Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
Loading next page...
/lp/american-psychological-association/suggestive-eyewitness-identification-procedures-and-the-supreme-court-LkIJTrJiXT
References (105)
-
M. B. Russano, J. J. Dickinson, S. M. Greathouse, M. B. Kovera (2006)
“Why don’t you take another look at number three?” Investigator knowledge and its effects on eyewitness confidence and identification decisionsCardozo Public Law, Policy, and Ethics Journal, 4
-
E. Loftus, G. Loftus, Jane Messo (1987)
Some facts about “weapon focus”Law and Human Behavior, 11
-
G. Wells, Brenda Hryciw (1984)
Memory for faces: Encoding and retrieval operationsMemory & Cognition, 12
-
G. Wells, Michael Leippe, T. Ostrom (1979)
Guidelines for empirically assessing the fairness of a lineupLaw and Human Behavior, 3
-
C. Semmler, N. Brewer (2006)
Postidentification Feedback Effects on Face Recognition Confidence: Evidence for Metacognitive Influences.Applied Cognitive Psychology, 20
-
G. Wells (1985)
Verbal Descriptions of Faces From Memory: Are They Diagnostic of Identification Accuracy?Journal of Applied Psychology, 70
-
Erin Harley, Keri Carlsen, G. Loftus (2004)
The "saw-it-all-along" effect: demonstrations of visual hindsight bias.Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition, 30 5
-
G. Wells, R. Lindsay, T. Ferguson (1979)
Accuracy, confidence, and juror perceptions in eyewitness identification.The Journal of applied psychology, 64 4
-
I. Sarason, Rick Stoops (1978)
Test anxiety and the passage of time.Journal of consulting and clinical psychology, 46 1
-
T. Valentine, A. Pickering, S. Darling (2003)
Characteristics of eyewitness identification that predict the outcome of real lineupsApplied Cognitive Psychology, 17
-
N. Steblay (1992)
A meta-analytic review of the weapon focus effectLaw and Human Behavior, 16
-
Tiffany Hinz, K. Pezdek (2001)
The Effect of Exposure to Multiple Lineups on Face Identification AccuracyLaw and Human Behavior, 25
-
Gabriel Gorenstein, P. Ellsworth (1980)
Effect of choosing an incorrect photograph on a later identification by an eyewitness.The Journal of applied psychology, 65 5
-
N. Steblay, Jennifer Dysart, S. Fulero, R. Lindsay (2003)
Eyewitness Accuracy Rates in Police Showup and Lineup Presentations: A Meta-Analytic ComparisonLaw and Human Behavior, 27
-
Bruce Behrman, Sherrie Davey (2001)
Eyewitness Identification in Actual Criminal Cases: An Archival AnalysisLaw and Human Behavior, 25
-
Sheila Seelau, G. Wells (1995)
Applied eyewitness research: The other missionLaw and Human Behavior, 19
-
S. Dixon, A. Memon (2005)
The effect of post-identification feedback on the recall of crime and perpetrator detailsApplied Cognitive Psychology, 19
-
S. E. Clark, J. L. Tunnicliff (2001)
Selecting lineup foils in eyewitness identification: Experimental control and real-world simulation.Law and Human Behavior, 25
-
A. Douglass, N. Steblay (2006)
Memory distortion in eyewitnesses: a meta-analysis of the post-identification feedback effectApplied Cognitive Psychology, 20
-
S. Sporer, Steven Penrod, D. Read, B. Cutler (1995)
CHOOSING, CONFIDENCE, AND ACCURACY : A META-ANALYSIS OF THE CONFIDENCE-ACCURACY RELATION IN EYEWITNESS IDENTIFICATION STUDIESPsychological Bulletin, 118
-
Steven Smith, R. Lindsay, Sean Pryke (2000)
Postdictors of eyewitness errors: can false identifications be diagnosed?The Journal of applied psychology, 85 4
-
S. Fox, H. Walters (1986)
The impact of general versus specific expert testimonyand eyewitness confidence upon mock juror judgmentLaw and Human Behavior, 10
-
R. Malpass, P. Devine (1981)
Eyewitness identification: Lineup instructions and the absence of the offender.Journal of Applied Psychology, 66
-
G. L. Wells, T. J. Ferguson, R. C. L. Lindsay (1981)
The tractability of eyewitness confidence and its implication for triers of fact.Journal of Applied Psychology, 66
-
B. Whitley, M. Greenberg (1986)
The Role of Eyewitness Confidence in Juror Perceptions of Credibility1Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 16
-
E. Loftus, E. Greene (1980)
