Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
S. Kassin, L. Wrightsman (1983)
The construction and validation of a juror bias scaleJournal of Research in Personality, 17
R. Bray, N. Kerr (1981)
Methodological considerations in the study of the psychology of the courtroom
S. Fulero, Steven Penrod (1990)
Attorney jury selection folklore: What do they think and how can psychologists help?
R. Bray, N. Kerr (1979)
Use of the simulation method in the study of jury behaviorLaw and Human Behavior, 3
M. Sandys, C. Dillehay (1995)
First-ballot votes, predeliberation dispositions, and final verdicts in jury trialsLaw and Human Behavior, 19
N. Kerr, D. Nerenz, D. Herrick (1979)
Role Playing and the Study of Jury BehaviorSociological Methods & Research, 7
D. Ugwuegbu (1979)
Racial and evidential factors in juror attribution of legal responsibilityJournal of Experimental Social Psychology, 15
(1989)
Death qualifi cation after
W. Thompson (1989)
Death qualification afterWainwright v. Witt andLockhart v. McCreeLaw and Human Behavior, 13
B. Bottoms, G. Goodman (1994)
Perceptions of Children's Credibility in Sexual Assault Cases1Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 24
A. Elwork, B. Sales, James Alfini (1977)
In Ignorance of the Law or in Light of It
Wayne Weiten, S. Diamond (1979)
A critical review of the jury simulation paradigmLaw and Human Behavior, 3
R. Juhnke, C. Vought, T. Pyszczynski, F. Dane, Bruce Losure, L. Wrightsman (1979)
Effects of Presentation Mode Upon Mock Jurors' Reactions to a TrialPersonality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 5
R. MacCoun, N. Kerr (1988)
Asymmetric influence in mock jury deliberation: jurors' bias for leniency.Journal of personality and social psychology, 54 1
B. Cutler, Steven Penrod, H. Dexter (1990)
Juror sensitivity to eyewitness identification evidenceLaw and Human Behavior, 14
G. Moran, J. Comfort (1982)
Scientific juror selection: Sex as a moderator of demographic and personality predictors of impaneled felony juror behavior.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 43
K. Gerbasi, M. Zuckerman, H. Reis (1977)
Justice needs a new blindfold: A review of mock jury research.Psychological Bulletin, 84
D. Ross, D. Dunning, M. Toglia, S. Ceci (1989)
Age Stereotypes, Communication Modality, and Mock Jurors’ Perceptions of the Child Witness
Douglas Zickafoose, B. Bornstein (1999)
Double Discounting: The Effects of Comparative Negligence on Mock Juror Decision MakingLaw and Human Behavior, 23
J. Swim, E. Borgida, Kathy Mcoy (1993)
Videotaped versus in-court witness testimony: Does protecting the child witness jeopardize due process?Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 23
P. Ellsworth (1988)
Unpleasant facts: The Supreme Court's response to empirical research on capital punishment.
