Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
The two most common polymorphs in industrial alite, M1 and M3, were characterized at the molecular scale. Diﬀerent methods were employed and discussed to assess mechani- cal properties and speciﬁc heat of both polymorphs. The calculated homogenized elastic moduli and speciﬁc heat were found in good agreement with experimental measurements. A comparative analysis of spacial Young’s modulus reveal isotropic and anisotropic spa- cial distribution for M and M respectively. A more isotropic compressive strength is 1 3 also reported for M when compared to M polymorph. Cleavage energies computation 1 3 allowed to proposed equilibrium shapes for both polymorph, with signiﬁcant diﬀerences. While the lowest cleavage energies were found along (100) and (001) for both poly- morphs, the constructed M1 crystal possesses 3 independent facets, against seven for the M3 polymorph. Keywords: Tricalcium silicate. Mechanical properties. Thermal properties. Cleavage energy. Crystal shape. Molecular dynamics. 1. Introduction The research in cementitious materials is experiencing new challenges mainly due to the need to preserve the environment and save energy. To reduce CO emissions and energy cost of production, alternative binders are under study [1]. However, ordinary Portland cement (OPC) should continue to be employed for a long time and understand- ing of its principal constituents is primordial for its improvement. Another way to reduce the environmental impact of Portland cement is to enhance its reactivity which will in- volve less content of cement in concrete for the same strength. Since alite is the principal phase of Portland clinker that most contributes to strength development of Portland cement and particularly at early ages, a deep understanding of its properties is crucial to Email address: siham.kamali-bernard@insa-rennes.fr (Siham Kamali-Bernard) arXiv:2003.10805v2 [cond-mat.mtrl-sci] 13 Nov 2020 improve its quality and reactivity. Alite is a tricalcium silicate (C S) with minor oxides usually called impurities. It presents a large grade of polymorphism depending on dif- ferent factors, among them: the nature and the amount of impurities, the temperature of preheating or burning [2]. Seven structures were reported in industrial alite: three triclinic (T , T and T ) , three monoclinic (M , M and M ), and a rhombohedral form 1 2 3 1 2 3 R. These polymorphs appear via successive and reversible phase transitions [3]: 620 °C 920 °C 980 °C 990 °C 1060 °C 1070 °C T ←−−−→ T ←−−−→ T ←−−−→ M ←−−−→ M ←−−−→ M ←−−−→ R (1) 1 2 3 1 2 3 It is well known that impurities in alite stabilize high temperature polymorphs at low temperatures [3, 4]. The two main C S polymorphs present in industrial clinker are M 3 1 and M . According to Maki and Goto [5], MgO in clinker promotes the stable growth of alite in favor of the occurrence of M . In contrary, decreased MgO/SO ratio lead to M 3 3 1 stabilization [2, 5]. It was also reported that preheating of the raw meal may result in the disappearance of the M3 polymorph [2]. This modiﬁcations in the structure of C S can have a signiﬁcant impact on strength as reported in few experimental results in the literature [2, 6]. The transformation of M to M polymorph may result in a 10% increase 3 1 in the compressive strength [2]. The origin of this observed variation in strength could be explained by a greater amount of non-bonding electrons in oxygens of M C S, leading 1 3 to a higher reactivity when compared to the M polymorph. The impact of structure at the nanoscale on the properties like strength is a complex topic and investigation at the atomic level via molecular modelling and simulation should be helpful to improve our understanding of Portland cement. Over recent years, the properties of cementitious materials were addressed using atom- istic models, with particular attention on the main hydration product of OPC: calcium silicate hydrates (C-S-H) [7, 8]. In comparison, only few studies at the atomic scale fo- cused on OPC clinker phases [9]. Computation of thermal and mechanical properties at the molecular scale can provides important information on the behaviour of OPC clinker and hydrated product. From the computation of surface energies, crystal shapes can be theoretically constructed for diﬀerent polymorphs and help to understand morphological changes [10]. The knowledge of preferential cleavage planes and crystal shapes of C S polymorphs is fundamental to understand their growth during the clinkering process [11]. It could also explain C S dissolution mechanisms [12] or cleavage modes during clinker grinding [13, 14]. Determination of such properties by experimental methods are most of the time limited, especially in the case of surface energies [15]. In all cases, a proper synthesis procedure of pure C S is necessary, and the determination of the amount of each polymorph in a sample is neither trivial nor accurate [16]. In this work, the mechanical, thermal and surface properties of M and M C S (the 1 3 3 main forms of alite encountered in industrial OPC [17]) were characterized by molecular dynamics (MD) simulations. The present article is divided into four sections: crystal structures and force ﬁelds, mechanical properties, thermal properties, and cleavage ener- gies and equilibrium shapes. The last three sections include a description of the method employed and a presentation and discussion of results. To ﬁnish, a general conclusion resumes the diﬀerent ﬁndings. 2 M C S 1 3 M CS 3 3 Figure 1: Unit cells of M C S (cell parameters: a = 27.874 Å, b = 7.059 Å, c = 12.257 Å, β = 116.03°) 1 3 [17] and M C S (cell parameters: a = 12.235 Å, b = 7.073 Å, c = 9.298 Å, β = 116.31°) [18]. Color 3 3 code: calcium cations in green, oxygen anions and silicate oxygen in red and silicon atoms in blue 2. Crystal structures and force ﬁelds The atomistic systems investigated were built from the pure M [17] and M [18] 1 3 crystal structures depicted in Fig. 1. While the latter has already been used [13, 19, 20], this is the ﬁrst time that a M C S model has been employed in a MD investigation, 1 3 despite of its predominance in alite of Portland clinker with high SO content [5]. Re- garding atomic structural organization along the (010) direction, and b parameters, the two cells are very close. However, the two models are shifted by 1/4 in cell units in the (010) direction, meaning that the (010) Ca-rich plane of the M model corresponds to the (040) plane of the M model. The atomic organization along (001) axis in the M model 3 1 is close to M model in the (100), and the c and a parameters in M and M respectively 3 1 3 are almost equal. Conversely, the a parameter of the M unit cell is approximately 3 times larger than the c parameter for M , and the major structural diﬀerence is expected in the (100) direction for M and (001) direction for M . 