Get 20M+ Full-Text Papers For Less Than $1.50/day. Start a 14-Day Trial for You or Your Team.

Learn More →

Anisotropic spin fluctuations in detwinned FeSe

Anisotropic spin fluctuations in detwinned FeSe Anisotropic spin uctuations in detwinned FeSe 1 2 3 4, 5 6 Tong Chen, Youzhe Chen, Andreas Kreisel, Xingye Lu, Astrid Schneidewind, Yiming Qiu, 7 8 8 9 1 1 4 Jitae Park, Toby G. Perring, J Ross Stewart, Huibo Cao, Rui Zhang, Yu Li, Yan Rong, 10 11 12 2, 6 1, 4,y Yuan Wei, Brian M. Andersen, P. J. Hirschfeld, Collin Broholm, and Pengcheng Dai Department of Physics and Astronomy, Rice University, Houston, Texas 77005, USA Department of Physics and Astronomy, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, Maryland 21218, USA Institut fur  Theoretische Physik, Universitat Leipzig, D-04103 Leipzig, Germany Center for Advanced Quantum Studies and Department of Physics, Beijing Normal University, Beijing 100875, China Julich  Center for Neutron Sciences, Forschungszentrum Julich  GmbH, Outstation at MLZ, D-85747 Garching, Germany NIST Center for Neutron Research, National Institute of Standards and Technology, Gaithersburg, Maryland 20899, USA Heinz Maier-Leibnitz Zentrum (MLZ), Technische Universitat Munchen,  D-85747 Garching, Germany ISIS Facility, STFC Rutherford-Appleton Laboratory, Didcot OX11 0OX, UK Neutron Scattering Division, Oak Ridge National Laboratory, Oak Ridge, Tennessee 37831, USA Institute of Physics, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100190, China Niels Bohr Institute, University of Copenhagen, Lyngbyvej 2, DK-2100 Copenhagen, Denmark Department of Physics, University of Florida, Gainesville, Florida 32611, USA Superconductivity in FeSe emerges from a nematic phase that breaks four-fold rotational sym- metry in the iron plane. This phase may arise from orbital ordering, spin uctuations, or hidden magnetic quadrupolar order. Here we use inelastic neutron scattering on a mosaic of single crystals of FeSe detwinned by mounting on a BaFe As substrate to demonstrate that spin excitations are 2 2 most intense at the antiferromagnetic wave vectors Q = (1; 0) at low energies E = 611 meV in AF the normal state. This two-fold (C ) anisotropy is reduced at lower energies 3-5 meV, indicating a gapped four-fold (C ) mode. In the superconducting state, however, the strong nematic anisotropy is again re ected in the spin resonance (E = 3:7 meV) at Q with incommensurate scattering AF around 5-6 meV. Our results highlight the extreme electronic anisotropy of the nematic phase of FeSe and are consistent with a highly anisotropic superconducting gap driven by spin uctuations. High-transition temperature superconductivity in copper and iron based materials emerges from their antiferromag- netic (AF) ordered nonsuperconducting parent compounds [1]. While the parents of copper oxide superconductors are Mott insulators with a simple checkerboard AF structure [1], most iron pnictide parent materials exhibit a tetragonal- to-orthorhombic structural transition at T (< 295 K) and form twin-domains before ordering antiferromagnetically at T (T  T ) [2]. Therefore, one must detwin iron pnictides in order to measure their intrinsic electronic properties N s N below T . By applying a uniaxial pressure along one-axis of the orthorhombic lattice to detwin the sample, an in-plane resistivity anisotropy has been observed in strained iron pnictides BaFe T As (where T is Co or Ni) above T [3, 4]. 2x x 2 s The resistivity anisotropy has been ascribed to an electronic nematic phase that spontaneously breaks the rotational symmetry while preserving the translation symmetry of the underlying lattice and is established in the temperature regime below T and above T [5, 6]. Below T , the AF structure is collinear, consisting of columns of antiparallel s N N spins along the orthorhombic a axis and parallel spins along the b axis with an in-plane AF ordering wave vector o o Q = (1; 0) in reciprocal space [2]. AF The highly unusual iron-based superconductor FeSe exhibits an orthorhombic structural distortion and supercon- ductivity without static AF order [Fig. 1(a)] [7{9]. Although the nematic phase in FeSe is established below T ( 90 K) [8], it has been argued that nematic order and superconductivity are induced by orbital uctuations [Fig. 1(b)] ++ [10{14], forming a sign-preserving s -wave electron pairing and therefore would be fundamentally di erent from other iron-based superconductors [15]. Alternatively, the absence of static AF order in FeSe has been interpreted as evidence for a quantum paramagnet arising from the d-orbital spin-1 localized iron moments [16, 17]. Here, the nematic phase is driven by magnetic frustration due to competition between low-energy spin uctuations associated with AF collinear order and those associated with various types of staggered order [18]. Third, the nematic super- conductivity in FeSe without AF order may arise from a frustration-induced nematic quantum spin liquid state with melted AF order [19]. This model predicted a dramatic suppression of the magnetic spectral weight at Q = (0;1) in a detwinned sample, and explained the observed superconducting gap anisotropy by angle resolved photo-emission spectroscopy (ARPES) [20{22] and scanning tunneling microscopy (STM) [23{25] experiments by an orbital depen- dent Hund's coupling [19]. Forth, the nematic order may arise from a hidden magnetic quadrupolar order [26, 27]. Finally, the nematic phase and superconductivity in FeSe has also been described by itinerant electrons interacting among quasi-nested hole-electron Fermi surfaces [28, 29], as in other iron based superconductors [30]. In this picture, arXiv:1905.08399v1 [cond-mat.str-el] 21 May 2019 2 the electronic correlation e ect is taken into account by orbital-dependent quasiparticle weights [24, 31]. Without electron correlation e ects, spin uctuations in the nematic phase below T exhibit only a minor C asymmetry. s 4 Including correlations in the theoretical calculations render the spin uctuations highly C symmetric with negligible weight at (0;1), and a neutron spin resonance exhibited only at Q = (1; 0) driven by the d orbitals [31]. AF yz Approaches based on localized models with magnetic quadrupolar order have also predicted a strong suppression of low-energy (0;1) intensity [27]. In recent inelastic neutron scattering (INS) experiments on twinned FeSe [18, 32, 33], well-de ned low-energy (E < 15 meV) spin uctuations are found at Q = (1; 0) and its twin-domain positions (0;1) in the nematic AF phase below T . On cooling below T , a neutron spin resonance, a key signature of unconventional superconductivity s c [1], appears at E  4 meV and sharply peaks at the (1; 0) and (0;1) positions [32, 33]. Figure 1(c) shows the energy dependence of the magnetic scattering S(E) integrated around Q obtained from our high-resolution INS AF experiments (see Methods). In the normal state, the magnetic scattering is gapless above E = 0:5 meV and increases in intensity with increasing energy [Fig. 2(a)]. In addition to having a weak peak around E  3:2 meV, we nd that the scattering changes from well-de ned commensurate peaks centered around Q below E = 3:625  0:125 AF meV [Figs. 2(b), 2(c)] to a peak with attish top at E = 5:625  0:125 meV [Fig. 2(d)]. Upon cooling to below T in the superconducting state, the spin excitation spectra open a gap below E  2:5 meV [Figs. 2(e), 2(f )], form a commensurate resonance at E = 3:6 meV [Fig. 2(g)], and exhibit ring-like incommensurate scattering at E = 5:25  0:075 meV [Fig. 2(f )]. The dispersive ring-like incommensurate resonance is also seen in hole-doped Ba K (Fe Co ) As superconductors [34]. 0:67 0:33 1x x 2 2 Although these results on twinned FeSe suggest that spin uctuations play an important role in the superconduc- tivity of FeSe, they provide no information on the possible orbital selective nature of the uctuations that may lead to a highly anisotropic electron pairing state [19, 31, 35{38]. From STM quasiparticle interference measurements on a single domain (detwinned) FeSe, where the Fermi surface geometry of electronic bands can be determined in the nematic phase, sign-reversed superconducting gaps are found at the hole [ or Q = (0; 0)] and electron [X or Q = (1; 0)] Fermi surface states derived from d orbitals of the Fe atoms along the orthorhombic a -axis direction AF yz o [Figs. 1(a) and 1(b)] [24]. Moreover, similar STM measurements show that the same orbital selective self-energy e ects are present already in the normal state of FeSe above T [25]. If superconductivity in FeSe arises from the quasiparticle excitations between hole and electron pockets [Fig. 1(b)] that are indeed orbital selective [24, 25], detwinned crystals should exhibit a strong anisotropy of the low energy spin excitations. In particular, it is expected that the neutron spin resonance associated with s superconductivity [32, 33] should only occur along the orthorhombic a -axis direction at Q = (1; 0) in a detwinned FeSe, as the o AF orbital selective superconducting gap with the d orbital character is large for scattering vectors along the a -axis yz o [24]. Similarly, orbital dependent Hund's coupling in a nematic quantum spin liquid of FeSe can also induce a large superconducting gap and spin excitation anisotropy [19]. To test these hypothesis, we used INS to study the low- energy spin uctuations in detwinned FeSe [Figs. 1(d)-1(e)]. In the normal state, spin uctuations from 6-11 meV are centered around Q with negligible intensity at (0;1), thus exhibiting a pronounced C rotational symmetry as AF 2 predicted by these theoretical approaches [19, 27, 31]. By contrast, for energies between 3-5 meV, the spin uctuations have a C rotational symmetry magnetic component as shown in the schematic illustration in Figs. 1(f ) and 1(g) which is based on combining experimental evidences from multiple instruments (Supplementary Fig. S10), possibly corresponding to a localized mode in both wave vector and energy. On cooling below T , the resonance only appears at Q = (1; 0) [Figs. 1(f ) and 1(g)], consistent with the STM observation that superconducting gaps are extremely AF anisotropic with minima at the tips of the elliptical pockets. Therefore, while the normal state C rotational symmetry magnetic component in the 3-5meV range is not anticipated, the anisotropic superconductivity-induced resonance is consistent with theoretical expectations [19, 24]. To detect anisotropic spin uctuations by INS [32, 33], one needs to co-align hundreds of single crystal FeSe samples. These are grown by chemical vapor transport method and are about 1-3 mm in size while few m in thickness (see Methods) [9]. Therefore, the most dicult part of carrying out INS experiments on FeSe is to simultaneously detwin hundreds of samples. In previous work on iron pnictides, we were able to completely detwin large (on the order of 0.5-1 cm by few mm in thickness) single crystals of BaFe As using a mechanical uniaxial pressure device [39, 40]. 