An Accurate Bilinear Cavern Model for Compressed Air Energy Storage
An Accurate Bilinear Cavern Model for Compressed Air Energy Storage
Zhan, Junpeng;Ansari, Osama Aslam;Liu, Weijia;Chung, C. Y.
2019-03-16 00:00:00
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apenergy.2019.03.104 accepted by Applied Energy on March 2019 1 An Accurate Bilinear Cavern Model for Compressed Air Energy Storage a,b a a a Junpeng Zhan , Osama Aslam Ansari , Weijia Liu , C. Y. Chung Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering, University of Saskatchewan, Saskatoon, SK S7N 5A9, Canada Sustainable Energy Technologies Department, Brookhaven National Laboratory, Upton, NY 11973, U.S.A. Mass of air in virtual container 2 as shown in Fig. 3 Abstract—Compressed air energy storage is suitable for large- (kg) scale electrical energy storage, which is important for integrating renewable energy sources into electric power systems. A typical Mass of air charged into the cavern (kg) compressed air energy storage plant consists of compressors, Number of time steps expanders, caverns, and a motor/generator set. Current cavern Pressure of the air charged into the cavern (bar) models used for compressed air energy storage are either accurate Pressures in virtual states as shown in Fig. 2, = 1,2 but highly nonlinear or linear but inaccurate. The application of (bar) highly nonlinear cavern models in power system optimization Maximum and minimum pressures in a cavern for problems renders them computationally challenging to solve. In optimal operation of compressed air energy storage this regard, an accurate bilinear cavern model for compressed air (CAES), respectively (bar) energy storage is proposed in this paper. The charging and discharging processes in a cavern are divided into several Pressure of the air in the cavern after the charging, real/virtual states. The first law of thermodynamics and ideal gas discharging, and idle processes for =2, 3, and 4, law are then utilized to derive a cavern model, i.e., a model for the respectively (bar) variation of temperature and pressure in these processes. Time step Thereafter, the heat transfer between the air in the cavern and the Surface area of the cavern wall (m ) cavern wall is considered and integrated into the cavern model. By , Operational costs of charging and discharging power subsequently eliminating several negligible terms, the cavern in CAES, respectively ($/MWh) model reduces to a bilinear model. The accuracy of the bilinear Maximum and minimum charging power of CAES, cavern model is verified via comparison with both an accurate respectively (MW) nonlinear model and two sets of field-measured data. The bilinear cavern model can be easily linearized and is then suitable for Maximum and minimum discharging power of integration into optimization problems considering compressed CAES, respectively (MW) air energy storage. This is verified via comparatively solving a self- Total internal energy (J) scheduling problem of compressed air energy storage using Specific air constant (J/(kg K)) different cavern models. Temperature of the air in the cavern after the Index Terms—Bilinear cavern model; compressed air energy charging, discharging, and idle processes for =2, 3, storage (CAES); heat transfer; ideal gas law; thermodynamics. and 4, respectively (K) Temperature of the cavern wall (K) Temperature of the air charged into the cavern (K) NOMENCLATURE Temperatures in virtual states as shown in Fig. 2, = Parameters 1,2 (K) a,ht Both adiabatic process and heat transfer are , Volumes of virtual containers as shown in Figs. 2 and considered (superscript) 3 (m ) Parameters, = 1,2,3, ⋯ ,13, given in the Appendix Volume of a cavern (m ) / Coefficients used to model the relationship between Work (J) charging/discharging power and mass flow rate in/out Average air density in a cavern (kg/m ) Parameters, = 0,1, representing the left-hand side Electricity price ($/MWh) of (3) and (10), respectively, given in the Appendix Δ