Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
F. Jentsch, John Barnett, C. Bowers, E. Salas (1999)
Who Is Flying This Plane Anyway? What Mishaps Tell Us about Crew Member Role Assignment and Air Crew Situation AwarenessHuman Factors: The Journal of Human Factors and Ergonomics Society, 41
(2011)
Safety Recommendation A-11–039
K. Roberts, S. Stout, Jennifer Halpern (1994)
Decision Dynamics in Two High Reliability Military OrganizationsManagement Science, 40
(1999)
Enhancing flight crew monitoring skills can increase flight safety
H. Cuevas, C. Bolstad (2010)
Influence of Team Leaders' Situation Awareness on their Team's Situation Awareness and PerformanceProceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society Annual Meeting, 54
Yiyuan Zheng, Yanyu Lu, Zheng Yang, Shan Fu (2014)
Expertise and responsibility effects on pilots' reactions to flight deck alerts in a simulator.Aviation, space, and environmental medicine, 85 11
Christy Spangler, Alice Park (2010)
Loss of Control on Approach Colgan Air, Inc., Operating as Continental Connection Flight 3407 Bombardier DHC-8-400, N200WQ Clarence Center, New York February 12, 2009
Dana Milanovich, J. Driskell, R. Stout, Eduardo Salas (1998)
Status and cockpit dynamics: a review and empirical study.Group dynamics : theory, research, and practice : the official journal of Division 49, Group Psychology and Group Psychotherapy of the American Psychological Association, 2 3
H. Smith (1979)
A simulator study of the interaction of pilot workload with errors, vigilance, and decisions
(2012)
Characteristics and analysis of major U.S. air
P. O'Connor, A. O'Dea, R. Flin, S. Belton (2008)
Identifying the team skills required by nuclear power plant operations personnelInternational Journal of Industrial Ergonomics, 38
M. Palmer, Abby Lack, Jeanne Lynch (1995)
Communication Conflicts of Status and Authority in Dyadic, Task-Based InteractionsJournal of Language and Social Psychology, 14
James Klinect, P. Murray, A. Merritt, R. Helmreich (2003)
LINE OPERATION SAFETY AUDITS (LOSA): DEFINITION AND OPERATING CHARACTERISTICS
(2014)
Crash during a nighttime nonprecision instrument approach to landing, UPS Flight 1354, Airbus A300-600, N155UP, Birmingham, Alabama, August 14, 2013 (NTSB/AAR-14/02)
Nadine Bienefeld, G. Grote (2012)
Silence that may kill: When aircrew members don’t speak up and why., 2
(2010)
Retrieved from https://ntrs
E. Rake, O. Njå (2009)
Perceptions and performances of experienced incident commandersJournal of Risk Research, 12
C. Withrow, M. Reveley (2014)
Analysis of Aviation Safety Reporting System Incident Data Associated With the Technical Challenges of the Vehicle Systems Safety Technology Project
S. Casner, J. Schooler (2015)
Vigilance impossible: Diligence, distraction, and daydreaming all lead to failures in a practical monitoring taskConsciousness and Cognition, 35
N. Sarter, D. Woods (1995)
How in the World Did We Ever Get into That Mode? Mode Error and Awareness in Supervisory ControlHuman Factors: The Journal of Human Factors and Ergonomics Society, 37
(1997)
Differences in situation assessment between expert and intermediate pilots – Development of a diagnostic and training tool
M. Girodo (2007)
Personality and cognitive processes in life and death decision making: An exploration into the source of judgment errors by police special squadsInternational Journal of Psychology, 42
M. Bromiley (2012)
Clinical human factors: the need to speak up to improve patient safety.Nursing standard (Royal College of Nursing (Great Britain) : 1987), 26 35
(1998)
Analysis of critical factors during approach and landing in accidents and normal flight
(1997)
Identifying the knowledges, skills, and abilities needed by the junior first officer
(1997)
October). Junior first officers as pilot-not-flying: A training challenge
C. Kelly, Sarah Larwill, L. Hamley, M. Sandford (2014)
Failure to escalate: What stops junior doctors asking for help when they need it?Asia Pacific journal of health management, 9
R. Khatwa, R. Helmreich (1999)
Flight Safety Foundation Approach-and-Landing Accident Reduction Task Force - Analysis of Critical Factors During Approach and Landing in Accidents and Normal Flight: Data Acquisition and Analysis Working Group Final ReportSAE transactions, 108
Brian Potter (2011)
Effects of Online Training on Aircrew Monitoring Behaviors: A Field Study
(1998)
Teams and technology: Flight crew
M. Endsley (1995)
Toward a Theory of Situation Awareness in Dynamic SystemsHuman Factors: The Journal of Human Factors and Ergonomics Society, 37
(1997)
Controlled flight into terrain ( CFIT ) accidents of air taxi , regional and major operators ( NLR TP 97270 U ) . Amsterdam , The Netherlands
James Klinect (2005)
Line operations safety audit: a cockpit observation methodology for monitoring commercial airline safety performance
Controlled flight into terrain , Bradley Air Services Limited ( First Air ) , Boeing 737 – 210 C C - GNWN , Resolute Bay , Nunavut , 20 August 2011 ( A 11 H 0002 )
S. Baker, Yandong Qiang, G. Rebok, Guohua Li (2008)
Pilot error in air carrier mishaps: longitudinal trends among 558 reports, 1983-2002.Aviation, space, and environmental medicine, 79 1
(2003)
Report on the accident to Boeing 747-2B5F, HL-7451 near London Stansted Airport on 22 December 1999 (3/2003)
R. Dismukes, B. Berman (2010)
Checklists and Monitoring in the Cockpit: Why Crucial Defenses Sometimes Fail
(1998)
October). How do flight crews
M. Endsley, M. Rodgers (1996)
Attention Distribution and Situation Awareness in Air Traffic ControlProceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society Annual Meeting, 40
M. Endsley (1999)
Situation Awareness In Aviation Systems
J. Orasanu, Ute Fischer, L. McDonnell, J. Davison, Keri Haars, Eric Villeda, Christina VanAken (1998)
How do Flight Crews Detect and Prevent Errors? Findings from a Flight Simulation StudyProceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society Annual Meeting, 42
(2011)
Crash during approach to landing, Empire Airlines Flight 8284, Avions de Transport Régional, Aerospatiale Alenia ATR 42-320, N902FX, Lubbock, Texas, January 27, 2009 (NTSB/AAR-11/02)
Compared with other team settings, flight crew in airtransport present a unique situation where the leader or supervisor regularlyengages in active control. When the captain is assigned cognitively demandingpilot flying duties, the subordinate and often less experienced first officermust perform equally crucial monitoring and support duties. Using a systematicreview methodology, this study reviews the reported effect of crew roleassignment on flight safety outcomes. Our review identified 18 relevant studiesand suggests crew performance factors linked to flight safety are affected bycrew role assignment. Findings suggest a greater number of inherent obstaclesmay exist for optimal crew performance with the captain as pilot flying, raisingthe need for further specific research and policy review in this area.
Aviation Psychology and Applied Human Factors – American Psychological Association
Published: Jan 1, 2018
Read and print from thousands of top scholarly journals.
Already have an account? Log in
Bookmark this article. You can see your Bookmarks on your DeepDyve Library.
To save an article, log in first, or sign up for a DeepDyve account if you don’t already have one.
Copy and paste the desired citation format or use the link below to download a file formatted for EndNote
Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
All DeepDyve websites use cookies to improve your online experience. They were placed on your computer when you launched this website. You can change your cookie settings through your browser.