2 2 By gluing many oriented FeSe on uniaxial pressured BaFe As shown schematically in Fig. 1(d), we were able to 2 2 simultaneously detwin many FeSe single crystals required for INS experiments (Supplementary Fig. S2). Figure 1(e) shows the temperature dependence of rocking scans along the [H; 0; 0] and [0; K; 0] directions on multiple FeSe on BaFe As assemblies. Below T  90 K, we see a clear splitting of the lattice constants. By comparing the scattering 2 2 s intensity of the (2; 0; 0) and (0; 2; 0) nuclear Bragg peaks, we nd that the FeSe sample assembly has detwinning ratio of  = [I (2; 0; 0) I (0; 2; 0) ]=[I (2; 0; 0) + I (0; 2; 0) ]  50% at 2 K [Fig. 1(e)], where I (2; 0; 0) and I (0; 2; 0) are o o o o o o 3 the observed Bragg peak intensity at (2; 0; 0) and (0; 2; 0), respectively, below T (Supplementary Figs. S3 and S4). In order to understand the e ect of detwinning FeSe, we rst need to determine the wave vector and energy dependence of the magnetic scattering S(Q; E) in twinned samples (See Methods and supplementary Fig. S5). Figures 2(a) and 2(e) show the energy dependence of the magnetic scattering along the [1; K; 0] direction above and below T , respectively. In the normal state at T = 10 K, the scattering is gapless above E = 0:5 meV and exhibits a weak peak around E = 3:2 meV [Fig. 2(a)]. The spin excitations are centered around Q = (1; 0) at AF E = 1 0:25 meV [Fig. 2(b)] and 3:625 0:125 meV [Fig. 1(c)]. At E = 5:625 0:125 meV, the spin excitations have a attish top as revealed by wave vector cuts along the [H; 0] and [1; K ] directions [Fig. 1(d)]. In the superconducting state at T = 2 K, a superconductivity-induced spin gap opens below E  2:5 meV and a resonance forms around E = 3:6 meV [Figs. 1(c), 2(e)]. This is con rmed by the vanishing signal at E = 1  0:25 meV [Fig. 2(f )] and enhanced magnetic scattering at 3:625 0:125 meV [Fig. 2(g)]. In addition, the resonance is clearly centered at the commensurate Q = (1; 0) position [Fig. 2(g)]. However, on increasing energy to E = 5:25  0:075 meV, we see AF clear incommensurate ring-like magnetic scattering centered around Q = (1; 0), as con rmed by wave vector cuts AF along the [H; 0] and [1; K ] directions [Fig. 2(h)]. The incommensurate scattering intensity in the superconducting state is higher than that of the normal state, suggesting it is a part of the dispersive resonance. In previous work, a dispersive ring-like neutron spin resonance has been seen in the hole-doped BaFe As family of materials, where the 2 2 incommensurate scattering has been ascribed to quasiparticle excitations from mismatched hole and electron Fermi surfaces [34]. Figure 3 summarizes the energy evolution of the normal state spin uctuations at Q = (1; 0) and (0; 1) in the AF (H; K ) plane in partially detwinned FeSe. Since our FeSe single crystals are mounted on surfaces of BaFe As , one 2 2 should also see spin uctuations from BaFe As at approximately the same position in reciprocal space. However, 2 2 the spin waves in BaFe As are gapped below 10 meV in the low-temperature AF ordered state [41, 42], meaning 2 2 that spin uctuations at Q  (1; 0) and (0; 1) below 10 meV must originate from FeSe. Figures 3(a) and 3(b) show AF constant-energy cuts in the (H; K ) plane for energy transfers of E = 3:5  0:5 and 4:5  0:5 meV, respectively, in the normal state at T = 12 K. We see clear evidence for magnetic scattering at Q  (1; 0) and (0; 1) with about AF the same strength (Supplementary Figs. S6a-S6d), suggesting a possible mode that has C rotational symmetry in the normal state. On increasing energies to E = 6 1 and 8 1 meV, the scattering at Q  (1; 0) becomes much AF stronger than those at (0; 1), suggesting that spin uctuations become highly C symmetric at these energies [Figs. 3(c) and 3(d)]. To con rm these results, we carried out energy scans at Q  (1; 0) and (0; 1) from 2.5 meV to 11 AF meV as shown in Fig. 3(e) (Supplementary Fig. S6e). From 6 meV to 11 meV, magnetic scattering at (1; 0) increase in intensity with increasing energy approximately two times faster than the increase of magnetic scattering at (0; 1). Figure 3(f ) shows wave vector scans approximately along the [1; K ] and [H; 1] directions at E = 8 meV (see E = 3:6 meV data in supplementary Fig. S6f ). The scattering intensity at (1; 0) dominated the signal while spin uctuations at (0; 1) are only 1/3 of that at (1; 0). After taking into account the nite detwinning ratio  of the FeSe samples (see supplementary information), there is almost no magnetic scattering at (0; 1) above the background. These results are consistent with Figs. 3(c) and 3(d), suggesting that the spin uctuations between 6-10 meV are strongly C symmetric. To con rm that spin uctuations in FeSe for energies below 5 meV have a C component as suggested in Figs. 3(a) and 3(b) and determine the impact of superconductivity (supplementary Figs. S7 and S8), we carried out constant- energy and constant-wave-vector scans at (1; 0) and (0; 1) using a cold neutron triple axis spectrometer (see Methods). Figures 4(a) and 4(b) show temperature di erence plot below (T = 2 K) and above (T = 12 K) T as a function of energy at (1; 0) and (0; 1), respectively. In previous work on twinned samples, superconductivity is found to induce a neutron spin resonance appearing below T at (1; 0) and (0; 1) around E  3:6 meV [Fig. 1(c)] [32, 33]. While Figure 4(a) shows clear evidence for the resonance at E  3:6 meV with intensity reduction (negative scattering) below the mode indicating opening of a spin gap [32, 33], an identical temperature di erence plot at (0; 1) in Fig. 4(b) yields no observable temperature di erence across T , and therefore no superconductivity-induced resonance and spin gap. Figures 4(c) and 4(d) show wave vector scans along the [H + 1; 0] and [0; K + 1] directions, respectively, at E = 3:6 meV. In the normal state (T = 12 K), we see well de ned peaks centered at (1; 0) and (0; 1), consistent with Figs. 3(a) and 3(b). On cooling below T , the scattering at (1; 0) increases in intensity and forms a resonance [Fig. 4(c)], while it does not change across T at (0; 1) [Fig. 4(d)]. Figures 4(e) and 4(f ) show the same data after correcting for background scattering and detwinning ratio . Similar to Figs. 4(c) and 4(d), we again nd that superconductivity induces a C symmetric resonance on a background of approximately C symmetric normal state 2 4 magnetic scattering (supplementary Figs. S9). Thus, it is the highly anisotropic pairing state of FeSe that drives the C symmetric magnetic scattering at these energies below T . Figures 1(f ) and 1(g) summarize the key results of our 2 c INS experiments on detwinned FeSe. The deviation of magnetic scattering intensity ratio at (1; 0) and (0; 1) from 3 : 1 provides convincing evidence for the existence of an unexpected mode. In the normal state, spin uctuations 4 have approximate C symmetry near the resonance energy but become C symmetric for energies above 6 meV. Upon 4 2 entering the superconducting state, a resonance with C symmetry is formed at Q [Fig. 1(f )] (supplementary Figs. 2 AF S10). In order to achieve a theoretical understanding of the experimental results presented above, we start from an itinerant ve-band model that quantitatively matches the low-energy electronic structure of FeSe in its nematic state 00 E=k T [9, 21, 24, 36] and compute the magnetic scattering S(Q; E) /  (Q; E)=(1 e ) within a standard random phase approximation formulation [28, 29, 31, 36]. The spectral function at the Fermi level is presented in Fig. 5(a). As illustrated in Figs. 5(c) and 5(e), this \plain vanilla" approach completely fails as is evident, e.g., from the presence of scattering close to (1; 1), and a negligible (1; 0) - (0; 1) anisotropy. The latter properties can be traced to an improper balance of the three most important scattering channels [see Fig. 5(a)]. However, electronic interactions and associated self-energy e ects are known to be important in FeSe, constituting an example of a Hund's metal [25]. Important properties of Hund's metals include the existence of orbital dependent mass renormalizations [43{45], and an associated redistribution of the relative importance of di erent orbital dependent scattering channels in the spin susceptibility [46]. A simple means to incorporate the important e ects of such orbital selectivity is through the introduction of orbital-dependent quasiparticle weights Z < 1[31, 36] leading to a modi ed bare susceptibility  ~ (Q; E) given ` ` ` ` 1 2 3 4 by 0 0 ~ (Q; E) = Z Z Z Z  (Q; E): (1) ` ` ` ` ` ` ` ` 1 2 3 4 ` ` ` ` 1 2 3 4 1 2 3 4 In agreement with theoretical expectations [43{45, 47], and earlier detailed studies of tunneling spectroscopy [24, 25], we apply the hierarchy Z < Z < Z , which shifts the relative importance of the dominant scattering vectors, xy xz yz as illustrated in Fig. 5(b), and thereby modi es the magnetic scattering. As seen in Fig. 5(d), the d -dominated xy (1; 1)-scattering is strongly reduced (because Z is the smallest), and the degree of C -symmetry breaking as seen xy 4 by the di erence in the scattering intensities at (1; 0) versus (0;1) is strongly enhanced (because Z < Z ), as xz yz seen explicitly by the dashed lines in Fig. 5(f ) (Supplementary Fig. S1). In the superconducting state, we employ the gap structure identical to the one of Refs. [24, 36] which is known to faithfully describe the gap in FeSe, and modify the bare susceptibility accordingly [28, 36]. When entering the highly anisotropic superconducting state, generated by the orbital-selective spin uctuations [24, 36], a neutron resonance is exhibited solely at the (1; 0) position as seen from Figs. 5(f ) and 5(g), in agreement with experiments. The associated neutron resonance is highly