J. Hepburn (1980)
The objective reality of evidence and the utility of systematic jury selectionLaw and Human Behavior, 4
V. Fishfader, G. Howells, R. Katz, Pamela Teresi (1996)
Evidential and extralegal factors in juror decisions: Presentation mode, retention, and level of emotionalityLaw and Human Behavior, 20
N. Finkel, C. Hughes, F. Smith, L. Hurabiell (1994)
Killing kids: The juvenile death penalty and community sentimentBehavioral Sciences & The Law, 12
D. Bridgeman, D. Marlowe (1979)
Jury Decision Making: An Empirical Study Based on Actual Felony Trials.Journal of Applied Psychology, 64
Jonathan Casper, Kennette Benedict, Joseph Perry (1989)
Juror decision making, attitudes, and the hindsight biasLaw and Human Behavior, 13
S. Fulero, N. Finkel (1991)
Barring ultimate issue testimonyLaw and Human Behavior, 15
COLOGICAL V ALIDITY OF J URY S IMULATIONS
G. R. Williams, L. C. Farmer, R. E. Lee, B. P. Cundick, R. J. Howell, C. K. Rooker (1975)
Juror perceptions of trial testimony as a function of the method of presentationBrigham Young University Law Review, 2
K. Williams, M. Bourgeois, R. Croyle (1993)
The effects of stealing thunder in criminal and civil trialsLaw and Human Behavior, 17
A. Reifman, Spencer Gusick, P. Ellsworth (1992)
Real jurors' understanding of the law in real casesLaw and Human Behavior, 16
(1991)
Felony-murder and community sentiment: Testing the Supreme Court’s assertions
Gerald Williams, Larry Farmer, Rex Lee, B. Cundick, R. Howell, C. Rooker (1975)
Juror Perceptions of Trial Testimony as a Function of the Method of Presentation: A Comparison of Live, Color Video, Black-and-White Video, Audio, and Transcript PresentationsBYU Law Review, 1975
R. Bray, Audrey Noble (1978)
Authoritarianism and decisions of mock juries: Evidence of jury bias and group polarization.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 36
B. Bornstein, M. Rajki (1994)
Extra-Legal Factors and Product Liability: The Influence of Mock Jurors’ Demographic Characteristics and Intuitions about the Cause of an InjuryBehavioral Sciences & The Law, 12
E. Borgida, Kenneth DeBono (1990)
The Effects of Media Coverage on Witness Testimony and Juror Perceptions
R. Simon, L. Mahan (1971)
Quantifying Burdens of Proof: A View from the Bench, the Jury, and the ClassroomLaw & Society Review, 5
N. Kerr, R. Bray (1981)
The Psychology of the courtroom
R. Stubblefield (1966)
Behavioral sciences and the law.The American journal of orthopsychiatry, 36 5
H. Hosch, E. Beck, Patricia McIntyre (1980)
Influence of expert testimony regarding eyewitness accuracy on jury decisionsLaw and Human Behavior, 4
Scott Decker (1979)
Law and Society ReviewJournal of Drug Issues, 9
N. Finkel, Marie Hurabiell, Kevin Hughes (1993)
Right to die, euthanasia, and community sentimentLaw and Human Behavior, 17
Larry Heuer, Steven Penrod (1988)
Increasing jurors' participation in trialsLaw and Human Behavior, 12
C. Mills, W. Bohannon (1980)
Character structure and jury behavior: Conceptual and applied implications.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 38
E. Greene, E. Loftus (1985)
When crimes are joined at trialLaw and Human Behavior, 9
E. Borgida (1979)
Character Proof and the fireside inductionLaw and Human Behavior, 3
T. Scheff, R. Simon (1968)
The Jury and the Defense of Insanity.American Sociological Review, 33
D. F. Ross, D. Dunning, M. P. Toglia, S. J. Ceci (1990)
The child in the eyes of the jury: Assessing mock jurors' perceptions of the child witnessLaw and Human Behavior, 14
Larry Heuer, Steven Penrod (1994)
Trial complexityLaw and Human Behavior, 18
S. Ceci, D. Ross, M. Toglia (1989)
Perspectives on children's testimony.
