Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
Donald Wallace (2000)
Book Review: Psychology and Law: The State of the DisciplineCriminal Justice Review, 25
W. Swoboda, N. Mühlberger, R. Weitkunat, S. Schneeweiss (1997)
Internet Surveys by Direct MailingSocial Science Computer Review, 15
S. Helle (1997)
Publicity does not equal prejudiceIllinois Bar Journal, 85
J. Pitkow, C. Kehoe (1995)
Results from the Third WWW User SurveyProceedings of the Fourth International Conference on World Wide Web
J. Carroll, N. Kerr, James Alfini, Frances Weaver, R. MacCoun, V. Feldman (2015)
Free press and fair trial: The role of behavioral researchLaw and Human Behavior, 10
C. Studebaker, Steven Penrod (1997)
Pretrial Publicity: The Media, the Law, and Common SensePsychology, Public Policy and Law, 3
R. Bray, N. Kerr (1981)
Methodological considerations in the study of the psychology of the courtroom
N. Kerr (1994)
The effects of pretrial publicity on jurors.
J. Pitkow, M. M. Recker (1995)
Using theWeb as a survey tool: Results from the secondWorld-Wide Web user surveyJournal of Computer Networks and ISDN Systems, 27
R. Bray, N. Kerr (1979)
Use of the simulation method in the study of jury behaviorLaw and Human Behavior, 3
T. Cook, D. Campbell (1979)
Quasi-experimentation: Design & analysis issues for field settings
W. J. Swoboda, N. Muhlberger, S. Schneeweib (1997)
Internet surveys by direct mailing:Aninnovative way of collecting dataSocial Science Computer Review, 15
D. Imrich, Charles Mullin, D. Linz (1995)
Measuring the Extent of Prejudicial Pretrial Publicity in Major American Newspapers: A Content AnalysisJournal of Communication, 45
N. Kerr, R. Bray (1981)
The Psychology of the courtroom
C. Studebaker, J. Robbennolt, Maithilee Pathak-Sharma, Steven Penrod (2000)
Assessing Pretrial Publicity Effects: Integrating Content Analytic ResultsLaw and Human Behavior, 24
Wayne Weiten, S. Diamond (1979)
A critical review of the jury simulation paradigmLaw and Human Behavior, 3
K. O'Neil, S. Penrod, R. Ray (2000)
The validity of conducting research over the World Wide Web: Experiences from psycholegal research
Jeffrey Wilson, B. Bornstein (1998)
Methodological Considerations in Pretrial Publicity Research: Is the Medium the Message?Law and Human Behavior, 22
M. T. Nietzel, D. M. McCarthy, M. J. Kern (1999)
Psychology and law: The state of the discipline
J. K. Robbennolt, R. J. MacCoun, J. M. Darley (2000)
Punitive damages: To the plaintiff or to the state?
Kevin O’Neil, Steven Penrod (2001)
Methodological variables in Web-based research that may affect results: Sample type, monetary incentives, and personal informationBehavior Research Methods, Instruments, & Computers, 33
J. Bruschke, W. Loges (1999)
Relationship between pretrial publicity and trial outcomesJournal of Communication, 49
V. Konečni, E. Ebbesen (1979)
External validity of research in legal psychologyLaw and Human Behavior, 3
D. K. Bowker (1999)
Constructing the client-computer interface: Guidelines for design and implementation of Web-based surveys (Summary Report No. 95-59)
N. Steblay, Jasmina Besirevic, S. Fulero, Belia Jimenez-Lorente (1999)
The Effects of Pretrial Publicity on Juror Verdicts: A Meta-Analytic ReviewLaw and Human Behavior, 23
B. Bornstein (1999)
The Ecological Validity of Jury Simulations: Is the Jury Still Out?Law and Human Behavior, 23
S. D. Penrod, K. M. O'Neil (2000)
Investigating the validity of a new method for jury research: Imposing the death penalty over the World-Wide Web
S. Fulero (1987)
The role of behavioral research in the free press/fair trial controversyLaw and Human Behavior, 11
J. Pitkow, Mimi Recker (1994)
Results from the First World-Wide Web User SurveyComput. Networks ISDN Syst., 27
Although research examining the effects of pretrial publicity (PTP) on individuals’ appraisals of a defendant and verdict decision making generally has been found to be internally valid, the external validity has been questioned by some social scientists as well as lawyers and judges. It is often proposed that the verisimilitude (or ecological validity) of the research should be increased in the service of increasing external validity; however, increasing verisimilitude can be costly in terms of both time and money. It is proposed that the Internet is a viable means of conducting PTP research that allows high verisimilitude without high costs. This is demonstrated with a study in which we used the Internet to examine PTP effects in an actual trial as it was taking place. Successful use of the Internet to conduct experimental research in other areas of psychology and law is discussed, as well as the importance of future research examining whether independent variables interact with methods in ways that undermine the generalizability of research findings.
Law and Human Behavior – American Psychological Association
Published: Feb 1, 2002
Read and print from thousands of top scholarly journals.
Already have an account? Log in
Bookmark this article. You can see your Bookmarks on your DeepDyve Library.
To save an article, log in first, or sign up for a DeepDyve account if you don’t already have one.
Copy and paste the desired citation format or use the link below to download a file formatted for EndNote
Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
All DeepDyve websites use cookies to improve your online experience. They were placed on your computer when you launched this website. You can change your cookie settings through your browser.