1 3 Understanding the mechanical properties of C S is important for various reasons; among them: 1) the total hydration of a cement paste is never achieved, so clinker components are, to some extent, involved in the ﬁnal microstructure of hydrated cement [21, 22], and mainly at early ages; and 2) to optimize the grinding of clinker during cement manufacturing. The investigation of elastic properties of cementitious materials are most of the time related to hydrated products and very few data can be found in the literature concerning elastic properties of clinker components. Synthetic alite can be made by solid state sintering of decarbonated calcium oxide and ﬁne silica, with possible addition of impurities (alumina, magnesium, sulfates), depending on the polymorph to be reached [23]. The elastic properties are typically determined by nanoindentation experiments and at the macroscale by resonance frequency measurements [24, 25]. Nanoindentation experiments are most of the time performed on hydrated mortar or cement paste [22, 26– 3 28], and more rarely on pure and doped clinker phases [24]. Unhydrated clinker phases are known to exhibit stiﬀnesses by 3–5 times larger and hardnesses by one order of magnitude larger than hydrated phases [22, 24, 29]. Two force ﬁelds (FF) introduced in the cemﬀ database [9] were employed to describe atomic interactions in C S: INTERFACE FF (IFF) [13, 30] and ClayFF [31]. The PCFF implementation of IFF, used inhere, includes quadratic bonded terms for covalent bonds in silicates, an electrostatic term and a 9-6 Lennard-Jones (LJ) potential for short-range interactions: 4 4 X X X X n n E = K (r − r ) + K (θ − θ ) IFF r,ij ij 0,ij θ,ij ij 0,ij ij n=2 ijk n=2 " # 9 6 X X 1 q q σ σ i j ij ij + + ε 2 − 3 (2) 0,ij 4πε ε r r r 0 r ij ij ij ij ij ClayFF is a general force ﬁeld initially developed to describe interfaces between clays and water [31], and in particular adsorption of ions for, inter alia, environmental appli- cation. It uses a ﬂexible single point charge (SPC) water model and its potential energy includes a 12-6 Lennard-Jones potential: 2 2 E = K (r − r ) + K (θ − θ ) ClayFF r,ij ij 0,ij θ,ij ij 0,ij " # 12 6 X X 1 q q σ σ i j ij ij + + ε − (3) 0,ij 4πε ε r r r 0 r ij ij ij ij ij For dehydrated species, its interaction potential is the sum of a 12-6 LJ potential and electrostatic interactions. ClayFF does not account explicitly for covalent bonding in sil- icates, and larger charges are used for silicon atoms (2.1e) when compared to IFF (1.0e). The ionic nature of these bonds is thus overestimated in ClayFF, and impacts substan- tially computed surface tension [13]. We also expect an inﬂuence of this assumption on the elastic behaviour [30]. Results in better agreement with experimental measurements are expected with IFF, for which parameters were optimized especially for C S [13]. Ev- ery simulation in the present paper were performed with the LAMMPS simulation code −5 [32]. A 12 Å cutoﬀ, and an Ewald summation with precision of 10 were adopted for short-range and long-range interaction, respectively. 3. Mechanical properties 3.1. Methods Elastic properties of solids are generally computed by applying a strain or a stress in the desired directions and by determining the strain-stress or strain-energy relations. Two type of methods are used and discussed in this work: static optimization methods and time integration methods. 4 1. Static optimization methods are typically applied at 0 K, or where anharmonical vibrations can be neglected, although lattice vibration frequency can be included through quasi-harmonic approximation techniques [33]. In this case, a small strain Δε is applied positively and negatively in each direction j: σ (Δε )− σ (0) i j i C = − ij Δε (4) σ (−Δε )− σ (0) i j i C = ij Δε + − The stiﬀness constants can be obtained by averaging C and C and the symmetric ij ij constants: + − + − C + C + C + C ij ij ji ji C = (5) ij This method performs quick calculation, minimizing the energy of the system before and after application of a small strain Δε. However, it does not provide the stress- strain behavior nor give a prediction of the failure point. This computational scheme can be extended by applying a strain on multiple steps followed by an energy minimization after each step. The stiﬀness constants are therefore obtained by linear regression on the desired strain range. For a system of particles with a volume V , the stress components can be computed as the sum of the kinetic and virial terms over the N particles: P P N N m v v r f k ki kj ki kj k k σ = + (6) ij V V where i and j are the directions x, y and z. m , r , v are the mass, position and k ki ki velocity respectively, and f is the force applied on the particle k. In the case of kj a molecular mechanics (MM) optimization, the kinetic term is zero. 2. Time integration methods use equilibrium MD (EMD) or non-equilibrium (NEMD) simulations to compute the deformation of the simulation box while controlling the stress or vice versa. In EMD, the equilibrium is reached before each production run, which provides time-averaged values of the computed properties. In NEMD, the strain, or the stress, is changed continuously during the run. This is convenient because only a single run is needed. However, the strain/stress rate may inﬂuence the result. The simulation can be either strain or stress controlled. In the ﬁrst case, a strain rate is applied on the desired direction and with a ﬁxed stress (usually 0 GPa) on the other directions. In the second case, a stress rate is applied in one direction while keeping the others at 0 GPa. The simulation box is thus allowed to relax in the other directions. The elastic properties of M and M C S were ﬁrst computed from the static MM 1 3 3 calculation method on unit cells. The enthalpy of the cell was minimized at 0 GPa, allowing free movement of atoms and cell parameters. Then a deformation was applied in the desired direction and the energy of the system was minimized, allowing the atoms to move while ﬁxing the cell parameters. The process was repeated negatively and positively in each direction, to calculate the 21 components of the stiﬀness matrix according to the 5 Eq. (5). The unit cells experienced maximal deformations of ±0.2, with increments of −4 1× 10 , but the values C were obtained by linear ﬁtting on values from zero to ±0.02 ij deformation. Homogeneous values of bulk and shear moduli for large crystals randomly dispersed were obtained by calculating Reuss and Voigt bounds. The Voigt-Reuss-Hill (or VRH) estimation for monoclinic crystals is obtained as the arithmetic average of Voigt and Reuss bounds on bulk and shear modulus [34–36]. In order to determine elastic properties at ﬁnite temperature supercells of 