Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
T. Grisso (2012)
Juveniles’ Waiver of Rights: Legal and Psychological Competence
H. Farber (2007)
The Role of the Parent/Guardian in Juvenile Custodial Interrogations: Friend or Foe'American Criminal Law Review, 41
S. Kassin, G. Gudjonsson (2004)
The Psychology of ConfessionsPsychological Science in the Public Interest, 5
Celeste Snyder, G. Lassiter, Matthew Lindberg, Shannon Pinegar (2009)
Videotaped interrogations and confessions: does a dual-camera approach yield unbiased and accurate evaluations?Behavioral sciences & the law, 27 3
R. Leo (1996)
Inside the Interrogation RoomJournal of Criminal Law & Criminology, 86
Barry Feld (2006)
Juveniles' Competence to Exercise Miranda Rights: An Empirical Study of Policy and PracticeMinnesota Law Review, 91
S. Mann, A. Vrij (2006)
Police officers’ judgements of veracity, tenseness, cognitive load and attempted behavioural control in real-life police interviewsPsychology, Crime & Law, 12
Jessica Owen-Kostelnik, N. Reppucci, Jessica Meyer (2006)
Testimony and interrogation of minors: assumptions about maturity and morality.The American psychologist, 61 4
L. Steinberg (2004)
Risk Taking in Adolescence: What Changes, and Why?Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, 1021
Kyle Scherr, Stephanie Madon (2011)
You Have the Right to Understand: The Deleterious Effect of Stress on Suspects’ Ability to Comprehend MirandaLaw and Human Behavior
T. Grisso, Laurence Steinberg, Jennifer Woolard, E. Cauffman, Elizabeth Scott, Sandra Graham, Frances Lexcen, N. Reppucci, Robert Schwartz (2003)
Juveniles' Competence to Stand Trial: A Comparison of Adolescents' and Adults' Capacities as Trial DefendantsLaw and Human Behavior, 27
S. Kassin, Steven Drizin, T. Grisso, G. Gudjonsson, R. Leo, A. Redlich (2010)
Police-Induced Confessions: Risk Factors and RecommendationsLaw and Human Behavior, 34
R. Ruback, Paula Vardaman (1997)
Decision Making in Delinquency Cases: The Role of Race and Juveniles' Admission/Denial of the CrimeLaw and Human Behavior, 21
S. Kassin, R. Leo, C. Meissner, Kimberly Richman, Lori Colwell, Amy‐May Leach, Dana Fon (2007)
Police Interviewing and Interrogation: A Self-Report Survey of Police Practices and BeliefsLaw and Human Behavior, 31
T. Sullivan (2004)
Police Experiences with Recording Custodial InterrogationsJudicature, 88
M. Hickman (2012)
Local Police Departments, 2003
V. Reyna, Frank Farley (2006)
Risk and Rationality in Adolescent Decision MakingPsychological Science in the Public Interest, 7
S. Kassin, Katherina Neumann (1997)
On the Power of Confession Evidence: An Experimental Test of the Fundamental Difference HypothesisLaw and Human Behavior, 21
G. Lassiter (2002)
Illusory Causation in the CourtroomCurrent Directions in Psychological Science, 11
P. Cassell, Bret Hayman (1996)
Police Interrogation in the 1990s: An Empirical Study of the Effects of MirandaUCLA Law Review, 43
James Lowenstein, H. Blank, J. Sauer (2010)
Uniforms Affect the Accuracy of Children’s Eyewitness Identifi cation Decisions, 7
Steven Drizin, R. Leo (2004)
The Problem of False Confessions in the Post-DNA WorldNorth Carolina Law Review, 82
G. Lassiter (2010)
Psychological science and sound public policy: video recording of custodial interrogations.The American psychologist, 65 8
Barry Feld (2006)
Police Interrogation of Juveniles: An Empirical Study of Policy and PracticeJournal of Criminal Law & Criminology, 97
Barry Feld (2012)
Kids, Cops, and Confessions: Inside the Interrogation Room
Cynthia Najdowski (2011)
Stereotype Threat in Criminal Interrogations:Why Innocent Black Suspects are at Risk for Confessing FalselyPsychology, Public Policy and Law, 17
J. Grisso, Carolyn Pomicter (1977)
Interrogation of juvenilesLaw and Human Behavior, 1
R. Leo (2008)
Police Interrogation and American Justice
Jennifer Woolard, Hayley Cleary, Samantha Harvell, Rusan Chen (2008)
Examining Adolescents’ and their Parents’ Conceptual and Practical Knowledge of Police Interrogation: A Family Dyad ApproachJournal of Youth and Adolescence, 37
N. Goldstein, L. Condie, Rachel Kalbeitzer, Douglas Osman, J. Geier (2003)
Juvenile Offenders’ Miranda Rights Comprehension and Self-Reported Likelihood of Offering False ConfessionsAssessment, 10
A. Piquero (2008)
Disproportionate Minority ContactThe Future of Children, 18
A. Redlich, G. Goodman (2003)
Taking Responsibility for an Act Not Committed: The Influence of Age and SuggestibilityLaw and Human Behavior, 27
S. Kassin, K. Kiechel (1996)
The Social Psychology of False Confessions: Compliance, Internalization, and ConfabulationPsychological Science, 7
L. Hsu, R. Field (2003)
Interrater Agreement Measures: Comments on Kappan, Cohen's Kappa, Scott's π, and Aickin's αUnderstanding Statistics, 2
A. Vrij (2008)
Detecting lies and deceit: Pitfalls and opportunities, 2nd ed.
Jacob Cohen (1960)
A Coefficient of Agreement for Nominal ScalesEducational and Psychological Measurement, 20
G. Lassiter, Lezlee Ware, J. Ratcliff, Clinton Irvin (2009)
Evidence of the camera perspective bias in authentic videotaped interrogations: Implications for emerging reform in the criminal justice systemLegal and Criminological Psychology, 14
Jodi Viljoen, J. Klaver, R. Roesch (2005)
Legal Decisions of Preadolescent and Adolescent Defendants: Predictors of Confessions, Pleas, Communication with Attorneys, and AppealsLaw and Human Behavior, 29
Although empirical attention to police interrogation has gained traction in recent years, comparatively few studies have examined interrogation of juvenile suspects, and virtually none have examined actual interrogations. Despite a growing literature on youths’ interrogation-related capacities, we still know very little about what actually transpires when police question youth. The present study examines electronically recorded police interviews with juveniles to describe the characteristics, processes, and outcomes that occur in actual juvenile interrogations, including interview duration, individuals present, and confessions. Fifty-seven electronic recordings from 17 police departments were analyzed using observational research software. The median juvenile interrogation lasted 46 min, though the range was extensive (6 min to nearly 5 hr). Youth frequently submitted to questioning without a parent or advocate present, and disruptions to the interview process were common. Interrogation outcomes varied and included full confessions, partially incriminating admissions, and denials of guilt. Results from this study provide context for interrogation research using other methods and suggest that youth may frequently consent to interrogation in the absence of important legal protections.
Law and Human Behavior – American Psychological Association
Published: Jun 30, 2014
Read and print from thousands of top scholarly journals.
Already have an account? Log in
Bookmark this article. You can see your Bookmarks on your DeepDyve Library.
To save an article, log in first, or sign up for a DeepDyve account if you don’t already have one.
Copy and paste the desired citation format or use the link below to download a file formatted for EndNote
Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
All DeepDyve websites use cookies to improve your online experience. They were placed on your computer when you launched this website. You can change your cookie settings through your browser.