Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
B. Marín, D. Holmes, Mark Guth, Paul Kovac (1979)
The potential of children as eyewitnessesLaw and Human Behavior, 3
J. Parker, E. Haverfield, S. Baker-Thomas (1986)
Eyewitness Testimony of Children1Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 16
L. Haward (1984)
Evaluating witness evidence: S. Llyod-Bostock and R. Clifford (Eds): Wiley, Chichester, England (1983). x + 305 pages. £19.95.Behaviour Research and Therapy, 22
Marcia Johnson, M. Foley (1984)
Differentiating Fact from Fantasy: The Reliability of Children's MemoryJournal of Social Issues, 40
G. Wells, Michael Leippe, T. Ostrom (1979)
Guidelines for empirically assessing the fairness of a lineupLaw and Human Behavior, 3
M. Fleet, J. Brigham, R. Bothwell (1987)
The Confidence-Accuracy Relationship: The Effects of Confidence Assessment and Choosing1Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 17
J. Brigham, Paul Barkowitz (1978)
Do “They all look alike?” The Effect of Race, Sex, Experience, and Attitudes on the Ability to Recognize Faces1Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 8
Peter Shapiro, Steven Penrod (1986)
Meta-analysis of facial identification studies.Psychological Bulletin, 100
S. Ceci, D. Ross, M. Toglia (1987)
Suggestibility of children's memory: Psycholegal implications.Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 116
Robert Blaney, E. Winograd (1978)
Developmental differences in children's recognition memory for faces.Developmental Psychology, 14
G. Wells (1985)
Verbal Descriptions of Faces From Memory: Are They Diagnostic of Identification Accuracy?Journal of Applied Psychology, 70
E. Zechmeister, M. Gruneberg, P. Morris, R. Sykes (1980)
Practical aspects of memoryAmerican Journal of Psychology, 93
G. Wells, John Turtle (1986)
Eyewitness identification: The importance of lineup models.Psychological Bulletin, 99
G. Wells, Michael Leippe (1981)
How do triers of fact infer the accuracy of eyewitness identifications? Using memory for peripheral detail can be misleading.Journal of Applied Psychology, 66
G. Goodman, C. Aman, J. Hirschman (1987)
Child Sexual and Physical Abuse: Children’s Testimony
R. Lindsay, G. Wells, C. Rumpel (1981)
Can People Detect Eyewitness-Identification Accuracy Within and Across Situations?Journal of Applied Psychology, 66
H. Ellis, J. Shepherd, A. Bruce (1973)
The effects of age and sex upon adolescents' recognition of faces.The Journal of genetic psychology, 123 1st Half
A. Flexser, J. Parker (1986)
A signal-detection-theory analysis of the eyewitness lineup-identification procedure
R. Flin (1980)
Age effects in children's memory for unfamiliar faces.Developmental Psychology, 16
B. Cutler, Steven Penrod, Todd Martens (1987)
The reliability of eyewitness identificationLaw and Human Behavior, 11
Gabriel Gorenstein, P. Ellsworth (1980)
Effect of choosing an incorrect photograph on a later identification by an eyewitness.The Journal of applied psychology, 65 5
K. Deffenbacher (1980)
Eyewitness accuracy and confidenceLaw and Human Behavior, 4
G. Wells, R. Lindsay (1985)
Methodological notes on the accuracy–confidence relation in eyewitness identifications.Journal of Applied Psychology, 70
D. Murray, G. Wells (1982)
Does Knowledge that a Crime Was Staged Affect Eyewitness Performance?1Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 12
Michael Leippe (1980)
Effects of integrative memorial and cognitive processes on the correspondence of eyewitness accuracy and confidenceLaw and Human Behavior, 4
G. Whipple (1909)
The observer as reporter: A survey of the 'psychology of testimony'.Psychological Bulletin, 6
Melissa Pigott, J. Brigham (1985)
Relationship between accuracy of prior description and facial recognition.Journal of Applied Psychology, 70
J. Chance, A. Goldstein (1984)
Face‐Recognition Memory: Implications for Children's Eyewitness TestimonyJournal of Social Issues, 40
G. Wells, E. Loftus (1984)
Eyewitness testimony : psychological perspectives
John Cross, J. Cross, James Daly (1971)
Sex, race, age, and beauty as factors in recognition of facesPerception & Psychophysics, 10
D. Peters (1987)
The Impact of Naturally Occurring Stress on Children’s Memory
R. Bothwell, K. Deffenbacher, J. Brigham (1987)
Correlation of eyewitness accuracy and confidence: Optimality hypothesis revisited.Journal of Applied Psychology, 72
R. Hastie, Robert Landsmant, E. Loftus (1978)
Eyewitness testimony: the dangers of guessing, 19
E. Loftus (1981)
Reconstructive Memory Processes in Eyewitness Testimony
S. Ceci, M. Toglia, D. Ross (1987)
Children's eyewitness memory
G. Goodman, R. Reed (1986)
Age differences in eyewitness testimonyLaw and Human Behavior, 10
R. Malpass, P. Devine (1981)
Eyewitness identification: Lineup instructions and the absence of the offender.Journal of Applied Psychology, 66
Gary Wells, Tamara Ferguson, R. Lindsay (1981)
The Tractability of Eyewitness Confidence and Its Implications for Triers of FactJournal of Applied Psychology, 66
A. Goldstein, J. Chance (1964)
RECOGNITION OF CHILDREN'S FACES.Child development, 35
M. Gruneberg, P. Morris, R. Sykes (1988)
Memory in everyday life
M. King, J. Yuille (1987)
Suggestibility and the Child Witness
J. List (1986)
Age and schematic differences in the reliability of eyewitness testimony.Developmental Psychology, 22
H. Hosch, Michael Leippe, P. Marchioni, D. Cooper (1984)
Victimization, self-monitoring, and eyewitness identification.Journal of Applied Psychology, 69
R. Malpass (1981)
Effective size and defendant bias in eyewitness identification lineupsLaw and Human Behavior, 5
G. Whipple (1911)
Psychology of testimony.Psychological Bulletin, 12
The effects of age of witness and age of suspect on eyewitness testimony were investigated. Fortyeight elementary school children and 48 college students viewed a slide sequence of a mock crime. This was followed by target-present or target-absent photo identification with a no-choice option, central and peripheral questions related to the crime, and a second photo identification. In photo identification, child witnesses had a higher rate of choosing than adult witnesses, suggesting that children have more lax criteria of responding. The accuracy data showed similar levels of sensitivity across ages although there was a trend toward reduced accuracy of child witnesses in target-absent lineups. All witnesses made more total choices and more correct rejections with child-suspect lineups than adult-suspect lineups. Central questions were answered better than peripheral questions by both age groups, but adults made significantly more “don’t know” choices.
Law and Human Behavior – American Psychological Association
Published: Jun 1, 1989
Read and print from thousands of top scholarly journals.
Already have an account? Log in
Bookmark this article. You can see your Bookmarks on your DeepDyve Library.
To save an article, log in first, or sign up for a DeepDyve account if you don’t already have one.
Copy and paste the desired citation format or use the link below to download a file formatted for EndNote
Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
All DeepDyve websites use cookies to improve your online experience. They were placed on your computer when you launched this website. You can change your cookie settings through your browser.