Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
Loading next page...
/lp/american-psychological-association/informing-juvenile-justice-policy-directions-for-behavioral-science-RypCMTGNvb
References (61)
-
(1997)
A critical analysis of research on the development of antisocial behavior from birth to adulthood -
S. Henggeler, G. Melton, L. Smith (1992)
Family preservation using multisystemic therapy: an effective alternative to incarcerating serious juvenile offenders.Journal of consulting and clinical psychology, 60 6
-
Edward Zigler, Cara Taussig, Kathryn Black (1992)
Early childhood intervention. A promising preventative for juvenile delinquency.The American psychologist, 47 8
-
D. Stoff, J. Breiling, J. Maser (1997)
Handbook of antisocial behavior -
Barry Feld (1999)
Readings in Juvenile Justice Administration -
S. Zilberstein (1995)
Models of Bounded Rationality -
R. Loeber, D. Farrington, Mary McGlynn (1999)
Serious and Violent Juvenile Offenders: Risk Factors and Successful InterventionsBehavioral Disorders, 25
-
M. Rutter (1990)
Risk and protective factors in the development of psychopathology -
(1999)
Justice for juveniles: New perspectives on adolescents' competence and culpability -
(1992)
Juvenile delinquency treatment: A meta-analytic inquiry into the variability of effects -
E. Mulvey, Michael Arthur, N. Reppucci (1993)
The prevention and treatment of juvenile delinquency: A review of the researchClinical Psychology Review, 13
-
(1999)
Developmental influences on adolescent culpability: Psychosocial factors affecting decision-making in criminal contexts. Paper presented at the APLS/EAPL -
S. Henggeler, Bradley Smith, Sonja Sahloenwald (1994)
Key theoretical and methodological issues in conducting treatment research in the juvenile justice systemJournal of Clinical Child Psychology, 23
-
R. Rogers, C. Webster (1989)
Assessing treatability in mentally disordered offendersLaw and Human Behavior, 13
-
C. Fried, N. Reppucci (2001)
Criminal Decision Making: The Development of Adolescent Judgment, Criminal Responsibility, and CulpabilityLaw and Human Behavior, 25
-
L. Steinberg, E. Cauffman (1996)
Maturity of judgment in adolescence: Psychosocial factors in adolescent decision makingLaw and Human Behavior, 20
-
H. N. Snyder, M. Sickmund (1999)
Juvenile offenders and victims: 1999 national report -
Barry Feld (1999)
Bad Kids: Race and the Transformation of the Juvenile Court -
Elizabeth Scott, T. Grisso (1997)
The Evolution of Adolescence: A Developmental Perspective on Juvenile Justice ReformJournal of Criminal Law & Criminology, 88
-
Edward Mulvey, N. Reppucci (1988)
The context of clinical judgment: The effect of resource availability on judgments of amenability to treatment in juvenile offendersAmerican Journal of Community Psychology, 16
-
W. Reese, R. Curtis, J. Whitworth (1988)
Dispositional Discretion or Disparity: The Juvenile Probation Officer's Role in Delinquency ProcessingThe Journal of Applied Behavioral Science, 24
-
(1999)
The triumph of benevolence: The origins of the juvenile justice system in the United States -
F. E. Zimring (2000)
Youth on trial -
(2000)
Researching juveniles' capacities as defendants -
C. Slobogin (1999)
Treating kids right: Deconstructing and reconstructing the amenability to treatment conceptJournal of Contemporary Legal Issues, 10
-
Barry Feld (1997)
Abolish the Juvenile court: Youthfulness, criminal responsibility, and sentencing policyJournal of Criminal Law & Criminology, 88
-
(1997)
Treatment of juvenile delinquency: Between punishment -
N. Reppucci (1984)
Children, mental health, and the law -
J. Fagan (1996)
The Comparative Advantage of Juvenile Versus Criminal Court Sanctions on Recidivism among Adolescent Felony OffendersLaw & Policy, 18
-
(1996)
Coercion to inpatient treatment : Initial results and implications for assertive treatment in the community -
H. Yoshikawa (1994)
Prevention as cumulative protection: effects of early family support and education on chronic delinquency and its risks.Psychological bulletin, 115 1
-
T. Moffitt (1993)
Adolescence-limited and life-course-persistent antisocial behavior: a developmental taxonomy.Psychological review, 100 4
-
(1984)
Judging amenability to treatment in juvenile offenders: Theory and practice -
(1997)
Themes for consideration in future research on prevention -
E. Scott, D. Reppucci, Jennifer Woolard (1995)
Evaluating adolescent decision making in legal contextsLaw and Human Behavior, 19
-
T. Palmer (1975)
Martinson RevisitedJournal of Research in Crime and Delinquency, 12
-
R. Loeber, D. Hay (1997)
