Get 20M+ Full-Text Papers For Less Than $1.50/day. Start a 14-Day Trial for You or Your Team.

Learn More →

The Uncritical Acceptance of Risk Assessment in Forensic Practice

The Uncritical Acceptance of Risk Assessment in Forensic Practice Forensic psychologists are frequently asked to conduction evaluations of risk assessment. While risk assessment has considerable merit, recent applications to forensic psychology raise concerns about whether these evaluations are thorough and balanced. Forensic adult risk-assessment models stress risk factors, and deemphasize or disregard entirely the other side of the equation: protective factors. Mediating and moderating effects must also be considered. Moreover, base-rate estimates may produce erroneous results if applied imprudently to forensic samples without regard to their unstable prevalence rates or the far-reaching effects of settings, referral questions, and evaluation procedures. Psychologists are offered a preliminary list of relevant issues for evaluating the merits of risk assessment in their forensic practices. http://www.deepdyve.com/assets/images/DeepDyve-Logo-lg.png Law and Human Behavior American Psychological Association

The Uncritical Acceptance of Risk Assessment in Forensic Practice

Law and Human Behavior , Volume 24 (5): 11 – Oct 1, 2000

Loading next page...
 
/lp/american-psychological-association/the-uncritical-acceptance-of-risk-assessment-in-forensic-practice-IP0X9Gdn0t

References (71)

Publisher
American Psychological Association
Copyright
Copyright © 2000 American Psychological Association
ISSN
0147-7307
eISSN
1573-661X
DOI
10.1023/A:1005575113507
Publisher site
See Article on Publisher Site

Abstract

Forensic psychologists are frequently asked to conduction evaluations of risk assessment. While risk assessment has considerable merit, recent applications to forensic psychology raise concerns about whether these evaluations are thorough and balanced. Forensic adult risk-assessment models stress risk factors, and deemphasize or disregard entirely the other side of the equation: protective factors. Mediating and moderating effects must also be considered. Moreover, base-rate estimates may produce erroneous results if applied imprudently to forensic samples without regard to their unstable prevalence rates or the far-reaching effects of settings, referral questions, and evaluation procedures. Psychologists are offered a preliminary list of relevant issues for evaluating the merits of risk assessment in their forensic practices.

Journal

Law and Human BehaviorAmerican Psychological Association

Published: Oct 1, 2000

There are no references for this article.