Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
E. Brown (2009)
16. Note on a new Species of Dinoflagellate from the Gills and Epidermis of Marine Fishes., 101
P. Cheung, R. Nigrelli, G. Ruggieri (1981)
Development of Oodinium ocellatum (Dinoflagellida): A Scanning Electron Microscopic StudyTransactions of the American Microscopical Society, 100
E. Brown, R. Hovasse (2009)
Amyloodinium ocellatum (Brown), a Peridinian Parasitic on Marine Fishes. A Complementary Study, 116
(1984)
Phylum Dinoflagellata
C. Cobb, M. Levy, E. Noga (1998)
Development of Immunity by the Tomato Clownfish Amphiprion frenatus to the Dinoflagellate Parasite Amyloodinium ocellatumJournal of Aquatic Animal Health, 10
A. Lawler (1980)
Studies on Amyloodinium ocellatum (Dinoflagellata) in Mississippi Sound: Natural and Experimental HostsGulf and Caribbean Research, 6
I. Paperna (1987)
Solving parasite-related problems in cultured marine fish.International journal for parasitology, 17 2
C. Bower, D. Turner, R. Biever (1987)
A standardized method of propagating the marine fish parasite, Amyloodinium ocellatum.The Journal of parasitology, 73 1
I. Paperna (1984)
Reproduction cycle and tolerance to temperature and salinity of Amyloodinium ocellatum (Brown, 1931) (Dinoflagellida).Annales de parasitologie humaine et comparee, 59 1
abstract : Amyloodinium ocellatum is a parasitic dinoflagellate that infects warm-water marine and estuarine fishes and causes mortalities in aquaculture. Its life cycle consists of 3 stages: a feeding trophont that parasitizes the gills and skin where it interferes with gas exchange, osmoregulation, and tissue integrity; a detached reproductive tomont; and a free-swimming infective dinospore. We compared the susceptibility and tolerance of juvenile spotted seatrout, Cynoscion nebulosus , and red snapper, Lutjanus campechanus , to this parasite by individually exposing fish in 3-L aquaria (at 25 C and 33 practical salinity units) to several dinospore doses over different time periods and quantified the size and number of resulting trophonts. We estimated the trophont detachment rate and trophont size at detachment, the 24-hr dinospore infection rate, the dinospore 48-hr median lethal dose (LD 50 ), and the trophont lethal load at the 48-hr LD 50 . There were no significant differences in dinospore infection rates or dinospore lethal doses between spotted seatrout and red snapper; however, trophonts remained attached longer and attained a larger size in red snapper than in spotted seatrout. The trophont lethal load was significantly higher in spotted seatrout than in red snapper. A proposed model simulating the trophont dynamics reflected our experimental findings and showed that A. ocellatum reproductive success is linked both to the number of dinospores and the size of the trophont, factors that, in turn, are linked to the time the trophont spends on the host and the number of trophonts the host can tolerate.
Journal of Parasitology – Allen Press
Published: Aug 1, 2011
Read and print from thousands of top scholarly journals.
Already have an account? Log in
Bookmark this article. You can see your Bookmarks on your DeepDyve Library.
To save an article, log in first, or sign up for a DeepDyve account if you don’t already have one.
Copy and paste the desired citation format or use the link below to download a file formatted for EndNote
Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
All DeepDyve websites use cookies to improve your online experience. They were placed on your computer when you launched this website. You can change your cookie settings through your browser.