orbital-selective with predominant d character, as seen by the orbital-resolved yz spin susceptibilities plotted in Fig. 5(h). Therefore, both the very strong C -symmetry breaking in the 5-10 meV range and the unidirectional neutron resonance observed experimentally are captured by the itinerant orbital-selective scenario. This approach, however, does not provide an explanation of the emergence of the localized approximately C - symmetric spin excitations near E = 3 meV as shown in Figs. 1(f ), 1(g) and 3(a), 3(b). There are several possible scenarios for this remarkable discovery. First, it is possible that self-energy e ects in FeSe have a signi cantly more complicated functional form that cannot be simply captured by including energy- and momentum-independent Z - factors. Second, there is a possibility of impurity-generated low-energy spectral weight similar to the case of cuprates where vortices and disorder have been shown to generate localized modes in a restricted low-energy regime [48{50]. A counter-argument to disorder-based scenario, however, is the high quality of the FeSe crystals used in the current experiment (Supplementary Fig. S2). Finally, if part of the spin excitations in FeSe arise from a local moment quantum paramagnet [16, 17, 19], the C symmetric AF collinear order competes with the C symmetric N eel order across the nematic ordering temperature T 4 s [18]. In this picture, the C symmetric low-energy magnetic excitations with spin-wave ring-like features in detwinned FeSe may simply be the remnant of the localized moment not directly associated with Fermi surface nesting and itinerant electrons. Regardless of the microscopic origin of the C spin excitations, our data support the notion that the spin uctuations in the nematic phase of FeSe are, generally, highly anisotropic, and is consistent with superconductivity being driven by spin uctuations arising mainly from the d orbital states. Our measurements highlight the need for a quantitative yz understanding of both the extreme spin anisotropy, as well as the emergence of C -symmetric magnetic excitations at the very lowest energies. Progress in this direction may well shed new light on the role of electronic correlations in FeSe, in particular, and the origin of unconventional superconductivity in interacting systems, in general. Online content Any methods, additional references, Nature Research reporting summaries, source data, statements of data avail- ability and associated accession codes are available at: 5 Electronic address: luxy@bnu.edu.cn Electronic address: pdai@rice.edu [1] Scalapino, D. J. A common thread: The pairing interaction for unconventional superconductors. Rev. Mod. Phys. 84, 1383 (2012). [2] Dai, P. C. Antiferromagnetic order and spin dynamics in iron-based superconductors, Rev. Mod. Phys. 87, 855 (2015). [3] Chu, J.-H. et al. In-plane resistivity anisotropy in an underdoped iron arsenide superconductor. Science 329, 824-826 (2010). [4] Kuo, H.-H., Chu, J.-H., Palmstrom, J. C., Kivelson, S. A., & Fisher, I. R. Ubiquitous signatures of nematic quantum criticality in optimally doped Fe-based superconductors. Science 352, 958-962 (2016). [5] Fernandes, R. M., Chubukov, A. V. & Schmalian, J. What drives nematic order in iron-based superconductors? Nat. Phys 10, 97104 (2014). [6] B ohmer, A. E. & Meingast, C. Electronic nematic susceptibility of iron-based superconductors. C. R. Physique 17 90-112 (2016). [7] Hsu, F. C. et al. Superconductivity in the PbO-type structure -FeSe. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 105, 14262 (2008). [8] McQueen, T. M. et al. Tetragonal-to-orthorhombic structural phase transition at 90K in the superconductor Fe Se. 1:01 Phys. Rev. Lett. 103, 057002 (2009). [9] B ohmer, A. E. & Kreisel, A., Nematicity, magnetism and superconductivity in FeSe, J. Phys.: Condens. Matter 30, 023001 (2018). [10] Lee, C. C., Yin, W.-G., & Ku, W., Ferro-orbital order and strong magnetic anisotropy in the parent compounds of iron-pnictide superconductors, Phys. Rev. Lett. 103, 267001 (2009). [11] Baek, S.-H. et al. Orbital-driven nematicity in FeSe. Nat. Mater. 14, 210214 (2015). [12] B ohmer, A. E. et al. Origin of the tetragonal-to-orthorhombic phase transition in FeSe: A combined thermodynamic and NMR study of nematicity. Phys. Rev. Lett. 114, 027001 (2015). [13] Yamakawa, Y., Onari, S., & Kontani, H. Nematicity and magnetism in FeSe and other families of Fe-based superconductors, Phys. Rev. X 6, 021032 (2016). [14] Onari, S., Yamakawa, Y., & Kontani, H. Sign-reversing orbital polarization in the nematic phase of FeSe due to the C symmetry breaking in the self-energy, Phys. Rev. Lett. 116, 227001 (2016). [15] Kontani, H. & Onari, S. Orbital- uctuation-mediated superconductivity in iron pnictides: Analysis of the ve-orbital Hubbard-Holstein model. Phys. Rev. Lett. 104, 157001 (2010). [16] Wang, F., Kivelson, S. & Lee, D.-H. Nematicity and quantum paramagnetism in FeSe. Nat. Phys. 11, 959963 (2015). [17] Glasbrenner, J. K. et al. E ect of magnetic frustration on nematicity and superconductivity in iron chalcogenides. Nat. Phys. 11, 953958 (2015). [18] Wang, Q. et al. Magnetic ground state of FeSe. Nat. Commun. 7, 12182 (2016). [19] She, J.-H., Lawler, M. J., & Kim, E.-A., Quantum spin liquid intertwining nematic and superconducting order in FeSe, Phys. Rev. Lett. 121, 237002 (2018). [20] Yi, M., Zhang, Y., Shen, Z.-X., & Lu, D., Role of the orbital degree of freedom in iron-based superconductors, npj Quantum Materials 2, 57 (2017). [21] Coldea, A. & Watson M. D., The key ingredients of the electronic structure of FeSe, Annu. Rev. Condens. Matter Phys. 9, 125-146 (2018). [22] Liu, D. F. et al. Orbital origin of extremely anisotropic superconducting gap in nematic phase of FeSe superconductor. Phys. Rev. X 8, 031033 (2018). [23] Song, C. L. et al. Imaging the electron boson coupling in superconducting FeSe lms using a scanning tunneling microscope. Phys. Rev. Lett. 112, 057002 (2014). [24] Sprau, P. O. et al. Discovery of orbital-selective Cooper pairing in FeSe, Science 357, 75-80 (2017). [25] Kostin, A. et al., Visualizing orbital-selective quasiparticle interference in the Hunds Metal State of FeSe, Nat. Mater. 17, 869-874 (2018). [26] Wang, Z. T., Hu, W. J., & Nevidomskyy, A. H. Spin Ferroquadrupolar Order in the Nematic Phase of FeSe, Phys. Rev. Lett. 116, 247203 (2016). [27] Lai, Hsin-Hua, Hu, W. J., Nica, E. M., Yu, Rong, & Si, Q., Antiferroquadrupolar order and rotational symmetry breaking in a generalized bilinear-biquadratic model on a square lattice, Phys. Rev. Lett. 118, 176401 (2017). [28] Kreisel, A., Mukherjee, S., Hirschfeld, P. J., & Andersen, B. M., Spin excitations in a model of FeSe with orbital ordering, Phys. Rev. B 92, 224515 (2015). [29] S. Mukherjee, A. Kreisel, P. J. Hirschfeld, and B. M. Andersen, Model of Electronic Structure and Superconductivity in Orbitally Ordered FeSe, Phys. Rev. Lett. 115, 026402 (2015). [30] Hirschfeld, P. J. Using gap symmetry and structure to reveal the pairing mechanism in Fe-based superconductors, C. R. Phys. 17, 197-231 (2016). [31] Kreisel, A., Andersen, B. M., & Hirschfeld, P. J. Itinerant approach to magnetic neutron scattering of FeSe: e ect of orbital selectivity, Phys. Rev. B 98, 214518 (2018). [32] Wang, Q. et al. Strong interplay between stripe spin uctuations, nematicity and superconductivity in FeSe. Nat. Mater. 15, 159163 (2016). [33] Ma, M. W. et al. Prominent role of spin-orbit coupling in FeSe revealed by inelastic neutron scattering, Phys. Rev. X 7, 6 021025 (2017). [34] Zhang, R. et al. Neutron spin resonance as a probe of Fermi surface nesting and superconducting gap symmetry in Ba K (Fe Co ) As , Phys. Rev. B 98, 060502(R) (2018). 0:67 0:33 1x x 2 2 [35] Nica, E. M., Yu, R., & Si, Q. Orbital-selective pairing and superconductivity in iron selenides, npj Quantum Mater. 2, 24 (2017). [36] Kreisel, A. et al., Orbital selective pairing and gap structures of iron-based superconductors, Phys. Rev. B 95, 174504 (2017). [37] Benfatto, L., Valenzuela, B., & Fanfarillo, L., Nematic pairing from orbital selective spin uctuations in FeSe, npj Quantum Mater. 3, 56 (2018). [38] Kang, J., Fernandes, R. M., & Chubukov, A., Superconductivity in FeSe: the role of nematic order, Phys. Rev. Lett. 120, 267001 (2018). [39] Lu, X. Y. et al., Nematic spin correlations in the tetragonal state of uniaxial-strained BaFe Ni As , Science 345, 657 2x x 2 (2014). [40] Lu, X. Y. et al., Spin waves in detwinned BaFe As , Phys. Rev. Lett. 121, 067002 (2018). 2 2 [41] Matan, K., Morinaga, R., Iida, K., & Sato, T. J., Anisotropic itinerant magnetism and spin uctuations in BaFe As : A 2 2 neutron scattering study, Phys. Rev. B 79, 054526 (2009). [42] Wang, C. et al. Longitudinal spin excitations and magnetic anisotropy in antiferromagnetically ordered BaFe As , Phys. 2 2 Rev. X 3, 041036 (2013). [43] Georges, A., de Medici, L. & Mravlje, J. Strong correlations from Hunds coupling. Annu. Rev. Condens. Matter Phys. 4, 137-178 (2013). [44] de Medici, L. & Capone, M. in F. Mancini, R. Citro (eds) The Iron Pnictide Superconductors. Springer Series in Solid-State Sciences 186 (Springer, Cham, 2017). [45] van Roekeghem, A., Richard, P., Ding, H. & Biermann, S., Spectral properties of transition metal pnictides and chalco- genides: Angle-resolved photoemission spectroscopy and dynamical mean- eld theory, C. R. Phys. 17, 140 (2016), iron- based superconductors/Supraconducteurs a  base de fer. [46] Ishizuka, J., Yamada, T., Yanagi, Y. & Ono, Y., Fermi surface, pressure-induced antiferromagnetic order, and supercon- ductivity in FeSe, Journal of the Physical Society of Japan 87, 014705 (2018). [47] Yu, R., Zhu, J.-X., & Si, Q., Orbital selectivity enhanced by nematic order in FeSe, Phys. Rev. Lett. 121, 227003 (2018). [48] Lake, B. et al., Spins in the Vortices of a High-Temperature Superconductor, Science 291, 1759 (2001). [49] Kimura, H. et al., Novel In-Gap Spin State in Zn-Doped La Sr CuO , Phys. Rev. Lett. 91, 067002 (2003). 