Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
J. Monahan, L. Walker (1988)
Social science research in law: A new paradigm.American Psychologist, 43
G. Davies, R. Flin, J. Baxter (1986)
The Child WitnessHoward Journal of Criminal Justice, 25
S. Smith (1989)
Mental health expert witnesses: Of science and crystal ballsBehavioral Sciences & The Law, 7
S. Ceci, D. Ross, M. Toglia (1987)
Suggestibility of children's memory: Psycholegal implications.Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 116
E. Duncan, P. Whitney, S. Kunen (1982)
Integration of visual and verbal information in children's memories.Child development, 53 5
M. Mason (1991)
A Judicial Dilemma: Expert Witness Testimony in Child Sex Abuse CasesJournal of Psychiatry and Law, 19
L. Pelton (1978)
Child abuse and neglect: the myth of classlessness.The American journal of orthopsychiatry, 48 4
R. Summit (1983)
The child sexual abuse accommodation syndrome.Child abuse & neglect, 7 2
Michael Leippe, A. Romanczyk (1989)
Reactions to child (Versus adult) eyewitnessesLaw and Human Behavior, 13
M. Foley, Marcia Johnson, C. Raye (1983)
Age-related changes in confusion between memories for thoughts and memories for speech.Child development, 54 1
H. Dent, R. Flin (1992)
Children as witnesses
L. Sherr (1991)
Women and children.AIDS care, 3 4
L. Duggan, M. Aubrey, E. Doherty, Peter Isquith, M. Levine, Janine Scheiner (1989)
The Credibility of Children as Witnesses in a Simulated Child Sex Abuse Trial
G. Goodman, B. Bottoms, B. Herscovici, P. Shaver (1989)
Determinants of the Child Victim’s Perceived Credibility
J. Bulkley (1989)
The Impact of New Child Witness Research on Sexual Abuse Prosecutions
T. Fundudis (1989)
Children's memory and the assessment of possible child sex abuse.Journal of child psychology and psychiatry, and allied disciplines, 30 3
G. Wells (1986)
Expert psychological testimonyLaw and Human Behavior, 10
S. Fox, H. Walters (1986)
The impact of general versus specific expert testimonyand eyewitness confidence upon mock juror judgmentLaw and Human Behavior, 10
S. Ceci, M. Toglia, D. Ross (1987)
Children's eyewitness memory
D. Ross, D. Dunning, M. Toglia, S. Ceci (1990)
The child in the eyes of the juryLaw and Human Behavior, 14
N. Brekke, E. Borgida (1988)
Expert psychological testimony in rape trials: A social-cognitive analysis.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 55
J. Myers, J. Bays, Judith Becker, L. Berliner, D. Corwin, Karen Saywitz (1989)
Expert Testimony in Child Sexual Abuse LitigationNebraska law review, 68
D. Ross, D. Dunning, M. Toglia, S. Ceci (1989)
Age Stereotypes, Communication Modality, and Mock Jurors’ Perceptions of the Child Witness
M. King, J. Yuille (1987)
Suggestibility and the Child Witness
David McCord (1986)
Expert Psychological Testimony About Child Complainants in Sexual Abuse Prosecutions: A Foray into the Admissibility of Novel Psychological EvidenceJournal of Criminal Law & Criminology, 77
N. Brekke, Pete Enko, G. Clavet, Eric Seelau (1991)
Of juries and court-appointed experts: The impact of nonadversarial versus adversarial expert testimony.Law and Human Behavior, 15
Michael Leippe, A. Romanczyk (1987)
Children on the Witness Stand: A Communication/Persuasion Analysis of Jurors’ Reactions to Child Witnesses
D. Faust, Jay Ziskin (1988)
The expert witness in psychology and psychiatry.Science, 241 4861
B. Marín, D. Holmes, Mark Guth, Paul Kovac (1979)
The potential of children as eyewitnessesLaw and Human Behavior, 3
Marcia Johnson, M. Foley (1984)
Differentiating Fact from Fantasy: The Reliability of Children's MemoryJournal of Social Issues, 40
G. Goodman, J. Golding, V. Helgeson, M. Haith, J. Michelli (1987)
When a child takes the standLaw and Human Behavior, 11
S. Bailey (1992)
CHILDREN’S EVIDENCE IN LEGAL PROCEEDINGSCriminal Behaviour and Mental Health, 2
