Get 20M+ Full-Text Papers For Less Than $1.50/day. Start a 14-Day Trial for You or Your Team.

Learn More →

A Meta-Analysis of Differences in Children’s Reports of Single and Repeated Events

A Meta-Analysis of Differences in Children’s Reports of Single and Repeated Events When children report abuse, they often report that it occurred repeatedly. In most jurisdictions, children will be asked to report each instance of abuse with as many details as possible. In the current meta-analysis, we analyzed data from 31 experiments and 3099 children. When accuracy was defined as the number of correct details from the target instance (i.e., narrow definition), repeated-event children were less accurate than single-event children. However, we argue that defining accuracy as the number of reported details that were experienced across instances (i.e., broad definition) is more appropriate for repeated events. When a broad definition was applied, single- and repeated-event children were similarly accurate. Importantly, repeated-event children were less likely than single-event children to report details that had never been experienced and they were no more likely to say “I don’t know.” Overall, repeated-event children were more suggestible than single-event children, but this was moderated by length of delay to recall. In analyses of recognition data, single-event children’s sensitivity score was higher than repeated-event children’s, with no significant difference in response bias as a function of event frequency. We discuss these results in the context of how children’s memory for repeated events is organized. We also consider the advantage of applying a broad definition of accuracy for victims of repeated abuse and charging repeated abuse as a continuous offense rather than discrete acts. http://www.deepdyve.com/assets/images/DeepDyve-Logo-lg.png Law and Human Behavior American Psychological Association

A Meta-Analysis of Differences in Children’s Reports of Single and Repeated Events

Download PDF
18 pages

Loading next page...
 
/lp/american-psychological-association/a-meta-analysis-of-differences-in-children-s-reports-of-single-and-JJVtXosBGT

References (80)

Publisher
American Psychological Association
Copyright
© 2018 American Psychological Association
ISSN
0147-7307
eISSN
1573-661X
DOI
10.1037/lhb0000312
Publisher site
See Article on Publisher Site

Abstract

When children report abuse, they often report that it occurred repeatedly. In most jurisdictions, children will be asked to report each instance of abuse with as many details as possible. In the current meta-analysis, we analyzed data from 31 experiments and 3099 children. When accuracy was defined as the number of correct details from the target instance (i.e., narrow definition), repeated-event children were less accurate than single-event children. However, we argue that defining accuracy as the number of reported details that were experienced across instances (i.e., broad definition) is more appropriate for repeated events. When a broad definition was applied, single- and repeated-event children were similarly accurate. Importantly, repeated-event children were less likely than single-event children to report details that had never been experienced and they were no more likely to say “I don’t know.” Overall, repeated-event children were more suggestible than single-event children, but this was moderated by length of delay to recall. In analyses of recognition data, single-event children’s sensitivity score was higher than repeated-event children’s, with no significant difference in response bias as a function of event frequency. We discuss these results in the context of how children’s memory for repeated events is organized. We also consider the advantage of applying a broad definition of accuracy for victims of repeated abuse and charging repeated abuse as a continuous offense rather than discrete acts.

Journal

Law and Human Behavior – American Psychological Association

Published: Feb 20, 2019

There are no references for this article.