J. Freedman, Kirsten Krismer, Jennifer MacDonald, J. Cunningham (1994)
Severity of penalty, seriousness of the charge, and mock jurors' verdictsLaw and Human Behavior, 18
M. Crowley, M. O'Callaghan, Peter Ball (1994)
The juridical impact of psychological expert testimony in a simulated child sexual abuse trialLaw and Human Behavior, 18
R. DeVries, J. Tapp, F. Levine (1977)
Law, Justice, and the Individual in Society: Psychological and Legal Issues
C. Scheirer, B. Hammonds, D. Bersoff (1983)
Psychology and the law
Dale Broeder (1959)
The University of Chicago Jury ProjectNebraska law review, 38
R. M. Bray, N. L. Kerr (1979)
Use of the simulation method in the study of jury behavior: Some methodological considerationsLaw and Human Behavior, 3
G. Bermant, M. McGuire, W. mckinley, Chris Salo (1974)
The Logic of Simulation in Jury ResearchCriminal Justice and Behavior, 1
A. Goldstein, H. Kalven, H. Zeisel, Thomas Callahan, P. Ennis (1966)
The American JuryLaw & Society Review, 1
Jh Davis, R. Bray, R. Holt (1976)
The empirical study of decision processes in juries: A critical review
R. Bray, C. Struckman‐Johnson, Marshall Osborne, J. McFarlane, Joanne Scott (1978)
The Effects of Defendant Status on the Decisions of Student and Community JuriesSocial Psychology, 41
E. Greene, L. Wilson, E. Loftus (1989)
Impact of hypnotic testimony on the juryLaw and Human Behavior, 13
A. Elwork, B. D. Sales, J. J. Alfini (1977)
Juridic decisions: In ignorance of the law or in light of it?Law and Human Behavior, 1
Andrea Halverson, M. Hallahan, Allen Hart, R. Rosenthal (1997)
Reducing the biasing effects of judges' nonverbal behavior with simplified jury instruction.Journal of Applied Psychology, 82
S. Brodsky (1980)
Criminal Justice and BehaviorCriminal Justice and Behavior, 7
G. P. Kramer, N. L. Kerr (1989)
Laboratory simulation and bias in the study of juror behavior: A methodological noteLaw and Human Behavior, 13
N. Finkel, Marie Hurabiell, Kevin Hughes (1993)
Competency, and other constructs, in right to die cases†Behavioral Sciences & The Law, 11
G. Lassiter, R. Slaw, Michael Briggs, CARLA Scanlan (1992)
The Potential for Bias in Videotaped Confessions1Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 22
(1996)
Putting the trial back into pretrial publicity: The medium is the message. Unpublished master's thesis
N. J. Finkel, M. L. Hurabiell, K. C. Hughes (1993)
Right to die, euthanasia, and community sentiment: Crossing the public/private boundaryLaw and Human Behavior, 17
L. Heuer, S. Penrod (1994)
Juror notetaking and question asking during trials: A national field experimentLaw and Human Behavior, 18
Geoffrey Kramer, N. Kerr (1989)
Laboratory simulation and bias in the study of juror behaviorLaw and Human Behavior, 13
G. S. Goodman, J. M. Golding, V. S. Helgeson, M. M. Haith, J. Michelli (1987)
When a child takes the stand: Jurors' perceptions of children's eyewitness testimonyLaw and Human Behavior, 9
L. Foley, Afesa Adams, J. Goodson (1996)
The Effect of Race on Decisions by Judges and Other Officers of the Court1Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 26
R. Schuller, P. Hastings (1996)
Trials of battered women who kill: the impact of alternative forms of expert evidenceLaw and Human Behavior, 20
Larry Heuer, Steven Penrod (1994)
Juror notetaking and question asking during trialsLaw and Human Behavior, 18
L. Heuer, S. Penrod (1994)
Trial complexity: A field investigation of its meaning and its effectsLaw and Human Behavior, 18
Garrett Berman, B. Cutler (1996)
Effects of inconsistencies in eyewitness testimony on mock-juror decision-makingJournal of Applied Psychology, 81
D. Ross, D. Dunning, M. Toglia, S. Ceci (1990)
The child in the eyes of the juryLaw and Human Behavior, 14
V. Konečni, E. Ebbesen (1979)
External validity of research in legal psychologyLaw and Human Behavior, 3
N. Finkel, Kristen Meister, Deirdre Lightfoot (1991)
The self-defense defense and community sentimentLaw and Human Behavior, 15
G. Goodman, J. Golding, M. Haith, J. Michelli (1987)
Jurors' Perceptions of Children's Eyewitness Testimony*
L. Heuer, S. Penrod (1988)
Increasing jurors' participation in trials: A field experiment with juror notetaking and question askingLaw and Human Behavior, 12
G. Fontaine, R. Kiger (1978)
