Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
J. Freeman, D. Thomas (1979)
Principles of Sentencing
I. Berg, R. Hullin, R. McGuire (1979)
A Randomly Controlled Trial of Two Court Procedures in Truancy
D. Rosenhan (1973)
On being sane in insane placesClinical Social Work Journal, 2
R. Tarling, Mollie Weatheritt (1979)
Sentencing practice in magistrates' courts
R. Bond, N. Lemon (1979)
Changes in Magistrates’ Attitudes During the First Year on the Bench
E. Ebbesen, V. Konečni (1975)
Decision Making and Information Integration in the Courts: The Setting of BailJournal of Personality and Social Psychology, 32
Michael Shea (1974)
A STUDY OF THE EFFECT OF THE PROSECUTOR'S CHOICE OF CHARGE ON MAGISTRATES' SENTENCING BEHAVIOURBritish Journal of Criminology, 14
R. Carr-Hill, R. Hood (1973)
Sentencing the Motoring OffenderBritish Journal of Sociology, 24
D. Howitt (1977)
Situational and Victims' Characteristics in Simulated Penal JudgmentsPsychological Reports, 40
J. Spencer, N. Walker (1965)
Crime and Punishment in BritainUniversity of Toronto Law Journal, 17
Gerald Lunney (1970)
USING ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE WITH A DICHOTOMOUS DEPENDENT VARIABLE: AN EMPIRICAL STUDYJournal of Educational Measurement, 7
N. Lemon (1974)
TRAINING, PERSONALITY AND ATTITUDE AS DETERMINANTS OF MAGISTRATES' SENTENCINGBritish Journal of Criminology, 14
R. Bond, N. Lemon (1981)
Training, experience, and magistrates' sentencing philosophiesLaw and Human Behavior, 5
Rich Block, N. Walker (1972)
Sentencing in a Rational Society.Social Forces, 50
D. Landy, E. Aronson (1969)
The influence of the character of the criminal and his victim on the decisions of simulated jurorsJournal of Experimental Social Psychology, 5
A pilot study was carried out with 23 magistrates to develop a sentencing severity scale. An experiment was then conducted with 168 magistrates deciding sentences for simulated cases in 56 groups of three. The results showed that sentences were more severe when offenses were more serious, when offenders had a more serious criminal record, when offenders were male, and when offenders were of higher social status. The age of the offender, the race of the offender and victim, the plea, the prevalence of the offense, and whether breach of trust was involved, did not have significant effects on sentence severity. A comparison between real and simulated sentencing decisions showed that they were similar, and a comparison between individual and group decisions showed that the group decisions were more likely to be relatively severe than relatively lenient.
Law and Human Behavior – American Psychological Association
Published: Jun 1, 1981
Read and print from thousands of top scholarly journals.
Already have an account? Log in
Bookmark this article. You can see your Bookmarks on your DeepDyve Library.
To save an article, log in first, or sign up for a DeepDyve account if you don’t already have one.
Copy and paste the desired citation format or use the link below to download a file formatted for EndNote
Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
All DeepDyve websites use cookies to improve your online experience. They were placed on your computer when you launched this website. You can change your cookie settings through your browser.