Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
T. Grisso (1998)
Instruments for assessing understanding & appreciation of Miranda rights.
Daniel Coleman (2007)
Crime in the United States, 2005
Jeffrey PsyD (2003)
Analysis of Miranda Reading Levels Across Jurisdictions: Implications for Evaluating Waiver CompetencyJournal of Forensic Psychology Practice, 3
(2005)
Miranda Rights Scale (MRS)
(1997)
Psychological evaluations for the courts
(2005)
Female offenders in correctional settings
D. Smith (2001)
CHAPTER 6 – Wechsler Individual Achievement Test
(1997)
Gudjonsson suggestibility scales manual
G. Gudjonsson (2003)
The Psychology of Interrogations and Confessions: A Handbook
Why Miranda warnings are not understood. California Association for Criminal Justice Capital Defense annual conference
R. Rogers, M. J. Jordan, K. S. Harrison (2004)
A critical review of published competency-to-confess measuresLaw and Human Behavior, 28
(2005)
Readability statistics of the juvenile Miranda warnings across jurisdictions
T. Grisso (2003)
Evaluating competencies: Forensic assessments and instruments, 2nd ed.
S. Kassin (2005)
On the psychology of confessions: does innocence put innocents at risk?The American psychologist, 60 3
(2002)
Slosson Oral Reading Test
K. Krippendorff (1980)
Content Analysis: An Introduction to Its Methodology
J. Carlisle, Lucile Felbinger (1991)
Profiles of Listening and Reading Comprehension.Journal of Educational Research, 84
C. Ommen (2005)
Putting the PC in IQ: Images in the Weschler Adult Intelligence Scale – Third Edition (WAIS III)South African Journal of Psychology, 35
Marilyn Ransby, H. Swanson (2003)
Reading Comprehension Skills of Young Adults with Childhood Diagnoses of DyslexiaJournal of Learning Disabilities, 36
R. Bonnie (1993)
The Competence of Criminal Defendants: Beyond Dusky and DropeUniversity of Miami law review, 47
Analysis of the prongs of the adult Miranda warnings across jurisdictions. Paper presented at the American Psychology-Law Society conference, St. Pete's Beach, FL
T. Grisso (1986)
Waiver of Rights to Silence and Legal Counsel
(2005)
The prevalence of correlates
L. Oberlander, N. Goldstein, A. Goldstein (2003)
Competence to Confess
R. Kessler, H. Birnbaum, Olga Demler, I. Falloon, Elizabeth Gagnon, Margaret Guyer, M. Howes, K. Kendler, Lizheng Shi, E. Walters, E. Wu (2005)
The Prevalence and Correlates of Nonaffective Psychosis in the National Comorbidity Survey Replication (NCS-R)Biological Psychiatry, 58
(1999)
Mental health and treatment of inmates and probationers
D. Wechsler (1999)
Wechsler Abbreviated Scale of Intelligence
T. Grisso (1981)
Juveniles’ waiver of rights: Legal and psychological competence
Lori Colwell, K. Cruise, Laura Guy, W. McCoy, Krissie Fernandez, Heather Ross (2005)
The influence of psychosocial maturity on male juvenile offenders' comprehension and understanding of the Miranda warning.The journal of the American Academy of Psychiatry and the Law, 33 4
R. Rogers, Kimberly Harrison, D. Shuman, K. Sewell, L. Hazelwood (2007)
An Analysis of Miranda Warnings and Waivers: Comprehension and CoverageLaw and Human Behavior, 31
S. M. Kassin, Gudjonnson (2004)
The psychology of confessions: A review of the literature and issuesPsychological Science, 5
R. Rogers, M. Jordan, Kimberly Harrison (2004)
Commentary: A Critical Review of Published Competency-to-Confess MeasuresLaw and Human Behavior, 28
Kathryn Brody (1999)
Instruments for Assessing Understanding and Appreciation of Miranda RightsPsychiatric Services, 50
G. Gudjonsson, J. Sigurdsson (1999)
The Gudjonsson Confession Questionnaire-Revised (GCQ-R) factor structure and its relationship with personalityPersonality and Individual Differences, 27
(2004)
Miranda, trial competency and Hispanic immigrant defendants
G. H. Gudjonsson, J. F. Sigurdsson (2003)
The relationship of compliance and coping strategies with self-esteemEuropean Journal of Psychological Assessment, 19
T. Grisso (1986)
Evaluating Competencies: Forensic Assessments and Instruments