1296 atoms (1× 4× 2 and 2× 4× 3, with dimensions 27.87 Å× 28.24 Å× 24.52 Å and 24.47 Å× 28.29 Å× 27.89 Å, for M and M C S respectively) were created from the unit cells 1 3 3 presented in Fig. 1. For each polymorph, three replicas were created by using diﬀerent seeds for the initial velocities of atoms. Equilibration runs were performed during 500 ps at 300 K in the NpT ensemble at hydrostatic pressure σ varying between 0 and 15 GPa, followed by a production run of 1 ns. Nose-Hoover thermostat and barostat [37, 38] were employed with the Verlet algorithm [39] to integrate Newton’s equations of motion. −5 Long-range interaction were computed with an Ewald summation with precision of 10 and a cutoﬀ of 10 Å was applied for van der Waals interactions. The bulk modulus K was calculated from EMD simulations in the NpT ensemble with incremental equilibrium pressure. In NEMD simulations, the supercells underwent 8 −1 1 ns runs of compression and tension at a strain rate of 1× 10 s up to 20 %, while maintaining the pressure to 0 GPa in the other directions. The stress components were computed from Eq. (6). No noticeable inﬂuence was reported for rates of one order 8 −1 of magnitude above and bellow 1× 10 s . This is predictable because the resulting −1 dislocation velocity is ∼0.28 m s for the largest dimension. This dislocation velocity is large when compared to macroscale tests, but is negligible compared to the velocity of acoustic waves in C S. Based on the values of bulk modulus K, Poisson’s ratio ν and density ρ from previous acoustic measurements, compressive and shear waves are −1 calculated as 7200 and 3700 m s respectively [40]. This ensures that atoms will respond instantaneously to the deformation of the simulation box [41, 42]. Elastic parameters were calculated by the direct relations, where i 6= j are the x, y and z coordinates: ii E = ii ii ij G = (7) ij ij ii ν = − ij jj 3.2. Results and discussion The stiﬀness constants, homogenized stiﬀness constants and elastic moduli of M and M C S, computed by static MM method, as well as experimental results from literature, 3 3 are reported in Table 1. ClayFF tends to underestimate by a factor of approximately 2 the stiﬀness constants and thus the elastic moduli. This very probably results from the non-bonded nature of atomic interactions in ClayFF, where the covalent nature of O-Si bonds in silicates is underestimated, thus decreasing their stiﬀness. Previous calculations on the same M unit cell, via second derivative of the binding energy with the GULP code, lead to very similar results [43]. The homogenized elastic moduli computed with IFF agree relatively with experiments. The values obtained for M C S are smaller than 3 3 6 M M Exp. 1 3 IFF ClayFF IFF ClayFF Boumiz et al. [40] Velez et al. [24] C 185.2(2) 89.3(2) 219.6(3) 118.6(2) C 62.11(9) 29.6(4) 77.54(9) 34.81(7) C 61.73(8) 27.83(7) 52.79(7) 35.98(5) C 17.35(3) −0.12(7) 4.0(1) 17.69(4) C 216.1(3) 112.6(5) 216.0(3) 85.9(3) C 70.77(9) 33.31(8) 52.72(8) 27.95(8) C −8.38(2) −4.7(3) −21.7(9) 1.39(4) C 212.7(3) 100.2(3) 189.6(2) 95.4(1) C −9.2(3) −7.93(3) −34.04(2) 6.65(3) C 66.54(3) 34.93(4) 37.0(7) 33.01(5) C −4.954(7) −3.958(8) −6.39(8) 3.28(5) C 66.44(3) 31.35(4) 43.4(6) 38.22(4) C 65.17(3) 32.21(4) 67.65(7) 32.16(6) K 111.1 53.2 104.7 53.9 105.2(5) G 66.7 33.5 54.3 33.5 44.8(6) b c E 166.8 83.0 139.0 83.2 117.6(8) 147(5) /135(7) ν 0.250 0.240 0.279 0.243 0.314(17) E 151.5 77.2 176.9 91.2 E 180.6 96.2 174.6 71.7 E 177.3 84.4 147.2 80.4 E 66.2 34.4 36.3 32.7 E 63.1 30.6 34.9 35.3 E 64.8 31.7 66.5 31.8 Table 1: Stiﬀness constants and elastic moduli of M C S obtained by static MM, in GPa. Acoustic 3 3 b c measurements. Resonance frequency. Nanoindentation. 7 for M and close to recent results from DFT calculations on the T C S [44]. Very 1 1 3 similar results were obtained by Manzano et al. [29], employing the Buckingham FF and a M C S model proposed by de la Torre et al. [45]. The lowest elastic modulus 3 3 is obtained in the x and z direction for the M and M polymorph respectively. This 1 3 result is predictable because of the correspondence of the c parameter of the M unit cell with the a parameter of the M unit cell. Spacial distributions of Young’s modulus were plotted with the ELATE open-source Python package [46] and reveal a much more anisotropic elasticity for M than for M C S (see Fig. 2). 3 1 3 Figure 2: Spacial distribution of Young’s modulus for the M C S, and M C S computed with IFF 1 3 3 3 using the static MM method. EMD calculations where performed with the IFF at 0, 1, 2.5 and 5 GPa. The bulk moduli obtained by linear ﬁtting of the hydrostatic pressure with respect to the volume variation are (101± 2) GPa and (103± 2) GPa for M and M C S polymorphs, respec- 1 3 3 tively. A larger diﬀerence with static MM calculation is observed for M . This could rely on the fact that the M model, which is not averaged, experienced a structural relaxation during the MD run. As an important feature of the C S, the change in coordination between calcium cations Ca and oxygen in silicates (Os) as a function of the hydrostatic pressure was analyzed by radial distribution function (RDF) (see Fig. 3). The increasing hydrostatic pressure seems to inﬂuence the C S structure at short range (∼4 Å). The second coor- dination shell is ﬂattened and shifted to the left by the eﬀect of the pressure. The same behavior is observed for both polymorphs. The stress-strain curves for NEMD and static MM simulations are plotted in Fig. 4. The general behavior of the M and M polymorphs seems similar. However, the com- 1 3 pressive strength seems to be larger for the M polymorph in the x direction, and for the M polymorph in the z direction. The structural correspondence of the (001) direction for the M unit cell with the (100) direction for the M unit cell explains this result.As 1 3 already noticed for the elastic behaviour (see Fig. 2), a more isotropic yield behaviour is observed for M when compared to M . The diﬀerence in compressive strength along 1 3 the x and z directions is greater for M C S (∼ 15 and 30 GPa) than for M C S (∼ 21 3 3 1 3 and 16 GPa). The elastic moduli obtained from these NEMD simulation are presented in Table 2. They are in good agreement with values from previous stress controlled NEMD 8 7 0 GPa 5 GPa 10 GPa 15 GPa 2 4 6 8 10 r (A) Figure 3: Radial distribution function of Ca-Os pairs as a function of the hydrostatic pressure for M C S, 3 3 with IFF. The RDF obtained for the M polymorph is very similar. simulations on M C S [13] and T C S [47]. 