Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
E. Loftus (1974)
Reconstructing memory: The incredible witnessPsychology Today, 8
S. Sue, Ronald Smith, R. Gilbert (1974)
Biasing effects of pretrial publicity on judicial decisionsJournal of Criminal Justice, 2
S. Tanford, M. Cox (1988)
The effects of impeachment evidence and limiting instructions on individual and group decision makingLaw and Human Behavior, 12
W. Wilcox, M. McCombs (1967)
Crime story elements and fair trial/free press
G. Wells, D. Murray (1983)
What can psychology say about the Neil v. Biggers criteria for judging eyewitness accuracyJournal of Applied Psychology, 68
R. Simon (1975)
The jury system in America : a critical overview
Bert Woodbnrn (1947)
Reader Interest in Newspaper PicturesJournalism & Mass Communication Quarterly, 24
G. E. Antunes, P. A. Hurley (1978)
The representation of criminal events in Houston's two daily papersJournalism Quarterly, 55
B. Cutler, Steven Penrod, Thomas Stuve (1988)
Juror decision making in eyewitness identification casesLaw and Human Behavior, 12
S. Sue, Ronald Smith, George Pedroza (1975)
Authoritarianism, Pretrial Publicity, and Awareness of Bias in Simulated JurorsPsychological Reports, 37
A. J. Pollock (1977)
The use of public opinion polls to obtain changes of venue and continuances in criminal trialsCriminal Justice Journal, 1
T. Simon, F. Fico, Stephen Lacy (1989)
Covering Conflict and Controversy: Measuring Balance, Fairness, DefamationJournalism & Mass Communication Quarterly, 66
A. Eagly, W. Wood, S. Chaiken (1978)
Causal inferences about communicators and their effect on opinion changeJournal of Personality and Social Psychology, 36
J. Tankard, K. Middleton, Tony Rimmer (1979)
Compliance with American Bar Association Fair Trial-Free Press GuidelinesJournalism & Mass Communication Quarterly, 56
D. Imrich, Charles Mullin, D. Linz (1995)
Measuring the Extent of Prejudicial Pretrial Publicity in Major American Newspapers: A Content AnalysisJournal of Communication, 45
(1995)
Model rules of professional conduct
M. T. Nietzel, R. C. Dillehay (1983)
Psychologists as consultants for changes of venueLaw and Human Behavior, 7
H. Zeisel, S. Diamond (1978)
The Effect of Peremptory Challenges on Jury and Verdict: An Experiment in a Federal District CourtStanford Law Review, 30
G. Moran, B. Cutler (1991)
The Prejudicial Impact of Pretrial Publicity1Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 21
C. Bush, Darwin Teilhet (1942)
The Press, Reader Habits, and Reader InterestThe Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 219
E. A. Norwood (1986)
The prosecutor and pre-trial publicity: The need for a ruleJournal of the Legal Profession, 22
J. Mcconahay, Courtney Mullin, Jeffrey Frederick (1977)
The Uses of Social Science in Trials With Political and Racial Overtones: The Trial of Joan LittleLaw and contemporary problems, 41
C. Hovland, A. Lumsdaine (1949)
Experiments On Mass Communication
F. Cate, N. Minow (1991)
Who Is an Impartial Juror in an Age of Mass MediaThe American University law review, 40
W. Wood, A. Eagly (1981)
Stages in the Analysis of Persuasive Messages: The Role of Causal Attributions and Message Comprehension.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 40
P. Olczak, M. Kaplan, Steven Penrod (1991)
Attorneys' lay psychology and its effectiveness in selecting jurors: Three empirical studies.Journal of Social Behavior and Personality
B. L. Cutler, S. D. Penrod (1995)
Mistaken identifications: The eyewitness, psychology, and law
De Luca, A. Joseph (1979)
Tipping the scales of justice: the effects of pretrial publicity
S. J. Arnold, A. D. Gold (1978)
The use of a public opinion poll on a change of venue applicationCriminal Law Quarterly, 21
Edmond Costantini, Joel King (1980)
The Partial Juror: Correlates and Causes of PrejudgmentLaw & Society Review, 15
Michael Ryan, D. Owen (1976)
A Content Analysis of Metropolitan Newspaper Coverage of Social IssuesJournalism & Mass Communication Quarterly, 53
E. Loftus (1979)
Eyewitness testimony
E. Walster, L. Festinger (1962)
The Effectiveness of "Overheard" Persuasive CommunicationsThe Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 65
T. E. Eimermann, R. J. Simon (1970)
Newspaper coverage of crimes and trials: Another look at the free press-fair trial controversyJournalism Quarterly, 47
F. Kline, P. Jess (1966)
Prejudicial Publicity: Its Effect on Law School Mock JuriesJournalism & Mass Communication Quarterly, 43
Thomas Eimermann, R. Simon (1970)
Newspaper Coverage of Crimes and Trials: Another Empirical Look at the Free Press—Fair Trial ControversyJournalism & Mass Communication Quarterly, 47
C. Studebaker, Steven Penrod (1997)
Pretrial Publicity: The Media, the Law, and Common SensePsychology, Public Policy and Law, 3
S. Penrod, A. Otto, H. Dexter (1990)
Assessing the impact of pretrial publicity on jury decisionmaking
C. Hovland, A. Lumsdaine, F. Sheffield (1950)
Experiments on mass communication. (Studies in social psychology in World War II), Vol. 3American Sociological Review, 15
D. Humphries (1981)
Serious crime news coverage and ideology: A content analysis of crime coverage in a metropolitan paperCrime and Delinquency, 27