1:85 0:15 4 [50] Andersen, B. M. et al., Disorder-induced freezing of dynamical spin uctuations in cuprate materials, Phys. Rev. Lett. 105, 147002 (2010). Acknowledgements We thank D. Abernathy, Q. Wang, Y. Hao and H. Hu for useful discussions. The neutron-scattering work at Rice University was supported by the U.S. DOE, BES de-sc0012311 (P.D.). The single-crystal synthesis work was supported by the Robert A. Welch Foundation Grant No. C-1839 (P.D.). C. B. and Y. C. are supported by the Department of Energy Grant No. DE-FG02-08ER46544. B. M. A. acknowledges nancial support from the Carlsberg Foundation. P. J. H. was supported by the Department of Energy under Grant No. DE-FG02-05ER46236. This research used resources at the High Flux Isotope Reactor and Spallation Neutron Source, a DOE Oce of Science User Facility operated by the Oak Ridge National Laboratory. Access to MACS was provided by the Center for High Resolution Neutron Scattering, a partnership between the National Institute of Standards and Technology and the National Science Foundation under Agreement No. DMR-1508249. Author contributions X.Y.L., T.C., and P.D. conceived the project. T.C. prepared all the FeSe single crystal samples. BaFe As single 2 2 crystals are prepared by T.C., X.Y.L., R.Z., Y.L., Y.R., Y.W. Neutron scattering experiments on twinned samples are carried out by T.C., Y.C., Y.M.Q., C.B., and P.D. at NCNR. Neutron scattering experiments on detwinned samples are carried out by T.C., J.P., T.G.P., J.R.S., H.B.C., and P.D. at ORNL, ISIS, and MLZ. Theoretical analysis was performed by A.G., B.M.A., and P.J.H. The entire project was supervised by P.D. The manuscript is written by P.D., T.C., A.K., B.M.A., and P.J.H. All authors made comments. The authors declare no competing nancial interests. Additional information Supplementary information is available for this paper at. Reprints and permissions information is available at www.nature.com/reprints. Correspondence and requests for materials should be addressed to X.Y.L. or P.D. Publishers note: Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional aliations. Methods Experimental Setups Elastic neutron experiments were carried out on the HB-3A four-Circle di ractometer at the High-Flux-Isotope Reactor (HFIR), Oak Ridge National Laboratory (ORNL), United States to rst check if the method works well in detwinning FeSe on a single piece of BaFe As (Supplementary Fig. S3). HB-3A uses a 2 2 silicon monochromator and a scintillator-based 2D Anger Camera. We de ne (H; K; L) = (q a=2; q b=2; q c=2) x y z 7 in reciprocal lattice units (r.l.u.) using the orthorhombic lattice notation for FeSe, where a  5:33 A, b  5:31 A, c = 5:486 A [9]. Our INS experiments on twinned samples were done on MACS cold triple axis spectrometer at NIST center for neutron scattering at Gaithersburg, Maryland. MACS spectrometer has a double focusing pyrolytic graphite [PG(002)] monochoromator and multi detectors. We used E = 3:7 meV with a BeO lter after the sample and a Be lter before the monochromator for energy transfers below E = 1:5 meV. Our INS experiments on detwinned samples were carried out on the PANDA cold neutron and PUMA thermal neutron triple-axis spectrometers, at MLZ, Garching, Germany [39], and on the MAPS time-of- ight chopper spec- trometer, at ISIS, Rutherford-Appleton laboratory, Didcot, United Kingdom [40]. For PANDA experiments, a double-focused pyrolytic graphite [PG(002)] monochromator and analyzer with xed 0 0 scattered neutron energy E = 5:1 meV were used with collimations of none-40 -40 -none for inelastic measurements. 0 0 0 0 For elastic measurements, we used E = 4:39 meV with collimations of 80 -80 -80 -80 . For thermal neutron measure- ments on PUMA, we used E = 14:69 meV with double focusing monochromator and analyzer and no collimators. For MAPS neutron time-of- ight measurements, we used an incident beam energy of E = 38 meV with the incident beam along the c-axis of the crystal. Sample growth and preparation The high quality FeSe single crystals used in the experiments are grown by a chemical vapor transport method. Fe and Se powder are sealed in quartz tubes with KCl-AlCl ux. The growth takes 28 days in a temperature gradient from 330 C to 400 C. Typical samples are 1 1 mm in area and < 0:1 mm in thickness. The square-shaped BaFe As crystals are grown using ux method [40]. They are aligned using a 2 2 Laue camera and cut along the tetragonal [1; 1; 0] and [1;1; 0] directions by a high-precision wire saw. Since single crystals of FeSe have one natural edge 45 rotated from the orthorhombic a direction, we can use an optical method to co-align FeSe on the surface of BaFe As . Given our intent to measure spin excitations in detwinned FeSe, we 2 2 aligned and glued (with CYTOP type-M) about 300 small pieces FeSe single crystals on many pieces of big BaFe As 2 2 single crystals (Supplementary Figs. S1-S3). Data availability The data that support the plots in this paper and other ndings of this study are available from the corresponding authors upon reasonable request. 8 FIG. 1: Crystal structure, Fermi surface and neutron scattering of FeSe (a) Crystal structure of FeSe, where blue and orange colors mark Fe and Se positions, respectively. The red arrows indicate the uniaxial strain direction applied through detwinned BaFe As . a and b are the orthorhombic lattice parameters (double-sided black arrows) in the nematic phase. 2 2 o o Gray dashed lines are guides for the eye. (b) Hole/electron Fermi surfaces of the tight binding model for FeSe [24]. Color indicates orbital character of the Fermi surfaces, where red, green, and blue indicate d , d , and d orbitals of the Fe xz yz xy atom. Fermi surface nesting of ! X and ! Y corresponds to (1; 0) and (0; 1) in reciprocal lattice units (r.l.u.), where (H; K ) = (q a =2; q b =2) are in-plane Miller indices of the orthorhombic lattice, respectively (see Methods). (c) Energy x o y o dependence of the measured magnetic scattering (S(Q; E)) integrated around (1; 0) above (T = 10 K) and below (T = 2 K) T ( 8 K) on twinned FeSe (Supplemental Fig. S5). The vertical error bars indicate the statistical errors of one standard deviation. (d) Schematic diagram of the sample arrangement, FeSe samples are glued on large single crystals of BaFe As 2 2 under uniaxial pressure of 20 MPa [39, 40], where red arrows indicate pressure direction. (e) Wave vector scans of nuclear (2; 0; 0) and (0; 2; 0) Bragg peaks of FeSe on an assembly of BaFe As single crystals at di erent temperatures. The dashed 2 2 lines indicate the single Gaussian components of the tting. (f,g) Schematic illustration of the magnetic scattering at (1; 0) and (0; 1) in the normal and superconducting (SC) states estimated from the twinned and detwinned samples (Supplemental Fig. S10). Shaded region in (f ) is (0; 1) data from (g). 9 FIG. 2: Low-energy spin uactuations in twinned FeSe below and above T . Two-dimensional images of wave vector and energy dependence of spin uctuations at (a) T = 10 K, (e) T = 2 K. Wave vector dependence of spin uctuations in the (H; K ) plane at energies (b,f ) E = 1  0:25 meV, (c,g) E = 3:6  0:125 meV, (d) E = 5:62  0:125 meV. Cuts along the [H; 0] and [1; K ] directions with a width of 0:04 r.l.u. show attish top scattering near (1; 0). (h) E = 5:25  0:075 meV. Incommensurate scattering is clearly seen through the identical cuts along the [H; 0] and [1; K ] directions. This feature is missed in previous work [18, 32, 33] due to the small incommensurability and narrow energy range. Panels (a,b,c,d) and (e,f,g,h) are at T = 10 K and T = 2 K, respectively. Solid lines are tting with the sum of two Gaussians to the data. The vertical error bars indicate the statistical errors of one standard deviation. 10 FIG. 3: Normal state spin uctuations in detwinned FeSe. The two-dimensional images of spin uctuations at (a) E = 3:5 0:5 meV, (b) E = 4:5 0:5 meV, (c) E = 6 1 meV, and E = 8:5 1 meV. The data are collected at T = 12 K using MAPS chopper spectrometer with incident neutron energy of E = 38 meV along the c axis and are folded to improve statistics. The scattering near wave vector (1; 1) is background and not magnetic in origin (Supplementary Figs. S6-S8). (e) Energy dependence of the scattering (1; 0) and (0; 1) above background at T = 11 K. The positions of signal and background are marked as large and small spots in the inset. (f ) Wave vector scans at E = 8 meV along the [1; K ] (green) and [H; 1] direction at T = 11 K. Linear backgrounds have been subtracted from the data. The vertical error bars indicate the statistical errors of one standard deviation. 11 FIG. 4: E ect of superconductivity on low-energy spin uctuations of detwinned FeSe. Di erence of the scattering in the superconducting state (below T ) and the normal state plotted as function of energy for the momentum transfer (a) (1; 0) and (b) (0; 1). The peak seen at E  3:6 meV in (a) marks the neutron spin resonance. The solid blue line and dashed red lines are guides to the eye. (c) Wave vector scans below and above T at E = 3:6 meV and (1; 0). (d) Similar scans at (0; 1). (e) (1; 0) and (f ) (0; 1) scans with background subtracted and detwinning ratio corrected (Supplemental Fig. S9). The solid lines in (c,d) and (e,f ) are Gaussian ts to the data before and after linear background subtraction. The vertical error bars indicate the statistical errors of one standard deviation. 12 FIG. 5: Theoretical calculations of the spin uctuations in detwinned FeSe. Map of the spectral function at zero energy for our model of the electronic structure of FeSe in (a) the fully coherent case with quasiparticle weights (Z = 1) and (b) the orbital-selective case where reduced quasiparticle weights (Z < 1) weaken the spin- uctuations at certain momentum transfer (blue and red arrows) while the spin uctuations stemming mostly from the d orbital become dominant (green arrow). yz (c) For the fully coherent model, one obtains in the normal state large contributions to the dynamical structure factor close to (1;1) from the d orbital and an almost identical but weaker contribution at (1; 0) and (0;1). (e) The susceptibility xy integrated around these momentum transfer vectors, shows the same trend at low energies. (d,f ) In contrast, the orbital selective model yields spin uctuations at low energies which are dominated by peaks at (1; 0) in the low energy range shown. The enhancement of the spin uctuations at (1; 0) in the superconducting state is clearly seen when plotted (f ) as function of energy and (g) as an intensity map in momentum-energy space. (h) The spin uctuations at (1; 0) are dominated by the contributions of the d orbital. yz http://www.deepdyve.com/assets/images/DeepDyve-Logo-lg.png Condensed Matter arXiv (Cornell University)