Warning: Even memory for faces may be contagiousLaw and Human Behavior, 4
-
G. Wells, Amy Bradfield (1999)
Distortions in Eyewitnesses' Recollections: Can the Postidentification-Feedback Effect Be Moderated?Psychological Science, 10
-
G. Bower, Martin Karlin (1974)
Depth of processing pictures of faces and recognition memoryJournal of Experimental Psychology, 103
-
G. Wells (1988)
Eyewitness identification: A system handbook -
Bruce Behrman, Regina Richards (2005)
Suspect/Foil Identification in Actual Crimes and in the Laboratory: A Reality Monitoring AnalysisLaw and Human Behavior, 29
-
E. F. Loftus (1979)
Eyewitness testimony -
R. Rosenthal (2002)
Covert communication in classrooms, clinics, courtrooms, and cubicles.The American psychologist, 57 11
-
S. Clark (2005)
A Re-examination of the Effects of Biased Lineup Instructions in Eyewitness IdentificationLaw and Human Behavior, 29
-
N. Steblay (1997)
Social Influence in Eyewitness Recall: A Meta-Analytic Review of Lineup Instruction EffectsLaw and Human Behavior, 21
-
Daniel Gilbert, Teidorlang Lyngdoh (2015)
Stumbling on HappinessMetamorphosis: A Journal of Management Research, 14
-
S. Sporer (1993)
Eyewitness identification accuracy, confidence, and decision times in simultaneous and sequential lineupsJournal of Applied Psychology, 78
-
G. Wells, M. Small, Steven Penrod, R. Malpass, Solomon Fulero, C. Brimacombe (1998)
Eyewitness Identification Procedures: Recommendations for Lineups and PhotospreadsLaw and Human Behavior, 22
-
K. Patterson, A. Baddeley (1977)
When face recognition fails.Journal of experimental psychology. Human learning and memory, 3 4
-
G. Wells, Amy Bradfield (1998)
"Good, you identified the suspect": Feedback to eyewitnesses distorts their reports of the witnessing experience.Journal of Applied Psychology, 83
-
Elin Skagerberg (2007)
Co-witness feedback in line-upsApplied Cognitive Psychology, 21
-
B. Scheck, P. Neufeld, J. Dwyer (2000)
Actual innocence -
S. Lichtenstein, Baruch Fischhoff (1980)
Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Learning and Memory -
G. L. Wells, S. M. Rydell, E. P. Seelau (1993)
On the selection of distractors for eyewitness lineupsJournal of Applied Psychology, 78
-
E. Loftus, David Miller, Helen Burns (1978)
Semantic integration of verbal information into a visual memory.Journal of experimental psychology. Human learning and memory, 4 1
-
Melissa Pigott, J. Brigham (1985)
Relationship between accuracy of prior description and facial recognition.Journal of Applied Psychology, 70
-
D. Kahneman (1973)
Attention and Effort -
C. Semmler, N. Brewer, G. L. Wells (2004)
Effects of postidentification feedback on eyewitness identification and nonidentification.Journal of Applied Psychology, 89
-
R. Nisbett, T. Wilson (1977)
Telling more than we can know: Verbal reports on mental processes.Psychological Review, 84
-
G. Wells (1984)
The Psychology of Lineup Identifications1Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 14
-
H. E. Ebbinghaus (1885)
Memory: A contribution to experimental psychology -
G. Wells (2006)
Eyewitness identification: Systemic reformsWisconsin Law Review, 2006
-
E. Connors, T. Lundregan, N. Miller, T. McEwan (1996)
Convicted by juries, exonerated by science: Case studies in the use of DNA evidence to establish innocence after trial -
M. Phillips, B. McAuliff, M. Kovera, B. Cutler (1999)
Double-blind photoarray administration as a safeguard against investigator bias.Journal of Applied Psychology, 84
-
Deanna Caputo, D. Dunning (2006)
Distinguishing Accurate Eyewitness Identifications from Erroneous Ones: Post-dictive Indicators of Eyewitness Accuracy -
G. Wells, Elizabeth Olson, Steve Charman (2003)
Distorted retrospective eyewitness reports as functions of feedback and delay.Journal of experimental psychology. Applied, 9 1
-
Jim Dwyer, Peter Neufeld, Barry Scheck (2000)
Actual Innocence : Five Days to Execution and Other Dispatches from the Wrongly Convicted -
N. Brewer, A. Burke (2002)
Effects of Testimonial Inconsistencies and Eyewitness Confidence on Mock-Juror JudgmentsLaw and Human Behavior, 26
-
T. Junkin (2004)
