Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
D. Kahneman, A. Tversky (1972)
Subjective Probability: A Judgment of RepresentativenessCognitive Psychology, 3
N. Shainess (1990)
Positive Illusions: Creative Self-Deception and the Healthy MindJAMA, 263
G. Gigerenzer, W. Hell, H. Blank (1988)
Presentation and content: The use of base rates as a continuous variable.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 14
G. Lester (1991)
Child support and alimony : 1989
P. Glick, Sung-Ling Lin (1986)
Recent changes in divorce and remarriage.Journal of Marriage and Family, 48
R. Emery (1988)
Marriage, divorce, and children's adjustment
G. Gigerenzer (1991)
How to Make Cognitive Illusions Disappear: Beyond “Heuristics and Biases”European Review of Social Psychology, 2
E. Meltzer (1971)
A Reconsideration ofThe Journal of Egyptian Archaeology, 57
S. Welch, M. Glendon (1988)
Abortion and Divorce in Western Law: American Failures, European ChallengesJournal of Marriage and Family, 50
(1988)
Alimony and the financially
(1974)
Heuristics and Biases
K. Kammeyer, L. Weitzman (1986)
The Divorce Revolution: The Unexpected Social and Economic Consequences for Women and Children in AmericaJournal of Marriage and Family, 48
Lynn Baker (1990)
Promulgating the Marriage ContractUniversity of Michigan Journal of Law Reform, 23
A. Norton, J. Moorman (1987)
Current Trends in Marriage and Divorce among American Women.Journal of Marriage and Family, 49
On the psychology of prediction
F. Furstenberg, C. Nord, J. Peterson, N. Zill (1983)
The Life Course of Children of Divorce: Marital Disruption and Parental Contact.American Sociological Review, 48
Marriage license applicants and law students were surveyed about their knowledge of divorce statutes, knowledge of the demographics of divorce, and expectations for their own marriage. Both groups had largely incorrect perceptions of the legal terms of the marriage contract as embodied in divorce statutes, but they had relatively accurate, if sometimes optimistic, perceptions of both the likelihood and the effects of divorce in the population at large. These same individuals expressed thoroughly idealistic expectations about both the longevity of their own marriages and the consequences should they personally be divorced. Increasing individuals’ knowledge of divorce statutes through a course on family law did not diminish this unrealistic optimism. Both groups largely approved of the existing divorce statutes, although there was substantial agreement about a few important respects in which the laws should be changed. These findings suggest that the sense of unfairness and surprise that frequently attend divorce may be a result of systematic cognitive biases rather than of a lack of information about divorce.
Law and Human Behavior – American Psychological Association
Published: Aug 1, 1993
Read and print from thousands of top scholarly journals.
Already have an account? Log in
Bookmark this article. You can see your Bookmarks on your DeepDyve Library.
To save an article, log in first, or sign up for a DeepDyve account if you don’t already have one.
Copy and paste the desired citation format or use the link below to download a file formatted for EndNote
Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
All DeepDyve websites use cookies to improve your online experience. They were placed on your computer when you launched this website. You can change your cookie settings through your browser.