Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
Loading next page...
/lp/american-psychological-association/competence-related-abilities-and-psychiatric-symptoms-an-analysis-of-ywviUA9mPJ
References (43)
-
Nancy Ryba, Virginia Cooper, P. Zapf (2003)
Juvenile competence to stand trial evaluations: A survey of current practices and test usage among psychologistsProfessional Psychology: Research and Practice, 34
-
D. Lukoff, K. H. Nuechterlein, J. Ventura (1986)
Appendix A: Manual for expanded Brief Psychiatric Rating Scale (BPRS)Schizophrenia Bulletin, 12
-
N. G. Poythress, R. A. Nicholson, R. K. Otto, J. F. Edens, R. J. Bonnie, J. Monahan, S. K. Hoge (1999)
Professional manual for the MacArthur competence assessment tool—criminal adjudication -
S. Hoge, R. Bonnie, N. Poythress, J. Monahan, M. Eisenberg, T. Feucht-Haviar (1997)
The MacArthur Adjudicative Competence Study: Development and Validation of a Research InstrumentLaw and Human Behavior, 21
-
J. L. Hedlund, B. W. Vieweg (1980)
The brief psychiatric rating scale (BPRS): A comprehensive reviewJournal of Operational Psychiatry, 11
-
T. Grisso, P. S. Appelbaum, E. Mulvey, K. Fletcher (1995)
The MacArthur treatment competence study. II: Measures of abilities related to competence to consent to treatmentLaw and Human Behavior, 19
-
T. Grisso, P. S. Appelbaum (1995)
The MacArthur treatment competence study, III: Abilities of patients to consent to psychiatric and medical treatmentLaw and Human Behavior, 19
-
T. Grisso, P. Appelbaum (1995)
The MacArthur Treatment Competence Study. IIILaw and Human Behavior, 19
-
Jennifer Skeem, S. Golding, N. Cohn, Gerald Berge (1998)
Logic and Reliability of Evaluations of Competence to Stand TrialLaw and Human Behavior, 22
-
D. Burnett (1999)
Evaluation of competency to stand trial in a juvenile population -
T. Grisso (1986)
Evaluating Competencies: Forensic Assessments and Instruments -
S. Brodsky (1980)
Criminal Justice and BehaviorCriminal Justice and Behavior, 7
-
Virginia Cooper, P. Zapf (2003)
Predictor Variables in Competency to Stand Trial DecisionsLaw and Human Behavior, 27
-
J. Overall, D. Gorham (1962)
The Brief Psychiatric Rating ScalePsychological Reports, 10
-
R. Stubblefield (1966)
Behavioral sciences and the law.The American journal of orthopsychiatry, 36 5
-
G. Melton, J. Petrila, N. Poythress, C. Slobogin (1997)
Psychological Evaluations for the Courts: A Handbook for Mental Health Professionals and Lawyers -
P. Zapf, R. Roesch (2001)
A comparison of the MacCAT-CA and the FIT for making determinations of competency to stand trial.International journal of law and psychiatry, 24 1
-
P. Zapf, Jennifer Skeem, S. Golding (2005)
Factor structure and validity of the MacArthur Competence Assessment Tool-Criminal Adjudication.Psychological assessment, 17 4
-
P. Appelbaum, T. Grisso (1995)
Mental Illness and Competence to Consent to Treatment -
K. Morlan, Siang‐Yang Tan (1998)
Comparison of the Brief Psychiatric Rating Scale and the Brief Symptom Inventory.Journal of clinical psychology, 54 7
-
Jodi Viljoen, R. Roesch, P. Zapf (2002)
An Examination of the Relationship Between Competency to Stand Trial, Competency to Waive Interrogation Rights, and PsychopathologyLaw and Human Behavior, 26
-
C. E. Tillbrook (2000)
Competency to proceed: A comparative appraisal of approaches to assessment. (Doctoral Dissertation, The University of Alabama, 2000)Dissertation Abstracts International, 61
-
P. A. Zapf (1998)
An investigation of the construct of competence in a criminal and civil context: A comparison of the FIT, MacCAT-CA, and the MacCAT-T. (Doctoral Dissertation, Simon Fraser University, 1998)Dissertation Abstracts International, 60
-
Keith Cruise, Richard Rogers (1998)
An analysis of competency to stand trial: an integration of case law and clinical knowledge.Behavioral sciences & the law, 16 1
-
P. Zapf, R. Roesch (2005)
An Investigation of the Construct of Competence: A Comparison of the FIT, the MacCAT-CA, and the MacCAT-TLaw and Human Behavior, 29
-
P. Appelbaum, T. Grisso (1995)
The MacArthur Treatment Competence Study. ILaw and Human Behavior, 19
-
Anthony Greenwood, G. Burt (2001)
