Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
Loading next page...
/lp/american-psychological-association/commentary-on-studying-eyewitness-investigations-in-the-field-a-look-Nc1c36xB3y
References (21)
-
G. Wells, A. Memon, Steven Penrod (2006)
Eyewitness EvidencePsychological Science in the Public Interest, 7
-
J. Westcott (1970)
The Practical Theorist The Life and Work of Kurt LewinCanadian Family Physician, 16
-
Ryann Haw, R. Fisher (2004)
Effects of administrator-witness contact on eyewitness identification accuracy.The Journal of applied psychology, 89 6
-
S. M. Kassin, V. A. Tubb, H. M. Hosch, A. Memon (2001)
On the “general acceptance” of eyewitness testimony researchAmerican Psychologist, 56
-
James Doyle, Steven Penrod, M. Kovera, Jennifer Dysart (2006)
The Street, the Lab, the Courtroom, the Meeting RoomPublic Interest Law Reporter, 11
-
J. Doyle (2005)
True witness: Cops, courts, science and the battle against misidentification -
S. Penrod (2003)
Eyewitness identification evidence: How well are witnesses and police performing?Criminal Justice Magazine, 54
-
R. Lindsay, Jamal Mansour, J. Beaudry, Amy‐May Leach, Michelle Bertrand (2009)
Sequential lineup presentation: Patterns and policyLegal and Criminological Psychology, 14
-
G. Wells (2006)
Eyewitness identification: Systemic reformsWisconsin Law Review, 2006
-
S. Diamond (2008)
Psychological Contributions to Evaluating Witness Testimony -
A. N. Doob, H. M. Kirshenbaum (1973)
Bias in police lineups—partial rememberingJournal of Police Science and Administration, 1
-
N. Steblay, Jennifer Dysart, S. Fulero, R. Lindsay (2001)
Eyewitness Accuracy Rates in Sequential and Simultaneous Lineup Presentations: A Meta-Analytic ComparisonLaw and Human Behavior, 25
-
M. Harris, R. Rosenthal (1985)
Mediation of interpersonal expectancy effects: 31 meta-analyses.Psychological Bulletin, 97
-
M. Phillips, B. McAuliff, M. Kovera, B. Cutler (1999)
Double-blind photoarray administration as a safeguard against investigator bias.Journal of Applied Psychology, 84
-
E. Borgida, S. Fiske (2007)
Beyond Common Sense: Psychological Science in the Courtroom -
D. Schacter, R. Dawes, L. Jacoby, D. Kahneman, Richard Lempert, H. Roediger, R. Rosenthal (2008)
Studying eyewitness investigations in the fieldLaw and Human Behavior, 32
-
S. Kassin, V. Tubb, H. Hosch, A. Memon (2001)
On the "general acceptance" of eyewitness testimony research. A new survey of the experts.The American psychologist, 56 5
-
R. Malpass (2006)
A POLICY EVALUATION OF SIMULTANEOUS AND SEQUENTIAL LINEUPSPsychology, Public Policy and Law, 12
-
G. L. Wells, A. Memon, S. D. Penrod (2007)
Eyewitness evidence: Improving its probative valuePsychological Science in the Public Interest, 7
-
Lynn Garrioch, C. Luus) (2001)
Lineup Administrators' Expectations: Their Impact on Eyewitness ConfidenceLaw and Human Behavior, 25
-
A. Klobuchar, N. K. M. Steblay, H. L. Caligiuri (2006)
Improving eyewitness identifications: Hennepin County’s blind sequential lineup pilot projectCardozo Public Law, Policy, and Ethics Journal, 2
- Publisher
- American Psychological Association
- Copyright
- Copyright © 2008 American Psychological Association
- ISSN
- 0147-7307
- eISSN
- 1573-661X
- DOI
- 10.1007/s10979-007-9105-9
- pmid
- 17641959
- Publisher site
- See Article on Publisher Site
Abstract
Schacter et al. (2007, this issue) address the controversy surrounding an Illinois pilot project that attempted to compare sequential versus simultaneous police lineup formats. The statement by these experts will guide the design and execution of future field lineup experiments. This commentary discusses three aspects of field studies that pose challenges as lineup experiments are interpreted: the imprecise meaning of the dependent measure (eyewitness decisions), the limitations of single studies, and the necessity to devise public policy from incomplete knowledge. A combination of laboratory and field information provides the means to determine best practices in eyewitness identification procedures.
Journal
Law and Human Behavior – American Psychological Association
Published: Feb 20, 2008