Get 20M+ Full-Text Papers For Less Than $1.50/day. Start a 14-Day Trial for You or Your Team.

Learn More →

Changing Views of Jury Power: The Nullification Debate, 1787–1988

Changing Views of Jury Power: The Nullification Debate, 1787–1988 This article highlights the major events and empirical research in the continuing debate over the power and competence of the jury in civil and criminal trials. The concept of jury nullification, the power of the jury to return a verdict based upon their moral conscience despite the evidence and the law, is used as a convenient filter to discuss the legal and behavioral assumptions about jury power and performance. The legal, historical, and even behavioral contexts reflect a bipolar theme in the level of trust Americans have exhibited towards the jury system. One pole reflects the notion that juries lack predictability and rationality in their verdicts and are moved by emotional concerns. Antipodally, juries have been thought to reflect an historical competence at applying common sense notions of equity and rationality to conflicted and ambiguous cases. This article traces the history of these two views of jury power and competence. A critical review of the empirical research that may inform the debate about the jury’s competence in both criminal and civil arenas is provided. http://www.deepdyve.com/assets/images/DeepDyve-Logo-lg.png Law and Human Behavior American Psychological Association

Changing Views of Jury Power: The Nullification Debate, 1787–1988

Law and Human Behavior , Volume 15 (2): 18 – Apr 1, 1991

Loading next page...
 
/lp/american-psychological-association/changing-views-of-jury-power-the-nullification-debate-1787-1988-ekiZZk5Jww

References (38)

Publisher
American Psychological Association
Copyright
Copyright © 1991 American Psychological Association
ISSN
0147-7307
eISSN
1573-661X
DOI
10.1007/BF01044616
Publisher site
See Article on Publisher Site

Abstract

This article highlights the major events and empirical research in the continuing debate over the power and competence of the jury in civil and criminal trials. The concept of jury nullification, the power of the jury to return a verdict based upon their moral conscience despite the evidence and the law, is used as a convenient filter to discuss the legal and behavioral assumptions about jury power and performance. The legal, historical, and even behavioral contexts reflect a bipolar theme in the level of trust Americans have exhibited towards the jury system. One pole reflects the notion that juries lack predictability and rationality in their verdicts and are moved by emotional concerns. Antipodally, juries have been thought to reflect an historical competence at applying common sense notions of equity and rationality to conflicted and ambiguous cases. This article traces the history of these two views of jury power and competence. A critical review of the empirical research that may inform the debate about the jury’s competence in both criminal and civil arenas is provided.

Journal

Law and Human BehaviorAmerican Psychological Association

Published: Apr 1, 1991

There are no references for this article.