Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
R. Lewicki (1990)
Research on Negotiation in Organizations
C. Hafer, L. Bègue (2005)
Experimental research on just-world theory: problems, developments, and future challenges.Psychological bulletin, 131 1
E. T. Higgins (1998)
Advances in experimental social psychology (Vol. 30
C. Lance (1988)
Residual Centering, Exploratory and Confirmatory Moderator Analysis, and Decomposition of Effects in Path Models Containing InteractionsApplied Psychological Measurement, 12
B. Major (1994)
From social inequality to personal entitlement: the role of social comparisons, legitimacy appraisals, and group membershipAdvances in Experimental Social Psychology, 26
J. Adams (1965)
Inequity In Social ExchangeAdvances in Experimental Social Psychology, 2
C. Batson, N. Ahmad, Jo-Ann Tsang (2002)
Four Motives for Community InvolvementJournal of Social Issues, 58
J. Thibaut, L. Walker (1978)
A Theory of ProcedureCalifornia Law Review, 66
T. Tyler, P. Degoey, Heather Smith (1996)
Understanding why the justice of group procedures matters: A test of the psychological dynamics of the group-value model.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 70
Elizabeth Mullen, L. Skitka (2006)
Exploring the psychological underpinnings of the moral mandate effect: motivated reasoning, group differentiation, or anger?Journal of personality and social psychology, 90 4
R. Bies (1987)
The predicament of injustice: The management of moral outrage.Research in Organizational Behavior
Tom Tyler, E. Lind, Yuen Huo (2000)
Cultural values and authority relations: The psychology of conflict resolution across cultures.Psychology, Public Policy and Law, 6
D. Skarlicki, R. Folger (1997)
RETALIATION IN THE WORKPLACE: THE ROLES OF DISTRIBUTIVE, PROCEDURAL, AND INTERACTIONAL JUSTICEJournal of Applied Psychology, 82
R. Lissak, Blair Sheppard (1983)
Beyond Fairness: The Criterion Problem in Research on Dispute Intervention1Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 13
R. Bies (2005)
Are Procedural Justice and Interactional Justice Conceptually Distinct
R. Folger, R. Cropanzano (1998)
Organizational Justice and Human Resource Management
Maureen Ambrose, R. Cropanzano (2003)
A longitudinal analysis of organizational fairness: an examination of reactions to tenure and promotion decisions.The Journal of applied psychology, 88 2
T. Tyler (1989)
The psychology of procedural justice: A test of the group-value model.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 57
Jerald Greenberg, R. Cropanzano (2001)
Advances in Organizational Justice
M. Lerner (2003)
The Justice Motive: Where Social Psychologists Found It, How they Lost It, and Why They May Not Find It AgainPersonality and Social Psychology Review, 7
Jacob Cohen (1978)
Partialed products are interactions; partialed powers are curve components.Psychological Bulletin, 85
R. Cropanzano (1993)
Justice in the workplace: Approaching fairness in human resource management.
Jonathan Casper, T. Tyler, B. Fisher (1988)
Procedural justice in felony casesLaw & Society Review, 22
R. Cropanzano, R. Folger (1989)
Referent Cognitions and Task Decision Autonomy: Beyond Equity TheoryJournal of Applied Psychology, 74
R. Folger (1984)
The sense of injustice: Social psychological perspectives
T. Tyler (1994)
Psychological models of the justice motive: Antecedents of distributive and procedural justice.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 67
N. Yperen, K. Bos, D. Graaff (2005)
Performance-based pay is fair, particularly when I perform better: Differential fairness perceptions of allocators and recipientsEuropean Journal of Social Psychology, 35
M. Lerner, S. Lerner (1981)
The Justice motive in social behavior : adapting to times of scarcity and change
L. Skitka, David Houston (2001)
When Due Process Is of No Consequence: Moral Mandates and Presumed Defendant Guilt or InnocenceSocial Justice Research, 14
K. Bos, R. Vermunt, Henk Wilke (1997)
Procedural and distributive justice: What is fair depends more on what comes first than on what comes next.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 72
Kristopher Preacher, A. Hayes (2004)
SPSS and SAS procedures for estimating indirect effects in simple mediation modelsBehavior Research Methods, Instruments, & Computers, 36
J. Jaccard, R. Turrisi, C. Wan (1992)
Interaction effects in multiple regression
D. De Cremer, H. J. E. M. Alberts (2004)
When procedural fairness does not influence how positive I feel: The effects of voice and leader selection as a function of belongingness needEuropean Journal of Social Psychology, 34
S. Blader, T. Tyler (2003)
What constitutes fairness in work settings? A four-component model of procedural justiceHuman Resource Management Review, 13
J. Shah, E. Higgins (2001)
Regulatory concerns and appraisal efficiency: the general impact of promotion and prevention.Journal of personality and social psychology, 80 5
J. Brockner, B. Wiesenfeld (1996)
An integrative framework for explaining reactions to decisions: interactive effects of outcomes and procedures.Psychological bulletin, 120 2
R. Bies (1987)
Beyond "voice": The influence of decision-maker justification and sincerity on procedural fairness judgments.
