Get 20M+ Full-Text Papers For Less Than $1.50/day. Start a 14-Day Trial for You or Your Team.

Learn More →

Market Socialism: A Case for Rejuvenation

Market Socialism: A Case for Rejuvenation Abstract In this paper, we will outline a feasible economic mechanism of “competitive socialism.” Our claim is that competitive markets are necessary to achieve an efficient and vigorous economy, but that full-scale private ownership is not necessary for the successful operation of competition and markets. Contrary to popular impression, this claim has not yet been disproved by either history or economic theory. It is the failure of both the political right and the left to disentangle the concepts of private ownership and the competitive market that has led to the premature obituaries for socialism. In the second section, we look at the question of the “soft budget constraint” as an agency problem under market socialism. We then propose two variants of a bank-centric system of insider monitoring as a viable solution to the agency problem. The next section discusses the essential problem of political accountability and the difficulty of credible pre-commitment in avoiding the soft budget constraint problem, and suggests ways of minimizing this problem in our proposed system. We then conclude by addressing some of the other standard objections to a proposal for market socialism. http://www.deepdyve.com/assets/images/DeepDyve-Logo-lg.png Journal of Economic Perspectives American Economic Association

Market Socialism: A Case for Rejuvenation

Loading next page...
 
/lp/american-economic-association/market-socialism-a-case-for-rejuvenation-ugl7H1X6he

References (42)

Publisher
American Economic Association
Copyright
Copyright © 1992 by the American Economic Association
Subject
Articles
ISSN
0895-3309
DOI
10.1257/jep.6.3.101
Publisher site
See Article on Publisher Site

Abstract

Abstract In this paper, we will outline a feasible economic mechanism of “competitive socialism.” Our claim is that competitive markets are necessary to achieve an efficient and vigorous economy, but that full-scale private ownership is not necessary for the successful operation of competition and markets. Contrary to popular impression, this claim has not yet been disproved by either history or economic theory. It is the failure of both the political right and the left to disentangle the concepts of private ownership and the competitive market that has led to the premature obituaries for socialism. In the second section, we look at the question of the “soft budget constraint” as an agency problem under market socialism. We then propose two variants of a bank-centric system of insider monitoring as a viable solution to the agency problem. The next section discusses the essential problem of political accountability and the difficulty of credible pre-commitment in avoiding the soft budget constraint problem, and suggests ways of minimizing this problem in our proposed system. We then conclude by addressing some of the other standard objections to a proposal for market socialism.

Journal

Journal of Economic PerspectivesAmerican Economic Association

Published: Aug 1, 1992

There are no references for this article.