Get 20M+ Full-Text Papers For Less Than $1.50/day. Start a 14-Day Trial for You or Your Team.

Learn More →

Assessing Pretrial Publicity Effects: Integrating Content Analytic Results

Assessing Pretrial Publicity Effects: Integrating Content Analytic Results -When a case has received pretrial publicity which has the capacity to bias potential jurors in the trial venue, a change of venue is one means of attempting to ensure that the defendant receives a fair trial. Content analysis of the pretrial publicity surrounding a case can provide the court with important information to consider when determining whether prejudice in the relevant community is too great for the defendant to receive a fair trial. This paper presents an approach to content analysis of pretrial publicity that draws upon both legal commentary and past empirical social science research. It is a systematic approach that could be employed by both the prosecution and defense when presenting arguments to the court about whether a change of venue should be granted. Information gleaned from content analysis of the publicity surrounding a specific case fills the gap between information provided by experimental research which has examined pretrial publicity effects and public opinion polls concerning the public’s perception of the defendant in a particular case. Results from a content analysis can servetovalidate public opinion survey data gathered from the same locales. To exemplify this content analytic approach, a content analysis conducted by the authors in preparation for the change of venue hearing in the case of Timothy McVeigh is presented. http://www.deepdyve.com/assets/images/DeepDyve-Logo-lg.png Law and Human Behavior American Psychological Association

Assessing Pretrial Publicity Effects: Integrating Content Analytic Results

Loading next page...
 
/lp/american-psychological-association/assessing-pretrial-publicity-effects-integrating-content-analytic-s0aR4LpeZ1

References (60)

Publisher
American Psychological Association
Copyright
Copyright © 2000 American Psychological Association
ISSN
0147-7307
eISSN
1573-661X
DOI
10.1023/A:1005536204923
Publisher site
See Article on Publisher Site

Abstract

-When a case has received pretrial publicity which has the capacity to bias potential jurors in the trial venue, a change of venue is one means of attempting to ensure that the defendant receives a fair trial. Content analysis of the pretrial publicity surrounding a case can provide the court with important information to consider when determining whether prejudice in the relevant community is too great for the defendant to receive a fair trial. This paper presents an approach to content analysis of pretrial publicity that draws upon both legal commentary and past empirical social science research. It is a systematic approach that could be employed by both the prosecution and defense when presenting arguments to the court about whether a change of venue should be granted. Information gleaned from content analysis of the publicity surrounding a specific case fills the gap between information provided by experimental research which has examined pretrial publicity effects and public opinion polls concerning the public’s perception of the defendant in a particular case. Results from a content analysis can servetovalidate public opinion survey data gathered from the same locales. To exemplify this content analytic approach, a content analysis conducted by the authors in preparation for the change of venue hearing in the case of Timothy McVeigh is presented.

Journal

Law and Human BehaviorAmerican Psychological Association

Published: Jun 1, 2000

There are no references for this article.