Anisotropic spin fluctuations in detwinned FeSe

Download PDF
12 pages

Loading next page...
 
/lp/arxiv-cornell-university/anisotropic-spin-fluctuations-in-detwinned-fese-kA7cJNGmFV

References (60)

ISSN
1476-1122
eISSN
ARCH-3331
DOI
10.1038/s41563-019-0369-5
Publisher site
See Article on Publisher Site

Abstract

Anisotropic spin uctuations in detwinned FeSe 1 2 3 4, 5 6 Tong Chen, Youzhe Chen, Andreas Kreisel, Xingye Lu, Astrid Schneidewind, Yiming Qiu, 7 8 8 9 1 1 4 Jitae Park, Toby G. Perring, J Ross Stewart, Huibo Cao, Rui Zhang, Yu Li, Yan Rong, 10 11 12 2, 6 1, 4,y Yuan Wei, Brian M. Andersen, P. J. Hirschfeld, Collin Broholm, and Pengcheng Dai Department of Physics and Astronomy, Rice University, Houston, Texas 77005, USA Department of Physics and Astronomy, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, Maryland 21218, USA Institut fur  Theoretische Physik, Universitat Leipzig, D-04103 Leipzig, Germany Center for Advanced Quantum Studies and Department of Physics, Beijing Normal University, Beijing 100875, China Julich  Center for Neutron Sciences, Forschungszentrum Julich  GmbH, Outstation at MLZ, D-85747 Garching, Germany NIST Center for Neutron Research, National Institute of Standards and Technology, Gaithersburg, Maryland 20899, USA Heinz Maier-Leibnitz Zentrum (MLZ), Technische Universitat Munchen,  D-85747 Garching, Germany ISIS Facility, STFC Rutherford-Appleton Laboratory, Didcot OX11 0OX, UK Neutron Scattering Division, Oak Ridge National Laboratory, Oak Ridge, Tennessee 37831, USA Institute of Physics, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100190, China Niels Bohr Institute, University of Copenhagen, Lyngbyvej 2, DK-2100 Copenhagen, Denmark Department of Physics, University of Florida, Gainesville, Florida 32611, USA Superconductivity in FeSe emerges from a nematic phase that breaks four-fold rotational sym- metry in the iron plane. This phase may arise from orbital ordering, spin uctuations, or hidden magnetic quadrupolar order. Here we use inelastic neutron scattering on a mosaic of single crystals of FeSe detwinned by mounting on a BaFe As substrate to demonstrate that spin excitations are 2 2 most intense at the antiferromagnetic wave vectors Q = (1; 0) at low energies E = 611 meV in AF the normal state. This two-fold (C ) anisotropy is reduced at lower energies 3-5 meV, indicating a gapped four-fold (C ) mode. In the superconducting state, however, the strong nematic anisotropy is again re ected in the spin resonance (E = 3:7 meV) at Q with incommensurate scattering AF around 5-6 meV. Our results highlight the extreme electronic anisotropy of the nematic phase of FeSe and are consistent with a highly anisotropic superconducting gap driven by spin uctuations. High-transition temperature superconductivity in copper and iron based materials emerges from their antiferromag- netic (AF) ordered nonsuperconducting parent compounds [1]. While the parents of copper oxide superconductors are Mott insulators with a simple checkerboard AF structure [1], most iron pnictide parent materials exhibit a tetragonal- to-orthorhombic structural transition at T (< 295 K) and form twin-domains before ordering antiferromagnetically at T (T  T ) [2]. Therefore, one must detwin iron pnictides in order to measure their intrinsic electronic properties N s N below T . By applying a uniaxial pressure along one-axis of the orthorhombic lattice to detwin the sample, an in-plane resistivity anisotropy has been observed in strained iron pnictides BaFe T As (where T is Co or Ni) above T [3, 4]. 2x x 2 s The resistivity anisotropy has been ascribed to an electronic nematic phase that spontaneously breaks the rotational symmetry while preserving the translation symmetry of the underlying lattice and is established in the temperature regime below T and above T [5, 6]. Below T , the AF structure is collinear, consisting of columns of antiparallel s N N spins along the orthorhombic a axis and parallel spins along the b axis with an in-plane AF ordering wave vector o o Q = (1; 0) in reciprocal space [2]. AF The highly unusual iron-based superconductor FeSe exhibits an orthorhombic structural distortion and supercon- ductivity without static AF order [Fig. 1(a)] [7{9]. Although the nematic phase in FeSe is established below T ( 90 K) [8], it has been argued that nematic order and superconductivity are induced by orbital uctuations [Fig. 1(b)] ++ [10{14], forming a sign-preserving s -wave electron pairing and therefore would be fundamentally di erent from other iron-based superconductors [15]. Alternatively, the absence of static AF order in FeSe has been interpreted as evidence for a quantum paramagnet arising from the d-orbital spin-1 localized iron moments [16, 17]. Here, the nematic phase is driven by magnetic frustration due to competition between low-energy spin uctuations associated with AF collinear order and those associated with various types of staggered order [18]. Third, the nematic super- conductivity in FeSe without AF order may arise from a frustration-induced nematic quantum spin liquid state with melted AF order [19]. This model predicted a dramatic suppression of the magnetic spectral weight at Q = (0;1) in a detwinned sample, and explained the observed superconducting gap anisotropy by angle resolved photo-emission spectroscopy (ARPES) [20{22] and scanning tunneling microscopy (STM) [23{25] experiments by an orbital depen- dent Hund's coupling [19]. Forth, the nematic order may arise from a hidden magnetic quadrupolar order [26, 27]. Finally, the nematic phase and superconductivity in FeSe has also been described by itinerant electrons interacting among quasi-nested hole-electron Fermi surfaces [28, 29], as in other iron based superconductors [30]. In this picture, arXiv:1905.08399v1 [cond-mat.str-el] 21 May 2019 2 the electronic correlation e ect is taken into account by orbital-dependent quasiparticle weights [24, 31]. Without electron correlation e ects, spin uctuations in the nematic phase below T exhibit only a minor C asymmetry. s 4 Including correlations in the theoretical calculations render the spin uctuations highly C symmetric with negligible weight at (0;1), and a neutron spin resonance exhibited only at Q = (1; 0) driven by the d orbitals [31]. AF yz Approaches based on localized models with magnetic quadrupolar order have also predicted a strong suppression of low-energy (0;1) intensity [27]. In recent inelastic neutron scattering (INS) experiments on twinned FeSe [18, 32, 33], well-de ned low-energy (E < 15 meV) spin uctuations are found at Q = (1; 0) and its twin-domain positions (0;1) in the nematic AF phase below T . On cooling below T , a neutron spin resonance, a key signature of unconventional superconductivity s c [1], appears at E  4 meV and sharply peaks at the (1; 0) and (0;1) positions [32, 33]. Figure 1(c) shows the energy dependence of the magnetic scattering S(E) integrated around Q obtained from our high-resolution INS AF experiments (see Methods). In the normal state, the magnetic scattering is gapless above E = 0:5 meV and increases in intensity with increasing energy [Fig. 2(a)]. In addition to having a weak peak around E  3:2 meV, we nd that the scattering changes from well-de ned commensurate peaks centered around Q below E = 3:625  0:125 AF meV [Figs. 2(b), 2(c)] to a peak with attish top at E = 5:625  0:125 meV [Fig. 2(d)]. Upon cooling to below T in the superconducting state, the spin excitation spectra open a gap below E  2:5 meV [Figs. 2(e), 2(f )], form a commensurate resonance at E = 3:6 meV [Fig. 2(g)], and exhibit ring-like incommensurate scattering at E = 5:25  0:075 meV [Fig. 2(f )]. The dispersive ring-like incommensurate resonance is also seen in hole-doped Ba K (Fe Co ) As superconductors [34]. 0:67 0:33 1x x 2 2 Although these results on twinned FeSe suggest that spin uctuations play an important role in the superconduc- tivity of FeSe, they provide no information on the possible orbital selective nature of the uctuations that may lead to a highly anisotropic electron pairing state [19, 31, 35{38]. From STM quasiparticle interference measurements on a single domain (detwinned) FeSe, where the Fermi surface geometry of electronic bands can be determined in the nematic phase, sign-reversed superconducting gaps are found at the hole [ or Q = (0; 0)] and electron [X or Q = (1; 0)] Fermi surface states derived from d orbitals of the Fe atoms along the orthorhombic a -axis direction AF yz o [Figs. 1(a) and 1(b)] [24]. Moreover, similar STM measurements show that the same orbital selective self-energy e ects are present already in the normal state of FeSe above T [25]. If superconductivity in FeSe arises from the quasiparticle excitations between hole and electron pockets [Fig. 1(b)] that are indeed orbital selective [24, 25], detwinned crystals should exhibit a strong anisotropy of the low energy spin excitations. In particular, it is expected that the neutron spin resonance associated with s superconductivity [32, 33] should only occur along the orthorhombic a -axis direction at Q = (1; 0) in a detwinned FeSe, as the o AF orbital selective superconducting gap with the d orbital character is large for scattering vectors along the a -axis yz o [24]. Similarly, orbital dependent Hund's coupling in a nematic quantum spin liquid of FeSe can also induce a large superconducting gap and spin excitation anisotropy [19]. To test these hypothesis, we used INS to study the low- energy spin uctuations in detwinned FeSe [Figs. 1(d)-1(e)]. In the normal state, spin uctuations from 6-11 meV are centered around Q with negligible intensity at (0;1), thus exhibiting a pronounced C rotational symmetry as AF 2 predicted by these theoretical approaches [19, 27, 31]. By contrast, for energies between 3-5 meV, the spin uctuations have a C rotational symmetry magnetic component as shown in the schematic illustration in Figs. 1(f ) and 1(g) which is based on combining experimental evidences from multiple instruments (Supplementary Fig. S10), possibly corresponding to a localized mode in both wave vector and energy. On cooling below T , the resonance only appears at Q = (1; 0) [Figs. 1(f ) and 1(g)], consistent with the STM observation that superconducting gaps are extremely AF anisotropic with minima at the tips of the elliptical pockets. Therefore, while the normal state C rotational symmetry magnetic component in the 3-5meV range is not anticipated, the anisotropic superconductivity-induced resonance is consistent with theoretical expectations [19, 24]. To detect anisotropic spin uctuations by INS [32, 33], one needs to co-align hundreds of single crystal FeSe samples. These are grown by chemical vapor transport method and are about 1-3 mm in size while few m in thickness (see Methods) [9]. Therefore, the most dicult part of carrying out INS experiments on FeSe is to simultaneously detwin hundreds of samples. In previous work on iron pnictides, we were able to completely detwin large (on the order of 0.5-1 cm by few mm in thickness) single crystals of BaFe As using a mechanical uniaxial pressure device [39, 40]. 