3 3 1 3 10 10 10 0 0 0 − 10 − 10 − 10 σ σ σ M MM M MM M MM − 20 1 − 20 1 − 20 1 M1 MD M1 MD M1 MD M MM M MM M MM − 30 3 − 30 3 − 30 3 M MD M MD M MD 3 3 3 − 40 − 40 − 40 − 0.2 − 0.1 0.0 0.1 0.2 − 0.2 − 0.1 0.0 0.1 0.2 − 0.2 − 0.1 0.0 0.1 0.2 x x y y zz 15 15 15 10 10 10 5 5 5 0 0 0 σ σ σ M MM M MM M MM 1 1 1 − 5 − 5 − 5 M MD M MD M MD 1 1 1 M3 MM M3 MM M3 MM − 10 − 10 − 10 M MD M MD M MD 3 3 3 − 15 − 15 − 15 − 0.2 − 0.1 0.0 0.1 0.2 − 0.2 − 0.1 0.0 0.1 0.2 − 0.2 − 0.1 0.0 0.1 0.2 y z x z x y Figure 4: Stress-strain curves obtained by NEMD and MM calculations with IFF. MM simulations results in a stiﬀer elastic behaviour than for MD simulations, due to the larger structural relaxation induced by the thermal motion. Nonetheless, the values obtained by these two methods are in good agreement. The static calculation method provides a good representation of elastic properties and is very fast, but does not allow to assess the yield stress properly, in particular in compression, since no relaxation is (GPa) (GPa) y z x x g(r) (GPa) (GPa) x z y y (GPa) (GPa) x y zz a M M M [13] 1 3 3 E = E 141.8(2) 168.5(2) 152(6) 11 xx E = E 164.4(2) 166.0(2) 176(3) 22 yy E = E 155.8(2) 154.9(1) 103(11) 33 zz E = G 62.6(5) 57.16(6) 44 yz E = G 59.22(7) 57.42(6) 55 xz E = G 59.77(5) 64.35(6) 66 xy ν = ν 0.220(1) 0.297(1) 0.303(42) 12 xy ν = ν 0.236(2) 0.227(2) 0.273(43) 13 xz ν = ν 0.241(2) 0.290(1) 0.225(21) 21 yx ν = ν 0.239(2) 0.215(1) 0.197(27) 23 yz ν = ν 0.245(2) 0.200(1) 0.372(41) 31 zx ν = ν 0.230(1) 0.200(1) 0.299(58) 32 zy Table 2: Elastic moduli obtained from NEMD simulations with IFF. Results from previous stress controlled NEMD. permitted in the transversal directions. This restriction causes hardening for negative strains. The yield stress could be assessed by enthalpy minimization, but such calculation is not trivial and the calculation can easily stuck in a local minima because the objective function is changing while the simulation box dimensions change. 4. Thermal properties During its lifetime, concrete undergoes temperature changes. The thermal expansion and contraction of concrete as temperature increases and decreases, is inﬂuenced by the aggregate type, the cement type, and the water/cement ratio. Although the aggregate type has the larger inﬂuence on the expansion and contraction of concrete, the thermal properties of hydrated and dry cement is of great interest. Thermal cracking of concrete generally occurs during the ﬁrst days after casting. During the exothermic hydration of cement, the temperature rises, and drops faster on the surface than in the bulk. The surface tends to contract with the cooling and stress arises because the bulk remains hot, resulting in cracks. Naturally, this phenomenon occurs more likely in larger volumes. The assessment of vibrational spectra and speciﬁc heat of cement phase is a ﬁrst step toward a microstructural modelling and further understanding of heat propagation in the cement paste. 4.1. Methods In the canonical ensemble, one can derive the ﬂuctuation relationship between speciﬁc heat and internal energy E: C = (ΔE) (8) kT where k is the Boltzmann constant. By using ﬂuctuation methods, the speciﬁc heat can be computed at any temperature with a single, long enough run. However, these methods rely strongly on the temperature relaxation parameter used to thermostat the 10 system (and in the case of the NpT ensemble, on the pressure relaxation parameter) [48]. Moreover values obtained by ﬂuctuation method depends on the time interval used for block averages [48], often leads to large uncertainties and to bad agreements with experimental results [49]. For this reason, non-ﬂuctuation, or direct method, is preferred. It consists on running several simulations at ﬁnite temperature and calculating the time average energies for each one. The speciﬁc heat is calculated by deﬁnition, as the slope of the internal energy with respect to the temperature, at the desired temperature. The chosen temperature increment must be large enough to compute accurately the variation of energy between each simulation, but small enough, for the ﬁtting to be representative. The speciﬁc heat capacity can also be computed from the velocity autocorrelation function (VACF) of atoms. Considering a solid made by quantum harmonic oscillator, the phonon density of states g(ω) is proportional to the Fourier transform of the velocity autocorrelation function of the atoms: +∞ iωt g(ω) = hv (t) · v (0)i e dt (9) i i 3NkT −∞ i=1 where k is the Boltzmann constant, N is the number of atoms and T is the temperature of the system. The occupational states of phonons follows a Bose-Einstein distribution f BE and at energy largely below the Debye temperature, the internal energy of the system can be reduced to the vibrational energy E [50, 51]: +∞ E = ¯hω g(ω)f (ω) + dω (10) v BE The speciﬁc heat c in 3Nk units is calculated as the partial derivative of internal energy with respect to temperature: 2 u u e +∞ g(ω)dω 0 u 2 (1− e ) c = (11) +∞ g(ω)dω where u = ¯hω/kT . One has to note that the phonon spectrum computed this way is semi-classical and is diﬀerent from the quantum phonon spectrum [52]. Although the Eq. (9) includes quantum eﬀects, the density of states is obtained by classical MD. We consider that this method is applicable at standard temperature and that anharmonic interactions are negligible. Most of the time, experimental measurement of speciﬁc heat capacities is performed at constant pressure. From thermodynamics, the speciﬁc heat capacities at constant volume and pressure c and c , are related by the equation: v p c − c = T (12) p v ρβ where ρ is the density, α = (1/V )(∂V /∂T ) is the thermal expansion coeﬃcient, and β = −(1/V )(∂V /∂P ) is the compressibility, inverse of the bulk modulus K. Speciﬁc heat and thermal expansion coeﬃcient were computed on three replicas of C S supercells. The simulations were performed in the NpT ensemble with the same 11 MD parameters as previously. The systems were relaxed during 0.5 ns, and the data were collected for 1 ns. Within the direct method, the speciﬁc heat c was computed by linear ﬁtting of the enthalpy with respect to the temperature at ﬁve points around the temperature of interest (e.g., 280, 290, 300, 310 and 320 K to compute the speciﬁc heat at 300 K). The same method was employed to calculate the expansion coeﬃcient, ﬁtting the volume variation with respect to the temperature. To avoid the external inﬂuence of thermostating or barostating, the relaxed systems were equilibrated for 500 ps in the NVE ensemble, before running simulation of 100 ps, dumping the trajectory at each time step to be able to observe high vibrational frequencies. For the calculation using the ClayFF, a geometric mixing rule for LJ parameters was used in place of the original arithmetic mixing. Indeed, this mixing rule provides more accurate value of density obtained during NpT simulations. The VACF were computed on ten correlation windows of 10 ps on three replica for each polymorph. 