Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
C. Kruttschnitt (1980)
Social Status and Sentences of Female OffendersLaw & Society Review, 15
L. R. Derogatis (1983)
SCL-90-R administration, scoring and procedures manual—II
A. Pokorny, B. Miller, H. Kaplan (1972)
The brief MAST: a shortened version of the Michigan Alcoholism Screening Test.The American journal of psychiatry, 129 3
H. Skinner (2013)
The drug abuse screening test.Addictive behaviors, 7 4
R. D. Adams (1988)
Mental health factsheet: Diverting people with mental illness who commit minor offenses from jails
H. Lamb, L. Weinberger, C. Reston-Parham (1996)
Court intervention to address the mental health needs of mentally ill offenders.New directions for mental health services, 90
F. Cohen, J. Dvoskin (1992)
Inmates with mental disorders: A guide to law and practiceMental and Physical Disability Law Reporter, 16
Kathleen Daly (1987)
Discrimination in the Criminal Courts: Family, Gender, and the Problem of Equal TreatmentSocial Forces, 66
S. Brodsky (1980)
Criminal Justice and BehaviorCriminal Justice and Behavior, 7
S. M. Morris, H. J. Steadman, B. M. Veysey (1997)
Mental health services in United States jails: A survey of innovative practicesCriminal Justice and Behavior, 24
A. Mclellan, H. Kushner, D. Metzger, R. Peters, Iris Smith, G. Grissom, H. Pettinati, M. Argeriou (1992)
The Fifth Edition of the Addiction Severity Index.Journal of substance abuse treatment, 9 3
L. Derogatis, L. Derogatis (1983)
SCL-90-R, Administration, Scoring, and Procedures Manual-II for the R(evised) Version and Other Instruments of the Psychopathology Rating Scale Series
Maude Dornfeld, C. Kruttschnitt (1992)
DO THE STEREOTYPES FIT? MAPPING GENDER‐SPECIFIC OUTCOMES AND RISK FACTORS*Criminology, 30
(1991)
Psychiatric disorders in America: The Epidemiological Catchment Area Study
S. Morris, H. Steadman, B. Veysey (1997)
Mental Health Services in United States JailsCriminal Justice and Behavior, 24
H. Steadman, Sharon Barbera, D. Dennis (1994)
A national survey of jail diversion programs for mentally ill detainees.Hospital & community psychiatry, 45 11
L. Teplin (1994)
Psychiatric and substance abuse disorders among male urban jail detainees.American journal of public health, 84 2
Henry Steadman, Suzanne Morris, Deborah Dennis (1995)
The diversion of mentally ill persons from jails to community-based services: a profile of programs.American journal of public health, 85 12
A. Mclellan, L. Luborsky, G. Woody, C. O'brien (1980)
An Improved Diagnostic Evaluation Instrument for Substance Abuse Patients: The Addiction Severity IndexThe Journal of Nervous and Mental Disease, 168
R. Stubblefield (1966)
Behavioral sciences and the law.The American journal of orthopsychiatry, 36 5
R. Borum, M. Deane, H. Steadman, J. Morrissey (1998)
Police perspectives on responding to mentally ill people in crisis: perceptions of program effectiveness.Behavioral sciences & the law, 16 4
Scott Decker (1979)
Law and Society ReviewJournal of Drug Issues, 9
H. Lamb, R. Shaner, Diana Elliott, Walter Decuir, James Foltz (1995)
Outcome for psychiatric emergency patients seen by an outreach police-mental health team.Psychiatric services, 46 12
B. M. Veysey, H. J. Steadman (1995)
Double jeopardy: Persons with mental illnesses in the criminal justice system: Report to Congress
L. Teplin (1984)
Criminalizing mental disorder. The comparative arrest rate of the mentally ill.The American psychologist, 39 7
H. Steadman, D. McCarty, J. Morrissey (1988)
The Mentally Ill in Jail: Planning for Essential Services
H. J. Steadman, S. H. Barbera, D. L. Dennis (1994)
A national survey of jail mental health diversion programsHospital and Community Psychiatry, 45
R. H. Lamb, L. E. Weinberger, C. Reston-Parham (1996)
Court intervention to address the mental health needs of mentally ill offendersPsychiatric Services, 47
M. Deane, Henry Steadman, Randy Borum, B. Veysey, Joseph Morrissey (1999)
Emerging partnerships between mental health and law enforcement.Psychiatric services, 50 1
Kathleen Daly (1989)
Neither Conflict Nor Labeling Nor Paternalism Will Suffice: Intersections of Race, Ethnicity, Gender, and Family in Criminal Court DecisionsCrime & Delinquency, 35
A. Lehman (1988)
A Quality of Life Interview for the chronically mentally ill.Evaluation and Program Planning, 11
R. Rogers, R. Bagby (1992)
Diversion of mentally disordered offenders: a legitimate role for clinicians?Behavioral sciences & the law, 10 3
L. Derogatis, R. Lipman, L. Covi (1973)
SCL-90: an outpatient psychiatric rating scale--preliminary report.Psychopharmacology bulletin, 9 1
E. F. Torrey, J. Steiber, J. Ezekiel, S. M. Wolfe, J. Sharfstein, J. H. Noble, L. M. Flynn (1992)
Criminalizing the seriously mentally ill
Helen Boritch (1992)
GENDER AND CRIMINAL COURT OUTCOMES: AN HISTORICAL ANALYSIS*Criminology, 30
L. Teplin (1984)
Mental Health and Criminal Justice
J. Hagan, Celesta Albonetti (1982)
Race, Class, and the Perception of Criminal Injustice in AmericaAmerican Journal of Sociology, 88
L. Teplin, K. Abram, G. Mcclelland (1996)
Prevalence of psychiatric disorders among incarcerated women. I. Pretrial jail detainees.Archives of general psychiatry, 53 6
L. Teplin, Nancy Pruett (1992)
Police as streetcorner psychiatrist: managing the mentally ill.International journal of law and psychiatry, 15 2
(1984)
Removing the chronically mentally ill from jail
L. Bachrach (1980)
Overview: model programs for chronic mental patients.The American journal of psychiatry, 137 9
Jail diversion programs have been proposed for use with persons with mental illnesses. While much support exists for these programs in theory, little is known about their characteristics, the individuals they divert, or their effectiveness. The current study focuses on identifying the characteristics of persons diverted through a court-based program in one midwestern city and their outcomes during the first 2 months after diversion. Information on participants (n = 80) was gathered through detainee interviews, staff interviews, and record abstracts. Two factors appear to be important in diversion: (1) community risk and (2) availability of specialized programs for diverted offenders. Demographic, clinical, and social context variables appear to influence diversion decisions. Overall, the diverted and nondiverted groups did approximately the same upon release, but one third of the nondiverted group never got released during the follow-up.
Law and Human Behavior – American Psychological Association
Published: Dec 1, 1999
Read and print from thousands of top scholarly journals.
Already have an account? Log in
Bookmark this article. You can see your Bookmarks on your DeepDyve Library.
To save an article, log in first, or sign up for a DeepDyve account if you don’t already have one.
Copy and paste the desired citation format or use the link below to download a file formatted for EndNote
Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
All DeepDyve websites use cookies to improve your online experience. They were placed on your computer when you launched this website. You can change your cookie settings through your browser.