Get 20M+ Full-Text Papers For Less Than $1.50/day. Start a 14-Day Trial for You or Your Team.

Learn More →

The Juridical Impact of Psychological Expert Testimony in a Simulated Child Sexual Abuse Trial

The Juridical Impact of Psychological Expert Testimony in a Simulated Child Sexual Abuse Trial Using a simulated child sexual abuse case, our study investigated the impact of expert testimony about cognitive development in children on jury decisions. Twenty-four gender-balanced panels, each of 6 mock jurors, viewed a videotaped simulation of a criminal court trial in which age of the child victim/witness (6, 9, or 12 years), sex of the child, and the presence or absence of expert testimony were manipulated. There were significant main effects for exposure to expert testimony on jurors’ ratings of the child on the factors addressed by the expert: memory expertise, susceptibility to suggestion, and reality monitoring ability. Jurors rated the expert testimony highly in terms of its helpfulness and impartiality. There were no significant main effects for child credibility ratings according to age or sex of the child victims, but juror gender polarization effects were noted, with females significantly more likely to rate the child’s credibility higher and to find the defendant guilty. http://www.deepdyve.com/assets/images/DeepDyve-Logo-lg.png Law and Human Behavior American Psychological Association

The Juridical Impact of Psychological Expert Testimony in a Simulated Child Sexual Abuse Trial

Loading next page...
 
/lp/american-psychological-association/the-juridical-impact-of-psychological-expert-testimony-in-a-simulated-mqS2xczMPN

References (49)

Publisher
American Psychological Association
Copyright
Copyright © 1994 American Psychological Association
ISSN
0147-7307
eISSN
1573-661X
DOI
10.1007/BF01499146
Publisher site
See Article on Publisher Site

Abstract

Using a simulated child sexual abuse case, our study investigated the impact of expert testimony about cognitive development in children on jury decisions. Twenty-four gender-balanced panels, each of 6 mock jurors, viewed a videotaped simulation of a criminal court trial in which age of the child victim/witness (6, 9, or 12 years), sex of the child, and the presence or absence of expert testimony were manipulated. There were significant main effects for exposure to expert testimony on jurors’ ratings of the child on the factors addressed by the expert: memory expertise, susceptibility to suggestion, and reality monitoring ability. Jurors rated the expert testimony highly in terms of its helpfulness and impartiality. There were no significant main effects for child credibility ratings according to age or sex of the child victims, but juror gender polarization effects were noted, with females significantly more likely to rate the child’s credibility higher and to find the defendant guilty.

Journal

Law and Human BehaviorAmerican Psychological Association

Published: Feb 1, 1994

There are no references for this article.