Yuen Huo (2003)
Procedural Justice and Social Regulation Across Group Boundaries: Does Subgroup Identity Undermine Relationship-Based Governance?Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 29
N. Finkel (2000)
But it's not fair! Commonsense notions of unfairness.Psychology, Public Policy and Law, 6
Jerald Greenberg (2006)
Losing sleep over organizational injustice: attenuating insomniac reactions to underpayment inequity with supervisory training in interactional justice.The Journal of applied psychology, 91 1
Tyler Tr, P. Degoey (1995)
Community, family, and the social good: the psychological dynamics of procedural justice and social identification.Nebraska Symposium on Motivation. Nebraska Symposium on Motivation, 42
Jane Mansbridge (1991)
Beyond self-interestAmerican Political Science Review, 85
J. Brockner, Larry Heuer, P. Siegel, B. Wiesenfeld, Christopher Martin, S. Grover, Thomas Reed, Svali Bjorgvinsson (1998)
The moderating effect of self-esteem in reaction to voice: converging evidence from five studies.Journal of personality and social psychology, 75 2
J. Monahan, L. Walker (1994)
Social science and law: Cases and materials
R. Folger, R. Bies (1989)
Managerial responsibilities and procedural justiceEmployee Responsibilities and Rights Journal, 2
Kristopher Preacher, A. Hayes (2008)
Asymptotic and resampling strategies for assessing and comparing indirect effects in multiple mediator modelsBehavior Research Methods, 40
Blair Sheppard, David Saunders, J. Minton (1988)
Procedural justice from the third-party perspective.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 54
M. Lerner (2002)
The Justice Motive in Everyday Life: Pursuing the Justice Motive
Ya-Ru Chen, J. Brockner, Jerald Greenberg (2003)
When is it “a pleasure to do business with you?” The effects of relative status, outcome favorability, and procedural fairness☆Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 92
P. Houlden, S. Latour, L. Walker, J. Thibaut (1978)
Preference for Modes of Dispute Resolution as a Function of Process and Decision Control.Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 14
Kristina Diekmann, Steven Samuels, Lee Ross, Max Bazerman (1997)
Self-interest and fairness in problems of resource allocation: allocators versus recipients.Journal of personality and social psychology, 72 5
Heather Smith, T. Tyler (1996)
Justice and power: when will justice concerns encourage the advantaged to support policies which redistribute economic resources and the disadvantaged to willingly obey the law?European Journal of Social Psychology, 26
L. Skitka, Elizabeth Mullen (2002)
Understanding Judgments of Fairness in a Real-World Political Context: A Test of the Value Protection Model of Justice ReasoningPersonality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 28
J. Thibaut, L. Walker (1976)
Procedural Justice: A Psychological Analysis
Allan Lind, John Thibaut, L. Walker, EA Lind, TR Tyler (1988)
The Social Psychology of Procedural Justice
J. Sunshine, L. Heuer (2002)
The justice motive in everyday life
R. Field, R. House (1989)
A Test of the Vroom-Yetton Model Using Manager and Subordinate Reports
J. Sunshine, Larry Heuer, M. Ross, Dale Miller (2002)
Deservingness and Perceptions of Procedural Justice in Citizen Encounters with the Police
R. Folger, Christopher Martin (1986)
Relative deprivation and referent cognitions: Distributive and procedural justice effectsJournal of Experimental Social Psychology, 22
D. Cremer, H. Alberts (2004)
When procedural fairness does not influence how good I feel: The effects of voice and leader selection as a function of belongingness needsCanadian Journal of Statistics-revue Canadienne De Statistique
M. Deutsch (1985)
Distributive justice
M. Lerner (1977)
The justice motive: Some hypotheses as to its origins and forms1Journal of Personality, 45
Jerald Greenberg (1987)
A Taxonomy of Organizational Justice TheoriesAcademy of Management Review, 12
Yuen Huo, Heather Smith, Tom Tyler, E. Lind (1996)
Superordinate Identification, Subgroup Identification, and Justice Concerns: Is Separatism the Problem; Is Assimilation the Answer?Psychological Science, 7
T. Tyler (1984)
The Role of Perceived Injustice in Defendants' Evaluations of Their Courtroom ExperienceLaw & Society Review, 18
L. Skitka (2002)
Do the Means Always Justify the Ends, or Do the Ends Sometimes Justify the Means? A Value Protection Model of Justice ReasoningPersonality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 28
Jerald Greenberg (1993)
The social side of fairness: Interpersonal and informational classes of organizational justice.
