Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
S. Oskamp (1984)
Applied social psychology
T. Stewart, S. Whiteside, J. Golding (2000)
The effectiveness of expert witnesses in civil trials involving repressed memories of sexual assaultThe American journal of forensic psychology, 18
D. Sugarman, Sue Boney-McCoy (1997)
Impact of Expert Testimony on the Believability of Repressed MemoriesViolence and Victims, 12
J. Hamilton (1987)
VIOLENCE AND VICTIMS The Contribution of Victimology to Forensic PsychiatryThe Lancet, 329
J. Golding, S. Sego, R. Sanchez, Dawn Hasemann (1995)
The believability of repressed memoriesLaw and Human Behavior, 19
J. Golding, S. Sego, R. Sanchez (1999)
The effect of multiple childhood sexual assaults on mock-jurors' perceptions of repressed memories.Behavioral sciences & the law, 17 4
B. Bottoms, G. Goodman (1994)
Perceptions of Children's Credibility in Sexual Assault Cases1Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 24
D. Ross, Steve Hopkins, Elaine Hanson, R. Lindsay, K. Hazen, T. Eslinger (1994)
The impact of protective shields and videotape testimony on conviction rates in a simulated trial of child sexual abuseLaw and Human Behavior, 18
E. Loftus, G. Loftus (1980)
On the permanence of stored information in the human brain.The American psychologist, 35 5
Holly Clark, N. Nightingale (1997)
When Jurors Consider Recovered Memory Cases: Effects of Victim and Juror Gender.Journal of Offender Rehabilitation, 25
Iris Tetford, R. Schuller (1996)
Mock Jurors' Evaluations of Child Sexual Abuse: The Impact of Memory Recovery and Therapeutic InterventionBehavioral Sciences & The Law, 14
D. Alkon, K. Eldred (1989)
The nature of memory.Endeavour, 13 1
M. Toglia (2007)
Memory for events
J. Myers, A. Redlich, G. Goodman, Lori Prizmich, E. Imwinkelried (1999)
Jurors' perceptions of hearsay in child sexual abuse cases.Psychology, Public Policy and Law, 5
G. Goodman, B. Bottoms, B. Herscovici, P. Shaver (1989)
Determinants of the Child Victim’s Perceived Credibility
D. Connolly, Heather Price, J. Read (2006)
Predicting expert social science testimony in criminal prosecutions of historic child sexual abuseLegal and Criminological Psychology, 11
Daniel Brown, A. Scheflin, D. Hammond (1998)
Memory, trauma treatment, and the law
Shelly Gable, H. Reis, G. Downey (2003)
He Said, She SaidPsychological Science, 14
Daniel Smith, Elizabeth Letourneau, B. Saunders, D. Kilpatrick, H. Resnick, C. Best (2000)
Delay in disclosure of childhood rape: results from a national survey.Child abuse & neglect, 24 2
S. Lamb, Susan Edgar-Smith (1994)
Aspects of DisclosureJournal of Interpersonal Violence, 9
R. Forsterlee, I. Horowitz, R. Ho, L. Forsterlee, A. McGovern (1999)
Community members' perceptions of evidence: the effects of gender in a recovered memory civil trial.The Journal of applied psychology, 84 4
C. Arata (1998)
To Tell or Not to Tell: Current Functioning of Child Sexual abuse Survivors who Disclosed their VictimizationChild Maltreatment, 3
J. Read, D. Connolly (2007)
The Effects of Delay on Long-Term Memory for Witnessed Events
J. Cashmore, K. Bussey (1996)
Judicial perceptions of child witness competenceLaw and Human Behavior, 20
D. Ross, D. Dunning, M. Toglia, S. Ceci (1990)
The child in the eyes of the juryLaw and Human Behavior, 14
B. Tabachnick, L. Fidell (1983)
Using Multivariate Statistics
B. Bornstein (1999)
The Ecological Validity of Jury Simulations: Is the Jury Still Out?Law and Human Behavior, 23
J. Golding, Amye Warren, D. Ross (1997)
On Legal Validity, Internal Validity, and Ecological Validity: Comment on Wasby and BrodyLaw and Human Behavior, 21
B. Bottoms, J. Golding, Margaret Stevenson, Tisha Wiley, John Yozwiak (2007)
A Review of Factors Affecting Jurors’ Decisions in Child Sexual Abuse Cases
D. Finkelhor, G. Hotaling, I. Lewis, Christine Smith (1990)
Sexual abuse in a national survey of adult men and women: prevalence, characteristics, and risk factors.Child abuse & neglect, 14 1
S. Porter, M. Campbell, A. Birt, M. Woodworth (2003)
"He Said, She Said": A Psychological Perspective on Historical Memory Evidence in the Courtroom*Canadian Psychology, 44
P. Regan, Sheri Baker (1998)
The Impact of Child Witness Demeanor on Perceived Credibility and Trial Outcome in Sexual Abuse CasesJournal of Family Violence, 13
Holly Key, Amye Warren, D. Ross (1996)
Perceptions of repressed memories: A reappraisalLaw and Human Behavior, 20
S. Diamond (1997)
Illuminations and Shadows from Jury SimulationsLaw and Human Behavior, 21
J. Read (1999)
The recovered/false memory debate: Three stepsforward, two steps back?Expert Evidence, 7
R. Fivush, J. Kuebli, Patricia Clubb (1992)
The Structure of Events and Event Representations: A Developmental AnalysisChild Development, 63
Stephen Wasby, David Brody (1997)
Studies of Repressed Memory and the Issue of Legal ValidityLaw and Human Behavior, 21
D. Stephen, Lindsay Read, D. Lindsay, Vincenza Grupusso, E. Loftus, S. Kalichman, G. Melton, Tonia Nicholls, J. Ogloff (1995)
"Memory work" and recovered memories of childhood sexual abuse: Scientific evidence and public, professional, and personal issues.Psychology, Public Policy and Law, 1
J. Golding, R. Sanchez, S. Sego (1999)
Brief Research Report: Age Factors Affecting the Believability of Repressed Memories of Child Sexual AssaultLaw and Human Behavior, 23
Natalie Gabora, N. Spaños, Amanda Joab (1993)
The effects of complainant age and expert psychological testimony in a simulated child sexual abuse trialLaw and Human Behavior, 17
D. Connolly, J. Read (2007)
Canadian criminal court reports of historic child sexual abuse: Factors associated with delayed prosecution and reported repression.