4.2. Results and discussion −1 −1 −3 −1 Temperature (K) α (K ) β (Pa ) ρ (g cm ) c − c (J g K) p v −5 −12 M 200 4.6(18)× 10 9.9(2)× 10 3.147(5) 0.013(14) −5 −12 300 4.4(15)× 10 9.7(3)× 10 3.160(4) 0.019(13) −5 −12 400 5.0(23)× 10 10.0(2)× 10 3.147(6) 0.032(30) −5 −12 M 200 3.6(14)× 10 9.7(2)× 10 3.139(5) 0.009(8) −5 −12 300 4.0(16)× 10 9.7(3)× 10 3.151(4) 0.016(13) −5 −12 400 4.8(15)× 10 9.5(2)× 10 3.128(6) 0.031(21) Table 3: Thermal properties of M and M C S. 1 3 3 The phonon density of states (DOS) obtained from simulations in the NVE ensemble are presented in Fig. 5.The phonon DOS obtained for M and M are almost identical, 1 3 so as the resulting speciﬁc heat. Thus the structural diﬀerence between both polymorph does not inﬂuence their thermal properties. However, the force ﬁeld does aﬀect the re- sults. The main diﬀerence between the phonon DOS obtained with IFF and ClayFF relies principally in their description of bonds in silicate. In the case of IFF, where Si-O bonds are described by harmonic oscillators in addition to the short and long range de- −1 scription, the partial DOS (PDOS) of Os and Si atoms form a sharp peak near 935 cm , in agreement with infrared spectroscopy measurements [53], while the in-plane bending −1 vibration of Os-Si-Os angle is measured as a band bellow 500 cm [53]. This bending −1 contribution happens at larger frequencies in our results (near 550 cm ). Wave num- −1 bers ω bellow 500 cm are associated to stretching between calcium and oxygen atoms [50, 54], in agreement with the PDOS obtained with both IFF and ClayFF. For ClayFF, the purely non-bonded description of Si-Os bonds allows for more degrees of freedom of atoms. The PDOS obtained for Si and Os atoms are thus more sparse. Generally, for the IFF, a shift of the DOS is observed towards higher vibrational frequencies. No signiﬁcant variation of the DOS was observed between 200, 300 and 400 K. The error on the calculation of the isobaric speciﬁc heat c are mostly related to the c − c quantity, p p v calculated from simulations in the NpT ensemble. The values of c −c were calculated at p v 12 ClayFF IFF M 1.0 1.0 Ca Ca Oi Oi 0.5 0.5 Os Os Si 0.0 Si 0.0 0 1 2 3 0 1 2 3 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 t (fs) t (fs) 0 200 400 600 800 1000 0 200 400 600 800 1000 −1 −1 ω (cm ) ω (cm ) ClayFF IFF M 1.0 1.0 Ca Ca Oi Oi 0.5 0.5 Os Os Si Si 0.0 0.0 0 1 2 3 0 1 2 3 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 t (fs) t (fs) 0 200 400 600 800 1000 0 200 400 600 800 1000 −1 −1 ω (cm ) ω (cm ) Figure 5: Total phonon density of states (top), and partial density of states with VACF in insets (bottom) of M and M C S obtained with IFF and ClayFF. 1 3 3 VACF VACF VACF VACF 200, 300 and 400 K and extrapolated linearly, because this quantity vary proportionally with temperature (see Eq. (12)). The thermal expansion coeﬃcient α, the compressibil- ity β, and the density ρ, computed from simulations in the NpT ensemble are presented in Table 3. The speciﬁc heat c obtained for M and M C S are plotted with respect to p 1 3 3 the temperature in Fig. 6. The values obtained at 300 K by the direct method are −1 −1 0.86± 0.10 and (0.87± 0.04) J g K for M and M C S respectively, which is much 1 3 3 larger than experimental measurements. As for the phonon DOS, no signiﬁcant vari- ation of c was found between M and M . The VACF method with ClayFF re- p 1 3 −1 −1 sults in c = (0.751± 0.013) J g K , which is very close to experimental values of −1 −1 −1 −1 0.756 J g K [55] and 0.753 J g K [56]. The IFF provided a value slightly lower −1 −1 than experimental measurements: (0.723± 0.013) J g K . 1.0 −1 −1 3Nk = 0.983 J g K 0.8 0.6 Direct - M 1 C3S Direct - M C S 3 3 0.4 VACF - IFF VACF - ClayFF Sim. Qomi - CSH FF (2015) 0.2 Exp. Matschei et. al (2007) Exp. Todd (1951) 0.0 100 200 300 400 Temperature (K) Figure 6: Speciﬁc heat of M and M C S obtained by the direct and VACF method, plotted as function 1 3 3 of the temperature. The transparent areas represent the error. Previously computed value from VACF calculation, as well as ﬁtting of experimental measurements [55] and direct measurements [56] are plotted in addition to the results. 5. Cleavage energies and equilibrium shapes In the current section, the cleavage energies of M and M C S were calculated from 1 3 3 energy diﬀerence of cleaved and uniﬁed slabs. From these energies, the crystal shapes of both polymorphs were constructed using the Wulﬀ construction method [57]. 5.1. Methods The calculation of cleavage energies for multiple planes of the two monoclinic C S models under study involved creation of cleaved and uniﬁed systems. For non-symmetric planes, reorganization of surface ions was performed to minimize superﬁcial dipole mo- ments. For each plane, ﬁve uniﬁed and cleaved systems were constructed with random distribution of surface species. A 10 nm vacuum was employed in cleaved systems. Series of steep temperature gradients were applied on ions within the uppermost and lowermost −1 −1 c (J g K ) p M C S 1 3 −2 Miller index Cleavage energy (J m ) (100) 1.04± 0.04 (010) 1.41± 0.04 (040) 1.76± 0.03 (003) 1.20± 0.03 (008) 1.20± 0.04 (110) 1.45± 0.04 (101) 1.51± 0.03 (011) 1.17± 0.04 (111) 1.43± 0.03 M C S 3 3 −2 Miller index Cleavage energy (J m ) (100) 1.39± 0.03 (300) 1.14± 0.03 (800) 1.17± 0.03 (010) 1.55± 0.04 (040) 1.31± 0.04 (001) 1.38± 0.04 (002) 1.45± 0.04 (003) 1.31± 0.04 (003) 1.33± 0.04 (008) 1.22± 0.04 (008) 1.22± 0.04 Table 4: Cleavage energies of M and M C S. Only the lowest energy plane is given in the (100) 1 3 3 direction for M . Results for M C S are from our previous study [58]. 1 3 3 atomic layer of slabs in uniﬁed and cleaved systems. This method was previously em- ployed and allows to relax the surfaces to the conﬁguration of lower energy [13, 59]. The systems with lower energies were selected to performed the calculation over 300 ps runs, after 200 ps equilibration runs. For more details on the method, we refer the reader to ref. [58] 5.2. Results and discussion The cleavage energy was computed classically from Eq. (13) and results are given in Table 4. E − E cleaved unified E = (13) cleav 2A −2 −2 The computed values are in the range of 1.14 to 1.55 J m (1.32 J m in average) for −2 −2 M C S, and 1.04 to 1.76 J m (1.35 J m in average) for M C S, in good agreement 3 3 1 3 with previous atomistic simulation studies [19, 60]. In general, the average values are very close between the two models. The energies obtained for particular planes vary as a function of the structure of each polymorph, and are particularly inﬂuenced by 15 M C S 1 3 M C S 3 3 Figure 7: Equilibrium shapes of M and M C S 1 3 3 coordination between calcium cations and oxygen atoms in silicates. The (100) direction of the M polymorph corresponds to the (001) direction of the M polymorph, and vice- 1 3 versa. For M C S, the present calculation indicates that the lowest energy plane is in 1 3 the (100) direction, at 2 Å from