0:25, for increasing values of the radiation factor . Cyan dots 1 2 3 indicate the location of the libration points, while red dots denote the coordinates of the primaries. The color code is the same used gure 3. it can be noted that in the case m = 0:5, m = m = 0:25, dominates, while for 2 [0:5; 0:75] the area of the set of 1 2 3 the basins of attraction exhibit a very complex pattern points converging to the xed point L is bigger than the symmetric in shape, but asymmetric in color. Due to the one for L and L . Special attention deserves the case 9 10 fact that the number of xed points grows for intermedi- = 0:625, where the basins seem stretched, here there are ate values of ( 2 [0:25; 0:75]) and decreases for larger three prevailing colors, the ones corresponding to L ; L 1 9 values of the radiation factor ( > 0:875), the highly frac- and L , i.e., the xed points that are closer to the origin tal structures are always present. Related to the extent of of coordinates. Such a structure allows us to prognosticate the basins of convergence, it is seen that for 2 [0; 0:375] a reduction of the fractality of the basin. the area corresponding to libration point L and L pre- Finally, for > 0:875, the area corresponding to the 9 10 10 Interval N. Equilibria Equilibria 2 [0:0000; 0:0029] 8 L 1;2;3;4;5;6;7;8 2 [0:0030; 0:9887] 6 L 1;2;3;5;7;8 2 [0:9888; 0:9940] 4 L 1;2;5;8; 2 [0:9941; 1:0000] 2 L 2;5 Table 4: Existence of equilibrium points with the variation of the radiation factor , for the Sun-Jupiter-Trojan Asteroid system. basin for L increases, while for = 1 it seems to be domi- nated by L , however, in the inset of the lower right panel, it is observed that the black region is, in fact, a very noisy region composed of initial conditions tending to all the libration points. From the previous description, we may infer that in the case of two equal masses, the determina- tions of the nal state via the root nding algorithm of Newton-Raphson is highly sensitive, mainly, for lower and higher values of . 3.3. Case 3: m 6= m 6= m 1 2 3 As a last scenario, we consider the equilateral trian- Figure 7: (Color online). Parametric evolution of the libration points gle con guration Sun-Jupiter-Trojan Asteroid, in addition for 2 [0; 1]. Cyan dots indicate the location of the libration points with the P-R and solar wind drag forces. In the nor- for = 0, while red dots represent the coordinates of the primaries. In the upper right corner, we show a zoom of the parametric evolution malized units, the masses of the primaries are given by around m . m = m = 0:999046321943, m = m = 0:000953678050 1 S 2 J and m = m = 6:99996 10 , where m corresponds 3 A 3 to the mass of 624 Hektor, an actual asteroid of the Trojan while for > 0:0104, all the xed points become unsta- group . ble. Here, it can be noted that  10 corresponds to According with Eqs. (5), the coordinates of the pri- the largest value of the radiation factor (of the three con- mary bodies are now sidered cases) in which we still having stable xed points. So, taking into account that  10 in the Solar system, (x ; y )  (0:000953678; 0:000000); 1 1 we may conclude that in the restricted four-body problem, (x ; y )  (0:999046; 6:35659 10 ); 2 2 Sun-Jupiter-Trojan Asteroid-Spacecraft (test particle), all (x ; y )  (0:499046;0:866025): 3 3 the libration points must be unstable. In Fig. 8 we present the parametric evolution of the In agreement with the seminal paper by Baltagiannis ZVS with , for di erent values of the Jacobi constant. [22], in absence of radiation pressure and drag forces ( = In absence of the P-R and drag forces, the forbidden re- 0), the Sun-Jupiter-Trojan Asteroid system admits eight gions of the Sun-Jupiter-Trojan Asteroid system are made non-collinear equilibrium points, three of them (L , L , 6 7 of horseshoe-shaped contours, very similar to the ones ob- and L ) linearly stable. The adjective non-collinear is due served in the Sun-Jupiter system in the circular restricted to the fact that L , L , and L , do not lie exactly on 1 2 3 three-body problem (see e.g. [23]). The circular horseshoe the x-axis. As increases, the equilibria L and L , reach 4 6 is open on m , such that this opening will be greater at both the same point and completely disappear for 0:0029 < lower values of C . Keeping a xed value of C , as in- < 0:0030. The same applies for L and L for 0:9887 < 3 7 creases, the mentioned horseshoe closes on it selves form- < 0:9888, and for L and L for 0:9940 < < 0:9941 1 8 ing a donut-shaped contour in which the allowed motion (we refer the reader to Table 4 for details). On the other region becomes smaller and smaller around the radiating hand, L and L hardly move, approaching each one to its 2 5 body. For larger values of ( ! 