D. Humphries (1981)
Serious Crime, News Coverage, and IdeologyCrime & Delinquency, 27
Martin Haskell, L. Yablonsky (1975)
Crime and Delinquency
Scott Decker (1979)
Law and Society ReviewJournal of Drug Issues, 9
L. Facorro, M. Defleur (1993)
A Cross-Cultural Experiment on How Well Audiences Remember News Stories from Newspaper, Computer, Television, and Radio SourcesJournalism & Mass Communication Quarterly, 70
J. Hvistendahl (1979)
The Effect of Placement of Biasing InformationJournalism & Mass Communication Quarterly, 56
Bennack, A. Frank (1999)
HOW THE PUBLIC VIEWS THE STATE COURTS A 1999 NATIONAL SURVEY
Amy Otto, Steven Penrod, H. Dexter (1994)
The biasing impact of pretrial publicity on juror judgmentsLaw and Human Behavior, 18
Jeffrey Wilson, B. Bornstein (1998)
Methodological Considerations in Pretrial Publicity Research: Is the Medium the Message?Law and Human Behavior, 22
S. M. Fulero, S. D. Penrod (1990)
The myths and realities of attorney jury selection folklore and scientific jury selection: What works?Ohio Northern University Law Review, XVII
Geoffrey Kramer, N. Kerr, J. Carroll (1990)
Pretrial publicity, judicial remedies, and jury biasLaw and Human Behavior, 14
R. Hardaway, Douglas Tumminello (1996)
Pretrial Publicity in Criminal Cases of National Notoriety: Constructing a Remedy for the Remediless WrongThe American University law review, 46
R. J. Simon, T. Eimermann (1971)
The jury finds not guilty: Another look at media influence on the juryJournalism Quarterly, 48
N. Steblay, Jasmina Besirevic, S. Fulero, Belia Jimenez-Lorente (1999)
The Effects of Pretrial Publicity on Juror Verdicts: A Meta-Analytic ReviewLaw and Human Behavior, 23
M. Nietzel, R. Dillehay (1983)
Psychologists as consultants for changes of venue the use of public opinion surveysLaw and Human Behavior, 7
H. Dexter, B. Cutler, G. Moran (1992)
A Test of Voir Dire as a Remedy for the Prejudicial Effects of Pretrial Publicity1Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 22
M. Defleur, Lucinda Davenport, Mary Cronin, Margaret DeFleur (1992)
Audience Recall of News Stories Presented by Newspaper, Computer, Television and RadioJournalism & Mass Communication Quarterly, 69
N. Vidmar, J. Judson (1981)
The use of social sciences in a change of venue applicationCanadian Bar Review, 59
Mary Tans, S. Chaffee (1966)
Pretrial Publicity and Juror PrejudiceJournalism & Mass Communication Quarterly, 43
N. Kerr, Geoffrey Kramer, J. Carroll, James Alfini (1991)
On the Effectiveness of Voir Dire in Criminal Cases with Prejudicial Pretrial Publicity: An Empirical StudyThe American University law review, 40
H. Bernstein, D. Horowitz, David Lange, H. Powell, Melvin Shimm, J. Weistart, R. Danner, Claire Germain, B. Baccari, Lisa Eichhorn, James Farrin, K. Cashion, Steven Chabinsky, Thomas Contois, James Glenister, Stephen Armitage, J. Cannon, C. Connolly, David Dabbs, Katherine Flanagan, P. Franklin, Donald Nielsen, Christopher Hart, Charles North, William O'Neil, Jane Schaefer, Eric Lieberman, Janet Moore, A. Walsh, Raymond Wierciszewski (1990)
LAW AND CONTEMPORARY PROBLEMS
-When a case has received pretrial publicity which has the capacity to bias potential jurors in the trial venue, a change of venue is one means of attempting to ensure that the defendant receives a fair trial. Content analysis of the pretrial publicity surrounding a case can provide the court with important information to consider when determining whether prejudice in the relevant community is too great for the defendant to receive a fair trial. This paper presents an approach to content analysis of pretrial publicity that draws upon both legal commentary and past empirical social science research. It is a systematic approach that could be employed by both the prosecution and defense when presenting arguments to the court about whether a change of venue should be granted. Information gleaned from content analysis of the publicity surrounding a specific case fills the gap between information provided by experimental research which has examined pretrial publicity effects and public opinion polls concerning the public’s perception of the defendant in a particular case. Results from a content analysis can servetovalidate public opinion survey data gathered from the same locales. To exemplify this content analytic approach, a content analysis conducted by the authors in preparation for the change of venue hearing in the case of Timothy McVeigh is presented.
Law and Human Behavior – American Psychological Association
Published: Jun 1, 2000
Read and print from thousands of top scholarly journals.
Already have an account? Log in
Bookmark this article. You can see your Bookmarks on your DeepDyve Library.
To save an article, log in first, or sign up for a DeepDyve account if you don’t already have one.
Copy and paste the desired citation format or use the link below to download a file formatted for EndNote
Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
All DeepDyve websites use cookies to improve your online experience. They were placed on your computer when you launched this website. You can change your cookie settings through your browser.