Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
With the help of immersive virtual reality technology,novel cockpit systems can be evaluated with pilots in an early design phase.This comparative study investigates the functional fidelity of a virtual realityflight simulator (VRFS) in comparison with a conventional flight simulator.Pilots’ movement time to reach cockpit controls, deviation from the idealflight path, workload, and simulator sickness are evaluated using an operationalscenario. The results show statistically significant differences in heading,altitude, and flight path, as well as delays in operating the controls invirtual reality. Yet, most participants could safely and reliably complete theflight task. For use cases in which adaptations to pace, exposure time, andflight task are acceptable, which is often the case in early phases of thedesign process, VRFSs can be viable tools for human factors engineering.
Aviation Psychology and Applied Human Factors – American Psychological Association
Published: Jan 1, 2018
Read and print from thousands of top scholarly journals.
Already have an account? Log in
Bookmark this article. You can see your Bookmarks on your DeepDyve Library.
To save an article, log in first, or sign up for a DeepDyve account if you don’t already have one.
Copy and paste the desired citation format or use the link below to download a file formatted for EndNote
Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
All DeepDyve websites use cookies to improve your online experience. They were placed on your computer when you launched this website. You can change your cookie settings through your browser.