2 2 By gluing many oriented FeSe on uniaxial pressured BaFe As shown schematically in Fig. 1(d), we were able to 2 2 simultaneously detwin many FeSe single crystals required for INS experiments (Supplementary Fig. S2). Figure 1(e) shows the temperature dependence of rocking scans along the [H; 0; 0] and [0; K; 0] directions on multiple FeSe on BaFe As assemblies. Below T  90 K, we see a clear splitting of the lattice constants. By comparing the scattering 2 2 s intensity of the (2; 0; 0) and (0; 2; 0) nuclear Bragg peaks, we nd that the FeSe sample assembly has detwinning ratio of  = [I (2; 0; 0) I (0; 2; 0) ]=[I (2; 0; 0) + I (0; 2; 0) ]  50% at 2 K [Fig. 1(e)], where I (2; 0; 0) and I (0; 2; 0) are o o o o o o 3 the observed Bragg peak intensity at (2; 0; 0) and (0; 2; 0), respectively, below T (Supplementary Figs. S3 and S4). In order to understand the e ect of detwinning FeSe, we rst need to determine the wave vector and energy dependence of the magnetic scattering S(Q; E) in twinned samples (See Methods and supplementary Fig. S5). Figures 2(a) and 2(e) show the energy dependence of the magnetic scattering along the [1; K; 0] direction above and below T , respectively. In the normal state at T = 10 K, the scattering is gapless above E = 0:5 meV and exhibits a weak peak around E = 3:2 meV [Fig. 2(a)]. The spin excitations are centered around Q = (1; 0) at AF E = 1 0:25 meV [Fig. 2(b)] and 3:625 0:125 meV [Fig. 1(c)]. At E = 5:625 0:125 meV, the spin excitations have a attish top as revealed by wave vector cuts along the [H; 0] and [1; K ] directions [Fig. 1(d)]. In the superconducting state at T = 2 K, a superconductivity-induced spin gap opens below E  2:5 meV and a resonance forms around E = 3:6 meV [Figs. 1(c), 2(e)]. This is con rmed by the vanishing signal at E = 1  0:25 meV [Fig. 2(f )] and enhanced magnetic scattering at 3:625 0:125 meV [Fig. 2(g)]. In addition, the resonance is clearly centered at the commensurate Q = (1; 0) position [Fig. 2(g)]. However, on increasing energy to E = 5:25  0:075 meV, we see AF clear incommensurate ring-like magnetic scattering centered around Q = (1; 0), as con rmed by wave vector cuts AF along the [H; 0] and [1; K ] directions [Fig. 2(h)]. The incommensurate scattering intensity in the superconducting state is higher than that of the normal state, suggesting it is a part of the dispersive resonance. In previous work, a dispersive ring-like neutron spin resonance has been seen in the hole-doped BaFe As family of materials, where the 2 2 incommensurate scattering has been ascribed to quasiparticle excitations from mismatched hole and electron Fermi surfaces [34]. Figure 3 summarizes the energy evolution of the normal state spin uctuations at Q = (1; 0) and (0; 1) in the AF (H; K ) plane in partially detwinned FeSe. Since our FeSe single crystals are mounted on surfaces of BaFe As , one 2 2 should also see spin uctuations from BaFe As at approximately the same position in reciprocal space. However, 2 2 the spin waves in BaFe As are gapped below 10 meV in the low-temperature AF ordered state [41, 42], meaning 2 2 that spin uctuations at Q  (1; 0) and (0; 1) below 10 meV must originate from FeSe. Figures 3(a) and 3(b) show AF constant-energy cuts in the (H; K ) plane for energy transfers of E = 3:5  0:5 and 4:5  0:5 meV, respectively, in the normal state at T = 12 K. We see clear evidence for magnetic scattering at Q  (1; 0) and (0; 1) with about AF the same strength (Supplementary Figs. S6a-S6d), suggesting a possible mode that has C rotational symmetry in the normal state. On increasing energies to E = 6 1 and 8 1 meV, the scattering at Q  (1; 0) becomes much AF stronger than those at (0; 1), suggesting that spin uctuations become highly C symmetric at these energies [Figs. 3(c) and 3(d)]. To con rm these results, we carried out energy scans at Q  (1; 0) and (0; 1) from 2.5 meV to 11 AF meV as shown in Fig. 3(e) (Supplementary Fig. S6e). From 6 meV to 11 meV, magnetic scattering at (1; 0) increase in intensity with increasing energy approximately two times faster than the increase of magnetic scattering at (0; 1). Figure 3(f ) shows wave vector scans approximately along the [1; K ] and [H; 1] directions at E = 8 meV (see E = 3:6 meV data in supplementary Fig. S6f ). The scattering intensity at (1; 0) dominated the signal while spin uctuations at (0; 1) are only 1/3 of that at (1; 0). After taking into account the nite detwinning ratio  of the FeSe samples (see supplementary information), there is almost no magnetic scattering at (0; 1) above the background. These results are consistent with Figs. 3(c) and 3(d), suggesting that the spin uctuations between 6-10 meV are strongly C symmetric. To con rm that spin uctuations in FeSe for energies below 5 meV have a C component as suggested in Figs. 3(a) and 3(b) and determine the impact of superconductivity (supplementary Figs. S7 and S8), we carried out constant- energy and constant-wave-vector scans at (1; 0) and (0; 1) using a cold neutron triple axis spectrometer (see Methods). Figures 4(a) and 4(b) show temperature di erence plot below (T = 2 K) and above (T = 12 K) T as a function of energy at (1; 0) and (0; 1), respectively. In previous work on twinned samples, superconductivity is found to induce a neutron spin resonance appearing below T at (1; 0) and (0; 1) around E  3:6 meV [Fig. 1(c)] [32, 33]. While Figure 4(a) shows clear evidence for the resonance at E  3:6 meV with intensity reduction (negative scattering) below the mode indicating opening of a spin gap [32, 33], an identical temperature di erence plot at (0; 1) in Fig. 4(b) yields no observable temperature di erence across T , and therefore no superconductivity-induced resonance and spin gap. Figures 4(c) and 4(d) show wave vector scans along the [H + 1; 0] and [0; K + 1] directions, respectively, at E = 3:6 meV. In the normal state (T = 12 K), we see well de ned peaks centered at (1; 0) and (0; 1), consistent with Figs. 3(a) and 3(b). On cooling below T , the scattering at (1; 0) increases in intensity and forms a resonance [Fig. 4(c)], while it does not change across T at (0; 1) [Fig. 4(d)]. Figures 4(e) and 4(f ) show the same data after correcting for background scattering and detwinning ratio . Similar to Figs. 4(c) and 4(d), we again nd that superconductivity induces a C symmetric resonance on a background of approximately C symmetric normal state 2 4 magnetic scattering (supplementary Figs. S9). Thus, it is the highly anisotropic pairing state of FeSe that drives the C symmetric magnetic scattering at these energies below T . Figures 1(f ) and 1(g) summarize the key results of our 2 c INS experiments on detwinned FeSe. The deviation of magnetic scattering intensity ratio at (1; 0) and (0; 1) from 3 : 1 provides convincing evidence for the existence of an unexpected mode. In the normal state, spin uctuations 4 have approximate C symmetry near the resonance energy but become C symmetric for energies above 6 meV. Upon 4 2 entering the superconducting state, a resonance with C symmetry is formed at Q [Fig. 1(f )] (supplementary Figs. 2 AF S10). In order to achieve a theoretical understanding of the experimental results presented above, we start from an itinerant ve-band model that quantitatively matches the low-energy electronic structure of FeSe in its nematic state 00 E=k T [9, 21, 24, 36] and compute the magnetic scattering S(Q; E) /  (Q; E)=(1 e ) within a standard random phase approximation formulation [28, 29, 31, 36]. The spectral function at the Fermi level is presented in Fig. 5(a). As illustrated in Figs. 5(c) and 5(e), this \plain vanilla" approach completely fails as is evident, e.g., from the presence of scattering close to (1; 1), and a negligible (1; 0) - (0; 1) anisotropy. The latter properties can be traced to an improper balance of the three most important scattering channels [see Fig. 5(a)]. However, electronic interactions and associated self-energy e ects are known to be important in FeSe, constituting an example of a Hund's metal [25]. Important properties of Hund's metals include the existence of orbital dependent mass renormalizations [43{45], and an associated redistribution of the relative importance of di erent orbital dependent scattering channels in the spin susceptibility [46]. A simple means to incorporate the important e ects of such orbital selectivity is through the introduction of orbital-dependent quasiparticle weights Z < 1[31, 36] leading to a modi ed bare susceptibility  ~ (Q; E) given ` ` ` ` 1 2 3 4 by 0 0 ~ (Q; E) = Z Z Z Z  (Q; E): (1) ` ` ` ` ` ` ` ` 1 2 3 4 ` ` ` ` 1 2 3 4 1 2 3 4 In agreement with theoretical expectations [43{45, 47], and earlier detailed studies of tunneling spectroscopy [24, 25], we apply the hierarchy Z < Z < Z , which shifts the relative importance of the dominant scattering vectors, xy xz yz as illustrated in Fig. 5(b), and thereby modi es the magnetic scattering. As seen in Fig. 5(d), the d -dominated xy (1; 1)-scattering is strongly reduced (because Z is the smallest), and the degree of C -symmetry breaking as seen xy 4 by the di erence in the scattering intensities at (1; 0) versus (0;1) is strongly enhanced (because Z < Z ), as xz yz seen explicitly by the dashed lines in Fig. 5(f ) (Supplementary Fig. S1). In the superconducting state, we employ the gap structure identical to the one of Refs. [24, 36] which is known to faithfully describe the gap in FeSe, and modify the bare susceptibility accordingly [28, 36]. When entering the highly anisotropic superconducting state, generated by the orbital-selective spin uctuations [24, 36], a neutron resonance is exhibited solely at the (1; 0) position as seen from Figs. 5(f ) and 5(g), in agreement with experiments. The