Get 20M+ Full-Text Papers For Less Than $1.50/day. Start a 14-Day Trial for You or Your Team.

Learn More →

COMMENTARY ON ANOTHER “DEFINING THE FIELD”

COMMENTARY ON ANOTHER “DEFINING THE FIELD” J. Parasitol., 86(2), 2000 p. 205 American Society of Parasitologists 2000 EDITOR'S NOTE . . . ``The crowding effect in tapeworm infections,'' an article by Clark P. Read, appeared in the Journal of Parasitology (37: 174­178) in April 1951. It has been one of the most widely and frequently cited papers over the last 50 yr. When I began thinking about the ``Defining the Field'' series for the Journal, the ``crowding effect'' paper was an obvious choice. On a personal note, I can vividly recall spending time with Read's paper as a graduate student in the late 1950s and early 1960s. After all, even by that time it was a must read (no pun intended!), and I am certain that I have read or at least perused it more than one time since. While re-reading the paper just a few months ago, I became quite intrigued (as one with an ecological interest) by what I thought it had said when I first read it many years ago. At this point, I was reminded that, despite its clear ecological implications, the paper is decidedly physiological in scope. Regardless of one's interests, whether ecology and physiology, the paper has had a substantial scientific impact and, in my opinion, still should be required reading for students in both fields. For these reasons, I determined it was necessary to give it balanced treatment for our ``Defining the Field'' series. I therefore asked Al Bush and Jeff Lotz to comment on it from an ecological point of view. Both of these distinguished investigators have long-standing experience in dealing with competitive interactions involving parasites. To examine the paper from the perspective of cestode physiology, I invited Larry Roberts who also has had a most distinguished research career, part of which has been directed at resolving some of the questions raised by Read's paper on the ``crowding effect'' in tapeworms. Finally, an additional point should be made. Since 1951, a number of significant papers emerged because of Read's insight regarding the ``crowding effect.'' One or more of these articles will be our focus in a subsequent segment of this series. In the first ``Defining the Field'' (Journal of Parasitology 85: 397­ 403), David Crompton provided an informative update of Norman Stoll's historically important, ``This wormy world,'' published in 1947. I believe that Al Bush, Jeff Lotz, and Larry Roberts have achieved the same end for Clark Read's, ``The crowding effect in tapeworm infections,'' originally published in the Journal in 1951 and reprinted here in its entirety. Gerald W. Esch, Department of Biology, Wake Forest University, Winston­Salem, North Carolina 27109. http://www.deepdyve.com/assets/images/DeepDyve-Logo-lg.png Journal of Parasitology Allen Press

COMMENTARY ON ANOTHER “DEFINING THE FIELD”

Journal of Parasitology , Volume 86 (2) – Apr 1, 2000

Loading next page...
 
/lp/allen-press/commentary-on-another-defining-the-field-4Athe0fPAO

References

References for this paper are not available at this time. We will be adding them shortly, thank you for your patience.

Publisher
Allen Press
Copyright
American Society of Parasitologists
ISSN
0022-3395
eISSN
1937-2345
DOI
10.1645/0022-3395%282000%29086%5B0205:COADTF%5D2.0.CO%3B2
Publisher site
See Article on Publisher Site

Abstract

J. Parasitol., 86(2), 2000 p. 205 American Society of Parasitologists 2000 EDITOR'S NOTE . . . ``The crowding effect in tapeworm infections,'' an article by Clark P. Read, appeared in the Journal of Parasitology (37: 174­178) in April 1951. It has been one of the most widely and frequently cited papers over the last 50 yr. When I began thinking about the ``Defining the Field'' series for the Journal, the ``crowding effect'' paper was an obvious choice. On a personal note, I can vividly recall spending time with Read's paper as a graduate student in the late 1950s and early 1960s. After all, even by that time it was a must read (no pun intended!), and I am certain that I have read or at least perused it more than one time since. While re-reading the paper just a few months ago, I became quite intrigued (as one with an ecological interest) by what I thought it had said when I first read it many years ago. At this point, I was reminded that, despite its clear ecological implications, the paper is decidedly physiological in scope. Regardless of one's interests, whether ecology and physiology, the paper has had a substantial scientific impact and, in my opinion, still should be required reading for students in both fields. For these reasons, I determined it was necessary to give it balanced treatment for our ``Defining the Field'' series. I therefore asked Al Bush and Jeff Lotz to comment on it from an ecological point of view. Both of these distinguished investigators have long-standing experience in dealing with competitive interactions involving parasites. To examine the paper from the perspective of cestode physiology, I invited Larry Roberts who also has had a most distinguished research career, part of which has been directed at resolving some of the questions raised by Read's paper on the ``crowding effect'' in tapeworms. Finally, an additional point should be made. Since 1951, a number of significant papers emerged because of Read's insight regarding the ``crowding effect.'' One or more of these articles will be our focus in a subsequent segment of this series. In the first ``Defining the Field'' (Journal of Parasitology 85: 397­ 403), David Crompton provided an informative update of Norman Stoll's historically important, ``This wormy world,'' published in 1947. I believe that Al Bush, Jeff Lotz, and Larry Roberts have achieved the same end for Clark Read's, ``The crowding effect in tapeworm infections,'' originally published in the Journal in 1951 and reprinted here in its entirety. Gerald W. Esch, Department of Biology, Wake Forest University, Winston­Salem, North Carolina 27109.

Journal

Journal of ParasitologyAllen Press

Published: Apr 1, 2000

There are no references for this article.