Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
M. Wogalter, D. Marwitz, David Leonard (1992)
Suggestiveness in photospread line‐ups: Similarity induces distinctivenessApplied Cognitive Psychology, 6
R. Lindsay (1986)
Confidence and accuracy of eyewitness identification from lineupsLaw and Human Behavior, 10
C. Krafka, Steven Penrod (1985)
Reinstatement of context in a field experiment on eyewitness identification.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 49
R. Lindsay, G. Wells (1980)
What price justice?Law and Human Behavior, 4
G. Wells, Sheila Rydell, Eric Seelau (1993)
The selection of distractors for eyewitness lineupsJournal of Applied Psychology, 78
Christine Ricci, C. Beal, D. Dekle (1996)
The effect of parent versus unfamiliar interviewers on children's eyewitness memory and identification accuracyLaw and Human Behavior, 20
D. Murray, G. Wells (1982)
Does Knowledge that a Crime Was Staged Affect Eyewitness Performance?1Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 12
W. Freudenburg (1999)
RESEARCH IN SOCIAL PROBLEMS AND PUBLIC POLICY, 7
J. Gross, H. Hayne (1996)
Eyewitness identification by 5-to 6-year-old childrenLaw and Human Behavior, 20
R. Malpass, P. Devine (1981)
Eyewitness identification: Lineup instructions and the absence of the offender.Journal of Applied Psychology, 66
J. Read, P. Tollestrup, R. Hammersley, E. McFadzen, A. Christensen (1990)
The unconscious transference effect: Are innocent bystanders ever misidentified?Applied Cognitive Psychology, 4
G. Wells (1993)
What do we know about eyewitness identification?The American psychologist, 48 5
D. Navon (1992)
Selection of lineup foils by similarity to the suspect is likely to misfireLaw and Human Behavior, 16
J. Tunnicliff, S. Clark (2000)
Selecting Foils for Identification Lineups: Matching Suspects or Descriptions?Law and Human Behavior, 24
Gary Wells, Tamara Ferguson, R. Lindsay (1981)
The Tractability of Eyewitness Confidence and Its Implications for Triers of FactJournal of Applied Psychology, 66
A. Yarmey, Meagan Yarmey, A. Yarmey (1996)
Accuracy of eyewitness identifications in showups and lineupsLaw and Human Behavior, 20
P. Tollestrup, John Turtle, J. Yuille (1994)
Adult Eyewitness Testimony: Actual victims and witnesses to robbery and fraud: An archival analysis
A. Graziano, M. Raulin (1989)
Research Methods: A Process of Inquiry
E. F. Loftus (1979)
Eyewitness testimony
N. Steblay (1997)
Social Influence in Eyewitness Recall: A Meta-Analytic Review of Lineup Instruction EffectsLaw and Human Behavior, 21
R. Lindsay, R. Martin, Lisa Webber (1994)
Default values in eyewitness descriptionsLaw and Human Behavior, 18
A. Graziano, M. Raulin (1993)
Research methods: A process of inquiry, 2nd ed.
