Get 20M+ Full-Text Papers For Less Than $1.50/day. Start a 14-Day Trial for You or Your Team.

Learn More →

Is There Touch in the Game of Twister®? The Effects of Innocuous Touch and Suggestive Questions on Children’s Eyewitness Memory

Is There Touch in the Game of Twister®? The Effects of Innocuous Touch and Suggestive Questions... Preschool children (ages 48–70 months, N = 48) experienced 2 to-be-remembered events (i.e., the games Twister® and Shapes) that included either innocuous bodily touch or no touch. Participants were interviewed 7 days later and asked direct (“Did Amy kiss you?”) or suggestive “tag” questions (“Amy kissed you, didn’t she?”) equated for content. Results indicated that children who were innocuously touched were no more likely to falsely assent to “abuse-related” touch questions (e.g., “Amy touched your bottom, didn’t she?”) than were children who were not touched. However, children who were asked tag questions responded at chance levels, thereby making high errors of commission in response to abuse-touch questions relative to their no-tag counterparts who responded to “abuse questions” accurately 93% of the time. Children who were asked tag questions assented at a higher rate to general forensic questions (“Amy took your picture, didn’t she?”) than did children asked direct questions, and children assented at higher rates to “abuse-touch” questions than to general forensic questions. Results are discussed in terms of prior research on interviewing techniques and adult influence on children’s testimony. http://www.deepdyve.com/assets/images/DeepDyve-Logo-lg.png Law and Human Behavior American Psychological Association

Is There Touch in the Game of Twister®? The Effects of Innocuous Touch and Suggestive Questions on Children’s Eyewitness Memory

Krackow, Elisa; Jay Lynn, Steven
Law and Human Behavior , Volume 27 (6): 16 – Dec 1, 2003
Download PDF
16 pages

Loading next page...
 
/lp/american-psychological-association/is-there-touch-in-the-game-of-twister-the-effects-of-innocuous-touch-2uIfgy09ha

References (36)

Publisher
American Psychological Association
Copyright
Copyright © 2003 American Psychological Association
ISSN
0147-7307
eISSN
1573-661X
DOI
10.1023/B:LAHU.0000004888.52210.35
Publisher site
See Article on Publisher Site

Abstract

Preschool children (ages 48–70 months, N = 48) experienced 2 to-be-remembered events (i.e., the games Twister® and Shapes) that included either innocuous bodily touch or no touch. Participants were interviewed 7 days later and asked direct (“Did Amy kiss you?”) or suggestive “tag” questions (“Amy kissed you, didn’t she?”) equated for content. Results indicated that children who were innocuously touched were no more likely to falsely assent to “abuse-related” touch questions (e.g., “Amy touched your bottom, didn’t she?”) than were children who were not touched. However, children who were asked tag questions responded at chance levels, thereby making high errors of commission in response to abuse-touch questions relative to their no-tag counterparts who responded to “abuse questions” accurately 93% of the time. Children who were asked tag questions assented at a higher rate to general forensic questions (“Amy took your picture, didn’t she?”) than did children asked direct questions, and children assented at higher rates to “abuse-touch” questions than to general forensic questions. Results are discussed in terms of prior research on interviewing techniques and adult influence on children’s testimony.

Journal

Law and Human Behavior – American Psychological Association

Published: Dec 1, 2003

There are no references for this article.