associated neutron resonance is highly orbital-selective with predominant d character, as seen by the orbital-resolved yz spin susceptibilities plotted in Fig. 5(h). Therefore, both the very strong C -symmetry breaking in the 5-10 meV range and the unidirectional neutron resonance observed experimentally are captured by the itinerant orbital-selective scenario. This approach, however, does not provide an explanation of the emergence of the localized approximately C - symmetric spin excitations near E = 3 meV as shown in Figs. 1(f ), 1(g) and 3(a), 3(b). There are several possible scenarios for this remarkable discovery. First, it is possible that self-energy e ects in FeSe have a signi cantly more complicated functional form that cannot be simply captured by including energy- and momentum-independent Z - factors. Second, there is a possibility of impurity-generated low-energy spectral weight similar to the case of cuprates where vortices and disorder have been shown to generate localized modes in a restricted low-energy regime [48{50]. A counter-argument to disorder-based scenario, however, is the high quality of the FeSe crystals used in the current experiment (Supplementary Fig. S2). Finally, if part of the spin excitations in FeSe arise from a local moment quantum paramagnet [16, 17, 19], the C symmetric AF collinear order competes with the C symmetric N eel order across the nematic ordering temperature T 4 s [18]. In this picture, the C symmetric low-energy magnetic excitations with spin-wave ring-like features in detwinned FeSe may simply be the remnant of the localized moment not directly associated with Fermi surface nesting and itinerant electrons. Regardless of the microscopic origin of the C spin excitations, our data support the notion that the spin uctuations in the nematic phase of FeSe are, generally, highly anisotropic, and is consistent with superconductivity being driven by spin uctuations arising mainly from the d orbital states. Our measurements highlight the need for a quantitative yz understanding of both the extreme spin anisotropy, as well as the emergence of C -symmetric magnetic excitations at the very lowest energies. Progress in this direction may well shed new light on the role of electronic correlations in FeSe, in particular, and the origin of unconventional superconductivity in interacting systems, in general. Online content Any methods, additional references, Nature Research reporting summaries, source data, statements of data avail- ability and associated accession codes are available at: 5 Electronic address: luxy@bnu.edu.cn Electronic address: pdai@rice.edu [1] Scalapino, D. J. A common thread: The pairing interaction for unconventional superconductors. Rev. Mod. Phys. 84, 1383 (2012). [2] Dai, P. C. Antiferromagnetic order and spin dynamics in iron-based superconductors, Rev. Mod. Phys. 87, 855 (2015). [3] Chu, J.-H. et al. In-plane resistivity anisotropy in an underdoped iron arsenide superconductor. Science 329, 824-826 (2010). [4] Kuo, H.-H., Chu, J.-H., Palmstrom, J. C., Kivelson, S. A., & Fisher, I. R. Ubiquitous signatures of nematic quantum criticality in optimally doped Fe-based superconductors. Science 352, 958-962 (2016). [5] Fernandes, R. M., Chubukov, A. V. & Schmalian, J. What drives nematic order in iron-based superconductors? Nat. Phys 10, 97104 (2014). [6] B ohmer, A. E. & Meingast, C. Electronic nematic susceptibility of iron-based superconductors. C. R. Physique 17 90-112 (2016). [7] Hsu, F. C. et al. Superconductivity in the PbO-type structure -FeSe. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 105, 14262 (2008). [8] McQueen, T. M. et al. Tetragonal-to-orthorhombic structural phase transition at 90K in the superconductor Fe Se. 1:01 Phys. Rev. Lett. 103, 057002 (2009). [9] B ohmer, A. E. & Kreisel, A., Nematicity, magnetism and superconductivity in FeSe, J. Phys.: Condens. Matter 30, 023001 (2018). [10] Lee, C. C., Yin, W.-G., & Ku, W., Ferro-orbital order and strong magnetic anisotropy in the parent compounds of iron-pnictide superconductors, Phys. Rev. Lett. 103, 267001 (2009). [11] Baek, S.-H. et al. Orbital-driven nematicity in FeSe. Nat. Mater. 14, 210214 (2015). [12] B ohmer, A. E. et al. Origin of the tetragonal-to-orthorhombic phase transition in FeSe: A combined thermodynamic and NMR study of nematicity. Phys. Rev. Lett. 114, 027001 (2015). [13] Yamakawa, Y., Onari, S., & Kontani, H. Nematicity and magnetism in FeSe and other families of Fe-based superconductors, Phys. Rev. X 6, 021032 (2016). [14] Onari, S., Yamakawa, Y., & Kontani, H. Sign-reversing orbital polarization in the nematic phase of FeSe due to the C symmetry breaking in the self-energy, Phys. Rev. Lett. 116, 227001 (2016). [15] Kontani, H. & Onari, S. Orbital- uctuation-mediated superconductivity in iron pnictides: Analysis of the ve-orbital Hubbard-Holstein model. Phys. Rev. Lett. 104, 157001 (2010). [16] Wang, F., Kivelson, S. & Lee, D.-H. Nematicity and quantum paramagnetism in FeSe. Nat. Phys. 11, 959963 (2015). [17] Glasbrenner, J. K. et al. E ect of magnetic frustration on nematicity and superconductivity in iron chalcogenides. Nat. Phys. 11, 953958 (2015). [18] Wang, Q. et al. Magnetic ground state of FeSe. Nat. Commun. 7, 12182 (2016). [19] She, J.-H., Lawler, M. J., & Kim, E.-A., Quantum spin liquid intertwining nematic and superconducting order in FeSe, Phys. Rev. Lett. 121, 237002 (2018). [20] Yi, M., Zhang, Y., Shen, Z.-X., & Lu, D., Role of the orbital degree of freedom in iron-based superconductors, npj Quantum Materials 2, 57 (2017). [21] Coldea, A. & Watson M. D., The key ingredients of the electronic structure of FeSe, Annu. Rev. Condens. Matter Phys. 9, 125-146 (2018). [22] Liu, D. F. et al. Orbital origin of extremely anisotropic superconducting gap in nematic phase of FeSe superconductor. Phys. Rev. X 8, 031033 (2018). [23] Song, C. L. et al. Imaging the electron boson coupling in superconducting FeSe lms using a scanning tunneling microscope. Phys. Rev. Lett. 112, 057002 (2014). [24] Sprau, P. O. et al. Discovery of orbital-selective Cooper pairing in FeSe, Science 357, 75-80 (2017). [25] Kostin, A. et al., Visualizing orbital-selective quasiparticle interference in the Hunds Metal State of FeSe, Nat. Mater. 17, 869-874 (2018). [26] Wang, Z. T., Hu, W. J., & Nevidomskyy, A. H. Spin Ferroquadrupolar Order in the Nematic Phase of FeSe, Phys. Rev. Lett. 116, 247203 (2016). [27] Lai, Hsin-Hua, Hu, W. J., Nica, E. M., Yu, Rong, & Si, Q., Antiferroquadrupolar order and rotational symmetry breaking in a generalized bilinear-biquadratic model on a square lattice, Phys. Rev. Lett. 118, 176401 (2017). [28] Kreisel, A., Mukherjee, S., Hirschfeld, P. J., & Andersen, B. M., Spin excitations in a model of FeSe with orbital ordering, Phys. Rev. B 92, 224515 (2015). [29] S. Mukherjee, A. Kreisel, P. J. Hirschfeld, and B. M. Andersen, Model of Electronic Structure and Superconductivity in Orbitally Ordered FeSe, Phys. Rev. Lett. 115, 026402 (2015). [30] Hirschfeld, P. J. Using gap symmetry and structure to reveal the pairing mechanism in Fe-based superconductors, C. R. Phys. 17, 197-231 (2016). [31] Kreisel, A., Andersen, B. M., & Hirschfeld, P. J. Itinerant approach to magnetic neutron scattering of FeSe: e ect of orbital selectivity, Phys. Rev. B 98, 214518 (2018). [32] Wang, Q. et al. Strong interplay between stripe spin uctuations, nematicity and superconductivity in FeSe. Nat. Mater. 15, 159163 (2016). [33] Ma, M. W. et al. Prominent role of spin-orbit coupling in FeSe revealed by inelastic neutron scattering, Phys. Rev. X 7, 6 021025 (2017). [34] Zhang, R. et al. Neutron spin resonance as a probe of Fermi surface nesting and superconducting gap symmetry in Ba K (Fe Co ) As , Phys. Rev. B 98, 060502(R) (2018). 0:67 0:33 1x x 2 2 [35] Nica, E. M., Yu, R., & Si, Q. Orbital-selective pairing and superconductivity in iron selenides, npj Quantum Mater. 2, 24 (2017). [36] Kreisel, A. et al., Orbital selective pairing and gap structures of iron-based superconductors, Phys. Rev. B 95, 174504 (2017). [37] Benfatto, L., Valenzuela, B., & Fanfarillo, L., Nematic pairing from orbital selective spin uctuations in FeSe, npj Quantum Mater. 3, 56 (2018). [38] Kang, J., Fernandes, R. M., & Chubukov, A., Superconductivity in FeSe: the role of nematic order, Phys. Rev. Lett. 120, 267001 (2018). [39] Lu, X. Y. et al., Nematic spin correlations in the tetragonal state of uniaxial-strained BaFe Ni As , Science 345, 657 2x x 2 (2014). [40] Lu, X. Y. et al., Spin waves in detwinned BaFe As , Phys. Rev. Lett. 121, 067002 (2018). 2 2 [41] Matan, K., Morinaga, R., Iida, K., & Sato, T. J., Anisotropic itinerant magnetism and spin uctuations in BaFe As : A 2 2 neutron scattering study, Phys. Rev. B 79, 054526 (2009). [42] Wang, C. et al. Longitudinal spin excitations and magnetic anisotropy in antiferromagnetically ordered BaFe As , Phys. 2 2 Rev. X 3, 041036 (2013). [43] Georges, A., de Medici, L. & Mravlje, J. Strong correlations from Hunds coupling. Annu. Rev. Condens. Matter Phys. 4, 137-178 (2013). [44] de Medici, L. & Capone, M. in F. Mancini, R. Citro (eds) The Iron Pnictide Superconductors. Springer Series in Solid-State Sciences 186 (Springer, Cham, 2017). [45] van Roekeghem, A., Richard, P., Ding, H. & Biermann, S., Spectral properties of transition metal pnictides and chalco- genides: Angle-resolved photoemission spectroscopy and dynamical mean- eld theory, C. R. Phys. 17, 140 (2016), iron- based superconductors/Supraconducteurs a  base de fer. [46] Ishizuka, J., Yamada, T., Yanagi, Y. & Ono, Y., Fermi surface, pressure-induced antiferromagnetic order, and supercon- ductivity in FeSe, Journal of the Physical Society of Japan 87, 014705 (2018). [47] Yu, R., Zhu, J.-X., & Si, Q., Orbital selectivity enhanced by nematic order in FeSe, Phys. Rev. Lett. 121, 227003 (2018). [48] Lake, B. et al., Spins in the Vortices of a High-Temperature Superconductor, Science 291, 1759 (2001). [49] Kimura, H. et al., Novel In-Gap Spin State in Zn-Doped La Sr CuO , Phys. Rev. Lett. 91, 067002 (2003). 