X. Meng, R. Rosenthal, D. Rubin (1992)
Comparing correlated correlation coefficientsPsychological Bulletin, 111
R. Bies, Debra Shapiro (1987)
Interactional fairness judgments: The influence of causal accountsSocial Justice Research, 1
E. Walster, Ellen Berscheid, William Walster (1973)
New directions in equity research.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 25
T. Tyler, Andrew Caine (1981)
The influence of outcomes and procedures on satisfaction with formal leaders.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 41
R. Folger (1993)
Justice, motivation, and performance beyond role requirementsEmployee Responsibilities and Rights Journal, 6
G. S. Leventhal, J. Karuza, W. R. Fry (1980)
Justice and social interaction
Jerald Greenberg (2004)
Stress Fairness to Fare No Stress:: Managing Workplace Stress by Promoting Organizational JusticeOrganizational Dynamics, 33
P. Ekeh, G. Homans (1975)
Social Behavior: Its Elementary Forms.Contemporary Sociology, 5
J. Shah, E. Higgins, Friedman, Ronald Friedman (1998)
Performance incentives and means: how regulatory focus influences goal attainment.Journal of personality and social psychology, 74 2
M. Ross, Dale Miller (2002)
The Justice Motive in Everyday Life: Subject Index
Francis Flynn, J. Brockner (2003)
It's different to give than to receive: predictors of givers' and receivers' reactions to favor exchange.The Journal of applied psychology, 88 6
G. Melton (1995)
The Individual, the Family, and Social Good: Personal Fulfillment in Times of Change. Nebraska Symposium on Motivation, Volume 42.
Mark Weber, J. Rotman, Shirli Kopelman, R. Dawes, Mark Kennedy, D. Malhotra, Keith Murnighan, P. Lange, Janine Webb (2004)
A Conceptual Review of Decision Making in Social Dilemmas: Applying a Logic of AppropriatenessPersonality and Social Psychology Review, 8
T. Tyler, Eugene Griffin (1991)
The Influence of Decision Makers' Goals on Their Concerns About Procedural Justice1Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 21
M. Heilman, H. Hornstein, J. Cage, Judith Herschlag (1984)
Reactions to prescribed leader behavior as a function of role perspective: The case of the Vroom-Yetton model.Journal of Applied Psychology, 69
Tomas Ståhl, J. Prooijen, R. Vermunt (2004)
On the psychology of procedural justice: reactions to procedures of ingroup vs. outgroup authoritiesEuropean Journal of Social Psychology, 34
R. J. Bies (1987)
Research in organizational behavior (Vol. 9
K. Bos, E. Lind (2001)
The Psychology of Own Versus Others’ Treatment: Self-Oriented and Other-Oriented Effects on Perceptions of Procedural JusticePersonality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 27
R. Dawes, Alphons Kragt, John Orbell (1990)
Cooperation for the benefit of us—Not me, or my conscience.
M. Lupfer, K. Weeks, K. Doan, David Houston (2000)
Folk conceptions of fairness and unfairnessEuropean Journal of Social Psychology, 30
E. Higgins (1998)
Promotion and Prevention: Regulatory Focus as A Motivational PrincipleAdvances in Experimental Social Psychology, 30
K. Bos, E. Lind (2002)
Uncertainty management by means of fairness judgments.Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, 34
T. Tyler, E. Lind (1992)
A Relational Model of Authority in GroupsAdvances in Experimental Social Psychology, 25
Larry Heuer, Eva Blumenthal, Amber Douglas, Tara Weinblatt (1999)
A Deservingness Approach to Respect as a Relationally Based Fairness JudgmentPersonality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 25
R. Folger, D. Rosenfield, Thomas Robinson (1983)
Relative deprivation and procedural justifications.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 45
R. Hogan, G. Curphy, J. Hogan (1994)
What we know about leadership. Effectiveness and personality.The American psychologist, 49 6
E. Berscheid, E. Walster (1967)
When does a harm-doer compensate a victim?Journal of personality and social psychology, 6 4
Four experiments examined the role of costs and benefits versus procedural and distributive justice for procedural fairness and procedural evaluations among decision makers and decision recipients. Experiments 1 and 2 examined the responses of actual judges in a 2 (high versus low benefit) × 2 (search procedure conducted respectfully versus disrespectfully) randomized factorial. In both studies judges evaluated procedures differently than is typical among samples of decision recipients: outcome concerns strongly influenced both procedural evaluations and procedural fairness while procedural concerns such as voice and respect were minimally influential. Whereas fairness concerns continued to be important among these decision makers, outcome fairness was more influential than procedural fairness. Studies 3 and 4 varied role (authority versus subordinate), procedural respect, and societal benefits. Both experiments supported our predictions that procedural criteria would dominate the procedural evaluations of subordinates whereas outcome concerns such as societal benefits would dominate the procedural evaluations of authorities.
Law and Human Behavior – American Psychological Association
Published: Dec 24, 2007
Read and print from thousands of top scholarly journals.
Already have an account? Log in
Bookmark this article. You can see your Bookmarks on your DeepDyve Library.
To save an article, log in first, or sign up for a DeepDyve account if you don’t already have one.
Copy and paste the desired citation format or use the link below to download a file formatted for EndNote
Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
All DeepDyve websites use cookies to improve your online experience. They were placed on your computer when you launched this website. You can change your cookie settings through your browser.