Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
J. Brigham, A. Maass, David Martinez, Gary Whittenberger (1983)
The effect of arousal on facial recognition.Basic and Applied Social Psychology, 4
K. Deffenbacher, E. Loftus (1982)
Do jurors share a common understanding concerning eyewitness behavior?Law and Human Behavior, 6
Fredric Woocher (1977)
Did Your Eyes Deceive You? Expert Psychological Testimony on the Unreliability of Eyewitness IdentificationStanford Law Review, 29
J. Lipton (1977)
On the psychology of eyewitness testimony.Journal of Applied Psychology, 62
J. Chance, A. Goldstein, L. McBride (1975)
Differential Experience and Recognition Memory for FacesJournal of Social Psychology, 97
J. Brigham, Paul Barkowitz (1978)
Do “They all look alike?” The Effect of Race, Sex, Experience, and Attitudes on the Ability to Recognize Faces1Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 8
B. Clifford, R. Bull (1978)
The psychology of person identification
R. Malpass, J. Kravitz (1969)
Recognition for faces of own and other race.Journal of personality and social psychology, 13 4
G. Wells, Michael Leippe (1981)
How do triers of fact infer the accuracy of eyewitness identifications? Using memory for peripheral detail can be misleading.Journal of Applied Psychology, 66
J. Brigham (1980)
Perspectives on the impact of lineup composition, race, and witness confidence on identification accuracyLaw and Human Behavior, 4
G. Wells, R. Lindsay, T. Ferguson (1979)
Accuracy, confidence, and juror perceptions in eyewitness identification.The Journal of applied psychology, 64 4
Michael McCloskey, H. Egeth (1983)
Eyewitness identification: What can a psychologist tell a jury?American Psychologist, 38
N. Sobel (1972)
Eye-witness identification: legal and practical problems,
R. Lindsay, G. Wells, C. Rumpel (1981)
Can People Detect Eyewitness-Identification Accuracy Within and Across Situations?Journal of Applied Psychology, 66
J. Brigham, Norma Williamson (1979)
Cross-racial Recognition and Age: When You're Over 60, Do They Still "All Look Alike?"Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 5
F. Levine, J. Tapp (1973)
Psychology of Criminal Identification: The Gap From Wade to KirbyUniversity of Pennsylvania Law Review, 121
H. Vann (1965)
Recent Book: Identification: Eye Witness Identification in Criminal CasesThe Police Journal: Theory, Practice and Principles, 38
A. Sealy, B. Sales (1978)
Psychology in the legal process, 5
J. Brigham, R. Bothwell (1983)
The ability of prospective jurors to estimate the accuracy of eyewitness identificationsLaw and Human Behavior, 7
K. Deffenbacher (1980)
Eyewitness accuracy and confidenceLaw and Human Behavior, 4
Paul Barkowitz, J. Brigham (1982)
Recognition of Faces: Own-Race Bias, Incentive, and Time Delay1Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 12
Katherine Ellison, R. Buckhout (1981)
Psychology and criminal justice
L. Foley, A. Yarmey (1981)
The psychology of eyewitness testimonyJournal of Criminal Law & Criminology, 72
Michael Leippe (1980)
Effects of integrative memorial and cognitive processes on the correspondence of eyewitness accuracy and confidenceLaw and Human Behavior, 4
A survey was conducted to obtain the opinions of attorneys and law enforcement personnel regarding several important aspects of eyewitness evidence: (1) legal procedures concerning eyewitness evidence; (2) estimated frequency of mistaken eyewitness identification; (3) the effects of certain witness/ suspect characteristics on identification accuracy; (4) the amount of emphasis placed on eyewitness evidence by judges and juries; (5) the relationship between a witness’ identification accuracy and certainty; and (6) the effect of stress and arousal on identification accuracy. The questionnaire was sent to a sample of defense and prosecuting attorneys in each of Florida’s 20 Judicial Circuits, to each of the 67 county Sheriff’s Departments in Florida, and to 100 randomly sampled Police Departments in Florida. Prosecuting attorneys and law enforcement officers indicated that they regard eyewitness identification as relatively accurate and that judges and juries appropriately emphasize its importance. Defense attorneys, on the other hand, felt that eyewitness identifications are often inaccurate and are overemphasized by triers of fact. The implications of these findings for the criminal justice system and their possible applications within the legal system are discussed.
Law and Human Behavior – American Psychological Association
Published: Dec 1, 1983
Read and print from thousands of top scholarly journals.
Already have an account? Log in
Bookmark this article. You can see your Bookmarks on your DeepDyve Library.
To save an article, log in first, or sign up for a DeepDyve account if you don’t already have one.
Copy and paste the desired citation format or use the link below to download a file formatted for EndNote
Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
All DeepDyve websites use cookies to improve your online experience. They were placed on your computer when you launched this website. You can change your cookie settings through your browser.