Validity of the Brief Psychiatric Rating Scale Within a Forensic Inpatient HospitalExpert Evidence, 8
-
R. Bonnie (1993)
The Competence of Criminal Defendants: Beyond Dusky and DropeUniversity of Miami law review, 47
-
R. Bonnie (1992)
The competence of criminal defendants: A theoretical reformulation.Behavioral Sciences & The Law, 10
-
Jennifer Skeem, S. Golding (1998)
Community Examiners' Evaluations of Competence to Stand Trial: Common Problems and Suggestions for ImprovementProfessional Psychology: Research and Practice, 29
-
T. Grisso, P. Appelbaum, E. Mulvey, K. Fletcher (1995)
The MacArthur Treatment Competence Study. IILaw and Human Behavior, 19
-
J. Ventura, M. Green, A. Shaner, R. Liberman (1993)
Training and quality assurance with the Brief Psychiatric Rating Scale: "The drift busters."International Journal of Methods in Psychiatric Research
-
R. Nicholson, Karen Kugler (1991)
Competent and incompetent criminal defendants: a quantitative review of comparative research.Psychological bulletin, 109 3
-
B. Tabachnick, L. Fidell (1983)
Using Multivariate Statistics -
J. C. Boyd (1999)
The competence-related abilities of juveniles prosecuted in criminal courtsDissertation Abstracts International, 60
-
R. Otto, N. Poythress, R. Nicholson, J. Edens, J. Monahan, R. Bonnie, S. Hoge, M. Eisenberg (1998)
Psychometric Properties of the MacArthur Competence Assessment Tool-Criminal AdjudicationPsychological Assessment, 10
-
D. Lachar, S. Bailley, Howard Rhoades, Alex Espadas, Miriam Aponte, Katherine Cowan, Pushpa Gummatira, Charles Kopecky, Adel Wassef (2001)
New subscales for an anchored version of the Brief Psychiatric Rating Scale: construction, reliability, and validity in acute psychiatric admissions.Psychological assessment, 13 3
-
A. Hafkenscheid (1993)
Reliability of a standardized and expanded Brief Psychiatric Rating Scale: a replication studyActa Psychiatrica Scandinavica, 88
-
P. S. Appelbaum, T. Grisso (1995)
The MacArthur treatment competence study. I: Mental illness and competence to consent to treatmentLaw and Human Behavior, 19
-
S. Hoge, N. Poythress, R. Bonnie, J. Monahan, M. Eisenberg, T. Feucht-Haviar (1997)
The MacArthur Adjudicative Competence Study: diagnosis, psychopathology, and competence-related abilities.Behavioral sciences & the law, 15 3
-
R. Rogers, N. Grandjean, C. Tillbrook, M. Vitacco, K. Sewell (2001)
Recent interview-based measures of competency to stand trial: a critical review augmented with research data.Behavioral sciences & the law, 19 4
-
B. Rosenfeld, A. Wall (1998)
Psychopathology and Competence to Stand TrialCriminal Justice and Behavior, 25
-
Jodi Viljoen, P. Zapf, R. Roesch (2004)
Diagnosis, Current Symptomatology, and the Ability to Stand TrialJournal of Forensic Psychology Practice, 3
- Publisher
- American Psychological Association
- Copyright
- Copyright © 2008 American Psychological Association
- ISSN
- 0147-7307
- eISSN
- 1573-661X
- DOI
- 10.1007/s10979-007-9086-8
- pmid
- 17546483
- Publisher site
- See Article on Publisher Site
Abstract
The current study used confirmatory factor analysis to examine the factor structures of two instruments commonly used in the assessment of competency to stand trial—the MacArthur Competence Assessment Tool—Criminal Adjudication (MacCAT-CA) and the Brief Psychiatric Rating Scale (BPRS). Results revealed support for the three-subscale factor structure of the MacCAT-CA defined by the authors of the instrument; for a slightly altered three-factor structure defined by Zapf, Skeem, and Golding (2005, Psychological Assessment, 17, 433–445); and for the four symptom clusters of the BPRS as defined by Hedlund and Vieweg (1980, Journal of Operational Psychiatry, 11, 48–63). In addition, exploratory factor analysis of all 24 items of the BPRS revealed a five-factor structure. Correlations between psychiatric symptoms, symptom clusters, and competence-related abilities were also examined using the previously identified and the newly identified factor structures of the MacCAT-CA and the BPRS. Significant relations between symptoms and psycholegal abilities are discussed.
Journal
Law and Human Behavior – American Psychological Association
Published: Feb 2, 2008