the origin. The (100) direction of the M polymorph has many possible cleavage planes and the plane for which the lowest energy was computed has no equivalent in the M polymorph. The Wulﬀ construction can give theoretical insights on the shape of a crystal at equi- librium [57]. It is based on the assumption that a crystal growth in a such way that the Gibbs free energy of its surface is minimized [61]. This results in a proportional rela- tionship between the surface energy of a facet and its distance from the crystal center. From the lowest energy obtained in each direction, the equilibrium shapes of M and M C S in Fig. 7 were created with the construction algorithm implemented in the py- 3 3 matgen library [15, 62]. In the M polymorph, the crystal grows only along three planes, while in the M , seven planes are available. Maki related that the equilibrium form of alite is usually made up of three special forms: one pedion and two rhombohedra [63]. The author proposed a morphology similar to the M obtained by Wulﬀ construction, though more ﬂat and with only one rhombohedra form. Maki explains that the crystal form of alite changes during recrystallization from platelet to massive granules with well ¯ ¯ developed pyramidal faces (1011) and (1102) [64]. The ratio between the width and the length of the platelet is function of the environment during the growth. One should note that the obtained equilibrium shapes are not fully deﬁnitive, since they were determined on a relatively ﬁnite number of planes. More calculations would probably reﬁne these shapes, and produce a more accurate prediction. 6. Conclusion This research aimed to provide knowledge at the atomic scale on the inﬂuence of alite polymorphism on its mechanical and thermal properties as well as on its equilibrium shape. The two main polymorphs of C S in industrial OPC, M and M , were inves- 3 1 3 16 tigated. This knowledge may contribute to the understanding of the inﬂuence of alite polymorphism on the variation in strength of Portland cement. This work also provide input data that are necessary in microscale modelling of Portland cement hydration and the development of its mechanical and thermal behavior [65, 66]. Cleavage energy values may improve our understanding of alite reactivity and dissolution kinetic, and crystal shapes could help for identiﬁcation of polymorphs by SEM. In addition, this study ex- plored and discussed diﬀerent calculation methods and compared the performance of two force ﬁelds widely used to described cementitious systems. The elastic constants were calculated by static and dynamical methods. The moduli found by Voigt-Reuss-Hill homogenization of the stiﬀness constants obtained in static calculation with IFF were found in good agreement with experimental measurements. However, the results obtained with ClayFF overestimated and underestimated experi- mental results, respectively. An isotropic distribution of elastic moduli in space was ob- served for the M polymorph, whereas an anisotropic distribution was found for M . The 1 3 assessment of stress-strain curves for both polymorphs also indicates a more anisotropic behaviour for M C S regarding the yield compressive stress. Bulk modulus was ob- 3 3 tained by EMD, and elastic, shear modulus, as well as Poisson’s ratio were calculated by NEMD. The results are in good agreement with static calculations and experimental measurements. Speciﬁc heat capacities were calculated by the direct method and from VACF. The direct method provides results greater than experimental measurements, and with much larger error than the VACF method. On the other hand, the VACF allowed to analyse the phonon density of states and provide results much more accurate. The results obtained with ClayFF are very close to previous experimental measurements, and results from IFF are slightly smaller. The DOS obtained from VACF are in good agreement with infrared spectroscopy measurements, and the diﬀerences between IFF and ClayFF arise mainly from the bond description in silicates. Cleavage energy calculations were performed on both M and M C S polymorphs, 1 3 3 using a temperature gradient method to relax superﬁcial ions to conﬁgurations of lower energy. These calculations allowed the construction of equilibrium shapes which are signiﬁcantly diﬀerent. The M crystal possess three facets against seven for the M 1 3 polymorph. The energies obtained for both polymorphs are in the same range. Despite diﬀerent morphologies, low index crystal planes with the lowest energies are the (100) and (001) for both polymorphs. The cleavage energies were calculated for a relatively limited number of planes, and further calculation could lead to even more accurate shapes. Acknowledgments The authors acknowledge Brazilian science agencies CAPES (PDSE process n°88881.188619/2018-01) and CNPq for ﬁnancial support. References [1] J. J. Biernacki, J. W. Bullard, G. Sant, K. Brown, F. P. Glasser, S. Jones, T. Ley, R. Livingston, L. Nicoleau, J. Olek, F. Sanchez, R. Shahsavari, P. E. Stutzman, K. Sobolev, T. Prater, Cements in the 21st century: Challenges, perspectives, and opportunities, Journal of the American Ceramic Society 100 (7) (2017) 2746–2773. doi:10.1111/jace.14948. 17 [2] T. Staněk, P. Sulovský, The inﬂuence of the alite polymorphism on the strength of the Portland cement, Cement and Concrete Research 32 (7) (2002) 1169–1175. doi:10.1016/s0008-8846(02) 00756-1. [3] H. F. W. Taylor, Cement Chemistry, Academic Pr, 1990. [4] I. Maki, S. Takahashi, Redistribution of impurity during recrystallization of alite in portland ce- ment clinker, Cement and Concrete Research 14 (3) (1984) 413–418. doi:10.1016/0008-8846(84) 90060-7. [5] I. Maki, K. Goto, Factors inﬂuencing the phase constitution of alite in portland cement clinker, Cement and Concrete Research 12 (3) (1982) 301–308. doi:10.1016/0008-8846(82)90078-3. [6] H. Zhou, X. Gu, J. Sun, Z. Yu, H. Huang, Q. Wang, X. Shen, Research on the formation of M1- type alite doped with MgO and SO 3 —A route to improve the quality of cement clinker with a high content of MgO, Construction and Building Materials 182 (2018) 156–166. doi:10.1016/j. conbuildmat.2018.06.078. [7] M. J. A. Qomi, M. Bauchy, F.-J. Ulm, R. J.-M. Pellenq, Anomalous composition-dependent dynam- ics of nanoconﬁned water in the interlayer of disordered calcium-silicates, The Journal of Chemical Physics 140 (5) (2014) 054515. doi:10.1063/1.4864118. [8] M. Bauchy, M. J. A. Qomi, F.-J. Ulm, R. J.