1), the circular region nearest primary (See Fig. 7). around m disappears, and the forbidden region of motion On the stability subject, for 2 (0; 0:0029] the equi- becomes a circle containing the Lagrangian points L and 2;5 libria L , L , and L are linearly stable, however, as 6 7 8 the three masses. Here, we would like to highlight that the grows the stability of the xed points also changes, i.e., location of m almost coincides with the position of L , for 3 5 for 2 [0:0030; 0:0104], only L and L remain stable, 7 8 this reason, the red dot of m is not seen in Fig. 8. On the other hand, in Fig. 9, we plot the basins of convergence of the equilibrium points for the Sun-Jupiter- Unlike the previous cases, all calculations of this subsection were Trojan Asteroid system. The color code used in this case performed in quadruple precision and the speed of light was set as in Baltagiannis [22] is the same as in gure 3. For = 0, the frame exhibits 11 Figure 8: (Color online). Zero velocity surfaces for increasing values of the radiation factor , in the Sun-Jupiter-Trojan Asteroid-Spacecraft system. Blue dots indicate the location of the libration points, while red dots denote the position of the primaries. The color code is indicated in the lower-right panel. the eight colors of the corresponding libration points, al- imposed with m ), no initial condition of our mesh con- beit the most noticeable basins are the ones correspond- verges to this point and therefore, the purple basin neither ing to L ; L ; L ; L ; L , and L . In general, it is observed appears. 1 3 5 6 7 8 that along the negative xaxis the basin associated to L In accordance with cases 3.1 and 3.2, the complexity predominates, while along the positive xaxis the one as- of the basins increases for larger values of , this is so be- sociated to L does. In the remaining frames, the number cause, for ! 1, L (whose initial position starts along- 3 3 of equilibria decreases to 6 (L , L , L , L , L , and L ), side the x-axis) moves downward, while L moves upward, 1 2 3 5 7 8 1 then 4 (L , L , L , and L ) and nally 2 (L and L ). L moves in counterclockwise and L moves toward the ra- 1 2 5 8 2 5 7 8 However, due to the location of the equilibria L (super- diating body m . Such displacements shall break the sym- 5 1 12 Figure 9: (Color online). Basins of attraction in the Sun-Jupiter-Trojan Asteroid-Spacecraft system, for increasing values of the radiation factor . Cyan dots indicate the location of the libration points, while red dots denote the coordinates of the primaries. The color code is the same used in gure 3. metry of the basins of convergence and hence increasing not allow for convergence of any initial condition of our the intricacy of them (see e.g. the lower-mid panel in Fig. mesh after 10 iterations. 9). Lastly, when ! 1 we observe a practically white con- guration space, this color is assigned to non-converging 4. Basin entropy initial conditions, however, the inset of this panel shows a region composed by scattered dark gray dots. This results So far, the analysis of the basins of convergence has can be understood by considering that for = 1 there been purely qualitative, in order to make quantitative our exist only 2 xed points, one of them corresponds to L 5 study, in this section, we shall use a quantity recently in- which, due to its superposition with the primary m , do 3 troduced in [24] which allow us to measure the uncertainty 13 (complexity) of a given basin. The new dynamical quan- tity is termed basin entropy and provides a useful method to explore the di erences observed in our system when the radiation and mass parameters are varied. For the sake of completeness, we will brie y describe the idea behind the calculation of the basins' entropy. As- suming that the phase space contains N di erent nal states (or colors in our case), we divide the space of states into a grid of N square cells, such that each one of these cells contains at least one of the N states. De ning p A i;j as the probability to detect a state j in the ith cell and by applying the Gibbs entropy de nition to that set, the entropy for the ith cell can be expressed as S = p log : (25) i i;j i;j j=1 Therefore, the basin entropy for the total number of cells N in the basin is calculated as an average, i.e., N N N X XX 1 1 1 S = S = p log : (26) b i i;j N N p i;j Figure 10: (Color online). Basin entropy S as a function of the i=1 i=1 j=1 radiation parameter in the three considered cases: (Case 1) m = m = m , (Case 2) m 6= m = m , and (Case 3) m 6= m 6= m . 