C. R. Huff (1987)
Wrongful conviction: Society tolerance of injusticeResearch in Social Problems and Public Policy, 4
G. Wells, M. Small, Steven Penrod, R. Malpass, Solomon Fulero, C. Brimacombe (1998)
Eyewitness Identification Procedures: Recommendations for Lineups and PhotospreadsLaw and Human Behavior, 22
A. Yarmey, A. Yarmey, Meagan Yarmey (1994)
Face and voice identifications in showups and lineupsApplied Cognitive Psychology, 8
R. Lindsay, J. Lea, Jennifer Fulford (1991)
Sequential lineup presentation : technique mattersJournal of Applied Psychology, 76
Thomas O'Rourke, Steven Penrod, B. Cutler, Thomas Stuve (1989)
The external validity of eyewitness identification research: Generalizing across subject populationsLaw and Human Behavior, 13
R. Lindsay, G. Wells (1985)
Improving eyewitness identifications from lineups: Simultaneous versus sequential lineup presentation.Journal of Applied Psychology, 70
R. Gonzalez, P. Ellsworth, Maceo Pembroke (1993)
Response biases in lineups and showups.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 64
M. Wogalter, R. Malpass, Michele Burger (1993)
How Police Officers Construct Lineups: A National SurveyProceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society Annual Meeting, 37
R. Melara, Thomas DeWitt-Rickards, T. O'Brien (1989)
Enhancing lineup identification accuracy: two codes are better than one.The Journal of applied psychology, 74 5
C. Luus, G. Wells (1991)
Eyewitness identification and the selection of distracters for lineupsLaw and Human Behavior, 15
B. Cutler, Steven Penrod, Todd Martens (1987)
The reliability of eyewitness identificationLaw and Human Behavior, 11
J. Read (1995)
The availability heuristic in person identification: The sometimes misleading consequences of enhanced contextual informationApplied Cognitive Psychology, 9
G. Sanders (1984)
Effects of Context Cues on Eyewitness Identification Responses1Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 14
H. Münsterberg (1908)
On the Witness StandCalifornia Law Review, 12
Melissa Pigott, J. Brigham (1985)
Relationship between accuracy of prior description and facial recognition.Journal of Applied Psychology, 70
Edward Smith, D. Medin (1984)
Categories and concepts
B. Cutler, Steven Penrod (1995)
Mistaken Identification: The Eyewitness, Psychology and the Law
R. Lindsay, J. Lea, G. Nosworthy, Jennifer Fulford, Julia Hector, Virginia LeVan, Carolyn Seabrook (1991)
Biased lineups: sequential presentation reduces the problem.The Journal of applied psychology, 76 6
G. Wells (1984)
The Psychology of Lineup Identifications1Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 14
R. C. L. Lindsay, R. Martin, L. Webber (1994)
Default values in eyewitness descriptions: A problem for the match-to-description lineup foil selection strategyLaw and Human Behavior, 18
H. Münsterberg (2007)
On the Witness Stand; Essays on Psychology and Crime
E. Connors, T. Lundregan, N. Miller, T. McEwen (1996)
Convicted by juries, exonerated by science: Case studies in the use of DNA evidence to establish innocence after trial
R. C. L. Lindsay, G. L. Wells (1980)
What price justice? Exploring the relationship of lineup fairness to identification accuracyLaw and Human Behavior, 4
P. A. Tollestrup, J.W. Turtle, J. C. Yuille (1994)
Adult eyewitness testimony: Current trends and developments
R. S. Woodworth, H. Schlosberg (1956)
Experimental psychology
B. L. Cutler, S. D. Penrod, T. K. Martens (1987)
The reliability of eyewitness identification: The role of system and estimator variablesLaw and Human Behavior, 11
B. Cutler, Steven Penrod (1988)
Improving the reliability of eyewitness identification: Lineup construction and presentation.Journal of Applied Psychology, 73
Experimental research on eyewitness identification follows a standard principle of experimental design. Perpetrator-present and perpetrator-absent lineups are constructed with the same foils, so that the two conditions are identical except for the presence or absence of the true perpetrator of the crime. However, this aspect of the design simulates conditions that do not correspond to those of real criminal investigations. Specifically, these conditions can create perp-absent lineups in which the foils are selected based on their similarity to an unknown person—the real perpetrator. Analysis of the similarity relations predicts that when foils for perp-absent lineups are selected based on their match to the perpetrator the false identification rate will be lower than if the foils are selected based on their match to the innocent suspect. This prediction was confirmed in an experiment that compared these two perp-absent lineup conditions. These results suggest that false identification rates in previous experiments would have been higher if the foils had been selected based on their match to the innocent suspect, rather than the absent perpetrator.
Law and Human Behavior – American Psychological Association
Published: Jun 1, 2001
Read and print from thousands of top scholarly journals.
Already have an account? Log in
Bookmark this article. You can see your Bookmarks on your DeepDyve Library.
To save an article, log in first, or sign up for a DeepDyve account if you don’t already have one.
Copy and paste the desired citation format or use the link below to download a file formatted for EndNote
Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
All DeepDyve websites use cookies to improve your online experience. They were placed on your computer when you launched this website. You can change your cookie settings through your browser.