Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
Loading next page...
/lp/american-psychological-association/investigating-flight-crew-recovery-capabilities-regarding-system-QJf0z48JP2
References (11)
-
S. Hart (2006)
Nasa-Task Load Index (NASA-TLX); 20 Years LaterProceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society Annual Meeting, 50
-
Amy Rankin, Rogier Woltjer, J. Field, D. Woods (2013)
“Staying ahead of the aircraft ” and Managing Surprise in Modern Airliners -
M. Fishbein, I. Ajzen (2009)
Predicting and Changing Behavior: The Reasoned Action Approach -
K. Mosier, L. Skitka, S. Heers, Mark Burdick (1997)
Automation bias: decision making and performance in high-tech cockpits.The International journal of aviation psychology, 8 1
-
Erik Hollnagel (2002)
Understanding accidents-from root causes to performance variabilityProceedings of the IEEE 7th Conference on Human Factors and Power Plants
-
E. Hollnagel, David Woods (2005)
Joint Cognitive Systems: Foundations of Cognitive Systems Engineering -
D. Manzey, Juliane Reichenbach, L. Onnasch (2012)
Human Performance Consequences of Automated Decision AidsJournal of Cognitive Engineering and Decision Making, 6
-
M. Endsley, W. Jones (1997)
Situation Awareness Information Dominance & Information Warfare. -
J. Rasmussen (1983)
Skills, rules, and knowledge; signals, signs, and symbols, and other distinctions in human performance modelsIEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics, SMC-13
-
J. Caldwell (2012)
Crew Schedules, Sleep Deprivation, and Aviation PerformanceCurrent Directions in Psychological Science, 21
-
M. Endsley (1995)
Toward a Theory of Situation Awareness in Dynamic SystemsHuman Factors: The Journal of Human Factors and Ergonomics Society, 37
- Publisher
- American Psychological Association
- Copyright
- Copyright © 2015 Hogrefe Publishing
- ISSN
- 2192-0923
- eISSN
- 2192-0931
- DOI
- 10.1027/2192-0923/a000079
- Publisher site
- See Article on Publisher Site
Abstract
This project aimed to understand rapid crew transitionsfrom a monitoring to a decision-making role, when asserting manual control ofaircraft subsystems. Ten crews unknowingly flew a semicritical failure scenarioin a full flight simulator, forcing several crew decision moments. Observationsof automation-related (diagnostic) behavior were correlated with respectiveflight performance, revealing that specific competencies (related to knowledge,procedures, attitude toward automation, and teamwork) with automated systems ledto significant performance gains. More importantly, the absence of thesebehaviors severely deteriorated performance and should not be underestimated inits potency to affect flight safety. These findings may form a foundation fordeveloping and evaluating near-future innovations in training, operations, andautomation design, which could prove critical toward improving future accidentrates.
Journal
Aviation Psychology and Applied Human Factors – American Psychological Association
Published: Jan 1, 2015