-M. Pellenq, Order and disorder in calcium-silicate- hydrate, The Journal of Chemical Physics 140 (21) (2014) 214503. doi:10.1063/1.4878656. [9] R. K. Mishra, A. K. Mohamed, D. Geissbühler, H. Manzano, T. Jamil, R. Shahsavari, A. G. Kalinichev, S. Galmarini, L. Tao, H. Heinz, R. Pellenq, A. C. van Duin, S. C. Parker, R. J. Flatt, P. Bowen, cemﬀ : A force ﬁeld database for cementitious materials including validations, applications and opportunities, Cement and Concrete Research 102 (2017) 68–89. doi:10.1016/j. cemconres.2017.09.003. [10] D. H. M. Azevedo, G. S. L. Fabris, J. R. Sambrano, J. M. M. Cordeiro, Surface and electronic properties of rutile TiO2 thin ﬁlms coated with PbO2, Computational Materials Science 171 (2020) 109222. doi:10.1016/j.commatsci.2019.109222. [11] I. Maki, K. Kato, Phase identiﬁcation of alite in portland cement clinker, Cement and Concrete Research 12 (1) (1982) 93–100. doi:10.1016/0008-8846(82)90103-x. [12] L. Nicoleau, M. A. Bertolim, Analytical Model for the Alite (C3S) Dissolution Topography, Journal of the American Ceramic Society 99 (3) (2015) 773–786. doi:10.1111/jace.13647. [13] R. K. Mishra, R. J. Flatt, H. Heinz, Force Field for Tricalcium Silicate and Insight into Nanoscale Properties: Cleavage, Initial Hydration, and Adsorption of Organic Molecules, The Journal of Physical Chemistry C 117 (20) (2013) 10417–10432. doi:10.1021/jp312815g. [14] R. K. Mishra, D. Geissbuhler, H. A. Carmona, F. K. Wittel, M. L. Sawley, M. Weibel, E. Gallucci, H. J. Herrmann, H. Heinz, R. J. Flatt, En route to multi-model scheme for clinker comminution with chemical grinding aids, Advances in Applied Ceramics 114 (2015) 393–401. doi:10.1179/ 1743676115y.0000000023. [15] R. Tran, Z. Xu, B. Radhakrishnan, D. Winston, W. Sun, K. A. Persson, S. P. Ong, Surface energies of elemental crystals, Scientiﬁc Data 3 (2016) 160080. doi:10.1038/sdata.2016.80. [16] E. Pustovgar, R. K. Mishra, M. Palacios, J.-B. d’Espinose de Lacaillerie, T. Matschei, A. S. Andreev, H. Heinz, R. Verel, R. J. Flatt, Inﬂuence of aluminates on the hydration kinetics of tricalcium silicate, Cement and Concrete Research 100 (2017) 245–262. doi:10.1016/j.cemconres.2017.06. [17] M.-N. D. Noirfontaine, M. Courtial, F. Dunstetter, G. Gasecki, M. Signes-Frehel, Tricalcium silicate Ca3SiO5 superstructure analysis: a route towards the structure of the M1 polymorph, Zeitschrift für Kristallographie 227 (2) (2012) 102–112. [18] W. G. Mumme, Crystal structure of tricalcium silicate from a Portland cement clinker and its application to quantitative XRD analysis, Neues Jahrbuch fuer Mineralogie: Monatshefte 4 (1995) 145–160. [19] H. Manzano, E. Durgun, I. López-Arbeloa, J. C. Grossman, Insight on Tricalcium Silicate Hydration and Dissolution Mechanism from Molecular Simulations, ACS Applied Materials & Interfaces 7 (27) (2015) 14726–14733. doi:10.1021/acsami.5b02505. [20] H. Manzano, E. Durgun, M. J. A. Qomi, F.-J. Ulm, R. J. M. Pellenq, J. C. Grossman, Impact of Chemical Impurities on the Crystalline Cement Clinker Phases Determined by Atomistic Simula- tions, Crystal Growth & Design 11 (7) (2011) 2964–2972. doi:10.1021/cg200212c. [21] J. E. Ash, M. G. Hall, J. I. Langford, M. Mellas, Estimations of degree of hydration of portland cement pastes, Cement and Concrete Research 23 (2) (1993) 399–406. doi:10.1016/0008-8846(93) 90105-i. [22] M. Vandamme, F.-J. Ulm, P. Fonollosa, Nanogranular packing of C–S–H at substochiometric condi- 18 tions, Cement and Concrete Research 40 (1) (2010) 14–26. doi:10.1016/j.cemconres.2009.09.017. [23] L. Nicoleau, A. Nonat, D. Perrey, The di- and tricalcium silicate dissolutions, Cement and Concrete Research 47 (2013) 14–30. doi:10.1016/j.cemconres.2013.01.017. [24] K. Velez, S. Maximilien, D. Damidot, G. Fantozzi, F. Sorrentino, Determination by nanoindentation of elastic modulus and hardness of pure constituents of Portland cement clinker, Cement and Concrete Research 31 (4) (2001) 555–561. doi:10.1016/s0008-8846(00)00505-6. [25] L. Brunarski, Recommendations for the use of resonance methods for testing concrete, Matériaux et Constructions 2 (4) (1969) 269–273. doi:10.1007/bf02475161. [26] X. Gao, Y. Wei, W. Huang, Eﬀect of individual phases on multiscale modeling mechanical properties of hardened cement paste, Construction and Building Materials 153 (2017) 25–35. doi:10.1016/j. conbuildmat.2017.07.074. [27] F.-J. Ulm, M. Vandamme, C. Bobko, J. A. Ortega, K. Tai, C. Ortiz, Statistical Indentation Tech- niques for Hydrated Nanocomposites: Concrete, Bone, and Shale, Journal of the American Ceramic Society 90 (9) (2007) 2677–2692. doi:10.1111/j.1551-2916.2007.02012.x. [28] F. Puertas, M. Palacios, H. Manzano, J. S. Dolado, A. Rico, J. Rodríguez, A model for the C-A-S-H gel formed in alkali-activated slag cements, Journal of the European Ceramic Society 31 (12) (2011) 2043–2056. doi:10.1016/j.jeurceramsoc.2011.04.036. [29] H. Manzano, J. S. Dolado, A. Ayuela, Elastic properties of the main species present in Portland cement pastes, Acta Materialia 57 (5) (2009) 1666–1674. doi:10.1016/j.actamat.2008.12.007. [30] H. Heinz, T.-J. Lin, R. K. Mishra, F. S. Emami, Thermodynamically Consistent Force Fields for the Assembly of Inorganic, Organic, and Biological Nanostructures: The INTERFACE Force Field, Langmuir 29 (6) (2013) 1754–1765. doi:10.1021/la3038846. [31] R. T. Cygan, J.-J. Liang, A. G. Kalinichev, Molecular models of hydroxide, oxyhydroxide, and clay phases and the development of a general force ﬁeld, The Journal of Physical Chemistry B 108 (4) (2004) 1255–1266. doi:10.1021/jp0363287. [32] S. Plimpton, Fast Parallel Algorithms for Short-Range Molecular Dynamics, Journal of Computa- tional Physics 117 (1) (1995) 1–19. doi:10.1006/jcph.1995.1039. [33] M. J. A. Qomi, D. Ebrahimi, M. Bauchy, R. Pellenq, F.-J. Ulm, Methodology for Estimation of Nanoscale Hardness via Atomistic Simulations, Journal of Nanomechanics and Micromechanics 7 (4) (2017) 04017011. doi:10.1061/(asce)nm.2153-5477.0000127. [34] Z. jian Wu, E. jun Zhao, H. ping Xiang, X. feng Hao, X. juan Liu, J. Meng, Crystal structures and elastic properties of superhard IrN and IrN from ﬁrst principles, Physical Review B 76 (5) 2 3 (2007). doi:10.1103/physrevb.76.054115. [35] J. Fu, F. Bernard, S. Kamali-Bernard, Assessment of the elastic properties of amorphous calcium silicates hydrates (I) and (II) structures by molecular dynamics simulation, Molecular Simulation 39 (2017) 1–15. doi:10.1080/08927022.2017.1373191. [36] F. Bernard, J. Fu, S. Kamali-Bernard, Multiscale modelling approach to determine the speciﬁc heat of cementitious materials, European Journal of Environmental and Civil Engineering (2018) 1–17doi:10.1080/19648189.2018.1443157. [37] S. Nosé, A uniﬁed formulation of the constant temperature molecular dynamics methods, The Journal of Chemical Physics 81 (1) (1984) 511–519. doi:10.1063/1.447334. [38] W. G. Hoover, Canonical dynamics: Equilibrium phase-space distributions, Physical Review A 31 (1985) 1695–1697. doi:10.1103/physreva.31.1695. [39] L. Verlet, Computer "Experiments" on Classical Fluids. I. Thermodynamical Properties of Lennard- Jones Molecules, Physical Review 159 (1) (1967) 