Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
D. Mueller (1989)
Public choice II
Holland Hunter (1993)
Socialism Revised and Modernized: The Case for Pragmatic Market SocialismComparative Economic Studies, 35
P. Bardhan, J. Roemer (1992)
Market Socialism: A Case for RejuvenationJournal of Economic Perspectives, 6
Andrei Shleifer, Robert Vishny (1991)
Pervasive Shortages Under Socialism
A. Bergson (1967)
Market Socialism RevisitedJournal of Political Economy, 75
T. Sowell (1990)
Preferential Policies: An International Perspective
J. Nellis (1989)
Contract plans and public enterprise performance
O. Lange (1938)
On the Economic Theory of Socialism
(1991)
Environmental Impact of a North-American Free Trade Agreement,
A. Lindbeck, P. Molander, T. Persson, Olof Peterson, A. Sandmo, Birgitta Swedenborg, N. Thygesen (1993)
Options for economic and political reform in SwedenEconomic Policy, 8
(1908)
The Ministry of Production in the Collectivist State," (1908)
G. Becker (1982)
Competition Among Pressure Groups for Political Influence
D. Wittman (1989)
Why Democracies Produce Efficient ResultsJournal of Political Economy, 97
James Tullock (1962)
The Calculus of ConsentAustralian Quarterly, 35
I. Little (1949)
The Economist and the StateThe Review of Economic Studies, 17
(1976)
The Wealth of Nations, (1776)
R. Golembiewski, M. Olson (1965)
The Logic of Collective Action
F. Hayek, Peter Boettke (1935)
Collectivist Economic Planning
(1991)
W[h]ither Socialism?: Perspectives from the Economics of Information,
G. Tullock (1959)
Problems of Majority VotingJournal of Political Economy, 67
N. Pierson, F. Hayek, L. Mises, G. Halm, Enrico Barone (1975)
Collectivist economic planning;: Critical studies on the possibilities of socialism,
G. Catlin (1944)
The Road to SerfdomNature, 154
S. Bostaph, P. Bardhan, J. Roemer (1995)
Market socialism : the current debateSouthern Economic Journal, 62
Abstract The debate over market socialism has ignored the importance of the assumptions about the objectives of politicians in determining resource allocation. Theory and evidence suggest that totalitarian socialism does not lead to efficient resource allocation because dictators do not maximize social welfare. But democratic governments have political objectives different from social welfare as well. The authors argue that because these governments command greater resources (have more control rights) under socialism, democratic socialism (even if it could exist) is a less efficient system than democratic capitalism. Thus the political case against market socialism is even stronger than the economic case.
Journal of Economic Perspectives – American Economic Association
Published: May 1, 1994
Read and print from thousands of top scholarly journals.
Already have an account? Log in
Bookmark this article. You can see your Bookmarks on your DeepDyve Library.
To save an article, log in first, or sign up for a DeepDyve account if you don’t already have one.
Copy and paste the desired citation format or use the link below to download a file formatted for EndNote
Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
All DeepDyve websites use cookies to improve your online experience. They were placed on your computer when you launched this website. You can change your cookie settings through your browser.