Get 20M+ Full-Text Papers For Less Than $1.50/day. Start a 14-Day Trial for You or Your Team.

Learn More →

Assessing the Impact of Affective and Cognitive Information in Predicting Attitudes toward Capital Punishment

Assessing the Impact of Affective and Cognitive Information in Predicting Attitudes toward... Research studying the public’s attitudes toward capital punishment has typically assessed whether individuals favor or oppose the use of the death penalty, without examining the underlying structure of these attitudes. The present study used a general model of attitude to examine the relative importance of affective information (i.e., feelings) and cognitive information (i.e., beliefs) in predicting attitudes toward capital punishment. Open-ended elicitation measures were used to determine the particular feelings and beliefs respondents most frequently associated with the issue. Participants also reported their attitude (i.e., overall evaluation) toward the issue. The results revealed that: (a) even the most frequently elicited responses were provided by a minority of respondents, (b) overall, both affective and cognitive information were important in predicting attitudes toward capital punishment, and (c) the relative importance of affective and cognitive information in predicting attitudes differed as a function of individual differences in attitude structure. The implications of the results for future research are discussed. http://www.deepdyve.com/assets/images/DeepDyve-Logo-lg.png Law and Human Behavior American Psychological Association

Assessing the Impact of Affective and Cognitive Information in Predicting Attitudes toward Capital Punishment

Law and Human Behavior , Volume 22 (3): 15 – Jun 1, 1998

Loading next page...
 
/lp/american-psychological-association/assessing-the-impact-of-affective-and-cognitive-information-in-ApDFnNugOm

References (25)

Publisher
American Psychological Association
Copyright
Copyright © 1998 American Psychological Association
ISSN
0147-7307
eISSN
1573-661X
DOI
10.1023/A:1025758623612
Publisher site
See Article on Publisher Site

Abstract

Research studying the public’s attitudes toward capital punishment has typically assessed whether individuals favor or oppose the use of the death penalty, without examining the underlying structure of these attitudes. The present study used a general model of attitude to examine the relative importance of affective information (i.e., feelings) and cognitive information (i.e., beliefs) in predicting attitudes toward capital punishment. Open-ended elicitation measures were used to determine the particular feelings and beliefs respondents most frequently associated with the issue. Participants also reported their attitude (i.e., overall evaluation) toward the issue. The results revealed that: (a) even the most frequently elicited responses were provided by a minority of respondents, (b) overall, both affective and cognitive information were important in predicting attitudes toward capital punishment, and (c) the relative importance of affective and cognitive information in predicting attitudes differed as a function of individual differences in attitude structure. The implications of the results for future research are discussed.

Journal

Law and Human BehaviorAmerican Psychological Association

Published: Jun 1, 1998

There are no references for this article.