98–103. doi:10.1103/physrev.159.98. [40] A. Boumiz, D. Sorrentino, C. Vernet, F. C. Tenoudji, Modelling the development of the elastic moduli as a function of the hydration degree of cement pastes and mortars, in: A. Nonat (Ed.), Second International RILEM Symposium on Hydration and Setting, RILEM Publications SARL, 1997, pp. 295–316. [41] R. M. Elder, D. B. Knorr, J. W. Andzelm, J. L. Lenhart, T. W. Sirk, Nanovoid formation and mechanics: a comparison of poly(dicyclopentadiene) and epoxy networks from molecular dynamics simulations, Soft Matter 12 (19) (2016) 4418–4434. doi:10.1039/c6sm00691d. [42] S. L. Teich-McGoldrick, J. A. Greathouse, R. T. Cygan, Molecular Dynamics Simulations of Struc- tural and Mechanical Properties of Muscovite: Pressure and Temperature Eﬀects, The Journal of Physical Chemistry C 116 (28) (2012) 15099–15107. doi:10.1021/jp303143s. [43] R. Shahsavari, L. Tao, L. Chen, Structure, Energetics, and Impact of Screw Dislocations in Tricalcium Silicates, Journal of the American Ceramic Society 99 (7) (2016) 2512–2520. doi: 10.1111/jace.14255. [44] M. Laanaiya, A. Bouibes, A. Zaoui, Understanding why Alite is responsible of the main mechanical 19 characteristics in Portland cement, Cement and Concrete Research 126 (2019) 105916. doi:10. 1016/j.cemconres.2019.105916. [45] Á. G. D. L. Torre, S. Bruque, J. Campo, M. A. G. Aranda, The superstructure of C S from synchrotron and neutron powder diﬀraction and its role in quantitative phase analyses, Cement and Concrete Research 32 (9) (2002) 1347–1356. doi:10.1016/s0008-8846(02)00796-2. [46] R. Gaillac, P. Pullumbi, F.-X. Coudert, ELATE: an open-source online application for analysis and visualization of elastic tensors, Journal of Physics: Condensed Matter 28 (27) (2016) 275201. doi:10.1088/0953-8984/28/27/275201. [47] D. Tavakoli, A. Tarighat, Molecular dynamics study on the mechanical properties of Portland cement clinker phases, Computational Materials Science 119 (2016) 65–73. doi:10.1016/j. commatsci.2016.03.043. [48] J. Hickman, Y. Mishin, Temperature ﬂuctuations in canonical systems: Insights from molecular dynamics simulations, Physical Review B 94 (18) (2016). doi:10.1103/physrevb.94.184311. [49] Q. Wang, D. J. Keﬀer, S. Petrovan, J. B. Thomas, Molecular Dynamics Simulation of Poly(ethylene terephthalate) Oligomers, The Journal of Physical Chemistry B 114 (2) (2010) 786–795. doi: 10.1021/jp909762j. [50] M. J. A. Qomi, F.-J. Ulm, R. J.-M. Pellenq, Physical Origins of Thermal Properties of Cement Paste, Physical Review Applied 3 (6) (2015). doi:10.1103/physrevapplied.3.064010. [51] P. Atkins, J. de Paula, Physical Chemistry, 9th Edition, W. H. Freeman, 2009. [52] B. Winkler, M. Dove, Thermodynamic properties of MgSiO3 perovskite derived from large scale molecular dynamics simulations, Physics and Chemistry of Minerals 18 (7) (1992). doi:10.1007/ bf00200963. [53] T. L. Hughes, C. M. Methven, T. G. J. Jones, S. E. Pelham, P. Fletcher, C. Hall, Determining cement composition by Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy, Advanced Cement Based Materials 2 (3) (1995) 91–104. doi:10.1016/1065-7355(94)00031-x. [54] P. Yu, R. J. Kirkpatrick, B. Poe, P. F. McMillan, X. Cong, Structure of Calcium Silicate Hydrate (C-S-H): Near-, Mid-, and Far-Infrared Spectroscopy, Journal of the American Ceramic Society 82 (3) (2004) 742–748. doi:10.1111/j.1151-2916.1999.tb01826.x. [55] T. Matschei, B. Lothenbach, F. P. Glasser, Thermodynamic properties of Portland cement hydrates in the system CaO–Al O –SiO –CaSO –CaCO –H O, Cement and Concrete Research 37 (10) 2 3 2 4 3 2 (2007) 1379–1410. doi:10.1016/j.cemconres.2007.06.002. [56] S. S. Todd, Low-temperature Heat Capacities and Entropies at 298.16°K of Crystalline Calcium Orthosilicate, Zinc Orthosilicate and Tricalcium Silicate, Journal of the American Chemical Society 73 (7) (1951) 3277–3278. doi:10.1021/ja01151a084. [57] G. Wulﬀ, Zur Frage der Geschwindigkeit des Wachstums und der Auﬂösung der Krystallﬂagen, Zeitschrift für Krystallographie und Mineralogie 5/6 (34) (1901) 449–530. [58] J. Claverie, F. Bernard, J. M. M. Cordeiro, S. Kamali-Bernard, Water's behaviour on Ca-rich tricalcium silicate surfaces for various degrees of hydration: A molecular dynamics investigation, Journal of Physics and Chemistry of Solids (2019). doi:10.1016/j.jpcs.2019.03.020. [59] Y.-T. Fu, H. Heinz, Cleavage Energy of Alkylammonium-Modiﬁed Montmorillonite and Relation to Exfoliation in Nanocomposites: Inﬂuence of Cation Density, Head Group Structure, and Chain Length, Chemistry of Materials 22 (4) (2010) 1595–1605. doi:10.1021/cm902784r. [60] E. Durgun, H. Manzano, P. V. Kumar, J. C. Grossman, The Characterization, Stability, and Reactivity of Synthetic Calcium Silicate Surfaces from First Principles, The Journal of Physical Chemistry C 118 (28) (2014) 15214–15219. doi:10.1021/jp408325f. [61] J. W. Gibbs, The collected works of J. Willard Gibbs, Longmans, Green, 1928. [62] S. P. Ong, W. D. Richards, A. Jain, G. Hautier, M. Kocher, S. Cholia, D. Gunter, V. L. Chevrier, K. A. Persson, G. Ceder, Python Materials Genomics (pymatgen): A robust, open-source python library for materials analysis, Computational Materials Science 68 (2013) 314–319. doi:10.1016/ j.commatsci.2012.10.028. [63] I. Maki, Relationship of processing parameters to clinker properties; inﬂuence of minor components, in: Proceedings of the 8th International Congress on the Chemistry of Cement, Vol. 1, 1986, pp. 34–47. [64] I. Maki, H. Haba, S. Takahashi, Eﬀect of recrystallization on the characters of alite in Portland cement clinker, Cement and Concrete Research 13 (5) (1983) 689–695. doi:10.1016/0008-8846(83) 90059-5. [65] S. Kamali-Bernard, F. Bernard, Eﬀect of tensile cracking on diﬀusivity of mortar: 3d numerical modelling, Computational Materials Science 47 (1) (2009) 178–185. doi:10.1016/j.commatsci. 2009.07.005. 20 [66] F. Bernard, S. Kamali-Bernard, Performance simulation and quantitative analysis of cement-based materials subjected to leaching, Computational Materials Science 50 (1) (2010) 218–226. doi: 10.1016/j.commatsci.2010.08.002.
Physics – arXiv (Cornell University)
Published: Mar 24, 2020
You can share this free article with as many people as you like with the url below! We hope you enjoy this feature!
Read and print from thousands of top scholarly journals.
Already have an account? Log in
Bookmark this article. You can see your Bookmarks on your DeepDyve Library.
To save an article, log in first, or sign up for a DeepDyve account if you don’t already have one.
Copy and paste the desired citation format or use the link below to download a file formatted for EndNote
Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
All DeepDyve websites use cookies to improve your online experience. They were placed on your computer when you launched this website. You can change your cookie settings through your browser.