Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
S. Clark (2008)
The importance (necessity) of computational modelling for eyewitness identification researchApplied Cognitive Psychology, 22
J. Sauer, N. Brewer, Tick Zweck, Nathan Weber (2010)
The Effect of Retention Interval on the Confidence–Accuracy Relationship for Eyewitness IdentificationLaw and Human Behavior, 34
N. Macmillan, C. Creelman (1991)
Detection Theory: A User's Guide
R. Rosenthal (1984)
Meta-analytic procedures for social research
D. McQuiston-Surrett, R. Malpass, C. Tredoux (2006)
Sequential vs. Simultaneous Lineups: A Review of Methods, Data, and Theory.Psychology, Public Policy and Law, 12
S. Starr, C. Metz, L. Lusted, D. Goodenough (1975)
Visual detection and localization of radiographic images.Radiology, 116 3
Matthew Duncan (2006)
A signal detection model of compound decision tasks
S. Gronlund (2004)
Sequential lineups: shift in criterion or decision strategy?The Journal of applied psychology, 89 2
G. Wells (2008)
Theory, Logic and Data : Paths to a More Coherent Eyewitness ScienceApplied Cognitive Psychology, 22
J. Pozzulo, S. Marciniak (2006)
Comparing identification procedures when the perpetrator has changed appearancePsychology, Crime & Law, 12
D. Green, J. Swets (1966)
Signal detection theory and psychophysics
O. MacLin, Colin Phelan (2007)
PC_Eyewitness: Evaluating the New Jersey methodBehavior Research Methods, 39
G. Wells, A. Memon, Steven Penrod (2006)
Eyewitness EvidencePsychological Science in the Public Interest, 7
S. Clark (2003)
A memory and decision model for eyewitness identificationApplied Cognitive Psychology, 17
(1995)
The Rhetoric of Innocence
T. Postelnicu (1970)
Sokal, R. R., and I. J. Rohlf: Biometry. W. H. Freeman and Company, San Francisco 1969, XXI + 776 S., 89 Abb., 56 Tab., Preis 126/—Biometrische Zeitschrift, 12
R. Rose, R. Bull, A. Vrij (2005)
Non-biased lineup instructions do matter – a problem for older witnessesPsychology, Crime & Law, 11
G. Wells (1993)
What do we know about eyewitness identification?The American psychologist, 48 5
E. Wells, J. Pozzulo (2006)
Accuracy of eyewitnesses with a two-culprit crime: Testing a new identification procedurePsychology, Crime & Law, 12
A. Memon, F. Gabbert (2003)
Improving the identification accuracy of senior witnesses: do prelineup questions and sequential testing help?The Journal of applied psychology, 88 2
S. Clark, Sherrie Davey (2005)
The Target-to-Foils Shift in Simultaneous and Sequential LineupsLaw and Human Behavior, 29
A. Koriat, S. Lichtenstein, Baruch Fischhoff (1980)
Reasons for confidence.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Learning & Memory, 6
C. Goodsell, S. Gronlund, Curt Carlson (2010)
Exploring the Sequential Lineup Advantage Using WITNESSLaw and Human Behavior, 34
S. Gronlund, Curt Carlson, Sarah Dailey, C. Goodsell (2009)
Robustness of the sequential lineup advantage.Journal of experimental psychology. Applied, 15 2
Sean Pryke, R. Lindsay, Jennifer Dysart, Paul Dupuis (2004)
Multiple independent identification decisions: a method of calibrating eyewitness identifications.The Journal of applied psychology, 89 1
S. Sporer (1993)
Eyewitness identification accuracy, confidence, and decision times in simultaneous and sequential lineupsJournal of Applied Psychology, 78
R. Lindsay, J. Lea, Jennifer Fulford (1991)
Sequential lineup presentation : technique mattersJournal of Applied Psychology, 76
R. Lindsay, G. Wells (1985)
Improving eyewitness identifications from lineups: Simultaneous versus sequential lineup presentation.Journal of Applied Psychology, 70
S. Greathouse, M. Kovera (2009)
Instruction Bias and Lineup Presentation Moderate the Effects of Administrator Knowledge on Eyewitness IdentificationLaw and Human Behavior, 33
J. Pozzulo, Julie Dempsey, S. Corey, A. Girardi, Alexander Lawandi, Cory Aston (2008)
Can a Lineup Procedure Designed for Child Witnesses Work for Adults? Comparing Simultaneous, Sequential, and Elimination Lineup ProceduresJournal of Applied Social Psychology, 38
W. Kneller, A. Memon, S. Stevenage (2001)
Simultaneous and sequential lineups: Decision processes of accurate and inaccurate eyewitnesses.Applied Cognitive Psychology, 15
J. Pozzulo, R. Lindsay (1999)
Elimination lineups : An improved identification procedure for child eyewitnessesJournal of Applied Psychology, 84
R. Melara, Thomas DeWitt-Rickards, T. O'Brien (1989)
Enhancing lineup identification accuracy: two codes are better than one.The Journal of applied psychology, 74 5
C. Luus, G. Wells (1991)
Eyewitness identification and the selection of distracters for lineupsLaw and Human Behavior, 15
J. Sauer, N. Brewer, Nathan Weber (2008)
Multiple confidence estimates as indices of eyewitness memory.Journal of experimental psychology. General, 137 3
S. Lichtenstein, Baruch Fischhoff (1980)
Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Learning and Memory
A. Volokh (1997)
N Guilty MenUniversity of Pennsylvania Law Review, 146
A. Levi (2006)
An analysis of multiple choices in MSL lineups, and a comparison with simultaneous and sequential onesPsychology, Crime & Law, 12
