Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
G. Wells, Michael Leippe, T. Ostrom (1979)
Guidelines for empirically assessing the fairness of a lineupLaw and Human Behavior, 3
G. Wells, E. Loftus (1984)
Eyewitness testimony : psychological perspectives
G. Wells (1984)
The Psychology of Lineup Identifications1Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 14
R. Lindsay, G. Wells (1985)
Improving eyewitness identifications from lineups: Simultaneous versus sequential lineup presentation.Journal of Applied Psychology, 70
G. Wells, C. Luus (1990)
Police Lineups as ExperimentsPersonality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 16
E. Langer, R. Abelson (1972)
The semantics of asking a favor: How to succeed in getting help without really dying.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 24
P. Wall (1966)
Eye-witness identification in criminal cases, 57
J. Brigham (1977)
The Structure of Racial Attitudes of BlacksPersonality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 3
J. Brigham, J. Woodmansee, S. Cook (1976)
Dimensions of Verbal Racial Attitudes: Interracial Marriage and Approaches to Racial EqualityJournal of Social Issues, 32
N. Ard, S. Cook (1977)
A Short Scale for the Measurement of Change in Verbal Racial Attitude 1Educational and Psychological Measurement, 37
C. Luus, G. Wells (1991)
Eyewitness identification and the selection of distracters for lineupsLaw and Human Behavior, 15
J. Brigham, D. Ready, S. Spier (1990)
Standards for Evaluating the Fairness of Photograph LineupsBasic and Applied Social Psychology, 11
G. Nosworthy, R. Lindsay (1990)
Does nominal lineup size matterJournal of Applied Psychology, 75
R. Malpass (1981)
Effective size and defendant bias in eyewitness identification lineupsLaw and Human Behavior, 5
J. Brigham, D. Ready (1985)
Own-race bias in lineup constructionLaw and Human Behavior, 9
Measures of lineup fairness typically utilize the responses of mock witnesses who attempt to identify the suspect in a lineup based solely on the physical description given by the eyewitnesses. Many people in the criminal justice system deride or fail to understand the relevance of these mock-witness-based indices. The present study compared several fairness indices derived from college student mock witnesses’ responses with fairness measures based on more direct evaluations of lineup usefulness and fairness made by a sample of law officers and by another sample of college students. An overall fairness index derived from the mock witness responses related significantly to the law officers’ usefulness and fairness categorizations. In general, usefulness and fairness indices calculated from the three sets of subjects—college student mock witnesses, college student evaluators, and law officer evaluators—covaried with each other. The findings support the similarity of student-based, mock witness indices of lineup fairness to the fairness evaluations law officers would make of the same lineups.
Law and Human Behavior – American Psychological Association
Published: Oct 1, 1992
Read and print from thousands of top scholarly journals.
Already have an account? Log in
Bookmark this article. You can see your Bookmarks on your DeepDyve Library.
To save an article, log in first, or sign up for a DeepDyve account if you don’t already have one.
Copy and paste the desired citation format or use the link below to download a file formatted for EndNote
Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
All DeepDyve websites use cookies to improve your online experience. They were placed on your computer when you launched this website. You can change your cookie settings through your browser.