Get 20M+ Full-Text Papers For Less Than $1.50/day. Start a 14-Day Trial for You or Your Team.

Learn More →

Eyewitness Testimony of Children in Target-Present and Target-Absent Lineups

Eyewitness Testimony of Children in Target-Present and Target-Absent Lineups The effects of age of witness and age of suspect on eyewitness testimony were investigated. Fortyeight elementary school children and 48 college students viewed a slide sequence of a mock crime. This was followed by target-present or target-absent photo identification with a no-choice option, central and peripheral questions related to the crime, and a second photo identification. In photo identification, child witnesses had a higher rate of choosing than adult witnesses, suggesting that children have more lax criteria of responding. The accuracy data showed similar levels of sensitivity across ages although there was a trend toward reduced accuracy of child witnesses in target-absent lineups. All witnesses made more total choices and more correct rejections with child-suspect lineups than adult-suspect lineups. Central questions were answered better than peripheral questions by both age groups, but adults made significantly more “don’t know” choices. http://www.deepdyve.com/assets/images/DeepDyve-Logo-lg.png Law and Human Behavior American Psychological Association

Eyewitness Testimony of Children in Target-Present and Target-Absent Lineups

Loading next page...
 
/lp/american-psychological-association/eyewitness-testimony-of-children-in-target-present-and-target-absent-wkKxbr4IUg

References (45)

Publisher
American Psychological Association
Copyright
Copyright © 1989 American Psychological Association
ISSN
0147-7307
eISSN
1573-661X
DOI
10.1007/BF01055920
Publisher site
See Article on Publisher Site

Abstract

The effects of age of witness and age of suspect on eyewitness testimony were investigated. Fortyeight elementary school children and 48 college students viewed a slide sequence of a mock crime. This was followed by target-present or target-absent photo identification with a no-choice option, central and peripheral questions related to the crime, and a second photo identification. In photo identification, child witnesses had a higher rate of choosing than adult witnesses, suggesting that children have more lax criteria of responding. The accuracy data showed similar levels of sensitivity across ages although there was a trend toward reduced accuracy of child witnesses in target-absent lineups. All witnesses made more total choices and more correct rejections with child-suspect lineups than adult-suspect lineups. Central questions were answered better than peripheral questions by both age groups, but adults made significantly more “don’t know” choices.

Journal

Law and Human BehaviorAmerican Psychological Association

Published: Jun 1, 1989

There are no references for this article.