Get 20M+ Full-Text Papers For Less Than $1.50/day. Start a 14-Day Trial for You or Your Team.

Learn More →

Assortative Matching or Exclusionary Hiring? The Impact of Employment and Pay Policies on Racial Wage Differences in Brazil†

Assortative Matching or Exclusionary Hiring? The Impact of Employment and Pay Policies on Racial... AbstractWe measure the effects of firm policies on racial pay differences in Brazil. Non-Whites are less likely to be hired by high-wage firms, explaining about 20 percent of the racial wage gap for both genders. Firm-specific pay premiums for non-Whites are also compressed relative to Whites, contributing another 5 percent for that gap. A counterfactual analysis reveals that about two-thirds of the underrepresentation of non-Whites at higher-wage firms is explained by race-neutral skill-based sorting. Non-skill-based sorting and differential wage setting are largest for college-educated workers, suggesting that the allocative costs of discriminatory hiring and pay policies may be relatively large in Brazil. (JEL J15, J24, J31, J41, J46, J71, O15) http://www.deepdyve.com/assets/images/DeepDyve-Logo-lg.png American Economic Review American Economic Association

Assortative Matching or Exclusionary Hiring? The Impact of Employment and Pay Policies on Racial Wage Differences in Brazil†

Assortative Matching or Exclusionary Hiring? The Impact of Employment and Pay Policies on Racial Wage Differences in Brazil†

American Economic Review 2021, 111(10): 3418–3457 https://doi.org/10.1257/aer.20181596 Assortative Matching or Exclusionary Hiring? The Impact of Employment and Pay Policies on Racial Wage Differences in Brazil By François Gerard, Lorenzo Lagos, Edson Severnini, and David Card* We measure the effects of firm policies on racial pay differences in Brazil. Non-Whites are less likely to be hired by high-wage firms, explaining about 20 percent of the racial wage gap for both genders. Firm-specific pay premiums for non-Whites are also compressed relative to Whites, contributing another 5  percent for that gap. A counterfactual analysis reveals that about two-thirds of the underrepresentation of non-Whites at higher-wage firms is explained by race-neutral skill-based sorting. Non-skill-based sorting and differential wage setting are largest for college-ed- ucated workers, suggesting that the allocative costs of discrimi- natory hiring and pay policies may be relatively large in Brazil. (JEL J15, J24, J31, J41, J46, J71, O15) In many countries around the world non-Whites earn less than Whites. Traditionally,  economic studies of racial pay disparities have built on the frame- work of Becker (1957), who assumed that each worker has a market-determined A growing body of wage that is independent of the choices of any single employer. work, however, suggests that firm-specific hiring and pay policies also contribute to When employers have wage-setting power, the between-group wage differentials. racial pay gap will depend partly on whether higher-paying firms differentially hire * Gerard: Queen Mary University of London and CEPR (email: f.gerard@qmul.ac.uk); Lagos: Brown University and IZA (email: lorenzo_lagos@brown.edu); Severnini: Carnegie Mellon University (Heinz College), IZA, and NBER (email: edsons@andrew.cmu.edu); Card: UC Berkeley and NBER (email: card@berkeley.edu). Esther Duflo was the coeditor for this article. We are grateful to three...
Loading next page...
 
/lp/american-economic-association/assortative-matching-or-exclusionary-hiring-the-impact-of-employment-r0q8aH0vUn

References

References for this paper are not available at this time. We will be adding them shortly, thank you for your patience.

Publisher
American Economic Association
Copyright
Copyright © 2021 © American Economic Association
ISSN
0002-8282
DOI
10.1257/aer.20181596
Publisher site
See Article on Publisher Site

Abstract

AbstractWe measure the effects of firm policies on racial pay differences in Brazil. Non-Whites are less likely to be hired by high-wage firms, explaining about 20 percent of the racial wage gap for both genders. Firm-specific pay premiums for non-Whites are also compressed relative to Whites, contributing another 5 percent for that gap. A counterfactual analysis reveals that about two-thirds of the underrepresentation of non-Whites at higher-wage firms is explained by race-neutral skill-based sorting. Non-skill-based sorting and differential wage setting are largest for college-educated workers, suggesting that the allocative costs of discriminatory hiring and pay policies may be relatively large in Brazil. (JEL J15, J24, J31, J41, J46, J71, O15)

Journal

American Economic ReviewAmerican Economic Association

Published: Oct 1, 2021

There are no references for this article.