R. Malpass, C. Tredoux, D. McQuiston-Surrett (2009)
Public policy and sequential lineupsLegal and Criminological Psychology, 14
N. Steblay, Jennifer Dysart, G. Wells (2011)
Seventy-two tests of the sequential lineup superiority effect: A meta-analysis and policy discussion.Psychology, Public Policy and Law, 17
R. Lindsay, J. Lea, G. Nosworthy, Jennifer Fulford, Julia Hector, Virginia LeVan, Carolyn Seabrook (1991)
Biased lineups: sequential presentation reduces the problem.The Journal of applied psychology, 76 6
N. Brewer, G. Wells (2006)
The confidence-accuracy relationship in eyewitness identification: effects of lineup instructions, foil similarity, and target-absent base rates.Journal of experimental psychology. Applied, 12 1
G. Wells (1984)
The Psychology of Lineup Identifications1Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 14
Rachel Wilcock, R. Bull, A. Vrij (2005)
Aiding the Performance of Older Eyewitnesses: Enhanced Non-Biased Line-Up Instructions and Line-Up PresentationPsychiatry, Psychology and Law, 12
R. Lindsay, J. Pozzulo, W. Craig, Kang Lee, S. Corber (1997)
Simultaneous Lineups, Sequential Lineups, and Showups: Eyewitness Identification Decisions of Adults and ChildrenLaw and Human Behavior, 21
R. Lindsay, Jamal Mansour, J. Beaudry, Amy‐May Leach, Michelle Bertrand (2009)
Sequential lineup presentation: Patterns and policyLegal and Criminological Psychology, 14
N. Steblay, Hannah Dietrich, Shannon Ryan, Jeanette Raczynski, Kali James (2011)
Sequential Lineup Laps and Eyewitness AccuracyLaw and Human Behavior, 35
N. Steblay, Jennifer Dysart, S. Fulero, R. Lindsay (2001)
Eyewitness Accuracy Rates in Sequential and Simultaneous Lineup Presentations: A Meta-Analytic ComparisonLaw and Human Behavior, 25
J. Parker, V. Ryan (1993)
An attempt to reduce guessing behavior in children's and adults' eyewitness identificationsLaw and Human Behavior, 17
O. MacLin, Laura Zimmerman, R. Malpass (2005)
PC_Eyewitness and the Sequential Superiority Effect: Computer-Based Lineup AdministrationLaw and Human Behavior, 29
Matthew Palmer, N. Brewer, Nathan Weber (2010)
Postidentification feedback affects subsequent eyewitness identification performance.Journal of experimental psychology. Applied, 16 4
R. Ratcliff, Ching-Fan Sheu, S. Gronlund (1992)
Testing global memory models using ROC curves.Psychological review, 99 3
Curt Carlson, S. Gronlund, S. Clark (2008)
Lineup composition, suspect position, and the sequential lineup advantage.Journal of experimental psychology. Applied, 14 2
C. Meissner, C. Tredoux, J. Parker, O. MacLin (2005)
Eyewitness decisions in simultaneous and sequential lineups: A dual-process signal detection theory analysisMemory & Cognition, 33
R. Malpass (2006)
A POLICY EVALUATION OF SIMULTANEOUS AND SEQUENTIAL LINEUPSPsychology, Public Policy and Law, 12
Nathan Weber, N. Brewer (2006)
Positive versus negative face recognition decisions: confidence, accuracy, and response latencyApplied Cognitive Psychology, 20
S. Clark, Ryan Howell, Sherrie Davey (2008)
Regularities in Eyewitness IdentificationLaw and Human Behavior, 32
B. Cutler, Steven Penrod (1988)
Improving the reliability of eyewitness identification: Lineup construction and presentation.Journal of Applied Psychology, 73
E. Ebbesen, H. Flowe (2002)
Simultaneous v. sequential lineups: What do we really know?
Daniel Katz (1955)
Handbook of Social Psychology.Psychological Bulletin
When compared with simultaneous lineup presentation, sequential presentation has been shown to reduce false identifications to a greater extent than it reduces correct identifications. However, there has been much debate about whether this difference in identification performance represents improved discriminability or more conservative responding. In this research, data from 22 experiments that compared sequential and simultaneous lineups were analyzed using a compound signal-detection model, which is specifically designed to describe decision-making performance on tasks such as eyewitness identification tests. Sequential (cf. simultaneous) presentation did not influence discriminability, but produced a conservative shift in response bias that resulted in less-biased choosing for sequential than simultaneous lineups. These results inform understanding of the effects of lineup presentation mode on eyewitness identification decisions.
Law and Human Behavior – American Psychological Association
Published: Jun 28, 2012
Read and print from thousands of top scholarly journals.
Already have an account? Log in
Bookmark this article. You can see your Bookmarks on your DeepDyve Library.
To save an article, log in first, or sign up for a DeepDyve account if you don’t already have one.
Copy and paste the desired citation format or use the link below to download a file formatted for EndNote
Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
All DeepDyve websites use cookies to improve your online experience. They were placed on your computer when you launched this website. You can change your cookie settings through your browser.