D. Connolly, Heather Price (2006)
Children's suggestibility for an instance of a repeated event versus a unique event: the effect of degree of association between variable details.Journal of experimental child psychology, 93 3
R. Stubblefield (1966)
Behavioral sciences and the law.The American journal of orthopsychiatry, 36 5
Jeannine All (1998)
The Nature of Memory: Controversies about Retrieved Memories and the Law of EvidenceJournal of Psychiatry and Law, 26
J. Griffith, T. Libkuman, Joseph Kazen, Ziv Shafir (1999)
Repressed memories in the courtroom: Trial characteristics affecting mock jurors' decision making.The American journal of forensic psychology
D. Shuman, Alexander Smith (2000)
Justice and the Prosecution of Old Crimes: Balancing Legal, Psychological, and Moral Concerns
Michelle McCauley, J. Parker (2001)
When will a child be believed? The impact of the victim's age and juror's gender on children's credibility and verdict in a sexual-abuse case.Child abuse & neglect, 25 4
N. Nightingale (1993)
Juror reactions to child victim witnessesLaw and Human Behavior, 17
B. Bornstein, S. Muller (2001)
The credibility of recovered memory testimony: exploring the effects of alleged victim and perpetrator gender.Child abuse & neglect, 25 11
S. Ceci, D. Ross, M. Toglia (1989)
Perspectives on children's testimony.
R. Lindsay, D. Ross, M. Toglia (2006)
HANDBOOK OF EYEWITNESS PSYCHOLOGY
D. Ross, F. Jurden, R. Lindsay, Jennifer Keeney (2003)
Replications and Limitations of a Two‐Factor Model of Child Witness CredibilityJournal of Applied Social Psychology, 33
Barbara Coleman, M. Stevens, G. Reeder (2001)
What Makes Recovered-Memory Testimony Compelling to Jurors?Law and Human Behavior, 25
J. Freyd (1996)
Betrayal Trauma: The Logic of Forgetting Childhood Abuse
M. Farrar, G. Goodman (1992)
Developmental changes in event memory.Child development, 63 1
J. Wixted (2004)
On Common Ground: Jost's (1897) law of forgetting and Ribot's (1881) law of retrograde amnesia.Psychological review, 111 4
DA Connolly (2006)
Delayed Prosecutions of Historic Child Sexual Abuse: Analyses of 2064 Canadian Criminal ComplaintsLaw and Human Behavior, 30
Logistic regression analyses were used to predict verdicts from 466 Canadian jury and 644 Canadian judge-alone criminal trials involving delayed or historic allegations of child sexual abuse. Variables in regard to the complainant and offence were selected from the legal, clinical, and experimental literatures, including mock juror research. Of six variables that had been related to decisions reached in mock juror research concerning delayed allegations of child sexual abuse (i.e., repressed memory testimony, involvement in therapy, length of delay, age of complainant, presence of experts, and frequency of abuse) two (age of complainant and presence of expert) predicted verdicts. An additional five variables (duration, severity, complainant–accused relationship, threats, and complainant gender) were also examined: of these, threats and the complainant–accused relationship reliably predicted jury verdicts. For judge-alone trials, five variables predicted verdict: length of the delay, offence severity, claims of repression, the relationship between complainant and accused, and presence of an expert. Implications of the jurors’ and judges’ differential sensitivity to these variables for future simulation and archival research are discussed.
Law and Human Behavior – American Psychological Association
Published: Jun 20, 2006
Read and print from thousands of top scholarly journals.
Already have an account? Log in
Bookmark this article. You can see your Bookmarks on your DeepDyve Library.
To save an article, log in first, or sign up for a DeepDyve account if you don’t already have one.
Copy and paste the desired citation format or use the link below to download a file formatted for EndNote
Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
All DeepDyve websites use cookies to improve your online experience. They were placed on your computer when you launched this website. You can change your cookie settings through your browser.