Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
Bruce Meyer, Wallace Mok, James Sullivan (2009)
The Under-Reporting of Transfers in Household Surveys: Its Nature and ConsequencesNBER Working Paper Series
Youngmi Kim, Jin Huang, Michael Sherraden (2014)
What Shapes Assessment of Ability to Pay for Children's College Education?Journal of Consumer Affairs, 48
A. Atkinson (2002)
Social Indicators: The EU and Social Inclusion
Tony Atkinson, B. Cantillon, Eric Marlier, B. Nolan (2002)
Indicators for Social Inclusion
D. Slesnick (1993)
Gaining Ground: Poverty in the Postwar United StatesJournal of Political Economy, 101
Bruce Meyer, James Sullivan (2013)
Consumption and Income Inequality and the Great RecessionThe American Economic Review, 103
R. Blank, P. Ruggles (1993)
When Do Women Use Afdc & Food Stamps? The Dynamics of Eligibility vs. ParticipationSIRN: Low Income Families with Children (Topic)
Elton Mykerezi, B. Mills, Ilda Melo (2013)
On intra-annual consumption-poverty in the U.S: Response to SNAP and the importance of within-year variationThe Social Science Journal, 50
Sheila Zedlewski, L. Giannarelli, Laura Wheaton, Joyce Morton (2010)
Measuring Poverty at the State LevelPSN: Poverty (Development) (Topic)
R. Blank (2008)
How to Improve Poverty Measurement in the United States
Mark Aguiar, Erik Hurst (2005)
Consumption versus ExpenditureJournal of Political Economy, 113
R. Lampman (1974)
Ends and means of reducing income poverty
Bruce Baker, L. Taylor, J. Levin, J. Chambers, Charles Blankenship (2013)
Adjusted Poverty Measures and the Distribution of Title I Aid: Does Title I Really Make the Rich States Richer?Education Finance and Policy, 8
(2012)
Wisconsin Poverty Report: How the Safety Net Protected Families from Poverty in 2010.
H. Chernick (2007)
Is the Gasoline Tax Regressive ?
(2005)
“ Two Tales of Irish Poverty . ” Box 3 in “ Note on Statistics in the Human Development Report ” in the Human Development Report 2005 , p . 334
Jeffrey ThompsonPost-1970 Trends in Within-Country Inequality and Poverty 593-696
James Ziliak, D. Betson, T. Garner (2011)
Supplemental Poverty Measure Thresholds: Laying the Foundation
P. Ruggles (1991)
Drawing the Line: Alternative Poverty Measures and Their Implications for Public PolicyContemporary Sociology, 20
(2010)
A Working Paper by the NYC Center for Economic Opportunity
David Hayes, Andrea Finney (2013)
Dominant Patterns of Expenditure Among Older People in the United Kingdom: Segmenting the Older Consumer Using the Living Costs and Food SurveyJournal of Population Ageing, 7
D. Slesnick (2000)
Consumption and Social Welfare: Introduction
Jean-Paul Fitoussi, Amartya Sen, J. Stiglitz (2011)
Report by the commission on the measurement of economic performance and social progress
(2002)
Forthcoming . “ Micro and Macro Validation of the Consumer Expenditure Survey
(2011)
“ The Research Supplemental Poverty Measure : 2010 . ” Current Population Report P 60 - 241 , U . S . Census Bureau . November
Bruce Meyer (2011)
Viewpoint: Further results on measuring the wellbeing of the poor using income and consumption
(2010)
The CEO Poverty Measure , 2005 – 2008
C. Milana, A. Ashta (2012)
Developing microfinance: A survey of the literature†Strategic Change, 21
Jonathan Fisher, David Johnson, Joseph Marchand, T. Smeeding, B. Torrey (2009)
Identifying the poorest older Americans.The journals of gerontology. Series B, Psychological sciences and social sciences, 64 6
Bruce Meyer, James Sullivan (2009)
Five Decades of Consumption and Income PovertyNBER Working Paper Series
R. Blank, P. Ruggles (1996)
When do women use Aid to Families with Dependent Children and Food Stamps
Sociology of 753-759
Philip Jefferson (2012)
The Oxford Handbook of the Economics of Poverty
D. Cutler, Lawrence Katz (1991)
Macroeconomic Performance and the Disadvantaged, 22
C. Citro, R. Michael, Panel Poverty, Family Assistance (1995)
Measuring poverty : a new approach
T. Garner, Charles Hokayem (2011)
Supplemental Poverty Measure Thresholds: Imputing Noncash Benefits to the Consumer Expenditure Survey Using Current Population Survey-Parts I and II
Nathan Hutto, J. Waldfogel, Neeraj Kaushal, I. Garfinkel (2011)
Improving the Measurement of PovertySocial Service Review, 85
J. Poterba (1991)
Is the Gasoline Tax Regressive?Tax Policy and the Economy, 5
Abstract We discuss poverty measurement, focusing on two alternatives to the current official measure: consumption poverty, and the Census Bureau's new Supplemental Poverty Measure (SPM) that was released for the first time last year. The SPM has advantages over the official poverty measure, including a more defensible adjustment for family size and composition, an expanded definition of the family unit that includes cohabitors, and a definition of income that is conceptually closer to resources available for consumption. The SPM's definition of income, though conceptually broader than pre-tax money income, is difficult to implement given available data and their accuracy. Furthermore, income data do not capture consumption out of savings and tangible assets such as houses and cars. A consumption-based measure has similar advantages but fewer disadvantages. We compare those added to and dropped from the poverty rolls by the alternative measures relative to the current official measure. We find that the SPM adds to poverty individuals who are more likely to be college graduates, own a home and a car, live in a larger housing unit, have air conditioning, health insurance, and substantial assets, and have other more favorable characteristics than those who are dropped from poverty. Meanwhile, we find that a consumption measure compared to the official measure or the SPM adds to the poverty rolls individuals who are more disadvantaged than those who are dropped. We decompose the differences between the SPM and official poverty and find that the most problematic aspect of the SPM is the subtraction of medical out-of-pocket expenses from SPM income. Also, because the SPM poverty thresholds change in an odd way over time, it will be hard to determine if changes in poverty are due to changes in income or changes in thresholds. Our results present strong evidence that a consumption-based poverty measure is preferable to both the official income-based poverty measure and to the Supplemental Poverty Measure for determining who are the most disadvantaged.
Journal of Economic Perspectives – American Economic Association
Published: Aug 1, 2012
Read and print from thousands of top scholarly journals.
Already have an account? Log in
Bookmark this article. You can see your Bookmarks on your DeepDyve Library.
To save an article, log in first, or sign up for a DeepDyve account if you don’t already have one.
Copy and paste the desired citation format or use the link below to download a file formatted for EndNote
Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
All DeepDyve websites use cookies to improve your online experience. They were placed on your computer when you launched this website. You can change your cookie settings through your browser.