1:85 0:15 4 [50] Andersen, B. M. et al., Disorder-induced freezing of dynamical spin uctuations in cuprate materials, Phys. Rev. Lett. 105, 147002 (2010). Acknowledgements We thank D. Abernathy, Q. Wang, Y. Hao and H. Hu for useful discussions. The neutron-scattering work at Rice University was supported by the U.S. DOE, BES de-sc0012311 (P.D.). The single-crystal synthesis work was supported by the Robert A. Welch Foundation Grant No. C-1839 (P.D.). C. B. and Y. C. are supported by the Department of Energy Grant No. DE-FG02-08ER46544. B. M. A. acknowledges nancial support from the Carlsberg Foundation. P. J. H. was supported by the Department of Energy under Grant No. DE-FG02-05ER46236. This research used resources at the High Flux Isotope Reactor and Spallation Neutron Source, a DOE Oce of Science User Facility operated by the Oak Ridge National Laboratory. Access to MACS was provided by the Center for High Resolution Neutron Scattering, a partnership between the National Institute of Standards and Technology and the National Science Foundation under Agreement No. DMR-1508249. Author contributions X.Y.L., T.C., and P.D. conceived the project. T.C. prepared all the FeSe single crystal samples. BaFe As single 2 2 crystals are prepared by T.C., X.Y.L., R.Z., Y.L., Y.R., Y.W. Neutron scattering experiments on twinned samples are carried out by T.C., Y.C., Y.M.Q., C.B., and P.D. at NCNR. Neutron scattering experiments on detwinned samples are carried out by T.C., J.P., T.G.P., J.R.S., H.B.C., and P.D. at ORNL, ISIS, and MLZ. Theoretical analysis was performed by A.G., B.M.A., and P.J.H. The entire project was supervised by P.D. The manuscript is written by P.D., T.C., A.K., B.M.A., and P.J.H. All authors made comments. The authors declare no competing nancial interests. Additional information Supplementary information is available for this paper at. Reprints and permissions information is available at www.nature.com/reprints. Correspondence and requests for materials should be addressed to X.Y.L. or P.D. Publishers note: Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional aliations. Methods Experimental Setups Elastic neutron experiments were carried out on the HB-3A four-Circle di ractometer at the High-Flux-Isotope Reactor (HFIR), Oak Ridge National Laboratory (ORNL), United States to rst check if the method works well in detwinning FeSe on a single piece of BaFe As (Supplementary Fig. S3). HB-3A uses a 2 2 silicon monochromator and a scintillator-based 2D Anger Camera. We de ne (H; K; L) = (q a=2; q b=2; q c=2) x y z 7 in reciprocal lattice units (r.l.u.) using the orthorhombic lattice notation for FeSe, where a  5:33 A, b  5:31 A, c = 5:486 A [9]. Our INS experiments on twinned samples were done on MACS cold triple axis spectrometer at NIST center for neutron scattering at Gaithersburg, Maryland. MACS spectrometer has a double focusing pyrolytic graphite [PG(002)] monochoromator and multi detectors. We used E = 3:7 meV with a BeO lter after the sample and a Be lter before the monochromator for energy transfers below E = 1:5 meV. Our INS experiments on detwinned samples were carried out on the PANDA cold neutron and PUMA thermal neutron triple-axis spectrometers, at MLZ, Garching, Germany [39], and on the MAPS time-of- ight chopper spec- trometer, at ISIS, Rutherford-Appleton laboratory, Didcot, United Kingdom [40]. For PANDA experiments, a double-focused pyrolytic graphite [PG(002)] monochromator and analyzer with xed 0 0 scattered neutron energy E = 5:1 meV were used with collimations of none-40 -40 -none for inelastic measurements. 0 0 0 0 For elastic measurements, we used E = 4:39 meV with collimations of 80 -80 -80 -80 . For thermal neutron measure- ments on PUMA, we used E = 14:69 meV with double focusing monochromator and analyzer and no collimators. For MAPS neutron time-of- ight measurements, we used an incident beam energy of E = 38 meV with the incident beam along the c-axis of the crystal. Sample growth and preparation The high quality FeSe single crystals used in the experiments are grown by a chemical vapor transport method. Fe and Se powder are sealed in quartz tubes with KCl-AlCl ux. The growth takes 28 days in a temperature gradient from 330 C to 400 C. Typical samples are 1 1 mm in area and < 0:1 mm in thickness. The square-shaped BaFe As crystals are grown using ux method [40]. They are aligned using a 2 2 Laue camera and cut along the tetragonal [1; 1; 0] and [1;1; 0] directions by a high-precision wire saw. Since single crystals of FeSe have one natural edge 45 rotated from the orthorhombic a direction, we can use an optical method to co-align FeSe on the surface of BaFe As . Given our intent to measure spin excitations in detwinned FeSe, we 2 2 aligned and glued (with CYTOP type-M) about 300 small pieces FeSe single crystals on many pieces of big BaFe As 2 2 single crystals (Supplementary Figs. S1-S3). Data availability The data that support the plots in this paper and other ndings of this study are available from the corresponding authors upon reasonable request. 8 FIG. 1: Crystal structure, Fermi surface and neutron scattering of FeSe (a) Crystal structure of FeSe, where blue and orange colors mark Fe and Se positions, respectively. The red arrows indicate the uniaxial strain direction applied through detwinned BaFe As . a and b are the orthorhombic lattice parameters (double-sided black arrows) in the nematic phase. 2 2 o o Gray dashed lines are guides for the eye. (b) Hole/electron Fermi surfaces of the tight binding model for FeSe [24]. Color indicates orbital character of the Fermi surfaces, where red, green, and blue indicate d , d , and d orbitals of the Fe xz yz xy atom. Fermi surface nesting of ! X and ! Y corresponds to (1; 0) and (0; 1) in reciprocal lattice units (r.l.u.), where (H; K ) = (q a =2; q b =2) are in-plane Miller indices of the orthorhombic lattice, respectively (see Methods). (c) Energy x o y o dependence of the measured magnetic scattering (S(Q; E)) integrated around (1; 0) above (T = 10 K) and below (T = 2 K) T ( 8 K) on twinned FeSe (Supplemental Fig. S5). The vertical error bars indicate the statistical errors of one standard deviation. (d) Schematic diagram of the sample arrangement, FeSe samples are glued on large single crystals of BaFe As 2 2 under uniaxial pressure of 20 MPa [39, 40], where red arrows indicate pressure direction. (e) Wave vector scans of nuclear (2; 0; 0) and (0; 2; 0) Bragg peaks of FeSe on an assembly of BaFe As single crystals at di erent temperatures. The dashed 2 2 lines indicate the single Gaussian components of the tting. (f,g) Schematic illustration of the magnetic scattering at (1; 0) and (0; 1) in the normal and superconducting (SC) states estimated from the twinned and detwinned samples (Supplemental Fig. S10). Shaded region in (f ) is (0; 1) data from (g). 9 FIG. 2: Low-energy spin uactuations in twinned FeSe below and above T . Two-dimensional images of wave vector and energy dependence of spin uctuations at (a) T = 10 K, (e) T = 2 K. Wave vector dependence of spin uctuations in the (H; K ) plane at energies (b,f ) E = 1  0:25 meV, (c,g) E = 3:6  0:125 meV, (d) E = 5:62  0:125 meV. Cuts along the [H; 0] and [1; K ] directions with a width of 0:04 r.l.u. show attish top scattering near (1; 0). (h) E = 5:25  0:075 meV. Incommensurate scattering is clearly seen through the identical cuts along the [H; 0] and [1; K ] directions. This feature is missed in previous work [18, 32, 33] due to the small incommensurability and narrow energy range. Panels (a,b,c,d) and (e,f,g,h) are at T = 10 K and T = 2 K, respectively. Solid lines are tting with the sum of two Gaussians to the data. The vertical error bars indicate the statistical errors of one standard deviation. 10 FIG. 3: Normal state spin uctuations in detwinned FeSe. The two-dimensional images of spin uctuations at (a) E = 3:5 0:5 meV, (b) E = 4:5 0:5 meV, (c) E = 6 1 meV, and E = 8:5 1 meV. The data are collected at T = 12 K using MAPS chopper spectrometer with incident neutron energy of E = 38 meV along the c axis and are folded to improve statistics. The scattering near wave vector (1; 1) is background and not magnetic in origin (Supplementary Figs. S6-S8). (e) Energy dependence of the scattering (1; 0) and (0; 1) above background at T = 11 K. The positions of signal and background are marked as large and small spots in the inset. (f ) Wave vector scans at E = 8 meV along the [1; K ] (green) and [H; 1] direction at T = 11 K. Linear backgrounds have been subtracted from the data. The vertical error bars indicate the statistical errors of one standard deviation. 11 FIG. 4: E ect of superconductivity on low-energy spin uctuations of detwinned FeSe. Di erence of the scattering in the superconducting state (below T ) and the normal state plotted as function of energy for the momentum transfer (a) (1; 0) and (b) (0; 1). The peak seen at E  3:6 meV in (a) marks the neutron spin resonance. The solid blue line and dashed red lines are guides to the eye. (c) Wave vector scans below and above T at E = 3:6 meV and (1; 0). (d) Similar scans at (0; 1). (e) (1; 0) and (f ) (0; 1) scans with background subtracted and detwinning ratio corrected (Supplemental Fig. S9). The solid lines in (c,d) and (e,f ) are Gaussian ts to the data before and after linear background subtraction. The vertical error bars indicate the statistical errors of one standard deviation. 12 FIG. 5: Theoretical calculations of the spin uctuations in detwinned FeSe. Map of the spectral function at zero energy for our model of the electronic structure of FeSe in (a) the fully coherent case with quasiparticle weights (Z = 1) and (b) the orbital-selective case where reduced quasiparticle weights (Z < 1) weaken the spin- uctuations at certain momentum transfer (blue and red arrows) while the spin uctuations stemming mostly from the d orbital become dominant (green arrow). yz (c) For the fully coherent model, one obtains in the normal state large contributions to the dynamical structure factor close to (1;1) from the d orbital and an almost identical but weaker contribution at (1; 0) and (0;1). (e) The susceptibility xy integrated around these momentum transfer vectors, shows the same trend at low energies. (d,f ) In contrast, the orbital selective model yields spin uctuations at low energies which are dominated by peaks at (1; 0) in the low energy range shown. The enhancement of the spin uctuations at (1; 0) in the superconducting state is clearly seen when plotted (f ) as function of energy and (g) as an intensity map in momentum-energy space. (h) The spin uctuations at (1; 0) are dominated by the contributions of the d orbital. yz

Journal

Condensed Matter – arXiv (Cornell University)

Published: May 21, 2019

There are no references for this article.