D. Wechsler (1997)
Weschler Adult Intelligence Scale-Third Edition (WAIS-III)
(2005)
Miranda and beyond: Competencies related to police investigations
D. Greenfield, Edward Dougherty, R. Jackson, J. Podboy, M. Zimmerman (2001)
Retrospective evaluation of Miranda reading levels and waiver competency.The American journal of forensic psychology
L. Teplin (1994)
Psychiatric and substance abuse disorders among male urban jail detainees.American journal of public health, 84 2
Comprehension of Miranda rights and cognitive functioning in a jail sample. Paper presented at the American Psychology-Law Society conference
R. Savage (2001)
The 'Simple View' of Reading: Some evidence and possible implicationsEducational Psychology in Practice, 17
R. Stubblefield (1966)
Behavioral sciences and the law.The American journal of orthopsychiatry, 36 5
R. Rogers, D. W. Shuman (2005)
Fundamentals of forensic practice: Mental health and criminal law
[ Survey data on Miranda practices by attorneys of the California Association for Criminal Justice ]
L. B. Oberlander, N. E. Goldstein, A. M. Goldstein (2003)
Handbook of psychology: Vol. 11. forensic psychology
G. Gudjonsson, J. Sigurdsson (2003)
The relationship of compliance with coping strategies and self-esteemEuropean Journal of Psychological Assessment, 19
G. B. Melton, J. Petrila, N. G. Poythress, C. Slobogin (1997)
Psychological evaluations for the courts (2nd ed.)
(2002)
Wechsler individual achievement test (2nd ed.)
R. Bonnie (1992)
The competence of criminal defendants: A theoretical reformulation.Behavioral Sciences & The Law, 10
H. C. Weinstein, D. Kim, A. V. Mack, K. E. Malavade, A. U. Saraiya (2005)
Handbook of correctional mental health
Virginia Galloway (2003)
Appreciation of Miranda Rights in Interrogation Situations: (352552004-001)
(2005)
The Interrogation Acquiescence Scale. Unpublished measure
(2002)
Schedule of Affective Disorders and Schizophrenia–Change Version
R. J. Bonnie (1993)
The competence of criminal defendants: Beyond Dusky and DropeMiami Law Review, 47
R. Rogers, R. Jackson, Karen Salekin, C. Neumann (2003)
Assessing Axis I Symptomatology on the SADS-C in Two Correctional Samples: The Validation of Subscales and a Screen for Malingered PresentationsJournal of Personality Assessment, 81
A conservative estimate is that 695,000 mentally disordered offenders are arrested and Mirandized annually in the United States. Past research has focused almost exclusively on cognitive factors affecting the comprehension of Miranda rights. The current study broadens the scope by including diagnostic variables and by extending the investigation to basic elements of Miranda reasoning. A sample of 107 mentally disordered defendants was administered two research measures, the Miranda Statements Scale (MSS) and Miranda Rights Scale (MRS), in addition to standardized tests. Most defendants lacked good comprehension of all but the simplest (Flesch-Kincaid <6th grade) Miranda warnings. Defendants with the poorest understanding (i.e., comprehending about 25% of the warnings) had marked deficits in multiple domains including cognitive abilities (intelligence and comprehension) and general adjustment. Different background and clinical variables predicted defendants’ abilities to generate reasons either to exercise or waive their Miranda rights.
Law and Human Behavior – American Psychological Association
Published: Aug 24, 2007
Read and print from thousands of top scholarly journals.
Already have an account? Log in
Bookmark this article. You can see your Bookmarks on your DeepDyve Library.
To save an article, log in first, or sign up for a DeepDyve account if you don’t already have one.
Copy and paste the desired citation format or use the link below to download a file formatted for EndNote
Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
All DeepDyve websites use cookies to improve your online experience. They were placed on your computer when you launched this website. You can change your cookie settings through your browser.