2 3 1 2 3 1 2 3 Strictly speaking, the average of this quantity must depend on the number of considered cells, such that for a larger value of N the result for the basin entropy S should points is one-fourth of the initial points, i.e., the number be more precise. However, a bigger N can be reached only of nal states N is considerably diminished, and hence, with a smaller size of the square cells, which also have a the value of Eq. (26) is also signi cantly modi ed. minimum size to contain at least one of the N states. To solve this issue, we follow the procedure outlined in [25], in which the square cells are randomly picked in the space 5. Discussion and conclusions of states through a Monte Carlo procedure, allowing us In the present paper, we numerically investigated the to increase the number of cells N as necessary. In our location, stability, and basins of convergence of the equi- particular problem, we nd that the nal value for the librium points, in the equilateral triangle con guration of basin entropy keeps constant for a number of cells larger 5 the four-body problem with a radiating body. Speci cally, than 3  10 , hence, in the three cases, we used N = 5 we showed how the radiation parameter in uences the dy- 3:5 10 cells. namics of the system, in three di erent combinations of In Fig. 10, we present the parametric evolution of the mass for the primaries: equal masses, two equal masses, basin entropy as a function of the radiation parameter , and three di erent masses. for the considered cases. Our results indicate that, in case Following the tendency in this eld, we used a multi- 1, the basin entropy increases almost monotonically with variate Newton-Raphson method in order to calculate the the radiation parameter . A very similar behavior is ob- corresponding basins of convergence. Such basins give a served for case 3 in the interval 2 [0:025; 0:975], yet global view of the set of initial conditions that, after an for 2 [0; 0:025] and 2 [0:975; 1], the basin entropy iterative process, show a tendency to a certain xed point. decreases abruptly. Interestingly, the opposite tendency is In each of the considered cases, we examine the in uence observed for case 2, where the basin entropy decreases with of the radiation parameter on the Newton-Raphson basins the radiation parameter in the interval 2 [0; 0:825], of convergence. Aiming to quantify the uncertainty (com- but increases in the interval 2 [0:825; 1] from S  0:1 plexity) of the basins, we calculated the basin entropy, up to a value of S  1:14. In general, our ndings monitoring its variation with the radiation parameter. suggest that in cases 1 and 2, the unpredictability asso- The main conclusions of this work can be summarized ciated to the NR basins of convergence for the triangu- as follows: lar restricted four-body problem with an extreme radiat- ing body ( = 1) is larger in comparison with the non- 1. In the three considered cases, the total number of radiating case. Nevertheless, in the case of Sun-Jupiter- libration points decreases as ! 1. Trojan Asteroid-Spacecraft system (case 3), the exact op- 2. The stability analysis suggests that, in the case of posite situation occurs. These results can be explained if equal masses and for 2 [0; 1], the equilibrium points we consider that in case 3, the nal number of libration 14 of the system are always linearly unstable. In the [9] M. C. Asique, U. Prasad, M.R. Hassan, et al., On the R4BP when third primary is an oblate spheroid. Astrophys. Space Sci., rest of the cases, the libration points are unstable if 357(1) (2015) 82. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10509-015-2235-5. > 0:01. [10] E. E. Zotos, Basins of convergence of equilibrium 3. Taking into account the radiation factor for the solar points in the generalized Hill problem. International Jour- nal of Bifurcation and Chaos, 27(12) (2017) 1730043. system, we conclude that the radiation pressure and https://doi.org/10.1142/S0218127417300439. drag forces should be able to destroy the stability of [11] E. E. Zotos, A. Riano-Doncel, ~ F. L. Dubeibe, Basins of conver- the xed points in the restricted four-body problem gence of equilibrium points in the generalized H enon-Heiles sys- composed by Sun, Jupiter, Trojan asteroid and a test tem. International Journal of Non-Linear Mechanics, 99 (2018) 218-228. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijnonlinmec.2017.12.004. (dust) particle. [12] A. N. Baltagiannis, K. E. Papadakis, Equilibrium points 4. Only in case 3 (Sun-Jupiter-Trojan Asteroid - Space- and their stability in the restricted four-body problem. Interna- craft system), we detected the existence of a consid- tional Journal of Bifurcation and Chaos, 21(8) (2011) 2179-2193. https://doi.org/10.1142/S0218127411029707. erable amount of non-converging initial conditions [13] E. E. Zotos, Revealing the basins of convergence in the planar after 50000 iterations. This is due to the fact that equilateral restricted four-body problem. Astrophys. Space Sci., there exists only one e ective xed point that can be 362 (2017) 2. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10509-016-2973-z. reached after the iterative process. [14] M. S. Suraj, M. C. Asique, U. Prasad, et al., Fractal basins of attraction in the restricted four-body problem when the primaries 5. The lowest value of the basin entropy was found in are triaxial rigid bodies. Astrophys. Space Sci., 362(11) (2017) the case of two equal masses near = 0:825, while on 211. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10509-017-3188-7 the other hand the highest value of S was measured b [15] M. S. Suraj, R. Aggarwal, M. Arora, On the restricted four-body problem with the e ect of small perturbations in the Coriolis and in the same case for = 1. centrifugal forces. Astrophysics and Space Science, 362(9) (2017) 6. It is found that in the cases of two or three equal 159. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10509-017-3123-y. masses, the unpredictability associated with the basin [16] E. E. Zotos, Equilibrium points and basins of conver- gence in the linear restricted four-body problem with an- of convergence is larger for the extreme radiating gular velocity. Chaos, Solitons & Fractals, 101 (2017) 8-19. case in comparison with the non-radiating one. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chaos.2017.05.003. [17] A. Mittal, R. Agarwal, M. S. Suraj, M. Arora, On the photo-gravitational restricted four-body problem with vari- Acknowledgments able mass. Astrophysics and Space Science, 363 (2018) 1-23. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10509-018-3321-2. FLD acknowledge nancial support from Universidad de los Llanos, [18] J. A. Burns, P. L. Lamy, S. Soter, Radiation forces on Grant No. CDP 2478. FLD and GAG gratefully acknowledge the small particles in the solar system. Icarus, 40(1) (1979) 1-48. nancial support provided by COLCIENCIAS (Colombia), Grants https://doi.org/10.1016/0019-1035(79)90050-2. Nos. 8840 and 8863. [19] F. L. Dubeibe, F. D. Lora-Clavijo, G. A. Gonz alez, On the conservation of the Jacobi integral in the post-Newtonian circular restricted three-body problem. Astrophysics and Space Science, References 362(5) (2017) 97. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10509-017-3076-1 [20] E. E. Zotos, F. L. Dubeibe, Orbital dynamics in the post- References Newtonian planar circular restricted Sun-Jupiter system. Inter- national Journal of Modern Physics D, 27(4) (2018) 1850036. [1] B. G. Marchand, K. C. Howell, R. S. Wilson, Improved cor- https://doi.org/10.1142/S0218271818500360. rections process for constrained trajectory design in the n-body [21] F. R. Moulton, On a class of particular solutions of the prob- problem. Journal of Spacecraft and Rockets, 44 (2007) 884-897. lem of four bodies. Trans. Amer. Math. Soc., 1(1) (1900) 17-29. https://doi.org/10.2514/1.27205. https://doi.org/10.1090/S0002-9947-1900-1500520-3. [2] K. Meyer, G. Hall, D. On, Introduction to Hamiltonian dynam- [22] A. N. Baltagiannis, K. E. Papadakis, Periodic solu- ical systems and the N -body problem (Vol. 90). Springer Science tions in the Sun-Jupiter-Trojan Asteroid-Spacecraft sys- & Business Media, 2008. tem. Planetary and Space Science, 75 (2013) 148-157. [3] M. Michalodimitrakis, The circular restricted four-body prob- https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pss.2012.11.006. lem. Astrophysics and Space Science, 75(2) (1981) 289-305. [23] J. C. Liou, H. A. Zook, A. A. Jackson, Radiation pres- https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00648643. sure, Poynting-Robertson drag, and solar wind drag in the [4] M. Alvarez-Ram rez, E. Barrab es, Transport orbits in restricted three-body problem. Icarus, 116(1) (1995) 186-201. an equilateral restricted four-body problem. Celestial Me- https://doi.org/10.1006/icar.1995.1120. chanics and Dynamical Astronomy, 121(2) (2015) 191-210. [24] A. Daza, A. Wagemakers, B. Georgeot, D. Gu ery-Odelin, https://doi.org/10.1007/s10569-014-9594-z. M. A. Sanju an, Basin entropy: a new tool to analyze uncer- [5] A. E. Roy, Orbital motion. CRC Press, 2004. tainty in dynamical systems. Scienti c reports, 6 (2016) 31416. [6] T. J. Kalvouridis, M. Arribas, A. Elipe, Parametric evolution https://doi.org/10.1038/srep31416. of periodic orbits in the restricted four-body problem with radia- [25] A. Daza, B. Georgeot, D. Gu ery-Odelin, A. Wagemakers, M. tion pressure. Planetary and Space Science, 55(4) (2007) 475-493. A. Sanju an, Chaotic dynamics and fractal structures in experi- https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pss.2006.07.005. ments with cold atoms. Physical Review A, 95(1) (2017) 013629. [7] J. P. Papadouris, K. E. Papadakis, Equilibrium points https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevA.95.013629. in the photogravitational restricted four-body problem. Astrophysics and Space Science, 344(1) (2013) 21-38. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10509-012-1319-8. [8] R. Kumari, B. S. Kushvah, Equilibrium points and zero veloc- ity surfaces in the restricted four-body problem with solar wind drag. Astrophysics and Space Science, 344(2) (2013) 347-359. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10509-012-1340-y.

Journal

Nonlinear Sciences – arXiv (Cornell University)

Published: Dec 20, 2018

There are no references for this article.