Bloodsworth: The true story of the first death row inmate exonerated by DNA -
D. Dunning, Scott Perretta (2002)
Automaticity and eyewitness accuracy: a 10- to 12-second rule for distinguishing accurate from inaccurate positive identifications.The Journal of applied psychology, 87 5
-
Nathan Weber, N. Brewer, G. Wells, C. Semmler, Amber Keast (2004)
Eyewitness identification accuracy and response latency: the unruly 10-12-second rule.Journal of experimental psychology. Applied, 10 3
-
D. M. Wegner (2002)
The illusion of conscious will -
G. Wells, D. Murray (1983)
What can psychology say about the Neil v. Biggers criteria for judging eyewitness accuracyJournal of Applied Psychology, 68
-
G. Hafstad, A. Memon, R. Logie (2004)
Post-identification feedback, confidence and recollections of witnessing conditions in child witnessesApplied Cognitive Psychology, 18
-
Ryann Haw, R. Fisher (2004)
Effects of administrator-witness contact on eyewitness identification accuracy.The Journal of applied psychology, 89 6
-
G. Wells, Michael Leippe (1981)
How do triers of fact infer the accuracy of eyewitness identifications? Using memory for peripheral detail can be misleading.Journal of Applied Psychology, 66
-
J. Pozzulo (2006)
Handbook of eyewitness psychology: Memory for people -
R. C. L. Lindsay, R. S. Malpass (1999)
Measuring lineup fairness [Special issue]Applied Cognitive Psychology, 13
-
R. Lindsay, G. Wells (1980)
What price justice?Law and Human Behavior, 4
-
B. Cutler, Steven Penrod, Thomas Stuve (1988)
Juror decision making in eyewitness identification casesLaw and Human Behavior, 12
-
D. Wright, Elin Skagerberg (2007)
Postidentification Feedback Affects Real EyewitnessesPsychological Science, 18
-
G. Wells, Sheila Rydell, Eric Seelau (1993)
The selection of distractors for eyewitness lineupsJournal of Applied Psychology, 78
-
D. Dunning, L. B. Stern (1994)
Distinguishing accurate from inaccurate identifications via inquiries about decision processesJournal of Personality and Social Psychology, 67
-
G. Wells, R. Malpass, R. Lindsay, R. Fisher, John Turtle, Solomon Fulero (2000)
From the lab to the police station. A successful application of eyewitness research.The American psychologist, 55 6
-
D. Dunning, L. Stern (1994)
Distinguishing accurate from inaccurate eyewitness identifications via inquiries about decision processesJournal of Personality and Social Psychology, 67
-
John Sutton, Celia Harris, A. Barnier (1977)
Memory and Cognition -
K. Deffenbacher, B. Bornstein, Steven Penrod (2006)
Mugshot Exposure Effects: Retroactive Interference, Mugshot Commitment, Source Confusion, and Unconscious TransferenceLaw and Human Behavior, 30
-
C. A. Morgan, G. Hazlett, A Doran, S. Garrett, G. Hoyt, P. Thomas, M. Baranoski, S. M. Southwick (2004)
Accuracy of eyewitness memory for persons encountered during exposure to highly intense stressInternational Journal of Psychiatry and the Law, 27
-
(1999)
Eyewitness evidence: A guide for law enforcement -
Amy Bradfield, G. Wells, Elizabeth Olson (2002)
The damaging effect of confirming feedback on the relation between eyewitness certainty and identification accuracy.The Journal of applied psychology, 87 1
-
C. Semmler, N. Brewer, G. Wells (2004)
Effects of postidentification feedback on eyewitness identification and nonidentification confidence.The Journal of applied psychology, 89 2
-
R. Rosenthal, D. Rubin (1978)
Interpersonal expectancy effects: the first 345 studiesBehavioral and Brain Sciences, 1
-
G. Wells (1978)
Applied eyewitness-testimony research: System variables and estimator variables.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 36
-
G. L. Wells, D. M. Murray (1983)
What can psychology say about the Neil vs. Biggers criteria for judging eyewitness identification accuracy?Journal of Applied Psychology, 68
-
C. Morgan, G. Hazlett, Anthony Doran, S. Garrett, G. Hoyt, P. Thomas, M. Baranoski, S. Southwick (2004)
Accuracy of eyewitness memory for persons encountered during exposure to highly intense stress.International journal of law and psychiatry, 27 3
-
R. Lindsay (1999)
