Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
(1968)
Review of Kassouf , T and E Thorp , Beat the Market : A Scientific Stock Market System ( 1967 )
Merton Miller, F. Modigliani (1961)
DIVIDEND POLICY, GROWTH, AND THE VALUATION OF SHARESThe Journal of Business, 34
A. Lo, Mark Mueller (2010)
Warning: Physics Envy May be Hazardous to Your Wealth!IO: Regulation
D. Bernoulli (1954)
Exposition of a New Theory on the Measurement of Risk, 3
J. Schumpeter, J. Keynes (1936)
The General Theory of Employment, Interest and Money.Journal of the American Statistical Association, 31
F. Hayek (1931)
Prices and production
C. Goodhart, M. Friedman, A. Schwartz (1964)
A Monetary History of the United States, 1867-1960.Economica, 31
P. Samuelson (1937)
Some Aspects of the Pure Theory of CapitalQuarterly Journal of Economics, 51
A. Einstein (2005)
Über die von der molekularkinetischen Theorie der Wärme geforderte Bewegung von in ruhenden Flüssigkeiten suspendierten Teilchen [AdP 17, 549 (1905)]Annalen der Physik, 517
I. Fisher, H. Brown
The Purchasing Power Of Money
(1905)
On the motion — required by the molecular kinetic theory of heat — of small particles suspended in a stationary liquid
P. Samuelson (2010)
On the Himalayan Shoulders of Harry Markowitz
A. Marshall (2003)
Money, Credit, and Commerce
Henry Oliver, M. Friedman (1963)
Capitalism and FreedomSouthern Economic Journal, 30
This is a terse account of group creation of modern finance theory; and a sampling of my prosaic autobiographical investing and consulting for nonprofit academies. Eschewing 1900 Bachelier and 1905 Einstein white noise randomness, my martingale version of market micro efficiency invoked no violation of economic law. My attempts to establish pricing theory for options fell a bit short of the Black-Scholes-Merton Holy Grail. For life cycle investing, mathematicians’ maximum growth Kelly criterion was debunked, as were vulgar notions that necessarily riskiness is averaged downward for long-term investors. Popular Markowitz-Tobin quadratic programming was shown to hold generically only for smallest price variations or for unrealistic risk-aversion functions. Because economic history at best obeys only quasi-stationary probabilities, no sure-thing formulas will ever be definable. Excess returns—excess “alphas”—can result only from early new “insider” knowledge, however acquired—legally or illegally. Boo hoo.
Annual Review of Financial Economics – Annual Reviews
Published: Jan 1, 2009
Read and print from thousands of top scholarly journals.
Already have an account? Log in
Bookmark this article. You can see your Bookmarks on your DeepDyve Library.
To save an article, log in first, or sign up for a DeepDyve account if you don’t already have one.
Copy and paste the desired citation format or use the link below to download a file formatted for EndNote
Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
All DeepDyve websites use cookies to improve your online experience. They were placed on your computer when you launched this website. You can change your cookie settings through your browser.