Get 20M+ Full-Text Papers For Less Than $1.50/day. Start a 14-Day Trial for You or Your Team.

Learn More →

Comparing Outcomes for Diverted and Nondiverted Jail Detainees with Mental Illnesses

Comparing Outcomes for Diverted and Nondiverted Jail Detainees with Mental Illnesses Jail diversion programs have been proposed for use with persons with mental illnesses. While much support exists for these programs in theory, little is known about their characteristics, the individuals they divert, or their effectiveness. The current study focuses on identifying the characteristics of persons diverted through a court-based program in one midwestern city and their outcomes during the first 2 months after diversion. Information on participants (n = 80) was gathered through detainee interviews, staff interviews, and record abstracts. Two factors appear to be important in diversion: (1) community risk and (2) availability of specialized programs for diverted offenders. Demographic, clinical, and social context variables appear to influence diversion decisions. Overall, the diverted and nondiverted groups did approximately the same upon release, but one third of the nondiverted group never got released during the follow-up. http://www.deepdyve.com/assets/images/DeepDyve-Logo-lg.png Law and Human Behavior American Psychological Association

Comparing Outcomes for Diverted and Nondiverted Jail Detainees with Mental Illnesses

Loading next page...
 
/lp/american-psychological-association/comparing-outcomes-for-diverted-and-nondiverted-jail-detainees-with-jKIjpsZPg8

References (41)

Publisher
American Psychological Association
Copyright
Copyright © 1999 American Psychological Association
ISSN
0147-7307
eISSN
1573-661X
DOI
10.1023/A:1022385204967
Publisher site
See Article on Publisher Site

Abstract

Jail diversion programs have been proposed for use with persons with mental illnesses. While much support exists for these programs in theory, little is known about their characteristics, the individuals they divert, or their effectiveness. The current study focuses on identifying the characteristics of persons diverted through a court-based program in one midwestern city and their outcomes during the first 2 months after diversion. Information on participants (n = 80) was gathered through detainee interviews, staff interviews, and record abstracts. Two factors appear to be important in diversion: (1) community risk and (2) availability of specialized programs for diverted offenders. Demographic, clinical, and social context variables appear to influence diversion decisions. Overall, the diverted and nondiverted groups did approximately the same upon release, but one third of the nondiverted group never got released during the follow-up.

Journal

Law and Human BehaviorAmerican Psychological Association

Published: Dec 1, 1999

There are no references for this article.