Get 20M+ Full-Text Papers For Less Than $1.50/day. Start a 14-Day Trial for You or Your Team.

Learn More →

The Ecological Validity of Jury Simulations: Is the Jury Still Out?

The Ecological Validity of Jury Simulations: Is the Jury Still Out? Despite the need to assess the ecological validity of jury simulation research before generalizing from simulations to the behavior of real jurors, surprisingly little jury research has directly addressed issues of validity. The present paper reviews the extant research on two aspects of the validity question—specifically, research that has compared different samples of mock jurors, and research that has manipulated the medium of trial presentation. In addition, jury simulation research published in the first 20 years of Law and Human Behavior is analyzed with respect to these variables. The majority of simulations used student-jurors and presented the trial in written form. Additionally, the methodology of simulation research has actually become less realistic over time. However, this trend is not necessarily cause for concern, as a review of the literature reveals little research that has obtained differences between different mock juror samples or different trial media. http://www.deepdyve.com/assets/images/DeepDyve-Logo-lg.png Law and Human Behavior American Psychological Association

The Ecological Validity of Jury Simulations: Is the Jury Still Out?

Law and Human Behavior , Volume 23 (1): 17 – Feb 1, 1999

Loading next page...
 
/lp/american-psychological-association/the-ecological-validity-of-jury-simulations-is-the-jury-still-out-gyAeQcUtKC

References (102)

Publisher
American Psychological Association
Copyright
Copyright © 1999 American Psychological Association
ISSN
0147-7307
eISSN
1573-661X
DOI
10.1023/A:1022326807441
Publisher site
See Article on Publisher Site

Abstract

Despite the need to assess the ecological validity of jury simulation research before generalizing from simulations to the behavior of real jurors, surprisingly little jury research has directly addressed issues of validity. The present paper reviews the extant research on two aspects of the validity question—specifically, research that has compared different samples of mock jurors, and research that has manipulated the medium of trial presentation. In addition, jury simulation research published in the first 20 years of Law and Human Behavior is analyzed with respect to these variables. The majority of simulations used student-jurors and presented the trial in written form. Additionally, the methodology of simulation research has actually become less realistic over time. However, this trend is not necessarily cause for concern, as a review of the literature reveals little research that has obtained differences between different mock juror samples or different trial media.

Journal

Law and Human BehaviorAmerican Psychological Association

Published: Feb 1, 1999

There are no references for this article.