The effects of defendant dress and supervision on judgments of simulated jurors: An exploratory studyLaw and Human Behavior, 2
S. Diamond (1997)
Illuminations and Shadows from Jury SimulationsLaw and Human Behavior, 21
J. Carroll, N. Kerr, James Alfini, Frances Weaver, R. MacCoun, V. Feldman (2015)
Free press and fair trial: The role of behavioral researchLaw and Human Behavior, 10
R. Elliott, R. Robinson (1991)
Death penalty attitudes and the tendency to convict or acquitLaw and Human Behavior, 15
(1979)
Simulation research and the law [Special issue
E. Borgida, K. G. DeBono, L. A. Buckman (1990)
Cameras in the courtroom: The effects of media coverage on witness testimony and juror perceptionsLaw and Human Behavior, 14
Douglas Narby, B. Cutler (1994)
Effectiveness of voir dire as a safeguard in eyewitness casesJournal of Applied Psychology, 79
C. Roberts, S. Golding (1991)
The social construction of criminal responsibility and insanityLaw and Human Behavior, 15
W. C. Thompson (1993)
Individual and group decision making: Current issues
Douglas Narby, B. Cutler, G. Moran (1993)
A meta-analysis of the association between authoritarianism and jurors' perceptions of defendant culpability.Journal of Applied Psychology, 78
Kenneth Haas, J. Inciardi (1988)
Challenging Capital Punishment: Legal and Social Science Approaches
C. Nemeth (1977)
Interactions between jurors as a function of majority vs. unanimity decision rules.Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 7
Geoffrey Kramer, N. Kerr, J. Carroll (1990)
Pretrial publicity, judicial remedies, and jury biasLaw and Human Behavior, 14
I. Horowitz (1980)
Juror Selection: A Comparison of Two Methods In Several Criminal Cases1Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 10
R. Elliott, R. J. Robinson (1991)
Death penalty attitudes and the tendency to convict or acquit: Some dataLaw and Human Behavior, 15
Stephan Landsman, R. Rakos (1994)
A preliminary inquiry into the effect of potentially biasing information on judges and jurors in civil litigationBehavioral Sciences & The Law, 12
B. Cutler, H. Dexter, Steven Penrod (1989)
Expert testimony and jury decision making: An empirical analysisBehavioral Sciences & The Law, 7
W. Weiten, S. S. Diamond (1979)
A critical review of the jury simulation paradigm: The case of defendant characteristicsLaw and Human Behavior, 3
N. Finkel, S. Handel (1989)
How jurors construe “insanity”Law and Human Behavior, 13
D. Sears (1986)
College sophomores in the laboratory: Influences of a narrow data base on social psychology's view of human nature.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 51
Despite the need to assess the ecological validity of jury simulation research before generalizing from simulations to the behavior of real jurors, surprisingly little jury research has directly addressed issues of validity. The present paper reviews the extant research on two aspects of the validity question—specifically, research that has compared different samples of mock jurors, and research that has manipulated the medium of trial presentation. In addition, jury simulation research published in the first 20 years of Law and Human Behavior is analyzed with respect to these variables. The majority of simulations used student-jurors and presented the trial in written form. Additionally, the methodology of simulation research has actually become less realistic over time. However, this trend is not necessarily cause for concern, as a review of the literature reveals little research that has obtained differences between different mock juror samples or different trial media.
Law and Human Behavior – American Psychological Association
Published: Feb 1, 1999
Read and print from thousands of top scholarly journals.
Already have an account? Log in
Bookmark this article. You can see your Bookmarks on your DeepDyve Library.
To save an article, log in first, or sign up for a DeepDyve account if you don’t already have one.
Copy and paste the desired citation format or use the link below to download a file formatted for EndNote
Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
All DeepDyve websites use cookies to improve your online experience. They were placed on your computer when you launched this website. You can change your cookie settings through your browser.