Applying applied research: selling the sequential line‐upApplied Cognitive Psychology, 13
-
E. Loftus, Jennifer Dysart, James Doyle (1987)
Eyewitness testimony: Civil and criminal -
Amy Bradfield, G. Wells (2000)
The Perceived Validity of Eyewitness Identification Testimony: A Test of the Five Biggers CriteriaLaw and Human Behavior, 24
-
L. Stern, D. Dunning (1994)
Distinguishing accurate from inaccurate eyewitness identifications: A reality monitoring approach. -
S. Dixon, A. Memon (2005)
The effect of post-identification feedback on the recall of crime and culprit detailsApplied Cognitive Psychology, 19
-
R. Malpass (1981)
Effective size and defendant bias in eyewitness identification lineupsLaw and Human Behavior, 5
-
Peter Shapiro, Steven Penrod (1986)
Meta-analysis of facial identification studies.Psychological Bulletin, 100
-
J. M. Doyle (2005)
True witness: Cops, courts, science, and the battle against misidentification -
H. Schiffman, D. Bobko (1974)
Effects of stimulus complexity on the perception of brief temporal intervals.Journal of experimental psychology, 103 1
-
S. Clark, J. Tunnicliff (2001)
Selecting Lineup Foils in Eyewitness Identification Experiments: Experimental Control and Real-World SimulationLaw and Human Behavior, 25
-
R. C. L. Lindsay, G. L. Wells (1980)
What price justice? Exploring the relationship between lineup fairness and identification accuracyLaw and Human Behavior, 4
-
J. Brigham, D. Cairns (1988)
The Effect of Mugshot Inspections on Eyewitness Identification Accuracy1Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 18
-
A. Douglass, D. McQuiston-Surrett (2006)
Post-identification feedback: exploring the effects of sequential photospreads and eyewitnesses' awareness of the identification taskApplied Cognitive Psychology, 20
-
B. Cutler, Steven Penrod (1995)
Mistaken Identification: The Eyewitness, Psychology and the Law -
S. Penrod (2005)
Eyewitness identification evidence: How well are witnesses and police performing?Criminal Justice Magazine, 54
-
D. Wright, A. McDaid (1996)
Comparing system and estimator variables using data from real line‐upsApplied Cognitive Psychology, 10
-
D. Ross, J. Read, M. Toglia (2007)
Adult Eyewitness Testimony: Current Trends and Developments -
J. Neuschatz, Elizabeth Preston, Amanda Burkett, M. Toglia, J. Lampinen, Joseph Neuschatz, A. Fairless, Deah Lawson, Ráchael Powers, C. Goodsell (2005)
The effects of post ‐identification feedback and age on retrospective eyewitness memoryApplied Cognitive Psychology, 19
-
Keun-Chang Kwak, W. Pedrycz (2005)
Face recognition: A study in information fusion using fuzzy integralPattern Recognit. Lett., 26
-
R. Malpass, R. Lindsay (1999)
Measuring lineup fairnessApplied Cognitive Psychology, 13
-
G. Loftus, Erin Harley (2005)
Why is it easier to identify someone close than far away?Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 12
- Publisher
- American Psychological Association
- Copyright
- Copyright © 2009 American Psychological Association
- ISSN
- 0147-7307
- eISSN
- 1573-661X
- DOI
- 10.1007/s10979-008-9130-3
- pmid
- 18302010
- Publisher site
- See Article on Publisher Site
Abstract
The U.S. Supreme Court’s ruling concerning suggestive eyewitness identification procedures (Manson v. Braithwaite, 1977, 432 U.S. 98) has not been revisited by the Court in the intervening 30+ years. Meanwhile, scientific studies of eyewitnesses have progressed and DNA exonerations show that mistaken identification is the primary cause of convictions of the innocent. We analyzed the two-inquiry logic in Manson in light of eyewitness science. Several problems are discussed. Ironically, we note that suggestive identification procedures (determined in the first inquiry) boost the eyewitnesses’ standing on three of the five criteria (used in the second inquiry) that are used to decide whether the suggestive procedures were a problem. The net effect undermines safeguards intended by the Court and destroys incentives to avoid suggestive procedures.
Journal
Law and Human Behavior – American Psychological Association
Published: Feb 27, 2009