Key issues in the development of aggression and violence from childhood to early adulthood.Annual review of psychology, 48
-
G. Gigerenzer, D. Goldstein (1996)
Reasoning the fast and frugal way: models of bounded rationality.Psychological review, 103 4
-
David Tate, N. Reppucci, E. Mulvey (1995)
Violent Juvenile Delinquents: Treatment Effectiveness and Implications for Future Action.American Psychologist, 50
-
(2000)
Criminal responsibility in adolescence: Lessons from developmental psychology -
L. Winner, L. Lanza-Kaduce, D. Bishop, C. Frazier (1997)
The Transfer of Juveniles to Criminal Court: Reexamining Recidivism Over the Long TermCrime & Delinquency, 43
-
J. Utts, T. Cook, H. Cooper, D. Cordray, H. Hartmann, L. Hedges, R. Light, T. Louis, F. Mosteller (1992)
Meta-Analysis for Explanation: A Casebook.Journal of the American Statistical Association, 89
-
Martin Haskell, L. Yablonsky (1975)
Crime and Delinquency -
R. Stubblefield (1966)
Behavioral sciences and the law.The American journal of orthopsychiatry, 36 5
-
S. Jackson, M. Fondacaro (1999)
Procedural Justice in Resolving Family Conflict: Implications for Youth Violence PreventionLaw & Policy, 21
-
F. Zimring (2000)
Penal proportionality for the young offender: Notes on immaturity, capacity, and diminished responsibility. -
J. Rolf, A. Masten, D. Cicchetti, K. Nuechterlein, S. Weintraub (1990)
Risk and protective factors in the development of psychopathology: Contents -
R. Martinson (1974)
What works? Questions and answers about prison reformPublic Interest, 35
-
D. Elliott (1994)
SERIOUS VIOLENT OFFENDERS: ONSET, DEVELOPMENTAL COURSE, AND TERMINATION—THE AMERICAN SOCIETY OF CRIMINOLOGY 1993 PRESIDENTIAL ADDRESS*Criminology, 32
-
D. Dennis, J. Monahan (1996)
Coercion and aggressive community treatment : a new frontier in mental health law -
(2000)
Researching adolescents' judgment and capability -
A. Simpson (1976)
Rehabilitation as the Justification of a Separate Juvenile Justice SystemCalifornia Law Review, 64
-
M. Lipsey, David Wilson (1998)
Effective intervention for serious juvenile offenders: A synthesis of research. -
D. Hawkins, J. Laub, Janet Lauritsen (1998)
Race, ethnicity, and serious juvenile offending. -
Melissa Sickmund (1997)
Juvenile offenders and victims -
C. Slobogin, M. Fondacaro, Jennifer Woolard (1999)
A Prevention Model of Juvenile Justice: The Promise of Kansas v. Hendricks for Children -
J. Ainsworth (1991)
Re-imagining Childhood and Reconstructing the Legal Order: The Case for Abolishing the Juvenile CourtNorth Carolina Law Review, 69
-
George Bridges, S. Steen (1998)
Racial disparities in official assessments of juvenile offenders : Attributional stereotypes as mediating mechanismsAmerican Sociological Review, 63
-
P. Kendall, M. Southam-Gerow (1995)
Issues in the transportability of treatment: the case of anxiety disorders in youths.Journal of consulting and clinical psychology, 63 5
-
K. Heilbrun, W. Bennett, James Evans, R. Offutt, Harry Reiff, Adam White (1988)
Assessing treatability in mentally disordered offenders: A conceptual and methodological noteBehavioral Sciences & The Law, 6
-
M. Rutter (1987)
Psychosocial resilience and protective mechanisms.The American journal of orthopsychiatry, 57 3
- Publisher
- American Psychological Association
- Copyright
- Copyright © 2001 American Psychological Association
- ISSN
- 0147-7307
- eISSN
- 1573-661X
- DOI
- 10.1023/A:1005635808317
- Publisher site
- See Article on Publisher Site
Abstract
Recent policy initiatives threaten to reduce the rehabilitative mission of the juvenile court or eliminate the court entirely. This article lays out a framework for an empirical assessment of these developments. It first evaluates the available and potential empirical support for three hypotheses about juveniles that might justify maintaining a separate, rehabilitation-oriented juvenile justice system: the hypotheses that, compared to adults, juveniles are more treatable, less culpable, and less deterrable. On the assumption that the continued existence of a rehabilitation-oriented juvenile court can be justified, it then provides suggestions as to how existing intervention strategies for juveniles could benefit from research attention to several substantive and methodological issues. These include refining outcome criteria and sampling strategies, matching offender and program characteristics, reexamining intervention efficacy, and focusing on decision makers and resource allocations.
Journal
Law and Human Behavior – American Psychological Association
Published: Feb 1, 2001