N. Pennington, R. Hastie (1988)
Explanation-based decision making: effects of memory structure on judgmentJournal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory and Cognition, 14
Franziska Marquart, Brigitte Naderer (1988)
Communication and persuasion : central and peripheral routes to attitude changeAmerican Journal of Psychology, 101
P. Tetreault (1989)
Rape myth acceptance: A case for providing educational expert testimony in rape jury trialsBehavioral Sciences & The Law, 7
J. Bulkley, Jo Jackson (1989)
State Child Care Licensing Laws in the Fifty States: A New Look in the Face of Child Abuse., 10
Natalie Gabora, N. Spaños, Amanda Joab (1993)
The effects of complainant age and expert psychological testimony in a simulated child sexual abuse trialLaw and Human Behavior, 17
D. Dunning (1989)
Research on Children’s Eyewitness Testimony: Perspectives on Its Past and Future
R. Stubblefield (1966)
Behavioral sciences and the law.The American journal of orthopsychiatry, 36 5
M. DeYoung (1987)
Disclosing sexual abuse: the impact of developmental variables.Child welfare, 66 3
Sandra Shrimpton (1993)
The suggestibility of children's recollections. Implications for eyewitness testimony: Edited by John Doris. American Psychological Association, Washington, DC, 1991. 193 pp.Child Abuse & Neglect, 17
E. Loftus (1986)
Experimental psychologist as advocate or impartial educatorLaw and Human Behavior, 10
M. Foley, Marcia Johnson (1985)
Confusions between memories for performed and imagined actions: a developmental comparison.Child development, 56 5
S. Ceci, D. Ross, M. Toglia (1989)
Perspectives on children's testimony.
J. Piaget, B. Inhelder, Helen Weaver (1969)
The Psychology of the Child
G. Annas (1995)
Women and children first.The New England journal of medicine, 333 24
G. Goodman, R. Reed (1986)
Age differences in eyewitness testimonyLaw and Human Behavior, 10
J. Haugaard (1988)
Judicial determination of children's competency to testify: Should it be abandoned?Professional Psychology: Research and Practice, 19
N. Pennington, R. Hastie (1986)
Evidence evaluation in complex decision making.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 51
Using a simulated child sexual abuse case, our study investigated the impact of expert testimony about cognitive development in children on jury decisions. Twenty-four gender-balanced panels, each of 6 mock jurors, viewed a videotaped simulation of a criminal court trial in which age of the child victim/witness (6, 9, or 12 years), sex of the child, and the presence or absence of expert testimony were manipulated. There were significant main effects for exposure to expert testimony on jurors’ ratings of the child on the factors addressed by the expert: memory expertise, susceptibility to suggestion, and reality monitoring ability. Jurors rated the expert testimony highly in terms of its helpfulness and impartiality. There were no significant main effects for child credibility ratings according to age or sex of the child victims, but juror gender polarization effects were noted, with females significantly more likely to rate the child’s credibility higher and to find the defendant guilty.
Law and Human Behavior – American Psychological Association
Published: Feb 1, 1994
Read and print from thousands of top scholarly journals.
Already have an account? Log in
Bookmark this article. You can see your Bookmarks on your DeepDyve Library.
To save an article, log in first, or sign up for a DeepDyve account if you don’t already have one.
Copy and paste the desired citation format or use the link below to download a file formatted for EndNote
Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
All DeepDyve websites use cookies to improve your online experience. They were placed on your computer when you launched this website. You can change your cookie settings through your browser.