Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
(1999)
The MacArthur Competence Assessment Tool – Criminal Adjudication: Professional manual Wechsler Abbreviated Scale of Intelligence
(1997)
Young children's legal knowledge and reasoning ability
Deborah Cooper (1997)
Juveniles' understanding of trial-related information: are they competent defendants?Behavioral sciences & the law, 15 2
Note: Superscripts refer to age group comparisons for each subscale considered separately
H. Snyder, M. Sickmund (1995)
Juvenile offenders and victims: A national report.
M. Peterson-badali, R. Abramovitch (1993)
Grade related changes in young people's reasoning about plea decisionsLaw and Human Behavior, 17
J. McDermott (1990)
Journal of the American Academy of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry Notes for AuthorsJournal of the American Academy of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, 29
R. Abramovitch, M. Peterson-badali, M. Rohan (1995)
Young people's understanding and assertion of their rights to silence and legal counsel.Canadian Journal of Criminology-revue Canadienne De Criminologie, 37
P. Witt (2003)
Evaluating Competencies: Forensic Assessments and Instruments, Second EditionPsychiatric Services, 54
(1998)
Ohio App. LEXIS 4973 (Ohio App. 3 rd
R. Sadoff (1999)
Assessing Competence to Consent to Treatment: A Guide for Physicians and Other Health ProfessionalsPsychiatric Services, 50
L. Steinberg, E. Cauffman (1996)
Maturity of judgment in adolescence: Psychosocial factors in adolescent decision makingLaw and Human Behavior, 20
E. Scott (1992)
Judgment and Reasoning in Adolescent DecisionmakingVillanova law review, 37
T. Grisso (2003)
Evaluating competencies: Forensic assessments and instruments, 2nd ed.
R. Bonnie (1993)
The Competence of Criminal Defendants: Beyond Dusky and DropeUniversity of Miami law review, 47
(2001)
Toward an expanded definition of adolescent competence in legal situations
R. Otto, N. Poythress, R. Nicholson, J. Edens, J. Monahan, R. Bonnie, S. Hoge, M. Eisenberg (1998)
Psychometric Properties of the MacArthur Competence Assessment Tool-Criminal AdjudicationPsychological Assessment, 10
R. Bonnie, T. Grisso (2000)
Adjudicative competence and youthful offenders.
(1999)
Wechsler Abbreviated Scale of Intelligence.
T. Grisso (1981)
Juveniles' waiver of rights: Legal and psychological competence.
E. Scott, D. Reppucci, Jennifer Woolard (1995)
Evaluating adolescent decision making in legal contextsLaw and Human Behavior, 19
Leslie Grammer (1998)
Fatal AsthmaAnnals of Internal Medicine, 129
Denise Mumley, C. Tillbrook, T. Grisso (2003)
Five year research update (1996-2000): evaluations for competence to stand trial (adjudicative competence).Behavioral sciences & the law, 21 3
J. Fagan, F. Zimring (2000)
The Changing Borders of Juvenile Justice: Transfer of Adolescents to the Criminal Court
Virginia Journal of Social Policy and the Law
T. Grisso (1997)
The Competence of Adolescents as Trial DefendantsPsychology, Public Policy and Law, 3
Patricia Torbet (1996)
State Responses to Serious and Violent Juvenile Crime. Research Report.
S. Feldman, G. Elliott (1990)
At the Threshold: The Developing Adolescent
P. Torbet, R. Gable, H. Hurst, I. Montgomery, L. Szymanski, D. Thomas (1996)
State responses to serious and violent juvenile crime.
(2002)
Adjudicative Competence in the Modern Juvenile Court, 9
T. Grisso (1986)
Evaluating Competencies: Forensic Assessments and Instruments
T. Grisso, R. Schwartz (2000)
Youth on Trial: A Developmental Perspective on Juvenile Justice
T. Grisso (1980)
Juveniles' Capacities to Waive Miranda Rights: An Empirical AnalysisCalifornia Law Review, 68
R. Stubblefield (1966)
Behavioral sciences and the law.The American journal of orthopsychiatry, 36 5
A. Hollingshead (1975)
Four factor index of social status
California Law Review
M. DeAntonio, W. Sack (1992)
At the Threshold: The Developing AdolescentJournal of the American Academy of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, 34
T. Grisso, R. Barnum, K. Fletcher, E. Cauffman, Dawn Peuschold (2001)
Massachusetts Youth Screening Instrument for mental health needs of juvenile justice youths.Journal of the American Academy of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, 40 5
T. Grisso (2000)
What we know about youths' capacities as trial defendants.
R. Bonnie (1992)
The competence of criminal defendants: A theoretical reformulation.Behavioral Sciences & The Law, 10
(1998)
Developmental aspects of judgment and competence in legally relevant contexts. Unpublished doctoral dissertation
Michael Fogel, W. Schiffman, Denise Mumley, C. Tillbrook, T. Grisso (2003)
Ten Year Research Update (2001–2010): Evaluations for Competence to Stand Trial (Adjudicative Competence)Behavioral Sciences & The Law, 31
Melissa Sickmund (1997)
Juvenile offenders and victims
N. Poythress, R. Nicholson, R. Otto, J. Edens, R. Bonnie, J. Monahan, S. Hoge (1999)
The MacArthur Competence Assessment Tool—Criminal Adjudication: Professional manual.
T. Grisso, R. Barnum (2000)
Massachusetts Youth Screening Instrument—Second Version: User's manual and technical report.
(1990)
Adolescent thinking
R. Bonnie (1993)
The competence of criminal defendants: Beyond Dusky and DropeMiami Law Review, 47
E. Cauffman, L. Steinberg (2000)
(Im)maturity of judgment in adolescence: why adolescents may be less culpable than adults.Behavioral sciences & the law, 18 6
(2002)
P1: GXB Law and Human Behavior [lahu] pp886-lahu-467385 June 4
J. Woolard, C. Fried, N. Reppucci (2001)
Psychology in the courts: International advances in knowledge
Abilities associated with adjudicative competence were assessed among 927 adolescents in juvenile detention facilities and community settings. Adolescents’ abilities were compared to those of 466 young adults in jails and in the community. Participants at 4 locations across the United States completed a standardized measure of abilities relevant for competence to stand trial (the MacArthur Competence Assessment Tool—Criminal Adjudication) as well as a new procedure for assessing psychosocial influences on legal decisions often required of defendants (MacArthur Judgment Evaluation). Youths aged 15 and younger performed more poorly than young adults, with a greater proportion manifesting a level of impairment consistent with that of persons found incompetent to stand trial Adolescents also tended more often than young adults to make choices (e.g., about plea agreements) that reflected compliance with authority, as well as influences of psychosocial immaturity. Implications of these results for policy and practice are discussed, with an emphasis on the development of legal standards that recognize immaturity as a potential predicate of incompetence to stand trial.
Law and Human Behavior – American Psychological Association
Published: Aug 1, 2003
Read and print from thousands of top scholarly journals.
Already have an account? Log in
Bookmark this article. You can see your Bookmarks on your DeepDyve Library.
To save an article, log in first, or sign up for a DeepDyve account if you don’t already have one.
Copy and paste the desired citation format or use the link below to download a file formatted for EndNote
Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
All DeepDyve websites use cookies to improve your online experience. They were placed on your computer when you launched this website. You can change your cookie settings through your browser.