Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
D. Bonett, E. Seier (2002)
A test of normality with high uniform powerComputational Statistics & Data Analysis, 40
T. Mikosch, C. Vries (2013)
Heavy tails of OLSJournal of Econometrics, 172
J. Huntley, V. Michelangeli (2011)
Can Tax Rebates Stimulate Consumption Spending in a Life-Cycle Model?†American Economic Journal: Macroeconomics, 6
Isil Erel, Brandon Julio, Woojin Kim, M. Weisbach (2011)
Macroeconomic Conditions and Capital RaisingMicroeconomics: Intertemporal Choice & Growth eJournal
Per Krusell, Anthony Jr. (1998)
Income and Wealth Heterogeneity in the MacroeconomyJournal of Political Economy, 106
(2009)
Did the 2008 Tax Rebates Stimulate Spending
Claudia Sahm, M. Shapiro, J. Slemrod (2009)
Household Response to the 2008 Tax Rebate: Survey Evidence and Aggregate ImplicationsTax Policy and the Economy, 24
J. Silva, Silvana Tenreyro (2004)
The Log of GravityThe Review of Economics and Statistics, 88
J. Heathcote, Kjetil Storesletten, G. Violante (2009)
Quantitative Macroeconomics with Heterogeneous HouseholdsNBER Working Paper Series
Kjetil Storesletten, Chris Telmer, A. Yaron (2000)
The Welfare Cost of Business Cycles Revisited: Finite Lives and Cyclical Variation in Idiosyncratic RiskMacroeconomics eJournal
J. Cloyne, Paolo Surico (2013)
Household Debt and the Dynamic Effects of Income Tax ChangesPolitical Economy: Taxation
Dirk Krueger, F. Perri (2002)
Does Income Inequality Lead to Consumption Inequality
J. Heckman (2001)
Micro Data, Heterogeneity, and the Evaluation of Public Policy: Nobel LectureJournal of Political Economy, 109
Jess Fernndez-Villaverde, Dirk Krueger (2007)
Consumption over the Life Cycle: Facts from Consumer Expenditure Survey DataThe Review of Economics and Statistics, 89
X. Ragot (2010)
The Case for a Financial Approach to Money DemandMonetary Economics eJournal
J. Parker (1999)
The Reaction of Household Consumption to Predictable Changes in Social Security TaxesThe American Economic Review, 89
O. Attanasio, Erik Hurst, Luigi Pistaferri (2012)
The Evolution of Income, Consumption, and Leisure Inequality in the Us, 1980-2010Ewing Marion Kauffman Foundation Research Paper Series
A. Lusardi (1996)
Permanent Income, Current Income, and Consumption: Evidence From Two Panel Data SetsJournal of Business & Economic Statistics, 14
J. Heathcote (2005)
Fiscal Policy with Heterogeneous Agents and Incomplete MarketsThe Review of Economic Studies, 72
E. Khmaladze (1982)
Martingale Approach in the Theory of Goodness-of-Fit TestsTheory of Probability and Its Applications, 26
T. Jappelli, Luigi Pistaferri (2009)
The Consumption Response to Income ChangesEconometrics: Applied Econometrics & Modeling eJournal
F. Anscombe, William Glynn (1983)
Distribution of the Kurtosis Statistic b2 for Normal Samples.Biometrika, 70
Dirk Krueger, F. Perri (2023)
How Do Households Respond to Income Shocks?SSRN Electronic Journal
V. Chernozhukov, Christian Hansen (2006)
Instrumental quantile regression inference for structural and treatment effect modelsJournal of Econometrics, 132
O. Attanasio, G. Weber (1993)
Consumption Growth, the Inter-est Rate and Aggregation
(2006)
Household Expenditure and the Income Tax Rebates of 2001
R. Koenker, J. Machado (1999)
Goodness of Fit and Related Inference Processes for Quantile RegressionJournal of the American Statistical Association, 94
R. Koenker (2000)
Inference on the Quantile Regression Process
Nicholas Souleles (1999)
The Response of Household Consumption to Income Tax RefundsThe American Economic Review, 89
O. Attanasio, G. Weber (1994)
Is Consumption Growth Consistent with Intertemporal Optimization? Evidence from the Consumer Expenditure SurveyJournal of Political Economy, 103
A. Acconcia, G. Corsetti, S. Simonelli (2011)
Mafia and Public Spending: Evidence on the Fiscal Multiplier from a Quasi-ExperimentCEPR Discussion Paper Series
S. Zeldes (1989)
Consumption and Liquidity Constraints: An Empirical InvestigationJournal of Political Economy, 97
J. Parker, Nicholas Souleles, David Johnson, David Johnson, R. McClelland (2011)
Consumer Spending and the Economic Stimulus Payments of 2008Randomized Social Experiments eJournal
Abstract Almost half of American families did not adjust their consumption following receipt of the 2001 or 2008 tax rebates. Another 20 percent, with low income and more likely to rent, spent a small but significant amount. Households with large spending propensity held high levels of mortgage debt. The heterogeneity is concentrated in a few nondurable categories and a handful of “new vehicle” purchases. The cumulated predictions of the heterogeneous response model tend to be smaller and more accurate than their homogeneous response model counterparts, offering new insights on the evaluation of the two fiscal stimulus programs. (JEL D12, D91, E21, E32, E62 )
American Economic Journal: Macroeconomics – American Economic Association
Published: Oct 1, 2014
Read and print from thousands of top scholarly journals.
Already have an account? Log in
Bookmark this article. You can see your Bookmarks on your DeepDyve Library.
To save an article, log in first, or sign up for a DeepDyve account if you don’t already have one.
Copy and paste the desired citation format or use the link below to download a file formatted for EndNote
Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
All DeepDyve websites use cookies to improve your online experience. They were placed on your computer when you launched this website. You can change your cookie settings through your browser.