Get 20M+ Full-Text Papers For Less Than $1.50/day. Start a 14-Day Trial for You or Your Team.

Learn More →

Unbiased Language Assessment: Contributions of Linguistic Theory

Unbiased Language Assessment: Contributions of Linguistic Theory This review addresses several situations of language learning to make concrete the issue of fairness—and justice—that arises in designing assessments. First, I discuss the implications of dialect variation in American English, asking how assessment has taken dialect into consideration. Second, I address the question of how to assess the distributed knowledge of bilingual or dual-language learners. The evaluation of the language skills of children growing up in poverty asks whether the current focus on the quantity of caregiver input is misplaced. Third, I address a special case in which the young speakers of a minority language, Romani, are judged to be unfit for schooling because they fail tests in the state language. Finally, I examine the difficult issue of language assessments in countries with multiple official languages and few resources. In each of these areas, the involvement and expertise of linguists are essential for knowing how the grammar works and what might be important to assess. http://www.deepdyve.com/assets/images/DeepDyve-Logo-lg.png Annual Review of Linguistics Annual Reviews

Unbiased Language Assessment: Contributions of Linguistic Theory

Download PDF
22 pages

Loading next page...
 
/lp/annual-reviews/unbiased-language-assessment-contributions-of-linguistic-theory-H0fMvJBXrk

References (61)

Publisher
Annual Reviews
Copyright
Copyright © 2017 by Annual Reviews. All rights reserved
ISSN
2333-9683
eISSN
2333-9683
DOI
10.1146/annurev-linguistics-011516-033854
Publisher site
See Article on Publisher Site

Abstract

This review addresses several situations of language learning to make concrete the issue of fairness—and justice—that arises in designing assessments. First, I discuss the implications of dialect variation in American English, asking how assessment has taken dialect into consideration. Second, I address the question of how to assess the distributed knowledge of bilingual or dual-language learners. The evaluation of the language skills of children growing up in poverty asks whether the current focus on the quantity of caregiver input is misplaced. Third, I address a special case in which the young speakers of a minority language, Romani, are judged to be unfit for schooling because they fail tests in the state language. Finally, I examine the difficult issue of language assessments in countries with multiple official languages and few resources. In each of these areas, the involvement and expertise of linguists are essential for knowing how the grammar works and what might be important to assess.

Journal

Annual Review of Linguistics – Annual Reviews

Published: Jan 14, 2017

There are no references for this article.